The DNA damage response is required for oocyte cyst breakdown and follicle formation in mice

Ana Martínez-Marchal; Yan Huang; Maria Teresa Guillot-Ferriols; Mònica Ferrer-Roda; Anna Guixé; Montserrat Garcia-Caldés; Ignasi Roig

doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067

Abstract

Mammalian oogonia proliferate without completing cytokinesis, forming cysts. Within these, oocytes differentiate and initiate meiosis, promoting double-strand break (DSBs) formation, which are repaired by homologous recombination (HR) causing the pairing and synapsis of the homologs. Errors in these processes activate checkpoint mechanisms, leading to apoptosis. At the end of prophase I, in contrast with what is observed in spermatocytes, oocytes accumulate unrepaired DSBs. Simultaneously to the cyst breakdown, there is a massive oocyte death, which has been proposed to be necessary to enable the individualization of the oocytes to form follicles. Based upon all the above-mentioned information, we hypothesize that the apparently inefficient HR occurring in the oocytes may be a requirement to first eliminate most of the oocytes and enable cyst breakdown and follicle formation. To test this idea, we compared perinatal ovaries from control and mutant mice for the effector kinase of the DNA Damage Response (DDR), CHK2. We found that CHK2 is required to eliminate ~50% of the fetal oocyte population. Nevertheless, the number of oocytes and follicles found in Chk2-mutant ovaries three days after birth was equivalent to that of the controls. These data revealed the existence of another mechanism capable of eliminating oocytes. In vitro inhibition of CHK1 rescued the oocyte number in Chk2^-/- mice, implying that CHK1 regulates postnatal oocyte death. Moreover, we found that CHK1 and CHK2 functions are required for the timely breakdown of the cyst and to form follicles. Thus, we uncovered a novel CHK1 function in regulating the oocyte population in mice. Based upon these data, we propose that the CHK1- and CHK2-dependent DDR controls the number of oocytes and is required to properly break down oocyte cysts and form follicles in mammals.

Author summary

In mammals, female fertility is limited by the number of germ cells, i.e., the oocytes, females are born with. These oocytes associate with somatic cells to produce follicles that guarantee the production of a fertilizable egg and the synthesis of sex hormones. During fetal development, oocytes initiate meiosis to halve their ploidy. As part of the meiotic program, oocytes self-induce hundreds of DSBs into their genome, which have to be repaired. However, oocytes are not very efficient at repairing DSBs. Also, during fetal development, a great part of the oocytes are eliminated, in a process that has been linked to the formation of follicles. It has been described that the effector kinase of the DDR (CHK2) is responsible for eliminating oocytes with persistent DSBs. Thus, we hypothesized that the DDR may be responsible for eliminating oocytes. In agreement with our hypothesis, we found that CHK2 was responsible for eliminating most fetal oocytes and regulating follicle formation in the mouse. Unexpectedly, we found that there is a CHK1-dependent perinatal oocyte death occurring in Chk2^-/- mice that alters follicle formation. These data suggest that the CHK2- and CHK1-dependent DDR control the oocyte pool and follicle formation in mammals.

Citation: Martínez-Marchal A, Huang Y, Guillot-Ferriols MT, Ferrer-Roda M, Guixé A, Garcia-Caldés M, et al. (2020) The DNA damage response is required for oocyte cyst breakdown and follicle formation in mice. PLoS Genet 16(11): e1009067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067

Editor: Mónica P. Colaiácovo, Harvard Medical School, UNITED STATES

Received: February 12, 2020; Accepted: August 20, 2020; Published: November 18, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Martínez-Marchal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: This work was supported by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (BFU2013-43965-P and BFU2016-80370-P, PID2019-107082RB-I00, IR; http://www.ciencia.gob.es/portal/site/MICINN/). AMM was supported by a PIF fellowship from Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (B16P0048; https://www.uab.cat/). YH was supported by a CSC fellowship from the China Science Council (201607040048). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

In mice oogenesis, the primordial germ cells migrate to the genital ridges around 10.5 days post-coitus (dpc)[1], become oogonia and proliferate without completing cytokinesis, resulting in the formation of cysts, i.e., groups of cells joined by the cytoplasm [2–4]. Within these cysts, oocytes differentiate and initiate meiosis around 13.5 dpc. But meiotic progression stops at the end of the first meiotic prophase, around birth [5]. Concomitantly, the majority of the oocytes die and cysts break down, so single oocytes can be surrounded by stromal ovarian cells to form primordial follicles [6]. These follicles containing arrested oocytes represent the pool of germ cells females will use during their entire reproductive lifetime.

The massive oocyte elimination occurring during the early stages of oogenesis is not specific to mice, but is common in many other mammalian species [7]. For instance, in humans, only ~10% of the oocytes that initiate meiosis will end up forming a follicle [8]. The reasons behind the effort of eliminating the vast majority of the oocytes produced are still unknown, although it has been speculated that it may help in disassembling cysts to individualize oocytes so follicles can form [9,10]. Additionally, the possible triggers of this massive oocyte death are not completely understood. The activation of the retrotransposable LINE-1 element during fetal development has been shown to trigger oocyte death [11], however, the mechanism behind it is also unknown [12]. Nonetheless, quality-control mechanisms that regulate meiotic prophase progression have been speculated to play a part in this process [7].

Meiosis is the reductional division of the genome that generates haploid cells. At the onset of the first meiotic prophase, SPO11 creates hundreds of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) on the genome, which are repaired by homologous recombination leading to the pairing and synapsis of the homologous chromosomes [13]. These processes are tightly regulated to avoid possible deleterious effects originated by errors in recombination or synapsis. Therefore, when errors occur, meiocytes delay their cell-cycle progression, and can even activate programmed cell death [14]. Two mechanisms have been identified that are able to lead mammalian meiocytes into apoptosis. One dependent on DSB formation and recombination progression, and a second one independent of SPO11-generated DSBs [15–19]. Studies in spermatocytes and oocytes have revealed the central role that the DNA damage-response (DDR) effector kinase, CHK2, has in the arrest of mammalian meiocytes with persistent recombination intermediates [17,19].

The DDR is a complex signaling network that is responsible for the maintenance of genome integrity. Different DNA lesions activate different DDR pathways. Whereas single-stranded DNA breaks activate the Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR), which in turn activates the effector kinase CHK1, DSBs activate the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase, which ultimately activates the effector kinase CHK2. Nonetheless, the activation of either of these two DDR pathways promotes the repair of DNA damage or the elimination of the cells which accumulate excessive damage in order to maintain genome stability [20]. Several studies have revealed the role of these two pathways in regulating meiotic recombination in mice [17,21–24].

Mammalian gametogenesis is characterized by a marked sexual dimorphism [25]. One of many examples is found in the distinct control of meiotic recombination that occurs in mammalian oocytes, as compared with spermatocytes [22,26–28]. While spermatocytes repair most DSBs by mid-pachynema, the vast majority of human oocytes still present multiple unrepaired DSBs at the same stage. Based upon the persistence of unrepaired DSBs present in wild-type oocytes at the end of meiotic prophase, we hypothesized that the physiological oocyte death occurring during oogenesis is due to the activation of the CHK2-dependent DDR in those oocytes that accumulate more unrepaired DSBs. Furthermore, due to the co-occurrence of this massive oocyte death and cyst breakdown, we have also hypothesized that the DDR-dependent oocyte elimination contributes to proper cyst breakdown and follicle formation. To test these ideas, the number of oocytes and the cyst breakdown and follicle formation in perinatal female ovaries from control and Chk2^-/- mice was analyzed. We found that during fetal development, the oocytes with higher amounts of unrepaired DSBs were eliminated in a CHK2-dependent manner, suggesting a selection process of the fittest oocytes to survive fetal development. We also showed that CHK2 is required to eliminate fetal oocytes as a result of LINE-1 activation, suggesting that the mechanism behind LINE-1-triggered oocyte death depends on DDR. Nevertheless, control and Chk2 mutant samples had the same number of oocytes by 4 days postpartum (dpp). Our results also provide evidence that the CHK1 function is required to eliminate Chk2^-/- oocytes after birth. Moreover, cyst breakdown and follicle formation were also disrupted when the two effector kinases of DDR were inhibited, proving that the regulation of the oocyte population mediated by DDR is required for proper cyst breakdown and follicle formation in mammals.

