Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Ultrasonic Gel Phantom Dosimetry for Evaluation of the Dose Response

  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic imaging is able to detect structural changes due to chemical reactions occurring due to ionizing irradiation. The purpose of this study to create a gel phantom dosimeter (developed MAGIC gel), which has ultrasonic properties equivalent to human tissue for readout with ultrasonic imaging. The speed of sound and the attenuation coefficient were determined as a function of the absorbed dose in the range of 0–50 Gy by using this dosimeter. A gel phantom was prepared by adding MAGIC polymer gel proprietary combinations in ultrasonic soft tissue-mimicking gel. Then, the ultrasonic parameters (response) of the samples, including the propagation speed of sound (SOS) and the attenuation coefficient (BUA) were measured in the absorbed dose range of 0-50 Gy in steps 2 Gy. The dose response curve is plotted and a sigmoid function is fitted. Ultrasonic images were recorded to assess the quality of the novel gel phantom. At 24 h postirradiation, the gel samples were imaged by using a magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. The mean values of the transverse relaxation rates (R2) were taken. The sensitivities of the speed of sound and the attenuation coefficient parameters and the R2 parameter were determined for the soft tissue-mimicking ultrasonic gel phantom. The concentrations of gel phantom, including 14% gelatin, 0.25% graphite, and 2% formaldehyde, with a maximum variation in the speed of sound (21.9 ± 2.3, 20.5 ± 2.1, and 24.3 ± 3.3 m/s) and attenuation coefficient (49.6 ± 9.1, 29.5 ± 5.5, and 47.9 ± 15.4 dB/MHz·m) were selected, respectively. The sensitivities of the speed of sound and the attenuation coefficient parameters and the R2 parameter were determined for the soft tissue-mimicking ultrasonic gel phantom as 1.01 m/s, 2.9 dB/MHz-m, and 0.48 s−1 per Gy and for the MAGIC-f polymer gel as 0.79 m/s, 1.9 dB/MHz-m, and 0.26 s−1 per Gy (R = 0.98), respectively. A significant correlation was found between the MAGIC-f polymer gel and the ultrasonic soft tissue-mimicking gel phantom with the R2 parameter (R = 0.9). Thus, the ultrasonic tissue-mimicking gel phantom can be concluded to be suitable for read-out using ultrasound waves as a free radical polymerization sensor. The cost effectiveness due to the utility of edible gelatin and the formation of breast soft tissue-mimicking ultrasonic images due to the presence of graphite scattering particles are distinctive features of the gel phantom introduced in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Hayashi et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 79, 803 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Y. De Deene, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 3, 34 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Baldock, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 777, 12 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sh. Smith et al., Med. Phys. 42, 6798 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Lepage et al., Med. Biol. 46, 2827 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. L. Mather et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 47, 4397 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. J. Venning, K. N. Nitschke, P. J. Keall and C. Baldock, Med. Phys. 32, 1047 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Brown et al., Appl. Radiat. Isot. 66, 1970 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Oldham and L. Kim, Med. Phys. 31, 1093 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Hilts, C. Audet and C. Duzneli, Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 2559 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. V. Trapp, S. A. Back and M. Lapage, Phys. Med. Biol. 46, 2939 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Rintoul, M. Lepage and C. Baldock, Appl. Spectrosc. 57, 51 (2003).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Watanabe, L. Warmington and N. Gopishankar, World J. Radiol. 9, 112 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Mokhtari-Dizaji, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 27, 1713 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. E. L. Madsen, G. R. Frank and F. Dong, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 24, 535 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. O. Culjat, D. Goldenberg, P. Tewari and R. S. Singha, Ultrasound Med. Biol. 36, 861 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. P. Fernandes, B. F. Pastorello, D. B. Araujo and O. Baffa, Phys. Med. Biol. 53, N53 (2008).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Masoumi, M. Mokhtari-Dizaji, A. Arbabi and M. Bakhshandeh, Dose-Response 14, 1 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. V. Papoutsaki et al., Phys. Med. 2, 1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. W. A. Findlay and R. F. Dillard, AAPS J. 9, 260 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. F. Pavoni and O. Baffa, Radiat. Meas. 47, 1074 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. J. J. Luci, H. M. Whitney and J. C. Gore, Phys. Med. Biol. 52, N241 (2007).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Khoei, J. V. Trapp and C. M. Langton, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 59, 444 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was approved by Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manijhe Mokhtari-Dizaji.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goharpey, N., Mokhtari-Dizaji, M. & Bakhshandeh, M. A Novel Ultrasonic Gel Phantom Dosimetry for Evaluation of the Dose Response. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 77, 1238–1247 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.1238

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.77.1238

Keywords

Navigation