Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Occurrence and Safety Evaluation of Antimicrobial Compounds Triclosan and Triclocarban in Water and Fishes of the Multitrophic Niche of River Torsa, India

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personal care product (PCP) chemicals have a greater chance of accumulation in the aquatic environments because of their volume of use. PCPs are biologically active substances that can exert an adverse effect on the ecology and food safety. Information on the status of these substances in Indian open water ecosystems is scarce. In this paper, we report the incidence of two synthetic antimicrobials, triclosan (TCS), including its metabolite methyl-triclosan (Me-TCS) and triclocarban (TCC) in Torsa, a transboundary river flowing through India. In water TCS and TCC were detected at levels exceeding their respective PNEC (Predictive No Effect Concentration). Both the compounds were found to be bioaccumulative in fish. TCS concentration (91.1–589 µg/kg) in fish was higher than that of TCC (29.1–285.5 µg/kg). The accumulation of residues of the biocides varied widely among fishes of different species, ecological niche, and feeding habits. Me-TCS could be detected in fishes and not in water. The environmental hazard quotient of both TCS and TCC in water indicated a moderate risk. However, the health risk analysis revealed that fishes of the river would not pose any direct hazard to human when consumed. This is the first report of the occurrence of these PCP chemicals in a torrential river system of the eastern Himalayan region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adolfsson-Erici M, Pettersson M, Parkkonen J, Sturve J (2002) Triclosan, a commonly used bactericide found in human milk and in the aquatic environment in Sweden. Chemosphere 46:1485–1489

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer ME, Poiger T, Droz C, Romanin K, Bergqvist PA, Müller MD, Buser HR (2004) Occurrence of methyl triclosan, a transformation product of the bactericide triclosan, in fish from various lakes in Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 38:390

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhadra B, Chakraborty R, Das S, Nanda AK (2005) Investigation of some basic water quality parameters of the north Bengal Terai river Kaljani—a tributary of river Torsa, and comparison thereof with the mainstream. J Environ Biol 26(2):277–286

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blanset DL, Zhang J, Robson MG (2007) Probabilistic estimates of lifetime daily doses from consumption of drinking water containing trace levels of N, N-diethyl-meta-toluamide (DEET), triclosan, or acetaminophen and the associated risk to human health. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 13:615–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boehmer W, Ruedel H, Wenzel A, Schroeter-Kermani C (2004) Retrospective monitoring of triclosan and methyl-triclosan in fish: results from the German environmental specimen bank. Organohalogen Compd 66:1516–1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Brausch JM, Rand GM (2011) A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82:1518–1532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buser HR, Balmer ME, Schmid P, Kohler M (2006) Occurrence of UV filters 4-methyl benzylidene camphor and octocrylene in fish from various Swiss rivers with inputs from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 40:1427–1431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Canosa P, Morales S, Rodriguez I, Rubi E, Cela R, Gomez M (2005) Aquatic degradation of triclosan and formation of toxic chlorophenols in presence of low concentrations of free chlorine. Anal Bioanal Chem 383:1119–1126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke R, Healy MG, Fenton O, Cummins E (2017) Quantitative risk assessment of antimicrobials in biosolids applied on agricultural land and potential translocation into food. Food Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.12.072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consortium T (2002) Iuclid data set, vol 44. TCC Consortium, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coogan MA, Edziyie RE, La Point TW, Venables BJ (2007) Algal bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl-triclosan in a North Texas wastewater treatment plant receiving stream. Chemosphere 67(10):1911–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coogan MA, La Point TW (2009) Snail bioaccumulation of triclocarban, triclosan, and methyl triclosan in a North Texas, USA, stream affected by wastewater treatment plant runoff. Environ Toxicol Chem 27(8):1788–1793. https://doi.org/10.1897/07-374.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhillon GS, Kaur S, Pulicharla R, Brar SK, Cledón M, Verma M, Surampalli RY (2015) Triclosan: current status, occurrence, environmental risks and bioaccumulation potential. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:5657–5684. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120505657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond RA, Russom CL (1990) Behavioral toxicity syndromes: a promising tool for assessing toxicity mechanisms in juvenile fathead minnows. Environ Toxicol Chem 9(1):37–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebele AJ, Abdallah MAE, Harrad S (2017) Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerg Contam 3(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPHC (2009) Environmental risk assessment guidance manual for industrial chemicals. The Department of Environment, Canberra, Australia. http://www.nepc.gov.au.