Results

Chk2 mutant fetal ovaries accumulate oocytes with more unrepaired DSBs than do controls

Our model predicts that in the absence of CHK2, ovaries will accumulate oocytes with high numbers of unrepaired DSBs that normally would be eliminated. To test this, the number of γH2AX patches was counted, as a surrogate of unrepaired DSBs [26], in control and Chk2 mutant oocytes at different stages of meiotic prophase. As mentioned earlier and described elsewhere [26,28], wild-type oocytes at pachynema presented multiple unrepaired DSBs. Importantly, Chk2 mutant pachytene-stage oocytes had significantly more patches of γH2AX than did control cells (p<0.0001 T-test, Fig 1, S1 Table and S1 Data). This finding is not due to a delay in the meiotic prophase progression of Chk2 mutant samples (S1 Fig). Thus, these data corroborate our model and suggest that CHK2 eliminates the oocytes with a higher number of unrepaired DSBs at pachynema. Nonetheless, as oocytes completed meiotic prophase, the difference of unrepaired DSBs between the two genotypes decreased. So that, at late-diplonema, mutant and control oocytes displayed similar numbers of γH2AX patches (p = 0.6856 T-test, Fig 1, S1 Table and S1 Data). This result could be a manifestation of the oocytes’ ability to repair the damage past the pachytene stage, as has been proposed before [19,29]. Alternatively, it could also be interpreted as oocytes which accumulate unrepaired DNA damage were being eliminated by a CHK2-independent mechanism occurring after the pachytene stage.

Download:

Fig 1. Chk2^-/- oocytes present a higher number of unrepaired DSBs at pachynema and early diplonema than do controls.

(A) Representative images of control (WT) and Chk2^-/- oocytes at pachynema and diplonema. The cells are immunostained against SYCP3 (red) and ɣH2AX (green). The scale bars represent 10 μm and applies to all images. (B) Quantification of the number of γH2AX patches found in WT and Chk2^-/- oocytes at pachynema and diplonema. The horizontal lines represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). Data were derived from at least two different animals per condition, and the number of cells counted per each genotype and condition is indicated above.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g001

Perinatal Chk2 mutant ovaries have more oocytes than do control ovaries

Our model also predicts that Chk2 mutant ovaries should contain more oocytes than wild-type controls. Thus, we counted the number of oocytes present in control and Chk2 mutant ovaries from 15.5 dpc to 4 dpp (22.5 dpc) mice. We expected that Chk2 mutant ovaries would present more oocytes than would wild-type samples after most oocytes have reached the pachytene stage, around 17.5–19.5 dpc. To perform this analysis, we serially sectioned the ovaries and immunostained every other section against the DDX4 germ-cell marker (Fig 2A and 2B). Our control mice showed the expected pattern: at 15.5 dpc, ovaries contained the maximum number of germ cells, on average almost 9,000 oocytes (Fig 2C, S2 Table and S1 Data). At 17.5 dpc, half of the control oocytes had been eliminated and the ovaries displayed an average number of 4,207 oocytes. From this stage, the number of oocytes found in our control mice tended to slowly decrease until 4 dpp. As expected, Chk2 mutant ovaries displayed a similar number of oocytes as did control samples at 15.5 dpc (p = 0.1181, T-test, Fig 2C, S2 Table and S1 Data). However, the number of oocytes found at 17.5 dpc in Chk2 mutant samples was significantly higher than was the one found in control ones (p = 0.0001, T test). These data suggest that CHK2 is required to physiologically eliminate the fetal oocytes around 16.5 dpc, as our model predicted. Unexpectedly, the number of oocytes present in Chk2 mutant ovaries declined significantly during the following days, until it matched the number of oocytes found in wild-type samples (p = 0.7775, T-test; at 22.5 dpc). These results reveal the existence of an unexpected CHK2-independent mechanism that eliminates Chk2^-/- oocytes around birth.

Download:

Fig 2. CHK2 determines the number of oocytes in fetal ovaries.

(A-B) Representative images of 17.5 dpc control (WT, A) and Chk2^-/- (B) histological sections of ovaries immunostained against DDX4 (red) and the DNA counterstained with DAPI (blue). The scale bar represents 40 μm. (C) Number of oocytes in fetal (15.5–17.5 dpc) and postnatal (19.5–22.5 dpc) control (WT) and Chk2^-/- ovaries. The round symbols represent the mean, and the lines the SEM. Pale circles show the number of oocytes found in each control and Chk2^-/- ovary counted. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). Data were derived from at least two different animals per condition, and the number of ovaries counted per each genotype and condition is indicated below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g002

The lack of CHK2 does not compromise cyst breakdown, but rather delays follicle formation initiation

Our model also predicts that Chk2 mutant ovaries will present defects in cyst breakdown and follicle formation, but since Chk2 mutant mice have been shown to be fertile [30], only minor alterations were expected of these processes. Thus, we classified the oocytes from control and mutant ovaries from 15.5 dpc to 4 dpp into three categories: oocytes in cyst (those sharing cytoplasm with their neighbors, Fig 3A), single oocytes (in which the limit of the oocyte cytoplasm was clearly visible, Fig 3B) and oocytes in follicles (in which the oocytes were surrounded by follicular cells; Fig 3C). At 15.5 dpc, approximately 40% of the oocytes from control and mutant ovaries remained in cysts, while the rest seemed to be individualized (Fig 3D, S3 Table and S1 Data). At 17.5 dpc, fifty percent of the control oocyte population had disappeared (Fig 2C). Remarkably, this translated into the loss of 60% of the oocytes that were forming cysts. However, we also observed the loss of 50% of those oocytes that were already individualized. These data suggest that the massive CHK2-dependent oocyte elimination occurs in both oocytes in cysts and individual oocytes, although other explanations may be plausible (See Discussion). Follicles began to appear in control samples at 17.5 dpc and formed most of the oocyte pool from 3 dpp (21.5 dpc) onwards. In Chk2 mutants, around 40% of the oocytes seemed individualized at 15.5 dpc. Similar to what we observed in control samples, this proportion persisted to 17.5 dpc. These data suggest that cyst breakdown is not affected by CHK2 ablation. Follicle formation in Chk2 mutants was very similar to the one found in controls. Follicles first appeared at 17.5 dpc, but in a reduced number and a significantly reduced proportion, as compared to controls (p = 0.0250, T-test; S3 Table). Follicles reached control numbers and proportions in newborn mice (p = 0.7791, T-test; at 19.5 dpc) and constituted most of the oocyte pool from 3 dpp onwards, as in controls. These data suggest that the absence of CHK2 does not principally compromise oocyte cyst breakdown, but rather delays the initiation of follicle formation.

Download:

Fig 3. CHK2 seems to be dispensable for cyst breakdown and follicle formation.

C) Representative images of oocytes immunostained against the germ-cell marker DDX4 forming a cyst (A), two single oocytes (B) and a follicle (C). The DNA is counterstained with DAPI (blue). The scale bar represents 10 μm. (D) Number of oocytes classified in the three different types described above in wild-type and Chk2 mutant ovaries of the indicated ages. The lines represent the mean ± SEM. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). The colored significances correspond to the different groups shown in the legend. Data analyzed in this graph come from the same oocytes counted in Fig 2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g003

Chk2 mutation partially rescues the oocyte loss occurring in Spo11 mutants and prevents oocyte cyst breakdown

At the onset of meiotic prophase, SPO11 generates multiple DSBs that will drive meiotic recombination and homologous chromosome synapsis [13]. Thus, based upon our model, we expected that the massive perinatal oocyte loss occurring in Spo11 mutants would be independent of CHK2. To test this, the number of oocytes present in newborn ovaries from Spo11^-/- and Spo11^-/- Chk2^-/- mice was counted. Spo11^-/- ovaries presented approximately 25% of the number of oocytes found in Chk2^-/- mice of the same age (p<0.0001, T test, Fig 4, S4 Table). Significantly, Spo11^-/- Chk2^-/- ovaries contained twice as many oocytes as Spo11^-/- ovaries (p = 0.0118, T-test, S4 Table and S1 Data), suggesting that CHK2 was responsible for part of the oocyte death occurring in Spo11^-/- fetal ovaries. Spo11^-/- oocytes have been reported to contain DNA damage at pachynema [31]. Thus, CHK2 may be activated as a response to the presence of this DNA damage, and this may lead to the elimination of some of these oocytes, as previously reported [32]. Importantly, Spo11^-/- Chk2^-/- ovaries contained half the number of oocytes found in Chk2^-/- ovaries (p = 0.0022, T test). These results suggest that although CHK2 participates in Spo11^-/- oocyte elimination, CHK2-independent mechanisms are also responsible for part of the oocyte death occurring in Spo11^-/- fetal ovaries.

