Elsevier

Energy Storage Materials

Volume 35, March 2021, Pages 353-377
Energy Storage Materials

Rational design of functional binder systems for high-energy lithium-based rechargeable batteries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Binders, which maintain the structural integrity of electrodes, are critical components of lithium-based rechargeable batteries (LBRBs) that significantly affect battery performances, despite accounting for 2 to 5 wt% (up to 5 wt% but usually 2 wt%) of the entire electrode. Traditional polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) binders that interact with electrode components via weak van der Waals forces are effective in conventional LBRB systems (graphite/LiCoO2, etc.). However, its stable fluorinated structures limit the potential for further functionalization and inhibit strong interactions towards external substances. Consequently, they are unsuitable for next-generation battery systems with high energy density. There is thus a need for new functional binders with facile features compatible with novel electrode materials and chemistries. Here in this review we consider the strategies for rationally designing these functional binders. On the basis of fundamental understandings of the issues for high-energy electrode materials, we have summarized seven desired functions that binders should possess depending on the target electrodes where the binders will be applied. Then a variety of leading-edge functional binders are reviewed to show how their chemical structures realize these above functions and how the employment of these binders affects the cell's electrochemical performances. Finally the corresponding design strategies are therefore proposed, and future research opportunities as well as challenges relating to LBRB binders are outlined.

Section snippets

Table of contents

Adhesion

A stable LBRB requires strong attachment and intimate contact between active material particles and conductive agents, as well as their robust adhesion to the current collector. This adhesion ability is the first priority and the most important factor into consideration when designing a novel binder. The adhesion ability of a polymeric binder mainly depends on its various surface functional groups and surface interactions, which may include van der Waals forces, electrostatic interactions and

Summary of design strategies

Binders are continuously facing challenges with the development of LBRBs. The pursuit of high-energy battery systems keeps pushing the requirements on binders to a new level. Conventional PVDF binder with great electrochemical stability and weak van der Waals forces works effectively with traditional LBRB intercalation chemistries (e.g. graphite/LiCoO2), maintaining its structural integrity. Nevertheless, for next-generation LBRBs (high-energy, high-power), PVDF is unable to fulfill the

Future outlook

In spite of these remarkable advances, many problems remain to be focused and solved: (1) the most prominent and commonly-used method for assessing a binder's adhesion ability is the peeling-off test. However, this test can only provide information on the bulk electrode layer's adhesion to the current collector, on a macro-level. Therefore, there is a lack of quantitative data on the adhesion between the binder and the active material and that between the binder and the conductive additive.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (No. 2019YFE0100200 and 2019YFA0705703), the Inner Mongolia Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2019ZD026). This study was also financially supported by the Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U1401243), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51232005). Naser Tavajohi appreciates the financial support by Bio4Energy program.

References (213)

  • Y. Ma et al.

    Energy Storage Mater.

    (2019)
  • X. Wang et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • J. Chong et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2011)
  • N. Nitta et al.

    Mater. Today

    (2015)
  • H. Zhang et al.

    Energy Storage Mater.

    (2019)
  • T. Yim et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • S. Pejovnik et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • L. Gong et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2013)
  • H. Huang

    Int. J. Electrochem. Sci.

    (2016)
  • C.-.C. Li et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2013)
  • C.R. Jarvis et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2001)
  • Z. Fu et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2014)
  • J. He et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2015)
  • S.S. Jeong et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2012)
  • S.S. Zhang et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2002)
  • M.H.T. Nguyen et al.

    Electrochem. Commun.

    (2013)
  • M.H.T. Nguyen et al.

    J. Electroanalyt. Chem.

    (2015)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    Joule

    (2018)
  • P. Bhattacharya et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2016)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Nature Energy

    (2019)
  • B. Dunn et al.

    Science

    (2011)
  • D. Bresser et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2018)
  • T. Zhang et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2016)
  • Y. Shi et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2017)
  • S.-.L. Chou et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2014)
  • H. Yuan et al.

    Adv. Energy Mater.

    (2018)
  • N.-.S. Choi et al.

    J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • L. Zhao, Z. Sun, H. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Mo, F. Yu, Y. Chen, RSC Advances, 10 (2020)...
  • X.H. YAO Dahua et al.

    Energy Storage Sci. Technol.

    (2019)
  • M. Biso et al.

    Polymer Eng. Sci.

    (2016)
  • M.T. McDowell et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2013)
  • M. Wu et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2013)
  • J.-.T. Li et al.

    Adv. Energy Mater.

    (2017)
  • H. Maleki

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (1999)
  • H. Maleki et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2000)
  • S.F. Lux et al.

    J. Electrochem. Soc.

    (2010)
  • H. Chen et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2018)
  • F. Zou et al.

    Adv. Energy Mater.

    (2020)
  • J.W. Choi et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2018)
  • G.G. Eshetu et al.

    ChemSusChem

    (2019)
  • A. Baldan

    J. Mater. Sci.

    (2004)
  • W.B. Jensen

    Rubber Chem. Technol.

    (1982)
  • S. Komaba et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2011)
  • S. Komaba et al.

    Electrochemistry

    (2011)
  • N. Yabuuchi et al.

    Adv. Energy Mater.

    (2011)
  • H.M. Kim et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Lett.

    (2017)
  • J. Pan, G. Xu, B. Ding, J. Han, H. Dou, X. Zhang, RSC Advances, 5 (2015)...
  • H. Zhong et al.

    J. Solid State Electrochem.

    (2016)
  • L. Chen et al.

    J. Appl. Electrochem.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Nature-resembled nanostructures for energy storage/conversion applications

      2024, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contribute equally to this work

    View full text