Skip to main content
Log in

The transsylvian corridor through minimally invasive transcranial approaches: a comparative anatomical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurosurgical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Minimally invasive transcranial approaches (MITAs) continue to expand in popularity in neurosurgery. Only few MITAs allow sufficient sylvian exposure to enable wide use of the transsylvian corridor. In this study, we aim to compare the transsylvian corridor in two MITAs: the minipterional (MPTa) and the extended supraorbital eyebrow approaches (XSEa). Eight cadaver heads were used to quantify the surgical exposure and maneuverability along the sylvian fissure and the insular lobe provided by the MPTa and the XSEa. Surgical exposure was calculated by means of the exposed length of the sylvian fissure and by the area framed within three extreme points in the insular lobe. Maneuverability was assessed by means of the surgical freedom along the sylvian cistern. XSEa provides twice the frontal exposure and half of the temporal exposure in comparison to the MPTa (p < 0.001 and p = 0.02, respectively). No significant differences were found between the two craniotomies in the length of the exposure of the sylvian fissure, area of insular exposure, or surgical freedom. Both the MPTa and the XSEa afford sufficient grades of exposure along the sylvian fissure and the insular lobe, although the viewing angle is significantly different between the two approaches. Such properties allow either to be used for microsurgery deep within the sylvian cistern. The use of additional corridors, such as the subfrontal route (XSEa) and pretemporal route (MPTa), may influence selection of either the minipterional or the extended supraorbital approaches according to the origin of the surgical pathology addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almeida JP, Ruiz-Treviño AS, Shetty SR, Omay SB, Anand VK, Schwartz TH (2017) Transorbital endoscopic approach for exposure of the sylvian fissure, middle cerebral artery and crural cistern: an anatomical study. Acta Neurochir 159:1893–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-017-3296-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ammirati M, Bernardo A (1998) Analytical evaluation of complex anterior approaches to the cranial base: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 43:1398–1407; discussion 1407-1408. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199812000-00081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrade-Barazarte H, Jägersberg M, Belkhair S, Tymianski R, Turel MK, Schaller K, Hernesniemi JA, Tymianski M, Radovanovic I (2017) The extended lateral supraorbital approach and extradural anterior clinoidectomy through a frontopterio-orbital window: technical note and pilot surgical series. World Neurosurg 100:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chabot JD, Gardner PA, Stefko ST, Zwagerman NT, Fernandez-Miranda JC (2017) Lateral orbitotomy approach for lesions involving the middle fossa: a retrospective review of thirteen patients. Neurosurgery 80:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen-Gadol AA (2020) Atraumatic sylvian fissure split: nuances and pitfalls. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 18:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davies JM, Lawton MT (2014) Advances in open microsurgery for cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery 74 Suppl 1:S7–S16. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elhadi AM, Hardesty DA, Zaidi HA, Kalani MYS, Nakaji P, White WL, Preul MC, Little AS (2015) Evaluation of surgical freedom for microscopic and endoscopic transsphenoidal approaches to the sella. Neurosurgery 11 Suppl 2:69–78; discussion 78-79. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Eroglu U, Shah K, Bozkurt M, Kahilogullari G, Yakar F, Dogan İ, Ozgural O, Attar A, Unlu A, Caglar S, Cohen Gadol AA, Ugur HC (2019) Supraorbital keyhole approach: lessons learned from 106 operative cases. World Neurosurg 124:e667–e674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Figueiredo EG, Deshmukh P, Nakaji P, Crusius MU, Crawford N, Spetzler RF, Preul MC (2007) The minipterional craniotomy: technical description and anatomic assessment. Neurosurgery 61:256–264; discussion 264-265. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000303978.11752.45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flanigan P, Kshettry VR, Mullin JP, Jahangiri A, Recinos PF (2016) Frontal sinus morphometry in relation to surgically relevant landmarks in the United States population. World Neurosurg 91:12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.03.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heros RC (2011) The supraorbital “keyhole” approach. J Neurosurg 114:850–851; discussion 851. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.6.JNS10878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeon C, Hong C-K, Woo KI, Hong SD, Nam D-H, Lee J-I, Choi JW, Seol HJ, Kong D-S (2018) Endoscopic transorbital surgery for Meckel’s cave and middle cranial fossa tumors: surgical technique and early results. J Neurosurg 131:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.6.JNS181099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez-Perez R, Albonette-Felicio T, Hardesty DA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2020) Same viewing angle, minimal craniotomy enlargement, extreme exposure increase: the extended supraorbital eyebrow approach. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01306-2

