Abstract
The over-under turbine based combined cycle (TBCC) propulsion system dynamic model is established, including the engine model and inlet model. A dual-channel inlet is designed to match the engine and the inlet performance parameters are obtained by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) calculation, which provides original data for the integrated Inlet/Engine matching model. Control plan is designed to ensure that the engine is not over-temperature, over-rotation or surging based on correlation analysis. The simulation results show that the designed control plan can keep the TBCC propulsion system continuous in thrust during the mode transition, and the thrust fluctuation is about 10%.
Funding source: National Science and Technology Major Project
Award Identifier / Grant number: 2017-V-0004-0054
-
Author contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
-
Research funding: This research is supported by National Science and Technology Major Project (2017-V-0004-0054).
-
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this article.
References
1. Foster, LE, Saunders, JDJ, Sanders, BW, Weir, LJ. Highlights from a Mach 4 experimental demonstration of inlet mode transition for turbine-based combined cycle hypersonic propulsion. In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit. Atlanta, Geogia: AIAA Inc.; 2012:4143 p.10.2514/6.2012-4143Search in Google Scholar
2. Ouzts, P. Mode transition design considerations for an airbreathing combined-cycle hypersonic vehicle. In: 15th AIAA international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference. Dayton, OH: AIAA Inc.; 2008:2621 p.10.2514/6.2008-2621Search in Google Scholar
3. McNelis, N, Bartolotta, P. Revolutionary turbine accelerator (RTA) demonstrator. In: AIAA/CIRA 13th international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference. Capua, Italy: AIAA Inc; 2005:3250–p.10.2514/6.2005-3250Search in Google Scholar
4. Lee, JH, Winslow, R, Buehrle, RJ. The GE-NASA RTA hyperburner design and development. In: 40th combustion, 28th airbreathing propulsion, 22nd propulsion systems hazards and 4th modeling and simulation joint subcommittee meetings. Charleston, South Carolina: AIAA Inc.; 2005:1361 p.Search in Google Scholar
5. Bradley, M, Bowcutt, K, McComb, J, Bartolotta, P, McNelis, N. Revolutionary turbine accelerator (RTA) two-stage-to-orbit (TSTO) vehicle study. In: 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference & exhibit; 2002:3902 p.10.2514/6.2002-3902Search in Google Scholar
6. Snyder, C, Maldonado, J. The design and performance estimates for the propulsion module for the booster of a TSTO vehicle. In: Aircraft design and operations meeting. Baltimore, MD: AIAA Inc.; 1991:3136 p.10.2514/6.1991-3136Search in Google Scholar
7. Davic, J, Midea, A. Propulsion and aerodynamic analysis of the beta II two-stage-to-orbit vehicle. In: Guidance, navigation and control conference;Hilton Head Island,SC. AIAA Inc; 1992:4245–p p.10.2514/6.1992-4245Search in Google Scholar
8. Hendrick, P, Saint-Mard, M. ACES saenger-type TSTO family with common first stage. In: 4th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Cleveland, OH: AIAA Inc.; 1998:3229 p.10.2514/6.1998-3229Search in Google Scholar
9. Snyder, L, Escher, D, DeFrancesco, R, Gutierrez, J, Buckwalter, D. Turbine based combination cycle (TBCC) propulsion subsystem integration. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: AIAA Inc.; 2004:3649 p.Search in Google Scholar
10. Walker, S, Tang, M, Mamplata, C. TBCC propulsion for a Mach 6 hypersonic airplane. In: 16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR international space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference. Bremen, Germany:AIAA Inc, 2013:7238 p.Search in Google Scholar
11. Osichev, A, Tkachenko, A. Evaluation of the dynamic properties of the electric scraper conveyor SR 72 at various reasons for jamming its working body. Problems automated electric. Theor Pract 2009;516:206–19.Search in Google Scholar
12. Saunders, JD, Slater, JW, Dippold, V, Lee, J, Sanders, BW, Weir, LJ. Inlet mode transition screening test for a turbine-based combined-cycle propulsion system. In: 55th JANNAF Propulsion Meeting. Cleveland, OH: AIAA Inc.; 2008:1530 p.Search in Google Scholar
13. Marshall, A, Gupta, A, Lavelle, T, Lewis, M. Critical issues in TBCC modeling. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: AIAA Inc.; 2004:3827 p.10.2514/6.2004-3827Search in Google Scholar
14. Saunders, JD, Stueber, TJ, Thomas, SR, Suder, KL, Weir, LJ, Sanders, BW. Testing of the NASA hypersonics project combined cycle engine large scale inlet mode transition experiment (CCE LIMX). In: 58th Joint Army-Navy-NASA-Air Force (JANNAF) propulsion meeting. Dallas, TX: AIAA Inc.; 2012:2103 p.Search in Google Scholar