Download:

Fig 4. CHK2 rescues the number of oocytes in cyst in a Spo11 background.

(A-B) Representative images of 19.5 dpc Spo11^-/- (A) and Chk2^-/- Spo11^-/- (B) histological sections of ovaries immunostained against DDX4 and counterstained with DAPI. The scale bar represents 40 μm. (C) Number of oocytes in 19.5 dpc control (WT), Chk2^-/-, Spo11^-/- and Chk2^-/- Spo11^-/- ovaries. The horizontal lines represent the mean ± the SEM. The data for wild-type and Chk2^-/- samples were taken from Fig 2. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). Data were derived from at least two different animals per condition, and the number of ovaries counted per each genotype and condition is indicated below. (D) Number of oocytes classified in the three different types (cyst, single oocytes, and follicles) from 19.5 dpc control (WT), Chk2^-/-, Spo11^-/- and Chk2^-/- Spo11^-/- ovaries. The lines represent the mean ± SEM. The data for wild-type and Chk2^-/- samples were taken from Fig 3. **0.01<p<0.001 (Unpaired T-test). The colored significances correspond to the different groups shown in the legend. Data analyzed in this graph come from the same oocytes counted in C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g004

Interestingly, the ablation of CHK2 in Spo11-mutant mice selectively rescued oocytes in cysts (p = 0.0025, T-test; Fig 4D, S4 Table and S1 Data), suggesting that CHK2 activity is required for the cyst breakdown, at least in the absence of SPO11.

CHK1 function is required to eliminate oocytes in Chk2^-/- ovaries in vitro

Contrary to what our model predicted, the number of oocytes present in Chk2^-/- ovaries significantly declined after birth, suggesting the existence of an alternative mechanism eliminating oocytes with persistent DNA damage. DDR relies on the activation of two effector kinases, CHK1 and CHK2, to repair the DNA damage, arrest cell-cycle progression, and, if necessary, induce apoptosis [20]. So, we wondered if CHK1 was compensating for the loss of CHK2 and, hence, was responsible for the postnatal elimination of Chk2^-/- oocytes. To test this hypothesis, an organotypic culture was set up that allowed follicle formation in vitro (S2 Fig). With this, newborn Chk2^-/- ovarian samples were cultured in the presence of different concentrations of LY2603618, a specific CHK1 inhibitor (CHK1i) [33]. We observed no difference in the number of oocytes found in cultured ovaries under a low concentration of CHK1i (1 μM), as compared to the DMSO controls (p = 0.8815, T-testT test; Fig 5, S5 Table and S1 Data). However, the addition to the culture medium of 5μM LY2603618 resulted in an increased presence of oocytes after culture (p = 0.0473, T-test; Fig 5). These samples contained almost twice as many oocytes as did control ones. Moreover, they contained, on average, three times the proportion of oocytes in cysts, compared to controls (p = 0.0010; T test; Fig 5, S5 Table and S1 Data) and 40% less follicles than controls (p = 0.0001, T test). These differences can be attributed to reduced CHK1 activity since ovaries exposed to 5μM LY2603618 showed a reduced presence of the active form of CHK1 (phosphorylated S296-CHK1) in the cultured oocytes (S3 Fig). Thus, these data suggest that CHK1 eliminates Chk2^-/- oocytes after birth and helps to break down the oocyte cysts to form follicles.

Download:

Fig 5. The inhibition of CHK1 in vitro rescues the oocyte number in Chk2^-/- ovaries.

(A-B) Histological sections of Chk2^-/- DMSO-treated ovaries (A) and 5 μM LY2603618 (CHK1i)-treated ovaries (B) immunostained against DDX4 and counterstained with DAPI. The inserts show the detail of oocytes in cyst (left), single oocytes (center) and a follicle (right). The scale bar in the top image represents 40 μm and applies to both top images. The scale bar in the insert represents 20 μm and applies to all inserts. (C) Number of oocytes found in Chk2^-/- 19.5 dpc ovaries after five days of culture exposed to DMSO, or 1 μM, or 5 μM of CHK1i. The lines represent the mean ± the SEM. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). Data were derived from at least three different animals per condition, and the number of ovaries counted per each genotype and condition is indicated below. (D) Number of oocytes classified in the three different types (cyst, single oocytes, and follicles) for the same ovaries. The lines represent the mean ± SEM per each category. **0.01<p<0.001, (Unpaired T-test). The colored significances correspond to the different groups shown in the legend. Data analyzed in this graph come from the same oocytes counted in C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g005

Fetal oocyte death mediated by LINE-1 activation depends on CHK2

The activation of the transposable LINE-1 element triggers fetal oocyte death [11]. Since LINE-1 retrotransposition into the genome may cause DNA damage [34], we wondered if the fetal oocyte death caused by LINE-1 would depend on the activation of DDR. To test this, 11.5 dpc pregnant mice carrying either wild type or Chk2^-/- fetuses were treated for six days with Azidothymidine (AZT, which prevents LINE-1 activation) and fetal ovaries at 17.5 dpc were collected. AZT is a nucleoside analog that specifically inhibits the retrotranscriptase activity required for LINE-1 retrotransposition into the genome. When we tested the previously reported concentration (5mg/Kg, Malki et al., 2014) on wild-type mice, we were unable to observe an effect on the number of oocytes present in the AZT-treated ovaries (p = 0.1577, T-test; Fig 6, S6 Table and S1 Data). Nevertheless, when the dose was raised to 15 mg/kg, the AZT-treated wild-type ovaries contained significantly more oocytes than did water controls (p = 0.0090, T-test; Fig 6E, S6 Table and S1 Data). Interestingly, the treated wild-type ovaries had fewer oocytes than did Chk2^-/- mice treated with water (p = 0.0421, T-test), suggesting that the Chk2 mutation could rescue more oocytes than could AZT inhibition. When the effect of the AZT treatment on the Chk2 mutants was analyzed, we did not observe any difference in the number of oocytes recovered in the control or in the AZT-treated samples, at any of the doses used (p = 0.7218 and p = 0.7435, T-test; 5 mM and 15 mM, respectively). These data show that the decrease in the number of oocytes caused by the activation of LINE-1 during fetal development is dependent on CHK2. Also, treatment with AZT had no influence in cyst breakdown or follicle formation in either wild-type or Chk2 mutant samples (Fig 6F, S6 Table and S1 Data).

Download:

Fig 6. LINE-1 inhibition rescues the oocyte number in wild-type ovaries, but not in Chk2^-/- ovaries.

(A-D) Histological sections of control (WT) treated with water (A), AZT-inhibited control (B), Chk2^-/- treated with water (C) and AZT-inhibited Chk2^-/- (D) ovaries immunostained against DDX4 and counterstained with DAPI. The scale bar represents 40 μm and applies to all images. (E) Number of oocytes per ovary after five days of water or AZT treatment. The round symbols represent the mean, and the lines the SEM. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). Data were derived from at least two different animals per condition, and the number of ovaries counted per each genotype and condition is indicated below. (F) Number of oocytes classified in the three different types (cyst, single oocytes, and follicles) for the same ovaries. The lines represent the mean ± SEM per each category. *0.05<p<0.01, **0.01<p<0.001, ***p≤0.001 (Unpaired T-test). The colored significances correspond to the different groups shown in the legend. Data analyzed in this graph come from the same oocytes counted in E.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g006

Discussion

Mammalian female reproduction greatly depends on the ability of the oocytes to arrange themselves into follicles. To do so, oocytes need to disaggregate from the cysts and surround themselves with ovarian stromal cells. In this study, we have uncovered the critical role of DDR in controlling this process in mammals. Our data show that the oocytes that accumulate high levels of unrepaired DSBs at pachynema are eliminated by the CHK2-dependent DDR during fetal development (Fig 7). This mechanism is required to timely initiate folliculogenesis. Moreover, the existence of a CHK1-dependent mechanism eliminating Chk2 mutant oocytes, which promotes oocyte cyst breakdown and follicle formation, demonstrates the importance of DDR in regulating these early stages of mammalian oogenesis.

Download:

Fig 7. DDR controls the oocyte population around birth.