  • ESRI (2008) ArcGIS desktop: release 9.3. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz S, Altenburger R, Heilmeier H, Schmitt-Janse M (2008) What contributes to the sensitivity of microalgae to triclosan? Aquat Toxicol 90:102–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geyer HJ, Rimkus GG, Scheunert I, Kaune A, Kettrup A, Zeeman M, Muir DCG, Hansen LG, Mackay D (2000). In: Beek B (ed) Bioaccumulation-new aspects and developments. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo-Lumbreras R, Sanz-Landaluze J, Guinea J, Cámara C (2012) Miniaturized extraction methods of triclosan from aqueous and fish roe samples. Bioconcentration studies zebrafish larvae (DanioRerio). Anal Bioanal Chem 403:927–937

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halden RU (2014) On the need and speed of regulating triclosan and triclocarban in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 48(7):3603–3611. https://doi.org/10.1021/es500495p

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halden RU, Paull DH (2005) Co-occurrence of triclocarban and triclosan in U.S. water resources. Environ Sci Technol 39:1420–1426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2011/march/first-report-on-bioaccumulation-and-processing-of-antibacterial-ingredient-tcc-in-fish.html. Accessed 30 Apr 2020

  • Jakimska A, Huerta B, Barganska Z, Kot-Wasik A, Rodrıguez- Mozaz S, Barcelo D (2013) Development of a liquid chromatography– tandem mass spectrometry procedure for determination of endocrine disrupting compounds in fish from Mediterranean rivers. J Chromatogr A 1306:44–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram KC (2009) Catfishes of India. Narendra Publishing House, New Delhi, xxii+383pp. ISBN 10: 8185375844.

  • Jeyakumar T, Kodisundaram P, Rajavel A, Rajendra K, Anbu M, Latha P, Roselet P (2012) Triclosan residues in estuarine sediments from Valliyar Estuary, Kanyakumari District, Tamil Nadu, India. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 9(1):53–58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khatikarn J, Satapornvanit K, Price OR, Van den Brink PJ (2018) Effects of triclosan on aquatic invertebrates in tropics and the influence of pH on its toxicity on microalgae. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 25:13244–13253

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolpin DW, Furlong ET, Meyer MT, Thurman EM, Zaugg SD, Barber LB, Buxton HT (2002) Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999–2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ Sci Technol 36(6):1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1021/es011055j

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari K, Sinha A, Koushlesh SK, Das Sarkar S, Borah S, Baitha R, Behera BK, Das BK (2020) Genetic differentiation and phylogenetic relationship of 11 Asian Sisorinae genera (Siluriformes: Sisoridae) with new record of Pseudolaguvia foveolata. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 31(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2020.1714605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehutso RF, Daso AP, Okonkwo JO (2017) Occurrence and environmental levels of triclosan and triclocarban in selected wastewater treatment plants in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Emerg Contam 3(3):107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Leiker TJ, Abney SR, Goodbred SL, Rosen MR (2009) Identification of methyl triclosan and halogenated analogues in male common carp (Cyprinus carpio) from Las Vegas Bay and semipermeable membrane devices from Las Vegas Wash, Nevada. Sci Total Environ 407(6):2102–2114

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lemly AD (1996) Evaluation of hazard quotient method for risk assessment of selenium. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 35:156–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff WS (2002) Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(7):1323–1329