15. Haid, DA, Gamble, EJ. Integrated turbine-based combined cycle dynamic simulation model. In: 58th JANNAF (JPM/CS/APS/EPSS/PHHS) Propulsion meeting. Reno, Nevada: AIAA Inc., 2011:1138 p.Search in Google Scholar
16. Mingyang, Z, Zhanxue, W, Zengwen, J, Xiaobo, Z. Analysis of modal conversion performance of Ma4 internal-parallel TBCC engine. Propuls Technol 2017;38:315–22. https://doi.org/10.13675/j.cnki.tjjs.2017.02.010.Search in Google Scholar
17. Xiaojie, Q, Su, W, Tang, Y. The mode switch control research of small-type parallel TBCC engine based on SQP method. In: AIAA modeling and simulation technologies conference. Dallas, TX: AIAA Inc.; 2015:2656 p.10.2514/6.2015-2656Search in Google Scholar
18. Mathioudakis, K, Kamboukos, P, Stamatis, A. Turbofan engine performance deterioration tracking using nonlinear models and optimization techniques. J Turbomach Trans ASME 2002;124:580–7.10.1115/1.1512678Search in Google Scholar
19. Songlin, L, Jianguo, S, Jinquan, H, Jianmin, L. An in-flight adaptive model of turbofan. J Aero Power 1997;13:315318.Search in Google Scholar
20. Yadav, R, Kapadi, Y, Pashilkar, A. Aero-thermodynamic model for digital simulation of turbofan engine. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air, vol. 46997. Reno, Nevada: ASME; 2005:63–70 pp.10.1115/GT2005-68248Search in Google Scholar
21. Leibov, R. Aircraft turbofan engine linear model with uncertain eigenvalues. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 2002;47:1367–9.10.1109/TAC.2002.801199Search in Google Scholar
22. Taiwo, O. Design of a multivariable controller for a high-order turbofan engine model by Zakian’s method of inequalities. IEEE Trans Automat Contr 1978;23:926–8.10.1109/TAC.1978.1101875Search in Google Scholar
23. Lokotko, AV. Investigation of jets mixing in the channel of the hypersonic rocket-ramjet engine model. J Phys Conf Ser 2019;1404:012086.10.1088/1742-6596/1404/1/012086Search in Google Scholar
24. Kanda, T, Tomioka, S, Ueda, S, Tani, K, Wakamatsu, Y. Design of sub-scale rocket-ramjet combined cycle engine model. In: 56th international astronautical congress of the international astronautical federation, the international academy of astronautics, and the international institute of space law. C4. 5.03. Palo Alto, CA: AAAI Press; 2012:2149–55 p.Search in Google Scholar
25. Park, IS, Kim, S, Yeom, H, Sung, H, Park, J. Control-oriented model for intake shock position dynamics in ramjet engine. J Propul Power 2011;27:499–502.10.2514/1.B34008Search in Google Scholar
26. Curran, ET, Heiser, WH, Pratt, DT. Fluid phenomena in scramjet engine combustion systems. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 1996;28:323–60.10.1146/annurev.fl.28.010196.001543Search in Google Scholar
27. Li, N, Chang, J, Jiang, C, Yu, D, Bao, W, Song, Y, et al.. Unstart/restart hysteresis characteristics analysis of an over-under TBCC inlet caused by backpressure and splitter. Aero Sci Technol 2017;72:418–25.10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.026Search in Google Scholar
28. Pilidis, P, MacCallum, NRL. The effect of heat transfer on gas turbine transients. In: Turbo expo: power for land, sea, and air. Palo Alto, CA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Press; 1986:204–18 p.10.1115/86-GT-275Search in Google Scholar
29. Snyder, L, Escher, D, Defrancesco, R, Gutierrez, J, Buckwaiter, D. Turbine based combination cycle (TBCC) propulsion subsystem integration. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit; 2004:3649 p.10.2514/6.2004-3649Search in Google Scholar
30. Albertson, CW, Emami, S, Trexler, CA. Mach 4 test results of a dual-flowpath, turbine based combined cycle inlet. In: 14th AIAA/AHI space planes and hypersonic systems and technologies conference. Canberra, Australia: AIAA Inc.; 2006:8138 p.10.2514/6.2006-8138Search in Google Scholar
31. Mani, M, Cary, A, Ramakrishnan, S. A structured and hybrid-unstructured grid euler and Navier-Stokes solver for general geometry. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, Nevada: AIAA Inc.; 2004:524 p.10.2514/6.2004-524Search in Google Scholar
32. Slater, J. CFD methods for computing the performance of supersonic inlets. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE joint propulsion conference and exhibit. Fort Lauderdale, Florida: AIAA Inc.; 2004:3404 p.10.2514/6.2004-3404Search in Google Scholar
33. Slater, JW, Saunders, JD. Modeling of fixed-exit porous bleed systems for supersonic inlets. J Propul Power 2010;26:193–202.10.2514/1.37390Search in Google Scholar
34. Slater, JW. Improvements in modeling 90-degree bleed holes for supersonic inlets. J Propul Power 2012;28:773–81.10.2514/1.B34333Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
