Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Responses of soil organic carbon components and their sensitivity to karst rocky desertification control measures in Southwest China

  • Soils, Sec 3 • Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Adequate karst rocky desertification control measures are very important in enhancing the soil quality and soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration in the karst regions of Southwest China. This study aims to assess the responses and sensitivity of SOC and its components to karst rocky desertification control measures in degraded karst ecosystems.

Materials and methods

Two karst rocky desertification control measures, namely, conversion of cropland to secondary forest (SF) and the Chinese prickly ash planting (CPP), were chosen with cropland (CL) as reference soil. Soils in 0–10- and 10–20-cm layers were sampled. Then, SOC, easily oxidizable organic carbon (EOC), non-liable organic carbon (NLOC), particulate organic carbon (POC), mineral-associated SOM (MOC), and the carbon pool management index (CPMI) were determined.

Results and discussion

Karst rocky desertification control measures caused SOC to increase significantly through the increase in active (EOC, POC), non-liable (NLOC), and stable carbons (MOC). Significant relationships between the changes in SOC and the changes in its components were observed in the depths of 0–20cm. The responses of POC were more sensitive than SOC and other soil C components under CPP and SF. The EOC and POC ratios to SOC were highest in SF soils, followed by CPP as compared with soils under CL. The values of the CPMI and C/N ratios in CPP were lower than those in SF. The sensitivity index (SI) value of POC was highest, followed by EOC, SOC, NLOC, and MOC. Redundancy analysis (RDA) showed the C/N, CPMI, and POC/SOC ratios had significant effects on changes in soil C components.

Conclusions

The results indicated that karst rocky desertification control measures not only enhanced SOC quality but may also be beneficial for soil C sequestration. Conversion of cropland to natural SF could be a more suitable control measure for enhancing SOC quality and storage in the karst regions of southwestern China. POC was the most sensitive SOC fraction to karst rocky desertification control measures and can best reflect the dynamics of SOC. C/N ratio and CPMI may be considered as useful soil quality indicators for the overall C change in different karst rocky desertification control measures in degraded karst systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azam A, Akhtar MS, Rukh S, Mehmood A, Imran M, Khan A, Qayyum A, Ahmad W, Gurmani AR (2020) Changes in Soil Organic Carbon Fractions Across a Loess Toposequence. In: Changes in soil organic carbon fractions across a loess Toposequence. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20:1193–1202

  • Benbi DK, Brar K, Toor AS, Singh P (2015) Total and labile pools of soil organic carbon in cultivated and undisturbed soils in northern India. Geoderma 237-238:149–158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair G, Lefroy R, Lisle L (1995) Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the development of a carbon management index for agricultural systems. Aust J Agric Res 46:1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongiorno G, Bünemann EK, Oguejiofor CU, Meier J, Gort G, Comans R, Mäder P, Brussaard L, Rd G (2019) Sensitivity of labile carbon fractions to tillage and organic matter management and their potential as comprehensive soil quality indicators across pedoclimatic conditions in Europe. Ecol Indic 99:38–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cambardella CA, Elliott ET (1992) Participate soil organic-matter changes across a grassland cultivation sequence. Soil Sci Soc Am J 56:777–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conant RT, Six J, Paustian K (2003) Land use effects on soil carbon fractions in the southeastern United States. I Management-intensive versus extensive grazing. Bio Fertil Soils 38:386–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corral-Fernández R, Parras-Alcántara L, Lozano-García B (2013) Stratification ratio of soil organic C, N and C:N in Mediterranean evergreen oak woodland with conventional and organic tillage. Agric Ecosyst Environ 164:252–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng L, Wang K, Tang Z, Shangguan Z (2016) Soil organic carbon dynamics following natural vegetation restoration: evidence from stable carbon isotopes (δ13C). Agric Ecosyst Environ 221:235–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duval ME, Martinez JM, Galantini JA, Aitkenhead M (2019) Assessing soil quality indices based on soil organic carbon fractions in different long-term wheat systems under semiarid conditions. Soil Use Manag 36:71–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han X, Zhao F, Tong X, Deng J, Yang G, Chen L, Kang D (2017) Understanding soil carbon sequestration following the afforestation of former arable land by physical fractionation. Catena 150:317–327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2005) Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils. Adv Agron 85:221–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu N, Lan J (2020) Impact of vegetation restoration on soil organic carbon stocks and aggregates in a karst rocky desertification area in Southwest China. J Soils Sediments 20:1264–1275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu P, Liu S, Ye Y, Zhang W, He X, Su Y, Wang K (2018a) Soil carbon and nitrogen accumulation following agricultural abandonment in a subtropical karst region. Appl Soil Ecol 132:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu P, Liu S, Ye Y, Zhang W, Wang K, Su Y (2018b) Effects of environmental factors on soil organic carbon under natural or managed vegetation restoration. Land Degrad Dev 29:387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Z, Lian Y, Qin X (2014) Rocky desertification in Southwest China: impacts, causes, and restoration. Earthence Reviews 132:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Carral P, Gonzalez-Vila FJ, Almendros G (2017) The diversity of methoxyphenols released by pyrolysis-gas chromatography as predictor of soil carbon storage. J Chromatogr A 1508:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez-González MA, Álvarez AM, Carral P, Almendros G (2020) Influence of soil forming factors on the molecular structure of soil organic matter and carbon levels. Catena 189:104501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladygina N, Hedlund K (2010) Plant species influence microbial diversity and carbon allocation in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 42:162–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laganière J, Angers DA, Paré D (2010) Carbon accumulation in agricultural soils after afforestation: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 16:439–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Kleber M (2015) The contentious nature of soil organic matter. Nature 528:60–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leifeld J, Kögel-Knabner I (2005) Soil organic matter fractions as early indicators for carbon stock changes under different land-use? Geoderma 124:143–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li ZW, Nie XD, Chen XL, Lu YM, Jiang WG, Zheng GM (2015) The effects of land use and landscape position on labile organic carbon and carbon management index in red soil hilly region, southern China. J Mt Sci 12:626–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Wen Y, Li X, Li Y, Yang X, Lin Z, Song Z, Cooper JM, Zhao B (2018) Soil labile organic carbon fractions and soil organic carbon stocks as affected by long-term organic and mineral fertilization regimes in the North China plain. Soil Tillage Res 175:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Zheng C, Li J, Long J (2018) Dynamics of soil microbial recovery from cropland to orchard along a 20-year chronosequence in a degraded karst ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 639:1051–1059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebig MA, Varvel GE, Doran JW, Wienhold BJ (2002) Crop sequence and nitrogen__fertilization effects on soil properties in the western Corn Belt. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:596–601

