Exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental aspects of an industrial-scale molasses-based ethanol production plant
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Climate change and its adverse health impacts have further intensified the global interest in alternative renewable projects to produce fuels, chemicals, and materials [1], [2]. In line with this trend, significant efforts have been devoted worldwide to developing and commercializing liquid transportation fuels derived from renewable sources, particularly bioethanol and biodiesel [3], [4]. This could be attributed to the fact that these eco-friendly and clean-burning biofuels share highly similar physicochemical properties with their petroleum counterparts, and hence they can be used in in-use internal combustion engines without the need for significant modifications [5]. Bioethanol and biodiesel can be used in neat form or blended with petroleum-based gasoline and diesel fuels, respectively [6]. Global bioethanol production has been much higher than that of biodiesel during the past two decades, and it is expected to continue to grow in the coming years [7].
Among the various production pathways developed for bioethanol production to date, bioethanol production from readily fermentable sugar feedstocks such as molasses is still the most promising route owing to the highly competitive cost of production and the relative abundance of the inputs [8]. In addition to being commercially viable, this bioethanol production route is also technologically mature [9]. These are indeed the two significant aspects that are still lacking for the lignocellulosic bioethanol production route [10]. The synthesis of bioethanol from readily fermentable organic waste materials does not pose any threats to food security in contrast to the bioethanol fuel produced from edible crops such as corn, wheat, and barley [11]. As mentioned earlier, molasses, a by-product of sugar production, is a suitable feedstock for bioethanol production [12]. This sugar-rich feedstock contains over 50 wt% sugar, including sucrose, glucose, and fructose [13]. According to Darvishi and Abolhasan Moghaddami [14], 40% of the molasses generated worldwide is fermented to bioethanol. Despite the above-mentioned unique features of the existing molasses-based bioethanol plants, their performance could still be enhanced by applying comprehensive sustainability assessment frameworks to facilitate the support decision-making process. Such findings could also guide future research efforts in this domain.
It is well-documented that compared to energy analysis, exergy analysis can provide more meaningful results regarding the efficiency of energy conversion systems [15]. Exergy analysis considers both the quantity and quality of material and energy flows, while energy analysis considers only their quantities [16]. The thermodynamic property exergy can reasonably value all kinds of material and energy flows in unified dimensions (J) [17]. Accordingly, exergy analysis and its extensions have been extensively employed in the literature for evaluating bioethanol production processes from various feedstocks such as oil palm fronds [18], sugarcane bagasse [19], [20], [21], wheat grain and straw [22], various fermentable sugars [23], and corn cob [24]. Through quantifying exergy destruction (thermodynamic losses), exergy analysis can determine the sustainability level of biofuel production processes [25]. The exergy concept can also be further strengthened through integration with economic and environmental constraints, and new insights into feasibility, profitability, and renewability of biofuel production systems could be subsequently obtained [26]. These exergy-based cost and environmental analyses, also known as “exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental” approaches, respectively, have become powerful tools for investigating the performance of energy conversion systems [27].
Accordingly, exergy analysis and its combination with economic and environmental considerations have been considered the most promising tools for analyzing biofuel production systems from the sustainability perspective [28]. Notably, invaluable practical information about the thermodynamic, economic, and environmental aspects of biofuel production systems can be obtained through exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental approaches that cannot be attained using exergy analysis or economic life cycle cost/environmental life cycle assessment. This can be mainly attributed to the synergy between the exergy principles and the economic accounting/environmental assessment concepts. The developed synergistic effect could then facilitate a mechanistic and systematic understanding of the cost and environmental impacts of products and the hotspots of the cost losses and environmental impacts of biofuel systems.
Overall, it could be concluded that exergy-based methods could provide decision-supporting insights to guide the sustainable production of biofuels. In better words, exergy-based approaches can reliably locate, quantify, and elucidate thermodynamic imperfections, cost losses, and environmental impacts of biofuel systems. Even though there are several studies on the use of exergy-based methods for investigating bioethanol production systems, all these attempts were only based on simulation studies with numerous irrational assumptions, unrealistic oversimplifications, and erroneous approximations [19], [20], [21], [29]. Besides, most of the processes simulated in these works were not validated and assessed using reliable experimental data. It is believed that the exergy-based analyses carried out herein based on empirical data can potentially provide more accurate and reliable results than the studies mentioned above carried out using simulation data.
To the best of our knowledge, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses have never been used before for scrutinizing bioethanol production systems in the literature. Furthermore, there is no report in the literature on the use of actual industrial data for determining the exergetic aspects of commercial bioethanol production systems, which was the motivation and focus of this study. Hence, the present survey, for the first time, was aimed at analyzing an industrial-scale bioethanol production plant from the exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental viewpoints using real-world operational thermodynamic, economic, and environmental data. This study was carried out to illustrate how exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental analyses could be efficiently and reliably applied to uncover the hotspots of the thermodynamic losses, cost losses, and environmental impacts of the investigated bioethanol production system. The exergetic values, unit exergoeconomic costs, and unit exergoenvironmental impacts of input/output streams were determined to present a general picture of the sustainability status of the molasses-based bioethanol production process. Besides, exergy, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental parameters of the process were determined to provide key insights to further improve the process. Typically, such studies should be of value in optimizing and enhancing the existing bioethanol production plants from thermodynamic, economic, and environmental viewpoints.
