Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element investigation on the dynamic mechanical properties of low-frequency vibrations on human L2–L3 spinal motion segments with different degrees of degeneration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposure to low-frequency vibration is harmful to human lumbar health. However, the dynamic mechanical properties of lumbar spines with varying degrees of degeneration during time-dependent vibration remain incompletely understood. In this study, four poroelastic finite element models of human L2–L3 spinal motion segments, including the non-degeneration and the mild, moderate, and serious degeneration, were established. One-hour low-frequency vibrations with different frequencies were applied. Then, the dynamic mechanical properties of different degenerated lumbar models under the same vibration and the same lumbar model under vibrations at different frequencies were investigated. The results indicated and implied that the negative influences of 1-h vibration on the dynamic mechanical properties of the non-degenerated and mildly degenerated models were similar, but became obvious for the moderately and seriously degenerated models with time. Therefore, the damage caused by low-frequency vibration on the degenerated spinal motion segments was more serious compared with that on the healthy one. Meanwhile, the dynamic mechanical properties of the same lumbar model under vibrations at different frequencies expressed the negligible differences when the vibration frequency was not close to the lumbar natural frequency. Thus, the effects of the 1-h vibrations at different frequencies on one spinal motion segment were similar.

Graphical abstract

Vibration frequency sensitivity analysis on the dynamic characteristics of human L2–L3 spinal motion segments with different degrees of degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shiri R, Falah-Hassani K, Heliovaara M, Solovieva S, Amiri S, Lallukka T, Burdorf A, Husgafvel-Pursiainen K, Viikari-Juntura E (2019) Risk factors for low back pain: a population-based longitudinal study. Arthrit Care Res 71(2):290–299

    Google Scholar 

  2. Weissenfels A, Teschler M, Willert S, Hettchen M, Frohlich M, Kleinoder H, Kohl M, Von-Stengel S, Kemmler W (2018) Effects of whole-body electromyostimulation on chronic nonspecific low back pain in adults: a randomized controlled study. J Pain Res 11:1949–1957

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pham MH, Buser Z, Wang JC, Acosta FL (2017) Low-magnitude mechanical signals and the spine: a review of current and future applications. J Clin Neurosci 40:18–23

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Azrah K, Mirzaei R, Poursadeghiyan M, Baneshi MM, Ebrahimi MH (2018) Evaluation of whole-body vibration exposure among urban metro drivers: comparing ISO2631-1 and ISO2631-5 standards to evaluate exposure. Health Scope 7(2):e55928

    Google Scholar 

  5. Holguin N, Uzer G, Chiang FP, Rubin C, Judex S (2011) Brief daily exposure to low-intensity vibration mitigates the degradation of the intervertebral disc in a frequency-specific manner. J Appl Physiol 111(6):1846–1853

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bovenzi M, Schust M, Menzel G, Hofmann J, Hinz B (2014) A cohort study of sciatic pain and measures of internal spinal load in professional drivers. Ergonomics 58(7):1088–1102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen BL, Dong YL, Guo JB, Zheng YL, Zhang J, Wang XQ (2019) Effects of whole-body vibration on lumbar-abdominal muscles activation in healthy young adults: a pilot study. Med Sci Monitor 25:1945–1951

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dreischarf M, Shirazi-Adl A, Arjmand N, Rohlmann A, Schmidt H (2016) Estimation of loads on human lumbar spine: a review of in vivo and computational model studies. J Biomech 49(6):833–845

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goel VK, Park H, Kong WZ (1994) Investigation of vibration characteristics of the ligamentous lumbar spine using the finite element approach. J Biomech Eng 116(4):377–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo LX, Zhang M, Zhang YM, Teo EC (2009) Vibration modes of injured spine at resonant frequencies under vertical vibration. Spine 34(19):682–688

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fan W, Guo LX (2017) Influence of different frequencies of axial cyclic loading on time-domain vibration response of the lumbar spine: a finite element study. Comput Biol Med 86:75–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Guo LX, Fan W (2019) Impact of material properties of intervertebral disc on dynamic response of the human lumbar spine to vertical vibration: a finite element sensitivity study. Med Biol Eng Comput 57(1):221–229

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Antoniou J, Steffen T, Nelson F, Winterbottom N, Hollander AP, Poole RA, Aebi M, Alini M (1996) The human lumbar intervertebral disc-evidence for changes in the biosynthesis and denaturation of the extracellular matrix with growth, maturation, ageing, and degeneration. J Clin Invest 98(4):996–1003

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiao ZT, Wang LY, Gong H, Zhu D (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of three surgical scenarios of posterior lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Biomed Eng Online 11:31

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Little JS, Khalsa PS (2005) Human lumbar spine creep during cyclic and static flexion: creep rate, biomechanics, and facet joint capsule strain. Ann Biomed Eng 33(3):391–401

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. O'Keeffe M, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan L, O'Sullivan K (2013) Specific flexion-related low back pain and sitting: comparison of seated discomfort on two different chairs. Ergonmics 56(4):650–658

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wilke HJ, Rohlmann F, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Werner K, Claes L, Kettler A (2006) Validity and interobserver agreement of a new radiographic grading system for intervertebral disc degeneration: part I. lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 15(6):720–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cassidy JJ, Hiltner A, Baer E (1989) Hierarchical structure of the intervertebral disc. Connect Tissue Res 23(1):75–88

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmidt H, Kettler A, Heuer F, Simon U, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2007) Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading. Spine 32(7):748–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan RX, Gong H, Qiu S, Zhang XB, Fang J, Zhu D (2015) Effects of resting modes on human lumbar spines with different levels of degenerated intervertebral discs: a finite element investigation. BMC Musculoskel Dis 16:221

