Epoxy resins composites for X-ray shielding materials additivated by coated barium sulfate with improved dispersibility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101888Get rights and content

Highlights

  • High performance barite/epoxy resin composites for X-ray shielding were produced.

  • Dispersibility of particles is improved through surface functionalization.

  • Liquid assisted grinding (LAG) was used to functionalize the additive surface.

  • Additive sedimentation was eliminated, and mechanical performances improved.

  • Liquid assisted grinding was used for the first time in the polymer field.

Abstract

Epoxy resins additivated by barium sulfate proved to be promising low cost, easy workable and environmentally friendly alternative to lead and steel as X-ray shielding materials, but the composites tends to be stratified, with the additive accumulating in the bottom side of the sample. This sedimentation process has been, at first, studied by in situ X-ray powder diffraction, thermogravimetric techniques and X-ray tomography and then inhibited by exploiting finer barite sources, implementing a grinding procedure, combined to a surface modification of the inorganic additives. Stearic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate were used to coat barite surface, using a liquid assisted grinding (LAG) approach. The functionalized additives resulted more compatible with the resin and their dispersion within the polymer resulted much improved. The produced composite samples were then studied by optical and electron microscopy, X-ray radiography, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis and tensile strength test. The use of a finer additive and the grinding procedure allowed to limit the sedimentation and induced a marked hardening of the samples, with the drawback of a reduction of their plasticity. Stearic acid coating was able to eliminate sedimentation maintaining good mechanical properties.

Introduction

Environmentally friendly X-ray shielding materials exploit minerals with high Z number elements such as Ba [1], Bi [2], Gd [3]. To obtain objects and artifacts with good mechanical performances such compounds are used as additive for polymers to obtain high performing composites. However, composite materials development must face the issues due to an unsuitable interaction between the different components used in their preparation. The low compatibility among the components might induce a reduced uniformity of the composite materials, with a general decrease of their performances and increase of defects. These effects are particularly common when dealing with polymers additivated with inorganic materials. Common behaviors are segregation, sedimentation and formation of voids and, in general, of interfaces between non or weakly bound components. These phenomena have been observed for instance in rubbers [4], biopolymers [5], bio-resorbable materials [6] and thermoplastic polymers [7]. The problem is well documented for epoxy composites, especially for fiber-reinforced materials [8], [9], [10]. These problems were faced by some of us [1] when dealing with epoxy resins additivated with commercial barium sulfate, to obtain X-ray shielding materials with low cost, easy workability and environmental impact smaller than lead and steel. In fact, the produced samples showed segregation and sedimentation of barite with a dramatic reduction of mechanical properties. This issue can be solved by disaggregating the particles, reducing their size and functionalizing their surface to improve the compatibility with the organic matrix [11], [12]. In the case of inorganic/epoxy resin composites, the main issue is the striking contrast between the polarity of the inorganic surface (additives are typically oxides, carbonates and sulfates) and the hydrophobicity of the polymer [13]. The typical approach is using low cost surfactants or fatty acids, able to bond the inorganic surface with their carboxylate or sulfonate heads and compatible with the polymers exploiting their apolar tails. The more common compounds used to obtain hydrophobic coated (nano) particles are stearic acid (SA) [14], [15], [16] and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) [17]. Nihal Tüzün et al. demonstrated that finely dispersed barite gave good results in adhesion test compared to coated calcite [18]. Sun et al. proposed the modification of barite with sodium stearate in a water slurry to improve hydrophobicity [19]. The addition of bismite fillers modified by multiwalled carbon nanotubes allowed to improve dispersion and thus increase the X-ray attenuation coefficient of the composite [20]. The addition of silica nanoparticles to bismite allowed to improve thermal stability [21]. Nanometric Gd2O3 appeared to be the unique filler giving good dispersion and attenuation coefficients without surface modification [3]. The aim of the present work is obtaining X-ray shielding materials using the methodology by Lopresti et al. [1], but by extensively studying and optimizing the interactions at the organic-inorganic interface to improve additive dispersion and increase attenuation coefficients, when using a low cost additive as barite. At first, the sedimentation process during composite gelation was studied by in situ X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), X-ray tomography and thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis to understand the features and critical issues of additive sedimentation. Then, the inorganic additive surface are functionalized, to obtain a better dispersion, limited or absent sedimentation and good mechanical performances. Low cost inorganic fillers (barium sulfate) and functionalizing agents (SA and SDS) were used. To have a facile and easily scalable functionalizing strategy, liquid assisted grinding [22], [23] and quasi solid-state reactions is used [24], for the first time in polymer additive field. On the sample preparation view point, the goal is understanding the better preparation conditions to obtain well dispersed samples and to reduce sedimentation. TGA, SEM and XRPD were used to investigate additive dispersion and sedimentation. The effect of the functionalization on mechanical properties was investigated by a tensile strength test to infer possible applications in the real world. On a more general viewpoint, we intend to demonstrate the potentialities of LAG approach in the field of polymer additive coating.

