Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of the effects of fetal bovine serum and newborn calf serum on cell growth and maintenance of cryopreserved mouse spermatogonial stem cells

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Serum is a common supplement that is widely used to protect various cells and tissues from cryopreservation because it provides the necessary active components for cell growth and maintenance. In this study, we compared the effects of newborn calf serum (NCS) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) on the cryopreservation of mouse spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). The isolated SSCs were cryopreserved in two groups: freezing medium that contained 10% DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) and 10% FBS in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) (group 1) and freezing medium that contained 10% DMSO and 10% NCS in DMEM (group 2). Real-time PCR was performed for stemness gene expression. The SSCs' viability was performed by trypan blue. We observed that the SSCs had increased viability in the NCS-freeze/thaw group (87.82%) compared to the FBS-freeze/thaw group (79.83%), but this increase was not statistically significant (P < 0.105). Promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (Plzf) and Lin28 gene expression levels in the NCS-frozen/thawed SSCs were not significantly different compared to the FBS-frozen/thawed SSCs; however, Nanog gene expression increased considerably, and Dazl gene expression decreased significantly. The results in this study demonstrated that the presence of NCS in a solution of cryopreserved SSCs increased their viability after freeze/thawing and might promote the proliferation of cultivated SSCs in vitro by increasing the relative expression of Nanog.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrishami M, Anzar M, Yang Y, Honaramooz A (2010) Cryopreservation of immature porcine testis tissue to maintain its developmental potential after xenografting into recipient mice. Theriogenology 73(1):86–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aliakbari F, Gilani MAS, Amidi F, Baazm M, Korouji M, Izadyar F, Yazdekhasti H, Abbasi M (2016) Improving the efficacy of cryopreservation of spermatogonia stem cells by antioxidant supplements. Cell Reprogramm 18(2):87–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alipoor FJ, Gilani MAS, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Hampa AD, Hosseinifar H, Alipour H, Panah ML (2009) Achieving high survival rate following cryopreservation after isolation of prepubertal mouse spermatogonial cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 26(2–3):143–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Assadollahi V, Hassanzadeh K, Abdi M, Alasvand M, Nasseri S, Fathi F (2019) Effect of embryo cryopreservation on derivation efficiency, pluripotency, and differentiation capacity of mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Physiol 234(12):21962–21972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balzer E, Heine C, Jiang Q, Lee VM, Moss EG (2010) LIN28 alters cell fate succession and acts independently of the let-7 microRNA during neurogliogenesis in vitro. Development 137(6):891–900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boroujeni MB, Peidayesh F, Pirnia A, Boroujeni NB, Ahmadi SAY, Gholami M (2019) Effect of selenium on freezing-thawing damage of mice spermatogonial stem cell: a model to preserve fertility in childhood cancers. Stem Cell Investig 6:36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho H, Lee A, Kim K (2018) The effect of serum types on Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells. Biomater Res 22(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dariush G, Gholamhossein R, Rouhollah F, Mahmood GS, Abdolhossein S, Mohsen S, Loghman A (2019) The application of ultrasonic vibration in human sperm cryopreservation as a novel method for the modification of physicochemical characteristics of freezing media. Sci Rep 9(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Filipponi D, Hobbs RM, Ottolenghi S, Rossi P, Jannini EA, Pandolfi PP, Dolci S (2007) Repression of kit expression by Plzf in germ cells. Mol Cell Biol 27(19):6770–6781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Garzón D, Peñaranda D, Pérez L, Marco-Jiménez F, Espert X, Müller T, Jover M, Asturiano J (2008) Effects of pH, sodium bicarbonate, cryoprotectants and foetal bovine serum on the cryopreservation of European eel sperm. ReprodDomestAnim 43(1):99–105

    Google Scholar 

  11. He Z, Kokkinaki M, Dym M (2009) Signaling molecules and pathways regulating the fate of spermatogonial stem cells. Microsc Res Techn 72(8):586–595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Izadyar F, Matthijs-Rijsenbilt J, Den Ouden K, Creemers LB, Woelders H, de Rooij DG (2002) Development of a cryopreservation protocol for type A spermatogonia. J Androl 23(4):537–545