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TR, Heidler J, Chillrud SN, Delaquil A, Ritchie JC, Mihalic JN, Bopp R, Halden RU (2008) Fate of triclosan and evidence for reductive dechlorination of triclocarban in estuarine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 42(12):4570–4576

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki T, Yamagishi T, Matsumoto M (1984) Residues of 4-chloro-1-(2, 4-dichlorophenoxy)-2-methoxybenzene (triclosan methyl) in aquatic biota. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 32:227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mottaleb MA, Usenko S, O’Donnell JG, Ramirez AJ, Brooks BW, Chambliss CK (2009) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry screening methods for select UV filters, synthetic musks, alkylphenols, an antimicrobial agent, and an insect repellent in fish. J Chromatogr A 1216:815–823

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muir D, Simmons D, Wang X, Peart T, Villella M, Miller J, Sherry J (2017) Bioaccumulation of pharmaceuticals and personal care product chemicals in fish exposed to wastewater effluent in an urban wetland. Sci Rep 7:16999. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15462-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nag SK, Das Sarkar S, Manna SK (2018) Triclosan—an antibacterial compound in water, sediment and fish of River Gomti, India. Int J Environ Health Res 28(5):461–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2018.1487044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nishi I, Kawakami T, Onodera S (2008) Monitoring of triclosan in the surface water of the Tone Canal, Japan. B Environ Contam Toxicol 80(2):163–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J, Capdevielle M, Rothenstein A, Cunningham V (2002) Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(7):1338–1349

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peng FJ, Pan CG, Zhang M, Zhang NS, Windfeld R, Salvito D, Selck H, Van den Brink PJ, Ying GG (2017) Occurrence and ecological risk assessment of emerging organic chemicals in urban rivers: Guangzhou as a case study in China. Sci Total Environ 589:46–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ramaswamy BR, Kim J, Isobe T, Chang K, Amano A, Miller TW, Siringan FP, Tanabe S (2011) Determination of preservative and antimicrobial compounds in fish from Manila Bay, Philippines using ultra high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, and assessment of human dietary exposure. J Hazard Mater 192:1739–1745

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy BR, Shanmugam G, Velu G, Rengarajan B, Larsson DG (2011) GC-MS analysis and ecotoxicological risk assessment of triclosan, carbamazepine and parabens in Indian rivers. J Hazard Mater 186(2–3):1586–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss R, Mackay N, Habig C, Griffin J (2002) An ecological risk assessment for triclosan in lotic systems following discharge from wastewater treatment plants in the United States. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(11):2483–2492

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ricart M, Guasch H, Alberch M, Barceló D, Bonnineau C, Geiszinger A, Ferrer J, Ricciardi F, Romaní AM, Morin S, Proia L (2010) Triclosan persistence through wastewater treatment plants and its potential toxic effects on river biofilms. Aquat Toxicol 100(4):346–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rudel H, Bohmer W, Muller M, Fliedner A, Ricking M, Teubner D, Schr€oter-Kermani C (2013) Retrospective study of triclosan and methyl-triclosan residues in fish and suspended particulate matter: results from the German Environmental Specimen Bank. Chemosphere 91:1517–1524

    Google Scholar 

  • Samsoe-Petersen L, Winter-Nielsen M, Madsen T (2003) Fate and effects of triclosan. Environmental Project No 861. Danish Environmental Protection Agency

  • SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety) (2010) Opinion on triclosan antimicrobial resistance. Luxembourg. Directorate-General Health and Consumer, European Commission

  • Shanmugam G, Ramasamy K, Selvaraj KK, Sampath S, Ramaswamy BR (2014) Triclosan in fresh water fish Gibelioncatla from the Kaveri river, India, and its consumption risk assessment. Environ Forensics 15(3):207–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15275922.2014.930940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Singer H, Müller S, Tixier C, Pillonel L (2002) Triclosan: occurrence and fate of a widely used biocide in the aquatic environment: field measurements in wastewater treatment plants, surface waters, and lake sediments. Environ Sci Technol 36(23):4998–5004. https://doi.org/10.1021/es025750i

