Abstract
Academic Social Networks (ASNs) are becoming an important tool in the professional lives of researchers, providing an online space for international academic discourse. At the micro-level, ASNs serve to facilitate, (a) knowledge sharing, (b) networking, and (c) identity-building. ASNs such as ResearchGate (RG) may support entry into scholarly communities by researchers who are otherwise marginalized in a modern academic environment that privileges research conducted by established researchers in well-resourced institutions in mostly western countries. This national study follows a recently published case study of Japan, and surveys the use of RG by more than 500 researchers across the country. The authors investigate participants’ awareness and regularity of use of the 3 micro-level components of RG, and the benefits and challenges of their adoption. The study finds that while RG is largely perceived as valuable for participants, use is unbalanced toward knowledge sharing, which is further limited to posting English-language outputs and accessing literature for personal consumption. Thus, RG may be positioned as a tool rather than a community, the latter requiring a more balanced engagement with the platform, particularly in the networking area. Some practical ideas for achieving this are offered in the discussion.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlburg, D. A. (Ed.). (2020). The changing face of higher education: Is there an international crisis in the humanities? Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Akar, A., & Mardikyan, S. (2018). User roles and contribution patterns in online communities: A managerial perspective. Sage Open, 8(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018794773
Ali, M. Y., & Richardson, J. (2017). Usage of academic social networking sites by Karachi social science faculty. IFLA Journal, 44(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035217744235
Armitage, C. (2018). Stalled ambition. Nature, 555(7697), s49.
Bański, J., & Ferenc, M. (2013). “International” or “Anglo-American” journals of geography? Geoforum, 45, 285–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.016
Belkhir, M., Brouard, M., Brunk, K. H., Dalmoro, M., Ferreira, M. C., Figueiredo, B., et al. (2019). Isolation in globalizing academic fields: A collaborative autoethnography of early career researchers. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 18(2), 261–285. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2017.0329
Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
Birbili, M. (2000). Translating from one language to another. Social Research Update, 31. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU31.html.
Bos, A. L., Sweet-Cushman, J., & Schneider, M. C. (2019). Family-friendly academic conferences: A missing link to fix the “leaky pipeline”? Politics, Groups, and Identities, 7(3), 748–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2017.1403936
Bozkurt, A., Koutropoulos, A., Singh, L., & Honeychurch, S. (2020). On lurking: Multiple perspectives on lurking within an educational community. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100709
Buckhingham, L. (2014). Building a career in english: Users of english as an additional language in academia in the Arabian Gulf. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.124
Cimenler, O., Reeves, K. A., & Skvoretz, J. (2014). A regression analysis of researchers social network metrics on their citation performance in a college of engineering. Journal of Informetrics, 8, 667–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.06.004
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
Copiello, S. (2019). Research interest: Another undisclosed (and redundant) algorithm by ResearchGate. Scientometrics, 120, 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03124-w
Elsayed, A. M. (2015). The use of academic social networks among Arab researchers: A survey. Social Science Computer Review, 34(3), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315589146
Else, H. (2018). Major publishers sue ResearchGate over copyright infringement. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06945-6
EF Education First. (2010). EF English proficiency index. The world’s largest ranking of countries and regions by English skills. https://www.ef.com/wwen/epi.
Fang, I. (2015). Alphabet to internet: Media in our lives. New York, NY: Routledge.
Faraldo-Cabana, P., & Lamela, C. (2019). How international are the top international journals of criminology and criminal justice? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09426-2
Gignac, G. (2019). How2statsbook (online edition 1). Perth, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.how2statsbook.com/p/chapters.html
Greifeneder, E., Pontis, S., Blandford, A., Attalla, H., Neal, D., & Schlebbe, K. (2018). Researchers attitudes towards the use of social networking sites. Journal of Documentation, 74(1), 119–136.
Grove, J. (2015). Social sciences and humanities faculties ‘to close’ in Japan after ministerial intervention. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/social-sciences-and-humanities-faculties-close-japan-after-ministerial-intervention#survey-answer.
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Guyot, P. (2010). Half of messages on Twitter are not in English. Japanese is the second most used language (Press release). Paris, France: Semiocast. Retrieved from https://semiocast.com/downloads/Semiocast_Half_of_messages_on_Twitter_are_not_in_English_20100224.pdf.
Jamali, H. R. (2017). Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics, 112, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4
Jordan, K., & Weller, M. (2018). Academics and social networking sites: Benefits, problems and tensions in professional engagement with online networking. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2018(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.448
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Macaluso, B., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, T., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2016). Is science built on the shoulders of women? A study of gender differences in contributor ship. Academic Medicine, 91(8), 1136–1142. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001261
Manca, S. (2017). An analysis of ResearchGate and Academia.edu as socio-technical systems for scholars’ networked learning: A multilevel framework proposal. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.17471/2499-4324/985
Manca, S. (2018). ResearchGate and Academia.edu as networked socio-technical systems for scholarly communication: A literature review. Research in Learning Technology, 26, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.2008
Manca, S., & Ranieri, M. (2017). Editorial: Reshaping professional learning in the social media landscape—Theories, practices and challenges. Qwerty, Open and Interdisciplinary Journal of Technology, Culture and Education, 12(2), 5–11.