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Bian YL, Schreurs N, Zhang XG, Raza SHA, Fang Q, Wang LQ, Hu JH (2018) Effects of five cryoprotectants on proliferation and differentiation-related gene expression of frozen-thawed bovine calf testicular tissue. ReprodDomestAnim 53(5):1211–1218

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Liang Z, Yang J, Wang D, Wang H, Zhu M, Geng B, Xu EY (2019) DAZL is a master translational regulator of murine spermatogenesis. NatlSci Rev 6(3):455–468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McLean DJ, Friel PJ, Johnston DS, Griswold MD (2003) Characterization of spermatogonial stem cell maturation and differentiation in neonatal mice. BiolReprod 69(6):2085–2091

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moghaddam AA, Rahimi-Feyli P, Nikousefat Z, Zarghami S (2016) Effects of different concentrations of sucrose and fetal bovine serum on viability rate of lamb spermatogonial stem cells before and after cryopreservation. Feyz J KashanUniv Med Sci 20(2):157–164

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mun S-E, Sim B-W, Yoon S-B, Jeong P-S, Yang H-J, Choi S-A, Park Y-H, Kim Y-H, Kang P, Jeong K-J (2017) Dual effect of fetal bovine serum on early development depends on stage-specific reactive oxygen species demands in pigs. PLoS ONE 12(4):e0175427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagano M, Brinster R (1998) Spermatogonial transplantation and reconstitution of donor cell spermatogenesis in recipient mice. Apmis 106(1–6):47–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagano MC (2003) Homing efficiency and proliferation kinetics of male germ line stem cells following transplantation in mice. BiolReprod 69(2):701–707

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Onofre J, Kadam P, Baert Y, Goossens E (2020) Testicular tissue cryopreservation is the preferred method to preserve spermatogonial stem cells prior to transplantation. ReprodBioMed Online 40(2):261–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pirnia A, Parivar K, Hemadi M, Yaghmaei P, Gholami M (2017) Stemness of spermatogonial stem cells encapsulated in alginate hydrogel during cryopreservation. Andrologia 49(5):e12650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Plant TM (2010) Undifferentiated primate spermatogonia and their endocrine control. Trends EndocrinolMetab 21(8):488–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Richards M, Tan SP, Tan JH, Chan WK, Bongso A (2004) The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Stem Cells 22(1):51–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, Kubota Y, Ogawa T (2011) In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature 471(7339):504–507

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2001) Remodeling of the postnatal mouse testis is accompanied by dramatic changes in stem cell number and niche accessibility. ProcNatlAcadSci 98(11):6186–6191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tagelenbosch RA, de Rooij DG (1993) A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat Res/FundamMolMech Mutagen 290(2):193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Torres-Osorio V, Urrego R, Echeverri-Zuluaga JJ, López-Herrera A (2019) Oxidative stress and antioxidant use during in vitro mammal embryo production. Review. Rev MexCiencPecu 10(2):433–459

    Google Scholar 

  28. Watson P (1995) Recent developments and concepts in the cryopreservation of spermatozoa and the assessment of their post-thawing function. ReprodFertilDev 7(4):871–891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wu J, Sun Y, Wang A, Che G, Hu T, Zhang X (2014) Effect of newborn bovine serum on cryopreservation of adult bovine testicular tissue. Andrologia 46(3):308–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang M, Deng B, Geng L, Li L, Wu X (2020) Pluripotency factor NANOG promotes germ cell maintenance in vitro without triggering dedifferentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Theriogenology 148:68–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yeh JR, Zhang X, Nagano MC (2007) Establishment of a short-term in vitro assay for mouse spermatogonial stem cells. BiolReprod 77(5):897–904

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was confirmed by the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences. The authors would like to thanks the Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran The authors also thank the head and staff of the Razi Herbal Medicines Research Center of Lorestan Medical University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Gholami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pirnia, A., Assadollahi, V., Alasvand, M. et al. A comparison of the effects of fetal bovine serum and newborn calf serum on cell growth and maintenance of cryopreserved mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Mol Biol Rep 47, 9609–9614 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-06004-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-06004-2

Keywords

Navigation