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics E (2013) Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Central Statistics Office, Government of India. 21th Issue

  • Subedi B, Balakrishna K, Sinha RK, Yamashita N, Balasubramanian VG, Kannan K (2015) Mass loading and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products, including psychoactive and illicit drugs and artificial sweeteners, in five sewage treatment plants in India. J Environ Chem Eng 3:2882–2891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suter GW (2007) Ecological risk assessment, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Talwar PK, Jhingran AG (1991) Inland fishes of India and adjacent countries. Oxford-IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatarazako N, Ishibashi H, Teshima K, Kishi K, Arizono K (2003) Effects of triclosan on various aquatic organisms. Environ Sci 11(2):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (1999) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington. USEPA Report No. EPA/630/R-95/002F

  • Valters K, Li H, Alaee M, D’Sa I, Marsh G, Bergman Å, Letcher RJ (2005) Polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hydroxylated and methoxylated brominated and chlorinated analogues in the plasma of fish from the Detroit river. Environ Sci Technol 39(15):5612–5619

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vimalkumar K, Arun E, Krishna-Kumar S, Poopal RK, Nikhil NP, Subramanian A, Babu-Rajendran R (2018) Occurrence of triclocarban and benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in water, sediment, and fish from Indian rivers. Sci Total Environ 625:1351–1360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson BA, Smith VH, deNoyelles Jr F, Larive CK (2003) Effects of three pharmaceutical and personal care products on natural freshwater algal assemblages. Environ Sci Technol 37(9):1713–1719. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0259741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JL, Lam NP, Martens D, Kettrup A, Cai Z (2007) Triclosan determination in water related to wastewater treatment. Talanta 72(5):1650–1654

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang GCC, Tsai HJ, Chang FK (2015) Occurrence of triclosan in the tropical rivers receiving the effluents from the hospital wastewater treatment plant. Environ Monit Assess 187:151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4372-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LH, Ying GG, Su HC, Stauber JL, Adams MS, Binet MT (2008) Growth inhibiting effects of twelve antibacterial agents and their mixtures on the freshwater microalga Pseudokirchneriella Subcapitata. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1201–1208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ying GG, Kookana RS (2007) Triclosan in wastewaters and biosolids from Australian wastewater treatment plants. Environ Int 33:199–205

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang N, Peng F, Ying GG, Van den Brink PJ (2019) Fate and effects of triclosan in subtropical river biofilms. Aquat Toxicol 212:11–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang NS, Liu YS, Van den Brink PJ, Price OR, Ying GG (2015) Ecological risks of home and personal care products in the riverine environment of a rural region in South China without domestic wastewater treatment facilities. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 122:417–425

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SY, Zhang QA, Darisaw S, Ehie O, Wang GD (2007) Simultaneous quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in Mississippi river water, in New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. Chemosphere 66(6):1057–1069

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JL, Ying GG, Liu YS, Chen F, Yang JF, Wang L (2010) Occurrence and risks of triclosan and triclocarban in the Pearl river system, South China: from source to the receiving environment. J Hazard Mater 179(1–3):215–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thankfully acknowledge the contribution by Dr. Malay Naskar, Principal Scientist, ICAR-CIFRI for the statistical analysis using R program, Mr. Samir Kumar Paul, former Technical Officer, ICAR-CIFRI for his assistance during field sampling, and Ms. Manisha Bhor, Research Scholar, ICAR-CIFRI for preparing the location map under GIS platform. They are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers who have extensively reviewed the paper and have put forth constructive comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subir Kumar Nag.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das Sarkar, S., Nag, S.K., Kumari, K. et al. Occurrence and Safety Evaluation of Antimicrobial Compounds Triclosan and Triclocarban in Water and Fishes of the Multitrophic Niche of River Torsa, India. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 79, 488–499 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00785-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00785-0

Navigation