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt H, Shirazi-Adl A, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ (2010) Response analysis of the lumbar spine during regular daily activities-a finite element analysis. J Biomech 43(10):1849–1856

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iatridis JC, Setton LA, Foster RJ, Rawlins BA, Weidenbaum M, Mow V (1998) Degeneration affects the anisotropic and nonlinear behaviors of human anulus fibrosus in compression. J Biomech 31(6):535–544

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmidt H, Kettler A, Rohlmann A, Claes L, Wilke HJ (2007) The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration-a finite element analysis. Clin Biomech 22(9):988–998

    Google Scholar 

  24. Massey CJ, Donkelaar CCV, Vresilovic E, Zavaliangos A, Marcolongo M (2012) Effects of aging and degeneration on the human intervertebral disc during the diurnal cycle: a finite element study. J Orthop Res 30(1):122–128

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Galbusera F, Schmidt H, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Gottschalk A, Wilke HJ (2011) The mechanical response of the lumbar spine to different combinations of disc degenerative changes investigated using randomized poroelastic finite element models. Eur Spine J 20(4):563–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Argoubi M, Shirazi-Adl A (1996) Poroelastic creep response analysis of a lumbar motion segment in compression. J Biomech 29(10):1331–1339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt H, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ, Shirazi-Adl A (2011) Remedy for fictive negative pressures in biphasic finite element models of the intervertebral disc during unloading. Comput Method Biomech 14(3):293–303

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xu H, Tang H, Guan XM, Jiang FG, Xu N, Ju W, Zhu XD, Zhang XJ, Zhang QL, Li M (2013) Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by finite element analysis. Neurosurgery 72(S1):21–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sharma M, Langrana NA, Rodriguze J (1995) Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. Spine 20(8):887–900

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Galbusera F, Schmidt H, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Wilke HJ (2011) The effect of degenerative morphological changes of the intervertebral disc on the lumbar spine biomechanics: a poroelastic finite element investigation. Comput Method Biomech 14(8):729–739

    Google Scholar 

  31. Urban JPG, Maroudas A (1981) Swelling of the intervertebral disc in vitro. Connect Tissue Res 9(1):1–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Verver MM, Van-Hoof J, Oomens CWJ, Van-de-Wouw N, Wismans JSHM (2003) Estimation of spinal loading in vertical vibrations by numerical simulation. Clin Biomech 8(9):800–811

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stokes IAF, Gardner-Morse M (2016) A database of lumbar spinal mechanical behavior for validation of spinal analytical models. J Biomech 49(5):780–785

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Macedo LG, Battié MC (2019) The association between occupational loading and spine degeneration on imaging-a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskel Dis 20:489

    Google Scholar 

  35. Schmidt AL, Paskoff G, Shender BS, Bass CR (2012) Risk of lumbar spine injury from cyclic compressive loading. Spine 37(26):1614–1621

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sato K, Kikuchi S, Yonezawa T (1999) In vivo intradiscal pressure measurement in healthy individuals and in patients with ongoing back problems. Spine 24(23):2468–2474

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Luoma K, Riihimaki H, Raininko R, Luukkonen R, Lamminen A, Viikari-Juntura E (1998) Lumbar disc degeneration in relation to occupation. Scand J Work Environ Health 24(5):358–366

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rohlmann A, Zander T, Schmidt H, Wilke HJ, Bergmann G (2006) Analysis of the influence of disc degeneration on the mechanical behaviour of a lumbar motion segment using the finite element method. J Biomech 39(13):2484–2490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Izambert O, Mitton D, Thourot M, Lavaste F (2003) Dynamic stiffness and damping of human intervertebral disc using axial oscillatory displacement under a free mass system. Eur Spine J 12(6):562–566

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Guo LX, Li R (2019) Influence of vibration frequency variation on poroelastic response of intervertebral disc of lumbar spine. J Mec Sci Technol 33(2):973–979

    Google Scholar 

  41. Weber M (2002) Is lumbar disk disease an occupational disease? Scientific background radiological findings, and medical legal interpretations. Z Orthop 140(5):512–517

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Fan RX, Liu J, Li YL, Liu J, Gao JZ (2018) Finite element investigation of the effects of the low-frequency vibration generated by vehicle driving on the human lumbar mechanical properties. Bio Res Int 7962414

  43. Pope MH, Novotny JE (1993) Spinal biomechanics. J Biomech Eng 115(4):569–574

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sandover J, Dupuis H (1987) A reanalysis of spinal motion during vibration. Ergonomics 30(6):975–985

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pope MH, Wilder DG, Jorneus L, Broman H, Svensson M, Andersson G (1987) The response of the seated human to sinusoidal vibration and impact. J Biomech Eng 109(4):279–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pankoke S, Hofmann J, Wolfel HP (2001) Determination of vibration-related spinal loads by numerical simulation. Clin Biomech 16(S1):45–56

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lewis CH, Griffin MJ (1979) Mechanisms of the effects of vibration frequency, level and duration on continuous manual control performance. Ergonomics 22(7):855–889

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Education Science and Technology Project of Jilin Province (JJKH20180560KJ).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruoxun Fan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, R., Liu, J. & Liu, J. Finite element investigation on the dynamic mechanical properties of low-frequency vibrations on human L2–L3 spinal motion segments with different degrees of degeneration. Med Biol Eng Comput 58, 3003–3016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02263-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-020-02263-0

Keywords

Navigation