Mason, S. (2020). Adoption and usage of academic social networks: A Japan case study. Scientometrics, 122, 1751–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03345-4
Mason, S., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Typical scope of time commitment and research outputs of thesis by publication in Australia. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(2), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1674253
Mat Roni, S., Merga, M., & Morris, J. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Singapore: Springer.
Meishar-Tal, H., & Pieterse, E. (2017). Why do academics use academic social networking sites? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i1.2643
Ministry of Education, culture, sports, science and technology. (2019). Gakō kihon chōsa (Basic survey of school). Retrieved from https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/chousa01/kihon/1267995.htm.
Ministry of internal affairs and communications. (2019). 2019 Kagaku gijutsu kenkyū chōsa kekka (2019 science and technology study findings). https://www.stat.go.jp/data/kagaku/kekka/youyaku/pdf/2019youyak.pdf.
Moahi, K. (2011). Research issues in the humanities and social sciences in Africa in the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Inkanyiso: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(2), 78–85.
Murai, S. (2016). Crisis in Japanese science leaves young researchers struggling to find long-term positions. Japan Times. Retrieved from https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/10/18/national/science-health/crisis-japanese-science-leaves-young-researchers-struggling-find-long-term-positions.
Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Xu, J., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Abdullah, A., Watkinson, A., et al. (2018). Early career researchers quest for reputation in the digital age. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 49(4), 375–396. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.49.4.01
Orduna-Malea, E., Martin-Martin, A., Thelwall, M., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2017). Do ResearchGate Scores create ghost academic reputations? Scientometrics, 112, 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2396-9
Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic social sites: The case of CSIC’s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004
Osumi, N. (2018, March 18). Japan’s woman problem. Nature Index. https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/japans-woman-problem.
Parker, M., & Weik, E. (2014). Free spirits? The academic on the aeroplane. Management Learning, 45(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612466210
Phillips, N. (2017a). Japanese research leaders warn about national science decline. Nature, 550(7676), 310–311.
Phillips, N. (2017b, March 23). The slow decline of Japanese research in 5 charts. Nature Index. Retrieved from https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-slow-decline-of-japanese-research-in-five-charts.
Porter, C. E. (2006). A typology of virtual communities: A multi-disciplinary foundation for future research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1), A3. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2004.tb00228.x
Prabhu, V. C., Barton, K., Pappu, S., Piedras-Renteria, E., Melian, E., & Biller, J. (2019). ReseachGate; Quo Vadis? World Neurosurgery, 128, 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.016
Reingewertz, Y., & Lutmar, C. (2018). Academic in-group bias: an empirical examination of the link between author and journal affiliation. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.006
ResearchGate. (n.d.) ResearchGate. About Us. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/about
Silvana de Rosa, A., Dryjanska, L., Bocci, E., & Borrelli, F. (2016). The role of academic social networking in the dissemination of the social representations literature. INTED2016 Conference, Valencia, Spain, 7–9 March. Retrieved from https://www.europhd.net/sites/europhd/files/images/onda_1/10/docs/dissemination_conferences/inted2016_academic_social_networking.pdf.
Singh Chawla, D. (2017). Publishers take ResearchGate to court, alleging massive copyright infringement. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq1560
So, R., Shinohara, K., Aoki, T., Tsujimoto, Y., Suganuma, A. M., & Furukawa, T. A. (2018). Effect of recruitment methods on response rate in a web-based study for primary care physicians: Factorial randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2), e28. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8561
Swanepoel, M., & Scott, D. R. (2018). Canadian and South African scholars’ use of institutional repositories, ResearchGate, and Academia.edu. Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.21083/partnership.v13i1.4137
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2013). Academia.edu: Social network or academic network? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23236
Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2017). ResearchGate versus google scholar: Which finds more early citations? Scientometrics, 112(2), 1125–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2400-4
Tsang, J. (2019). Rent or conference: Early-career researchers shouldn’t have to choose. Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00979-0.
Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126–129.
Wang, H., Chung, J. E., Park, N., McLaughlin, M. L., & Fulk, J. (2012). Understanding online community participation: A technology acceptance perspective. Communication Research, 39(6), 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408593
Weller, M. (2011). The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. London: Bloomsbury.
Wilson, M.C. (2017). Universities spend millions of accessing results of publicly funded research. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/universities-spend-millions-on-accessing-results-of-publicly-funded-research-88392.
Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Research universities on the ResearchGate social networking site: An examination of institutional differences, research activity level, and social networks formed. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.002
Yonezawa, A. (2009). The internationalization of Japanese higher education: Policy debates and realities. Nagoya Bulletin of Higher Education, 9, 199–219.
Zhou, T. (2011). Understanding online community user participation: A social influence perspective. Internet Research, 21(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111104884
Zhou, T. (2019). Understanding users’ participation in online health communities: A social capital perspective. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666919864620
Zivony, A. (2019). Academia is not a meritocracy. Nature human behaviour, 3(10), 1037.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a Japanese government KAKEN Grant, #19K14262, received by Shannon Mason. The authors wish to thank all of the participants for their time and support of this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mason, S., Sakurai, Y. A ResearchGate-way to an international academic community?. Scientometrics 126, 1149–1171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03772-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03772-3