Model showing how DDR regulates the number of oocytes found in mouse ovaries around birth. At 15.5 dpc, oocytes are grouped in cysts and contain extensive DNA damage which can be caused by multiple origins, including SPO11 function and LINE-1 activation. Oocytes with more unrepaired DSBs are eliminated around 16.5 dpc by a CHK2-dependent mechanism. This mechanism helps cyst breakdown and oocyte individualization. After birth, a CHK1-dependent mechanism can eliminate oocytes that accumulate unrepaired DSBs. Ultimately, DDR is required to establish the follicle reserve in mice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.g007

Mammalian gametogenesis is sexually dimorphic in several aspects [25]. One of them is the apparently different efficiency in completing meiotic recombination of spermatocytes and oocytes [26,27]. While mammalian spermatocytes complete repair of most of their DSBs at pachynema, oocytes show multiple unrepaired DSBs at this stage [26]. Our findings suggest that the existence of these unrepaired DSBs is crucial to set the oocyte population during fetal development. Thus, DDR is at least partly responsible in determining the perinatal oocyte pool.

What is noteworthy is that our data show that this CHK2-mediated meiotic response to DNA damage can react to SPO11-originated DSBs as well as to other sources of DNA damage. It has been previously reported that Spo11^-/- oocytes present markers of DNA damage [31], and these can activate a CHK2-dependent oocyte elimination [32]. Our results confirm these findings, revealing that DDR is partly responsible for eliminating Spo11 mutant oocytes. However, the observed rescue in 1 dpp Spo11^-/- Chk2^-/- ovaries does not reach Chk2^-/- numbers, as one would expect if DDR activation was the only mechanism eliminating Spo11^-/- oocytes. In fact, our data show that DDR is not the main mechanism to eliminate Spo11^-/- oocytes during fetal development, since only ~35% of the oocytes are eliminated by a CHK2-dependent pathway. Thus, other mechanisms should account for the elimination of most of the Spo11 mutant fetal oocyte pool. Presumably, the response to the presence of unsynapsed chromosomes may be responsible for this cell death. At the end of meiotic prophase, unsynapsed chromosomes are silenced by the activation of a cascade of events involving several key proteins of DDR, such as ATR, MDC1 or H2AX, which ultimately leads to their silencing [35–38]. This mechanism, known as meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromosomes (MSUC), has been shown to be able to eliminate oocytes with asynaptic chromosomes [39]. Thus, it is plausible that most of the Spo11^-/- fetal oocytes are eliminated as a consequence of the MSUC mechanism. This finding demonstrates the existence of different surveillance mechanisms that monitor meiotic prophase progression which are activated by different events, such as asynapsis or the presence of recombination intermediates [15]. Nevertheless, the fact that part of the signaling machinery that participates in the response to synapsis and recombination defects is shared by both pathways (such as, ATR [22,24,40]) makes the study of these mechanisms very complex. Based on the dispensability of CHK2 to eliminate the majority of Spo11 mutant fetal oocytes, one could think that DDR is not required to activate the mechanism that responds to asynapsis. However, our finding that CHK1 may compensate for the loss of CHK2 urges us to analyze the involvement of CHK1 in the elimination of Spo11 mutant oocytes.

Recent papers have studied the downstream effectors of DDR in controlling the oocyte population. Canonically, active CHK1 and CHK2 promote the activation of the p53 family members (p53 and p63), which in turn can induce apoptosis by expressing intrinsic apoptosis pathway components (such as Puma, Noxa, Bax). Surprisingly, the ablation of p53 and p63 leads to the complete rescue of the number of oocytes present in recombination-deficient mutants (e.g., Trip13^gt/gt) as well as synapsis-deficient mutants (Spo11^-/-)[41]. Thus, these data suggest that defects in synapsis and recombination activate p53 and p63, which could imply the existence of a common mechanism to control cell-cycle progression in response to these defects. However, a recent publication has shown that the combined ablation of PUMA and NOXA can only rescue the number of oocytes in recombination-deficient mutants, suggesting the existence of genetically separate signaling pathways controlling the oocyte pool in mammals [42]. Altogether, these two recent reports only show the need to investigate the mechanisms that control the mammalian oocyte pool to understand how recombination and synapsis errors in the oocytes are sensed, signaled and responded to.

Apart from synaptic and recombination defects, the activation of the LINE-1 retrotransposon can also trigger fetal oocyte death [12]. During germ-cell development, LINE-1 is derepressed as a consequence of the erasing of the genome methylation marks to initiate the epigenetic reprogramming of the future egg. Restoration of DNA methylation will not take place after birth. Thus, meiotic prophase oocytes suffer from a high expression of LINE-1 [11]. This rise in LINE-1 activation is associated with the loss of approximately 50% of the oocytes, occurring between embryonic days 15.5 and 17.5. To date, it is not clear if this rise in LINE-1 activation results in increased insertions of LINE-1 in the oocyte genome. And, in the same way, it is also not clear what mechanism is associating LINE-1 activation to oocyte death [12]. Since LINE-1 incorporation into the genome may cause DNA damage and the inhibition of LINE-1 activity by AZT was reported to cause an oocyte rescue similar to the one we observed in Chk2 mutants [11,12], we investigated whether CHK2 was required for the oocyte loss caused by LINE-1 activity. We found problems recapitulating the previously published results [11], and had to triplicate the dose of AZT administered to our wild-type mice to observe a rescue of oocytes. Recently, a correction of the original paper was made stating the actual dose used for the AZT treatment (50mg/ml) [43], which was more than twice the one we used. Importantly, this explains why the rescue was not complete, as was previously reported. Nonetheless, it showed that LINE-1 activation was responsible for at least part of the fetal oocyte death that occurs in wild-type mice. However, AZT treatment had no effect on Chk2-mutant mice, suggesting that the oocyte death originated by LINE-1 was also dependent on CHK2. We do not think this is related to the low AZT concentration used because a recent report has shown that exposition to 50 mg/ml of AZT to Chk2^-/- fetal oocytes has no effect on the number of oocytes found at 17.5 dpc [44]. Based upon these data, we propose that the mechanism behind LINE-1-induced fetal oocyte death, at least up to 17.5 dpc, is the formation of DNA damage, which ultimately leads to the activation of CHK2 and the elimination of fetal oocytes.

Our data also reveal the unexpected involvement of CHK1 in the elimination of oocytes with persistent DNA damage. The study of the function of CHK1 during meiotic prophase has been challenging because CHK1 is required to allow embryo development in mammals [45]. Furthermore, the use of conditional mutants has shown that CHK1 is also required for germ-cell proliferation [23]. Our in vitro approach allowed us to show that CHK1 activity, in either the oocytes and/or the somatic cells of the ovary, is able to compensate for the loss of CHK2. This finding explains why the number of oocytes found in 4 dpp Chk2^-/- ovaries is the same as those in wild-type ovaries. The fact that Chk2 mutants have twice the number of oocytes as do controls at 17.5 dpc suggests that CHK1 activation is delayed, as compared to CHK2. Consistent with this idea, we found that Chk2^-/- early-pachytene oocytes had more unrepaired DSBs than did wild-type oocytes, suggesting that CHK1 may not be active at early-pachynema. Nonetheless, the differences between the two genotypes disappeared as cells completed meiotic prophase, so that late-diplotene wild-type and Chk2 mutant oocytes presented the same number of unrepaired DSBs. Interestingly, we did not see a significant change in the oocyte population of control mice from 19.5 dpc to 22.5 dpc. To us, this suggests that the CHK1-dependent perinatal loss of oocytes is negligible in CHK2-proficient mice. Agreeing with this hypothesis, a recent study reports that CHK1 is not activated in perinatal ovaries from wild-type mice [41].

These findings open the possibility that CHK2 and CHK1 may be differentially regulated during meiotic prophase. In fact, sensitivity to DNA damage differs significantly from early-prophase to dictyate-arrested oocytes. While leptotene oocytes endure hundreds of DSBs, dictyate oocytes are very sensitive to DNA damage [27,46]. This is partly accomplished by regulating the activity of TAp63α, a key protein of DDR in oocytes [47]. p63 is required to eliminate dictyate-arrested oocytes weakly irradiated (0.3 Gy [46]). However, p63 is not expressed until oocytes reach mid-meiotic prophase (17 dpc onwards) and its function is actively inhibited [47], suggesting that p63 activity might be deleterious for meiotic prophase oocytes. Thus, it is plausible that different pathways of DDR are selectively regulated during oogenesis in order to first allow meiotic DSB formation and repair to promote homolog synapsis and crossover formation. Once this is accomplished, DDR may activate alternative, or supplementary, pathways to achieve a greater sensitivity to DNA lesions, in order to assure only high-quality oocytes can pass their genetic information on to the next generation. Thus, we propose CHK2 may participate in the surveillance mechanisms that control the progression of DSB repair until mid-pachynema. This mechanism is responsible for the elimination of approximately 50% of the oocytes during fetal oogenesis. Once this meiotic surveillance mechanism is met, an alternative or supplementary CHK1-dependent pathway may become active to ensure the genetic integrity of the remaining oocytes. This model would explain why CHK1 cannot compensate for the loss of CHK2 during fetal development but can do it later on, once the oocytes may have reached a particular stage (late-pachynema, diplonema and/or dictyate).