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Liu G, Fu B, Zheng X (2007) Relationship between plant species diversity and soil microbial functional diversity along a longitudinal gradient in temperate grasslands of Hulunbeir, Inner Mongolia, China. Ecol Res 23:511–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas ST, Weil RR (2012) Can a labile carbon test be used to predict crop responses to improve soil organic matter management? Agron J 104:1160–1170

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Y, Li Q, Shen J, Wang C, Li B, Yuan S, Zhao B, Li H, Zhao J, Guo L, Li S, He Y (2019) Effects of agricultural land use change on organic carbon and its labile fractions in the soil profile in an urban agricultural area. Land Degrad Dev 30:1875–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang D, Cui M, Liu Y, Wang G, Cao J, Wang X, Dan X, Zhou J (2019) Responses of soil labile organic carbon fractions and stocks to different vegetation restoration strategies in degraded karst ecosystems of Southwest China. Ecol Eng 138:391–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton WJ, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS (1987) Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–1179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza-Bonilla D, Álvaro-Fuentes J, Cantero-Martínez C (2014) Identifying soil organic carbon fractions sensitive to agricultural management practices. Soil Tillage Res 139:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin Y, Xin Z, Wang D, Xiao Y (2017) Soil organic carbon storage and its influencing factors in the riparian woodlands of a Chinese karst area. Catena 153:21–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qiu L, Wei X, Gao J, Zhang X (2015) Dynamics of soil aggregate-associated organic carbon along an afforestation chronosequence. Plant Soil 391:237–251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwendenmann L, Pendall E (2006) Effects of forest conversion into grassland on soil aggregate structure and carbon storage in Panama: evidence from soil carbon fractionation and stable isotopes. Plant Soil 288:217–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Six J, Callewaert P, Lenders S (2002) Measuring and understanding carbon storage in afforested soils by physical fractionation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:1981–1987

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Wang Y, Wang Q, Liu J (2014) Impacts of 9 years of a new conservational agricultural management on soil organic carbon fractions. Soil Tillage Res 143:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu GL, Liu ZH, Zhang L, Hu TM, Chen JM (2010) Effects of artificial grassland establishment on soil nutrients and carbon properties in a black-soil-type degraded grassland. Plant Soil 333:469–479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Jiang X, Lu Q, Li J, Chen J (2020) Changes in soil organic carbon and aggregate stability following a chronosequence of Liriodendron chinense plantations. J For Res

  • Yang L, Luo P, Wen L, Li D (2016) Soil organic carbon accumulation during post-agricultural succession in a karst area, Southwest China. Sci Rep 6:37118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao FZ, Ren CJ, Zhang L, Hanc XH, Yang GH, Wang J (2018) Changes in soil microbial community are linked to soil carbon fractions after afforestation. Eur J Soil Sci 69:370–379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C, Long J, Liao H, Zheng C, Li J, Liu L, Zhang M (2019) Dynamics of soil microbial communities following vegetation succession in a karst mountain ecosystem, Southwest China. Sci Rep 9:2160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41601584), Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Foundation (Qiankehe Foundation [2017]1417), National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0502603), Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Program (Qiankehe Platform Talent [2017]5726), and Guizhou Normal University Doctoral Research Fund (2014).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Karst Science/State Engineering Technology Institute for Karst Desertification control, Guizhou Normal University, No.116, Baoshan Road (North), Yunyan District, Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People’s Republic of China

    Jiacheng Lan

Authors
  1. Jiacheng Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiacheng Lan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Yan He

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lan, J. Responses of soil organic carbon components and their sensitivity to karst rocky desertification control measures in Southwest China. J Soils Sediments 21, 978–989 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02840-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02840-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation