Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating the number of farms experienced foot and mouth disease outbreaks using capture-recapture methods

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is recognized as an endemic disease in Thailand and throughout other countries in Southeast Asia. The underreporting of FMD outbreaks has affected the true status of the disease. This study aimed to determine the number of dairy farms in Chiang Mai that had experienced FMD outbreaks (FMD outbreak farm) during 2015–2016 using capture-recapture (CR) methods. Two independent FMD outbreak data sources including data from the livestock authorities and survey questionnaires were analyzed using Chapman estimator and Chao estimator. Results showed that the estimated number of FMD outbreak farms was 264 (95% CI = 250, 277) and 273 (95% CI = 259, 292) farms based on the Chapman estimator and Chao estimator, respectively. The estimated prevalence of FMD corresponding to the Chapman estimator was lower than the Chao estimator. The active approach of the survey method offered a higher degree of sensitivity compared to the passive method used by the livestock authorities. Estimations from the CR method provided an upper bound for the true number of outbreak farms. This study demonstrated the use of the CR method to estimate the true status of FMD outbreaks. Our proposed approach can potentially be used as a tool to enhance the accuracy and sensitivity of established monitoring and surveillance systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would also like to acknowledge all of the participating dairy cooperatives located in Chiang Mai and the Chiang Mai Provincial Livestock Office for providing relevant data. Furthermore, we gratefully acknowledge all dairy farmers who were willing to be interviewed as part of this study. Additionally, we gratefully recognize all participants in this study for their involvement and for providing us with relevant field data. In addition, our sincere appreciation is offered to Professor Karl Hans Zessin for his valuable guidance.

Funding

This study received financial support from the Participatory One Health Disease Detection (PODD), Veterinary Public Health and Food Safety Centre for the Asia Pacific, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. We express our sincere gratitude for the financial support and the highly valuable technical and logistical support we received from this agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veerasak Punyapornwithaya.

Ethics declarations

Statement on animal rights

The questionnaire survey and research proposal of this study received approval from the Ethical Review Committee. Furthermore, Chiang Mai University Research Ethics Committee has reviewed and approved the research proposal based on international guidelines for human research protection (COA No. 008/60). The questionnaire survey participants were dairy farmers who willingly gave their informed consent to participate in the interviews. No samples were obtained from animals during the course of this research study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

ESM 1

(DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sansamur, C., Wiratsudakul, A., Charoenpanyanet, A. et al. Estimating the number of farms experienced foot and mouth disease outbreaks using capture-recapture methods. Trop Anim Health Prod 53, 12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02452-x

Keywords

Navigation