The perinatal massive oocyte death that naturally occurs in mouse oogenesis has been historically associated with cyst breakdown [9,10,48]. Germ cells, before differentiating into oocytes, go through several mitotic divisions in which cytokinesis is not completed, thus resulting in a syncitium of cells, the cysts, which will initiate meiosis. At the end of the meiotic prophase, these cysts need to be disassembled so single oocytes can be surrounded by stromal ovarian cells to form follicles. The significance of proper cyst breakdown is manifested in mutants that fail to individualize oocytes, which are infertile due to the formation of follicles containing multiple oocytes [49]. Our model predicted that, at least in part, fetal oocyte loss would facilitate cyst breakdown. So, we expected that, in mutants that fail to activate DDR, cyst breakdown and follicle formation would be altered.

Our data suggest that in our colony less than 45% of the oocytes of 15.5 dpc mice are forming cysts. However, this seems unlikely since cyst breakdown should not start until 17.5 dpc [10]. Nonetheless, some reports show the existence of cyst fragmentation during fetal development that may result in the individualization of oocytes before 17.5 dpc [50]. Notwithstanding, this event seems to be rare during fetal development. Previous studies have shown that less than 7% of the oocytes were individualized at 17.5 dpc, and this figure only reaches 20% by birth [50]. Thus, it is more likely that our data reflect that the approach we used for this analysis is unable to detect all oocytes in cysts. This is not unlikely, especially because of the two-dimensional analysis that we have performed, we were only able to determine whether one oocyte was in a cyst if its sister cells were on the same focal plane. Thus, all oocytes in a cyst in which their sister cells were located in different focal planes may have been scored as individual oocytes. This will ultimately cause an overrepresentation of this category in our dataset.

Taking this caveat into consideration, to address if DDR is required to breakdown cysts and if this had an effect on follicle formation, firstly we will focus our analysis in follicle formation. The analysis of the Chk2^-/- ovaries shows that CHK2 is required to timely initiate follicle formation at 17.5 dpc, but it seems dispensable for cyst breakdown and follicle formation from that time onwards, since the number and proportion of follicles formed in Chk2 mutants are indistinguishable to those found in control samples. Interestingly, inhibition of the CHK1 function in Chk2 mutant ovaries reduced the proportion of follicles formed in vitro (S5 Table and S1 Data). Furthermore, these samples contained more oocytes in cysts, suggesting that DDR was required for cyst breakdown. In our opinion, these data point out the importance of a functional DDR for the proper timing of follicle formation. Moreover, it suggests that DDR-dependent oocyte elimination may participate in cyst breakdown and follicle formation. In this sense, in Spo11^-/- ovaries, Chk2 mutation preferentially rescues the number of oocytes in cysts, supporting the idea that DDR impacts cyst breakdown, and consequently follicle formation.

Altogether, our data highlight the importance of DDR in regulating the follicle reserve in the females. First, during fetal development regulating the number of fetal oocytes using a CHK2-dependent response, and postnatally activating a CHK1-dependent response. The oocyte loss caused by these two mechanisms promotes cyst breakdown, facilitating follicle formation and, thus, regulating the reserve of oocytes that mammalian females will use during their entire reproductive lifespan.

Material and methods

Animals and genotyping

Chk2 and Spo11 mutant mice were generated previously [13,30]. These alleles were maintained in a C57BL6-129Sv mixed background. All experiments were performed using at least two mutant animals and compared with control littermates or with animals of closely related parents. The term wild-type (WT) in the text and figures refers to both homozygous and heterozygous mice. All animals were sacrificed using CO₂ or decapitation methods following the CEEAAH 1091 protocol (DAAM6395) approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and the Catalan Government.

Mouse genotyping was performed by PCR analysis from the DNA extracted from the tails as previously performed [17,18,22].

Harvesting of the ovaries

Ovarian samples were obtained from females at different ages from 15.5 dpc to 22.5 dpc. The presence of a vaginal plug was used to determine the age of the mice. Females were caged overnight with males and if the vaginal plug was found next morning the female was isolated and defined as 0.5 dpc. To obtain 15.5 dpc and 17.5 dpc ovaries, pregnant females were sacrificed and the fetuses were removed, rinsed in PBS and ovaries were harvested under a stereo microscope (Nikon SMZ-1). Since, in our mouse colony, deliveries always occurred at 19 dpc, neonatal ovaries from 1 dpp to 4 dpp correspond to 19.5 dpc to 22.5 dpc. In other publications, 19.5dpc can also be considered as P0 and 22.5dpc as P3.

Histology, immunolabeling and oocyte quantification

Harvested perinatal ovaries (from 15.5 dpc to 22.5 dpc) were immediately fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Samples were then dehydrated, cleared and embedded in paraffin using standard procedures. The whole ovary was sectioned at a thickness of 7 μm and a half ovary (every other section) was processed for immunostaining as follows: the sections were deparaffinized and antigen was unmasked by treating the slides for 20 minutes in Sodium Citrate buffer (10 mM Sodium Citrate, 0.05% Tween 20 in Milli-Q water, pH 6.0) at 95°C-100°C. Standard immunofluorescence was then performed using rabbit anti-DDX4 (Abcam) at 1:100 dilution or rabbit anti-Phospho-Chk1 (Ser296) (ThermoFisher) at 1:100 dillution and a mouse monoclonal antibody against p63 (Abcam) at 1:100 dillution. Slides were counterstained with DAPI.

Oocytes were manually counted and classified under the fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axipohot) with the 63x magnification. Classification of the analyzed oocytes was done as follows: oocytes in cyst (sharing the cytoplasm, Fig 3A), single oocytes (individual oocytes showing clear cytoplasmic limits, Fig 3B) and oocytes in follicles (oocytes surrounded by one layer of flat granulosa cells, Fig 3C). Only DDX4-positive oocytes with a visible nucleus stained with DAPI were considered for the analysis.

Surface oocyte spreads and immunolabeling

Isolated ovaries from 17.5 and 19.5 dpc mice were placed in a 24-well plate with M2 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) and digested in collagenase dissolved in M2 medium for 20 minutes at 37°C. Then, the ovaries were transferred to hypotonic buffer (30 mM Tris-HCl pH = 8.2, 50 mM Sucrose, 17 mM Sodium Citrate, 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT [Roche Diagnostics], 1x Protease Inhibitor Cocktail [Roche Diagnostics] in Milli-Q water) and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. The oocytes were released from the ovary by pipetting up and down in 100 mM sucrose and transferred onto slides with fixative (1% PFA, 5 mM Sodium Borate, 0.15% Triton X-100, 3 mM DTT, 1x Protease Inhibitor Cocktail in Milli-Q water, pH = 9.2) in a humid chamber. After two hours of fixation, slides were air-dried, washed with 0.4% Photoflo (Kodak), air-dried again and stored at -80°C until use.

Immunostaining was performed using standard methods [26] with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-SYCP3 (Abcam) at 1:200 dilution and mouse anti-γH2AX (Millipore) 1:200 dilution.

Neonatal ovarian organ culture

Neonatal mouse ovaries were harvested and cultured, as previously reported [51]. Briefly, ovaries were placed in prewarmed dissection media (Leibowitz L15 [Sigma-Aldrich] with 3mg/mL of BSA) and, under the stereomicroscope, they were trimmed with forceps, eliminating the remains of the bursal sac, the oviduct, and the uterus. Ovaries were transferred to UV- sterilized polycarbonate membrane (Whatman) sitting on a 24-well plate containing prewarmed culture media (α-Minimum Essential Medium (Thermofisher) with 3mg/mL of BSA). The samples were treated with 1 μM or 5 μM of the CHK1 inhibitor LY2603618 (Selleckchem), dissolved in DMSO. Control samples were treated with equivalent volumes of DMSO. All ovaries were cultured in an incubator at 37°C supplied with 5% CO₂ for five days. After this time, ovaries were processed as previously mentioned to obtain ovarian sections.