Section snippets

Materials

A two-components epoxy resin was purchased by S.E. Special Engine S.r.l. (Torino, Italy); the first component (Sepox 225) consists in 80% (w/w) of bisphenol-A-(epichlorohydrin) and epoxy resins with an average molecular mass lower than 700 Da. The second component (DK505) consists in 35% (w/w) of 3-aminomethyl-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexylamine and about 18% (w/w) of polyoxypropylenediamine. Two different kinds of barium sulfate (>99% (w/w)), Blanc Fixe G and Blanc Fixe JM3B were given by Universal

Results and discussion

Lowly additivated samples from a previous work [1] presented a strong sedimentation behavior, which was observed by X-ray computed tomography. The dynamic of the sedimentation was then analyzed with an in situ X-ray diffraction experiment and by thermogravimetric analysis (Section 3.1). Grinding and surface coating strategies for powder additives were then designed and two biosurfactants (stearic acid and sodium dodecyl sulfate) were chosen as functionalizing agents (Section 3.2). Samples were

Conclusions

The sedimentation and aggregation of a commercial technical grade barite during composite gelation and curing was investigated by X-ray tomography, TGA and in situ XRPD. The observed bad additive dispersion is the main cause of defect formation and reduction of the mechanical properties, due to a not optimal additive/polymer interaction and of sedimentation, causing anisotropic X-ray shielding properties in composite samples and real world artifacts. To improve the compatibility of barite with

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgement

Luca Cremonesi is aknowledged for its contribution to the in situ study within is bachelor thesis at the Università del Piemonte Orientale. Riccardo Soncin is aknowledged for its contribution to the production of the functionalized samples by LAG within is bachelor thesis at the Università del Piemonte Orientale. Adil Lamoumni (Bytest s.r.l. within the project code 208-105 funded by FINPIEMONTE) is acknowledged for technical support for radiographic measurements. Dr. Diego Antonioli is

References (30)

  • M. Lopresti et al.

    Light weight easy formable and non-toxic polymer-based composites for hard X-ray shielding: a theoretical and experimental study

    Int. J. Mol. Sci.

    (2020)
  • S. Nambiar et al.

    Polymer nanocomposite-based shielding against diagnostic X-rays

    J. Appl. Polym. Sci.

    (2013)
  • S. Jayakumar et al.

    Preparation, characterization and X-ray attenuation property of gd2 o3-based nanocomposites

    Appl. Nanosci. (Switzerland)

    (2017)
  • K. Roy et al.

    A critical review on the utilization of various reinforcement modifiers in filled rubber composites

    J. Elastomers Plast.

    (2019)
  • F.G. Torres et al.

    Green composite materials from biopolymers reinforced with agroforestry waste

    J. Polym. Environ.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (19)

    • IETeasy: An open source and low-cost instrument for impulse excitation technique, applied to materials classification by acoustical and mechanical properties assessment.

      2021, HardwareX
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite its capability to provide precise and accurate results in a very short time, IET initially remained mainly confined in the industrial world and used for quality control purposes. However, even in this field, other expensive complementary techniques had been preferred to IET, such as the ultrasounds analysis, radiography and tomography [8], which are still the most used non-destructive techniques (NDT) for quality control and certification. In the last years, many notable academic research examples began to spread in the fields of the metallurgy [9–11], geology [12] and the science of ceramic materials [13–15].

    • Investigation of impact resistance performance of carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene composites with different lamination to applicate fender parts

      2021, Composites Part B: Engineering
      Citation Excerpt :

      The formulations of thermoset resins are now customizable at a commercial level to meet consumers’ needs for specific requirements of cure process such as room temperature curing or rapid curing. In addition to the tailorable formulations, advanced curing systems equipped with X-ray or ultraviolet radiation have been developed to cure large-area composites faster simply at room temperature [22–24]. Another important process technique for the thermoset resins is concerned with the impregnation of fiber bundles or tows in a stable yet quick manner [25].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text