  14. Martínez-Pérez R, Albonette-Felicio T, Hardesty DA, Prevedello DM (2020) Comparative anatomical analysis between the minipterional and supraorbital approaches. J Neurosurg:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.12.JNS193196

  15. Martinez-Perez R, Hardesty DA, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2020) The extended eyebrow approach a cadaveric stepwise dissection. Acta Neurochir 162:617–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04203-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martinez-Perez R, Hardesty DA, Li R, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM (2020) Sylvian and insular exposure in the extended minipterional approach: landmarks, benefits, and quantitative analysis using a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 138:e859–e866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.03.126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Martínez-Pérez R, Hernández-Álvarez V, Maturana R, Mura JM (2019) The extradural minipterional pretemporal approach for the treatment of spheno-petro-clival meningiomas. Acta Neurochir 161:2577–2582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04064-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Martinez-Perez R, Joswig H, Tsimpas A, Poblete T, Albiña P, Perales I, Mura JM (2019) The extradural minipterional approach for the treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms: a cadaver stepwise dissection and clinical case series. Neurosurg Rev 43:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-019-01219-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martinez-Perez R, Mura JM (2019) The extradural minipterional approach: “think small, play wider.”. World Neurosurg 125:534–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.10.240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Muhammad S, Tanikawa R, Lawton M, Regli L, Niemelä M, Korja M (2019) Microsurgical dissection of sylvian fissure-short technical videos of third generation cerebrovascular neurosurgeons. Acta Neurochir 161:1743–1746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03999-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Raza SM, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Lim M, Boahene KDO (2013) The transconjunctival transorbital approach: a keyhole approach to the midline anterior skull base. World Neurosurg 80:864–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.06.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reisch R, Perneczky A (2005) Ten-year experience with the supraorbital subfrontal approach through an eyebrow skin incision. Neurosurgery 57:242–255; discussion 242-255. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000178353.42777.2c

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rychen J, Croci D, Roethlisberger M, Nossek E, Potts M, Radovanovic I, Riina H, Mariani L, Guzman R, Zumofen DW (2018) Minimally invasive alternative approaches to pterional craniotomy: a systematic review of the literature. World Neurosurg 113:163–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sattur MG, Abi-Aad KR, Welz ME, Aoun RJ, Krishna C, Purnell C, Alghoul M, Bendok BR (2020) Extended lateral orbital craniotomy: anatomic study and initial clinical series of a novel minimally invasive pterional approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 81:88–96. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1677470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tra H, Huynh T, Nguyen B (2018) Minipterional and supraorbital keyhole craniotomies for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms: experience at single center. World Neurosurg 109:36–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.058

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Welling LC, Figueiredo EG, Wen HT, Gomes MQT, Bor-Seng-Shu E, Casarolli C, Guirado VMP, Teixeira MJ (2015) Prospective randomized study comparing clinical, functional, and aesthetic results of minipterional and classic pterional craniotomies. J Neurosurg 122:1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.11.JNS146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rafael Martinez-Perez or Daniel M. Prevedello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Daniel M. Prevedello is a consultant for Integra LifeSciences Corp. and Stryker Corporation. Daniel Prevedello has equity on 3 rivers LLC, eLUM Technologies, LLC, and Soliton LLC. Daniel Prevedello receives royalties from ACE Medical, KLS Martin, and Mizuho.

Ethical approval and informed consent

Informed consent and ethical approval were not deemed necessary by the local ethics in view of the design of the study. Anatomical dissections, measurements, and analysis were performed at the Anatomical Laboratory for VisuoSpatial Innovations in Otolaryngology and Neurosurgery (ALT-VISION) at The Ohio State University.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martinez-Perez, R., Beer-Furlan, A., Albonette-Felicio, T. et al. The transsylvian corridor through minimally invasive transcranial approaches: a comparative anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev 44, 2619–2627 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01439-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-020-01439-4

Keywords

Navigation