AZT treatment

To inhibit LINE-1 activity, 5mg/kg/day and 15 mg/kg/day AZT (Sigma Aldrich) were administered to wild-type and Chk2^-/- pregnant mice from 11.5 dpc until 17.5 dpc by gavage, as described elsewhere [11]. At 17.5 dpc, pregnant mice were sacrificed and fetal ovaries were harvested and processed as mentioned above to obtain ovarian sections.

Image processing and data analysis

Microscopy analysis was performed with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope. Images were captured with a Point Gray Research, Inc. camera with the ACO XY Software (A. COLOMA Open microscopy).

All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CC to overlay the different fluorescent channels and match the intensity observed in the microscope. The software Image Composite Editor (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/product/computational-photography-applications/image-composite-editor/) was used to stitch the composite panoramic images of the sections.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis and statistical inference were performed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software (https://www.graphpad.com/scientific-software/prism/).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Meiotic prophase progression is faster in the absence of CHK2.

Representative oocytes at leptotene, zygotene, pachytene and diplotene stained against the axial element protein SYCP3 (green). The scale bars represents 10 μm. Percentage of oocytes found in each meiotic prophase stage in control (WT, N = 2) and Chk2 mutant ovaries (N = 2) from 17.5 and 19.5 dpc mice is shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The organotypic culture allows folliculogenesis initiation in vitro.

(A) Number of oocytes classified in the three different types (cyst, single oocytes, and follicles) for control ovaries cultured for different number of days. After five days of culture, the ovaries present the same percentage of follicles as the 21.5 dpc ovaries (3 dpp). (B) Histological section of a control ovary after five days of culture, immunostained against DDX4 and counterstained with DAPI. The scale bar represents 40 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s002

(JPG)

S3 Fig. Exposure to 5μM LY2603618 causes a reduction of the active form of CHK1 in cultured oocytes.

(A-D) Representative images of Chk2 mutant ovaries cultured in the presence of DMSO (A-B) or 5μM LY2603618 (C-D) stained against the oocyte marker, p63, and the phosphorylated Ser296-CHK1 (pCHK1). Panels B and D show the pCHK1 signal from images displayed in Panels A and C, respectively. Notice how the intensity of the signal from DMSO-treated samples is significantly stronger than the one present in CHKi-treated samples. Also, a few discrete foci can be observed in the nucleus of DMSO-treated oocytes that appear to be absent from CHK1i-treated oocytes. (E) Quantification of the intensity of the pCHK1 signal present in the nucleus of DMSO- and CHK1i-treated oocytes. Cells were obtained from three mice per each condition. N denotes the number of oocytes counted and the p value is the significance of the T-test analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s003

(TIF)

S1 Data. The file containing the detailed statistics for all comparisons performed in this manuscript.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s004

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Number of γH2AX patches per oocyte at pachynema and diplonema from wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s005

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Oocyte number on the different perinatal days from wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s006

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found on the wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries analyzed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s007

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found at 19.5 dpc ovaries from the different indicated genotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s008

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of Chk2^-/- oocytes found after culture at the indicated conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s009

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found at 17.5 dpc after AZT treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009067.s010

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Attila Toth, Scott Keeney, Vera Rinaldi, Ewelina Bolcun-Filas, Miguel Ángel Brieño-Enriquez and Judith Yanowitz for discussions and sharing unpublished information. We also thank members of the SCAC for technical advice in setting up the ovarian culture technique.

References

1. Molyneaux KA, Stallock J, Schaible K, Wylie C. Time-Lapse Analysis of Living Mouse Germ Cell Migration. Dev Biol. 2001;240: 488–498. pmid:11784078
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. McLaren A. Meiosis and differentiation of mouse germ cells. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38: 7–23. pmid:6400220
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Pepling ME, Spradling AC. Female mouse germ cells form synchronously dividing cysts. Development. 1998;125: 3323–8. pmid:9693136
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Tam PP, Snow MH. Proliferation and migration of primordial germ cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981;64: 133–47. pmid:7310300
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Borum K. Oogenesis in the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1961;24: 495–507. pmid:13871511
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Hirshfield AN. Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;124: 43–101. pmid:2001918
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Klinger FG, Rossi V, De Felici M. Multifaceted programmed cell death in the mammalian fetal ovary. Int J Dev Biol. 2015;59: 51–54. pmid:26374525
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Baker TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 1963;158: 417–433. pmid:14070052
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Pepling ME. Follicular assembly: mechanisms of action. REPRODUCTION. 2012;143: 139–149. pmid:22065859
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Pepling ME, Spradling AC. Mouse ovarian germ cell cysts undergo programmed breakdown to form primordial follicles. Dev Biol. 2001;234: 339–351. pmid:11397004
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Malki S, van der Heijden GW, O’Donnell KA, Martin SL, Bortvin A. A Role for Retrotransposon LINE-1 in Fetal Oocyte Attrition in Mice. Dev Cell. 2014;29: 521–533. pmid:24882376
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Hunter N. Oocyte Quality Control: Causes, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2017;82: 235–247. pmid:29743337
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell. 2000;6: 989–998. pmid:11106739
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Subramanian V V, Hochwagen A. The Meiotic Checkpoint Network: Step-by-Step through Meiotic Prophase. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6. pmid:25274702
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, Jasin M. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 737–742. pmid:15640358
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, Burgoyne PS, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25: 7203–7215. pmid:16055729
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Pacheco S, Marcet-Ortega M, Lange J, Jasin M, Keeney S, Roig I. The ATM Signaling Cascade Promotes Recombination-Dependent Pachytene Arrest in Mouse Spermatocytes. Lichten M, editor. PLOS Genet. 2015;11: e1005017. pmid:25768017
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Marcet-Ortega M, Pacheco S, Martínez-Marchal A, Castillo H, Flores E, Jasin M, et al. p53 and TAp63 participate in the recombination-dependent pachytene arrest in mouse spermatocytes. Cohen PE, editor. PLoS Genet. 2017;13: e1006845. pmid:28617799
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Bolcun-Filas E, Rinaldi VD, White ME, Schimenti JC. Reversal of Female Infertility by Chk2 Ablation Reveals the Oocyte DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway. Science (80-). 2014;343: 533–536. pmid:24482479
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Stracker TH, Usui T, Petrini JHJ. Taking the time to make important decisions: the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2009;8: 1047–1054. pmid:19473886
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, De Rooij DGG, Keeney S, Jasin M. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008;4: e1000076. pmid:18497861
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Pacheco S, Maldonado-Linares A, Marcet-Ortega M, Rojas C, Martínez-Marchal A, Fuentes-Lazaro J, et al. ATR is required to complete meiotic recombination in mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2622. pmid:29977027
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Abe H, Alavattam KG, Kato Y, Castrillon DH, Pang Q, Andreassen PR, et al. CHEK1 coordinates DNA damage signaling and meiotic progression in the male germline of mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27: 1136–1149. pmid:29360988
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Widger A, Mahadevaiah SK, Lange J, ElInati E, Zohren J, Hirota T, et al. ATR is a multifunctional regulator of male mouse meiosis. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2621. pmid:29976923
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Morelli MA, Cohen PE. Not all germ cells are created equal: aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis. Reproduction. 2005;130: 761–781. pmid:16322537
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Roig I, Liebe B, Egozcue J, Cabero L, Garcia M, Scherthan H. Female-specific features of recombinational double-stranded DNA repair in relation to synapsis and telomere dynamics in human oocytes. Chromosoma. 2004;113: 22–33. pmid:15235794
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Lenzi ML, Smith J, Snowden T, Kim M, Fishel R, Poulos BK, et al. Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis I in human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76: 112–127. pmid:15558497
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Pacheco S, Maldonado-Linares A, Garcia-Caldés M, Roig I. ATR function is indispensable to allow proper mammalian follicle development. Chromosoma. 2019;128:489–500 pmid:31489491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Qiao H, Rao HBDP, Yun Y, Sandhu S, Fong JH, Sapre M, et al. Impeding DNA Break Repair Enables Oocyte Quality Control. Mol Cell. 2018;72: 211–221.e3. pmid:30270110
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Takai H, Naka K, Okada Y, Watanabe M, Harada N, Saito S, et al. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription. EMBO J. 2002;21: 5195–5205. pmid:12356735
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Carofiglio F, Inagaki A, de Vries S, Wassenaar E, Schoenmakers S, Vermeulen C, et al. SPO11-Independent DNA Repair Foci and Their Role in Meiotic Silencing. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003538. pmid:23754961
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Rinaldi VD, Bolcun-Filas E, Kogo H, Kurahashi H, Schimenti JC. The DNA Damage Checkpoint Eliminates Mouse Oocytes with Chromosome Synapsis Failure. Mol Cell. 2017;67: 1026–1036.e2. pmid:28844861
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Dai Y, Grant S. New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16: 376–83. pmid:20068082
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Belgnaoui SM, Gosden RG, Semmes OJ, Haoudi A. Human LINE-1 retrotransposon induces DNA damage and apoptosis in cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2006;6: 13. pmid:16670018
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc’his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, Burgoyne PS. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182: 263–276. pmid:18663141
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, Deng CX, et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2005;37: 41–47. pmid:15580272
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Ichijima Y, Sin H-S, Namekawa SH. Sex chromosome inactivation in germ cells: emerging roles of DNA damage response pathways. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 2559–2572. pmid:22382926
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Ichijima Y, Ichijima M, Lou Z, Nussenzweig A, Camerini-Otero RD, Chen J, et al. MDC1 directs chromosome-wide silencing of the sex chromosomes in male germ cells. Genes Dev. 2011;25: 959–71. pmid:21536735
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Cloutier JM, Mahadevaiah SK, ElInati E, Nussenzweig A, Tóth A, Turner JMA. Histone H2AFX Links Meiotic Chromosome Asynapsis to Prophase I Oocyte Loss in Mammals. PLoS Genet. 2015;11: e1005462. pmid:26509888
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Royo H, Prosser H, Ruzankina Y, Mahadevaiah SK, Cloutier JM, Baumann M, et al. ATR acts stage specifically to regulate multiple aspects of mammalian meiotic silencing. Genes Dev. 2013;27: 1484–1494. pmid:23824539
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Rinaldi VD, Bloom JC, Schimenti JC. Oocyte Elimination Through DNA Damage Signaling from CHK1/CHK2 to p53 and p63. Genetics. 2020;215: 373–378. pmid:32273296
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. ElInati E, Zielinska AP, McCarthy A, Kubikova N, Maciulyte V, Mahadevaiah S, et al. The BCL-2 pathway preserves mammalian genome integrity by eliminating recombination-defective oocytes. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 2598. pmid:32451402
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Malki S, van der Heijden GW, O’Donnell KA, Martin SL, Bortvin A. A Role for Retrotransposon LINE-1 in Fetal Oocyte Attrition in Mice. Dev Cell. 2019;51: 658. pmid:31794719
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Tharp ME, Malki S, Bortvin A. Maximizing the ovarian reserve in mice by evading LINE-1 genotoxicity. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 330. pmid:31949138
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2000;14: 1448–1459. pmid:10859164
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Suh EK, Yang A, Kettenbach A, Bamberger C, Michaelis AH, Zhu Z, et al. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature. 2006;444: 624–628. pmid:17122775
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Kim D-A, Suh E-K. Defying DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Death during Prophase I Meiosis by Temporal TAp63 Phosphorylation Regulation in Developing Mouse Oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34: 1460–1473. pmid:24515437
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Pepling ME. From primordial germ cell to primordial follicle: mammalian female germ cell development. Genes (New York, NY 2000). 2006;44: 622–632. pmid:17146778
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Xu J, Gridley T. Notch2 is required in somatic cells for breakdown of ovarian germ-cell nests and formation of primordial follicles. BMC Biol. 2013;11: 13. pmid:23406467
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Lei L, Spradling AC. Mouse primordial germ cells produce cysts that partially fragment prior to meiosis. Development. 2013;140: 2075–81. pmid:23578925
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Morgan S, Campbell L, Allison V, Murray A, Spears N. Culture and co-culture of mouse ovaries and ovarian follicles. J Vis Exp. 2015; 17:52458. pmid:25867892
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Molyneaux KA, Stallock J, Schaible K, Wylie C. Time-Lapse Analysis of Living Mouse Germ Cell Migration. Dev Biol. 2001;240: 488–498. pmid:11784078
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. McLaren A. Meiosis and differentiation of mouse germ cells. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1984;38: 7–23. pmid:6400220
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Pepling ME, Spradling AC. Female mouse germ cells form synchronously dividing cysts. Development. 1998;125: 3323–8. pmid:9693136
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Tam PP, Snow MH. Proliferation and migration of primordial germ cells during compensatory growth in mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1981;64: 133–47. pmid:7310300
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Borum K. Oogenesis in the mouse. Exp Cell Res. 1961;24: 495–507. pmid:13871511
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Hirshfield AN. Development of follicles in the mammalian ovary. Int Rev Cytol. 1991;124: 43–101. pmid:2001918
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Klinger FG, Rossi V, De Felici M. Multifaceted programmed cell death in the mammalian fetal ovary. Int J Dev Biol. 2015;59: 51–54. pmid:26374525
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Baker TG. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proc R Soc Lond Biol. 1963;158: 417–433. pmid:14070052
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Pepling ME. Follicular assembly: mechanisms of action. REPRODUCTION. 2012;143: 139–149. pmid:22065859
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Pepling ME, Spradling AC. Mouse ovarian germ cell cysts undergo programmed breakdown to form primordial follicles. Dev Biol. 2001;234: 339–351. pmid:11397004
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Malki S, van der Heijden GW, O’Donnell KA, Martin SL, Bortvin A. A Role for Retrotransposon LINE-1 in Fetal Oocyte Attrition in Mice. Dev Cell. 2014;29: 521–533. pmid:24882376
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Hunter N. Oocyte Quality Control: Causes, Mechanisms, and Consequences. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2017;82: 235–247. pmid:29743337
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol Cell. 2000;6: 989–998. pmid:11106739
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] PubMed/NCBI

[52] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Subramanian V V, Hochwagen A. The Meiotic Checkpoint Network: Step-by-Step through Meiotic Prophase. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6. pmid:25274702
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[54] View Article

[55] PubMed/NCBI

[56] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Di Giacomo M, Barchi M, Baudat F, Edelmann W, Keeney S, Jasin M. Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102: 737–742. pmid:15640358
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, Baudat F, de Rooij DG, Burgoyne PS, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25: 7203–7215. pmid:16055729
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Pacheco S, Marcet-Ortega M, Lange J, Jasin M, Keeney S, Roig I. The ATM Signaling Cascade Promotes Recombination-Dependent Pachytene Arrest in Mouse Spermatocytes. Lichten M, editor. PLOS Genet. 2015;11: e1005017. pmid:25768017
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] PubMed/NCBI

[68] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Marcet-Ortega M, Pacheco S, Martínez-Marchal A, Castillo H, Flores E, Jasin M, et al. p53 and TAp63 participate in the recombination-dependent pachytene arrest in mouse spermatocytes. Cohen PE, editor. PLoS Genet. 2017;13: e1006845. pmid:28617799
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Bolcun-Filas E, Rinaldi VD, White ME, Schimenti JC. Reversal of Female Infertility by Chk2 Ablation Reveals the Oocyte DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathway. Science (80-). 2014;343: 533–536. pmid:24482479
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Stracker TH, Usui T, Petrini JHJ. Taking the time to make important decisions: the checkpoint effector kinases Chk1 and Chk2 and the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (Amst). 2009;8: 1047–1054. pmid:19473886
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Barchi M, Roig I, Di Giacomo M, De Rooij DGG, Keeney S, Jasin M. ATM promotes the obligate XY crossover and both crossover control and chromosome axis integrity on autosomes. PLoS Genet. 2008;4: e1000076. pmid:18497861
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Pacheco S, Maldonado-Linares A, Marcet-Ortega M, Rojas C, Martínez-Marchal A, Fuentes-Lazaro J, et al. ATR is required to complete meiotic recombination in mice. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2622. pmid:29977027
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] PubMed/NCBI

[88] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Abe H, Alavattam KG, Kato Y, Castrillon DH, Pang Q, Andreassen PR, et al. CHEK1 coordinates DNA damage signaling and meiotic progression in the male germline of mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27: 1136–1149. pmid:29360988
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[90] View Article

[91] PubMed/NCBI

[92] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Widger A, Mahadevaiah SK, Lange J, ElInati E, Zohren J, Hirota T, et al. ATR is a multifunctional regulator of male mouse meiosis. Nat Commun. 2018;9: 2621. pmid:29976923
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Morelli MA, Cohen PE. Not all germ cells are created equal: aspects of sexual dimorphism in mammalian meiosis. Reproduction. 2005;130: 761–781. pmid:16322537
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Roig I, Liebe B, Egozcue J, Cabero L, Garcia M, Scherthan H. Female-specific features of recombinational double-stranded DNA repair in relation to synapsis and telomere dynamics in human oocytes. Chromosoma. 2004;113: 22–33. pmid:15235794
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Lenzi ML, Smith J, Snowden T, Kim M, Fishel R, Poulos BK, et al. Extreme heterogeneity in the molecular events leading to the establishment of chiasmata during meiosis I in human oocytes. Am J Hum Genet. 2005;76: 112–127. pmid:15558497
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Pacheco S, Maldonado-Linares A, Garcia-Caldés M, Roig I. ATR function is indispensable to allow proper mammalian follicle development. Chromosoma. 2019;128:489–500 pmid:31489491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Qiao H, Rao HBDP, Yun Y, Sandhu S, Fong JH, Sapre M, et al. Impeding DNA Break Repair Enables Oocyte Quality Control. Mol Cell. 2018;72: 211–221.e3. pmid:30270110
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Takai H, Naka K, Okada Y, Watanabe M, Harada N, Saito S, et al. Chk2-deficient mice exhibit radioresistance and defective p53-mediated transcription. EMBO J. 2002;21: 5195–5205. pmid:12356735
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Carofiglio F, Inagaki A, de Vries S, Wassenaar E, Schoenmakers S, Vermeulen C, et al. SPO11-Independent DNA Repair Foci and Their Role in Meiotic Silencing. PLoS Genet. 2013;9: e1003538. pmid:23754961
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Rinaldi VD, Bolcun-Filas E, Kogo H, Kurahashi H, Schimenti JC. The DNA Damage Checkpoint Eliminates Mouse Oocytes with Chromosome Synapsis Failure. Mol Cell. 2017;67: 1026–1036.e2. pmid:28844861
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Dai Y, Grant S. New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16: 376–83. pmid:20068082
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Belgnaoui SM, Gosden RG, Semmes OJ, Haoudi A. Human LINE-1 retrotransposon induces DNA damage and apoptosis in cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2006;6: 13. pmid:16670018
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Mahadevaiah SK, Bourc’his D, de Rooij DG, Bestor TH, Turner JM, Burgoyne PS. Extensive meiotic asynapsis in mice antagonises meiotic silencing of unsynapsed chromatin and consequently disrupts meiotic sex chromosome inactivation. J Cell Biol. 2008;182: 263–276. pmid:18663141
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Turner JM, Mahadevaiah SK, Fernandez-Capetillo O, Nussenzweig A, Xu X, Deng CX, et al. Silencing of unsynapsed meiotic chromosomes in the mouse. Nat Genet. 2005;37: 41–47. pmid:15580272
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Ichijima Y, Sin H-S, Namekawa SH. Sex chromosome inactivation in germ cells: emerging roles of DNA damage response pathways. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69: 2559–2572. pmid:22382926
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Ichijima Y, Ichijima M, Lou Z, Nussenzweig A, Camerini-Otero RD, Chen J, et al. MDC1 directs chromosome-wide silencing of the sex chromosomes in male germ cells. Genes Dev. 2011;25: 959–71. pmid:21536735
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Cloutier JM, Mahadevaiah SK, ElInati E, Nussenzweig A, Tóth A, Turner JMA. Histone H2AFX Links Meiotic Chromosome Asynapsis to Prophase I Oocyte Loss in Mammals. PLoS Genet. 2015;11: e1005462. pmid:26509888
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Royo H, Prosser H, Ruzankina Y, Mahadevaiah SK, Cloutier JM, Baumann M, et al. ATR acts stage specifically to regulate multiple aspects of mammalian meiotic silencing. Genes Dev. 2013;27: 1484–1494. pmid:23824539
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Rinaldi VD, Bloom JC, Schimenti JC. Oocyte Elimination Through DNA Damage Signaling from CHK1/CHK2 to p53 and p63. Genetics. 2020;215: 373–378. pmid:32273296
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. ElInati E, Zielinska AP, McCarthy A, Kubikova N, Maciulyte V, Mahadevaiah S, et al. The BCL-2 pathway preserves mammalian genome integrity by eliminating recombination-defective oocytes. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 2598. pmid:32451402
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Malki S, van der Heijden GW, O’Donnell KA, Martin SL, Bortvin A. A Role for Retrotransposon LINE-1 in Fetal Oocyte Attrition in Mice. Dev Cell. 2019;51: 658. pmid:31794719
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Tharp ME, Malki S, Bortvin A. Maximizing the ovarian reserve in mice by evading LINE-1 genotoxicity. Nat Commun. 2020;11: 330. pmid:31949138
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Liu Q, Guntuku S, Cui XS, Matsuoka S, Cortez D, Tamai K, et al. Chk1 is an essential kinase that is regulated by Atr and required for the G(2)/M DNA damage checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2000;14: 1448–1459. pmid:10859164
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Suh EK, Yang A, Kettenbach A, Bamberger C, Michaelis AH, Zhu Z, et al. p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature. 2006;444: 624–628. pmid:17122775
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Kim D-A, Suh E-K. Defying DNA Double-Strand Break-Induced Death during Prophase I Meiosis by Temporal TAp63 Phosphorylation Regulation in Developing Mouse Oocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34: 1460–1473. pmid:24515437
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] PubMed/NCBI

[188] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Pepling ME. From primordial germ cell to primordial follicle: mammalian female germ cell development. Genes (New York, NY 2000). 2006;44: 622–632. pmid:17146778
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[190] View Article

[191] PubMed/NCBI

[192] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Xu J, Gridley T. Notch2 is required in somatic cells for breakdown of ovarian germ-cell nests and formation of primordial follicles. BMC Biol. 2013;11: 13. pmid:23406467
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[194] View Article

[195] PubMed/NCBI

[196] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Lei L, Spradling AC. Mouse primordial germ cells produce cysts that partially fragment prior to meiosis. Development. 2013;140: 2075–81. pmid:23578925
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[198] View Article

[199] PubMed/NCBI

[200] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Morgan S, Campbell L, Allison V, Murray A, Spears N. Culture and co-culture of mouse ovaries and ovarian follicles. J Vis Exp. 2015; 17:52458. pmid:25867892
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[202] View Article

[203] PubMed/NCBI

[204] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Author summary

Introduction

Results

Chk2 mutant fetal ovaries accumulate oocytes with more unrepaired DSBs than do controls

Perinatal Chk2 mutant ovaries have more oocytes than do control ovaries

The lack of CHK2 does not compromise cyst breakdown, but rather delays follicle formation initiation

Chk2 mutation partially rescues the oocyte loss occurring in Spo11 mutants and prevents oocyte cyst breakdown

CHK1 function is required to eliminate oocytes in Chk2-/- ovaries in vitro

Fetal oocyte death mediated by LINE-1 activation depends on CHK2

Discussion

Material and methods

Animals and genotyping

Harvesting of the ovaries

Histology, immunolabeling and oocyte quantification

Surface oocyte spreads and immunolabeling

Neonatal ovarian organ culture

AZT treatment

Image processing and data analysis

Statistical analysis

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Meiotic prophase progression is faster in the absence of CHK2.

S2 Fig. The organotypic culture allows folliculogenesis initiation in vitro.

S3 Fig. Exposure to 5μM LY2603618 causes a reduction of the active form of CHK1 in cultured oocytes.

S1 Data. The file containing the detailed statistics for all comparisons performed in this manuscript.

S1 Table. Number of γH2AX patches per oocyte at pachynema and diplonema from wild-type and Chk2-/- ovaries.

S2 Table. Oocyte number on the different perinatal days from wild-type and Chk2-/- ovaries.

S3 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found on the wild-type and Chk2-/- ovaries analyzed.

S4 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found at 19.5 dpc ovaries from the different indicated genotypes.

S5 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of Chk2-/- oocytes found after culture at the indicated conditions.

S6 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found at 17.5 dpc after AZT treatment.

Acknowledgments

References

CHK1 function is required to eliminate oocytes in Chk2^-/- ovaries in vitro

S1 Table. Number of γH2AX patches per oocyte at pachynema and diplonema from wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries.

S2 Table. Oocyte number on the different perinatal days from wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries.

S3 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of oocytes found on the wild-type and Chk2^-/- ovaries analyzed.

S5 Table. Number and percentage of the different classes of Chk2^-/- oocytes found after culture at the indicated conditions.