Section snippets
Bioethanol production plant and data compilation
The required data for calculating exergetic, exergoeconomic, and exergoenvironmental parameters of the plant were acquired from an industrial bioethanol production plant (Zist Faravardeh Sepahan) located in Isfahan, Iran. The investigated plant was an independent distillery. The data collected (measured and recorded) were averaged and used in the exergetic calculations. The plant could produce bioethanol from sugarcane/sugarbeet molasses, corn sugar syrup, date syrup, and their mixtures. The
Results and discussion
The daily rates of exergy, cost, and environmental impact associated with the plant inputs are presented in Table 6. The main input streams of the process were molasses (41000 kg/d), water (128261 kg/d), natural gas (27000 Nm3/d), and electricity (16800 kWh/d). The total input exergy rate, cost rate, and environmental impact rate of the process were found to be 1403 GJ/d, 10,829 USD/d, and 21,862 mPts/d, respectively. The exergy rate of natural gas was highest (857 GJ/d) among the plant input
Improvement suggestions
Based on the findings of the present study and the conclusions drawn above, the following suggestions can be made to improve the sustainability of the existing molasses-based bioethanol plants and to direct future research works:
- •
Given that natural gas has the highest contribution to the total input exergy rate and the environmental impact rate of the process, a slight reduction in using this energy carrier can markedly boost the process from exergetic and exergoenvironmental perspectives. For
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Sama Amid: Investigation, Methodology. Mortaza Aghbashlo: Conceptualization. Meisam Tabatabaei: Conceptualization. Keikhosro Karimi: Data curation, Resources. Abdul-Sattar Nizami: Supervision. Mohammad Rehan: Supervision. Homa Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha: Software, Formal analysis. Mohamad Mojarab Soufiyan: Visualization, Validation. Wanxi Peng: Project administration, Funding acquisition. Su Shiung Lam: Conceptualization.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciations to the Isfahan University of Technology, University of Tehran, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, and Biofuel Research Team (BRTeam) for their support through the course of this project. The authors would also like to acknowledge the Henan Agricultural University for the financial, facility, and technical support provided throughout this research project under a Research Collaboration Agreement (RCA) and the Golden Goose Research Grant
References (60)
- et al.
The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate
The Lancet
(2019) - et al.
The 2018 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: shaping the health of nations for centuries to come
The Lancet
(2018) - et al.
Neat diesel beats waste-oriented biodiesel from the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental point of views
Energy Convers Manage
(2017) - et al.
Experimental and theoretical study of the thermal decomposition of ethyl acetate during fast pyrolysis
Chem Eng Res Des
(2020) - et al.
Rotary biofilm reactor: A new tool for long-term bioethanol production from non-sterilized beet molasses by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in repeated-batch fermentation
J Cleaner Prod
(2020) - et al.
Conversion of residues from agro-food industry into bioethanol in Iran: An under-valued biofuel additive to phase out MTBE in gasoline
Renewable Energy
(2020) - et al.
Comprehensive assessment of 2G bioethanol production
Bioresour Technol
(2020) - et al.
Feasibility assessment of the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass pretreated with acid mine drainage (AMD)
Renewable Energy
(2020) - et al.
Mixotrophic cultivation of microalga Spirulina platensis using molasses as organic substrate
Aquaculture
(2007) - et al.
Exergy-based control strategies for the efficient operation of building energy systems
J Cleaner Prod
(2019)
Comparative thermodynamic sustainability assessment of lignocellulosic pretreatment methods for bioethanol production via exergy analysis
Chem Eng J
Sustainable ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass – Application of exergy analysis
Energy
Exergy assessment and techno-economic optimization of bioethanol production routes
Fuel
Comparison of combined ethanol and biogas polygeneration facilities using exergy analysis
Appl Therm Eng
Exergy-based sustainability assessment of ethanol production via Mucor indicus from fructose, glucose, sucrose, and molasses
Energy
Exergy analysis of a new lignocellulosic biomass-based polygeneration system
Energy
Comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a municipal solid waste digestion plant equipped with a biogas genset
Waste Manage
Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis
Renewable Energy
On the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation and optimization of biodiesel synthesis from waste cooking oil (WCO) using a low power, high frequency ultrasonic reactor
Energy Convers Manage
A critical review of the effects of pretreatment methods on the exergetic aspects of lignocellulosic biofuels
Energy Convers Manage
A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels
Energy
Exergetic performance assessment of a long-life milk processing plant: a comprehensive survey
J Cleaner Prod
SPECO: A systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems
Energy
Energy saving in a convective dryer by using novel real-time exergy-based control schemes adjusting exhaust air recirculation
J Cleaner Prod
Performance analysis of drying of green olive in a tray dryer
J Food Eng
Exergy analysis of a lignocellulosic-based biorefinery annexed to a sugarcane mill for simultaneous lactic acid and electricity production
Energy
Exergoeconomic valuation of a waste-based integrated combined cycle (WICC) for heat and power production
Energy
CO2 capture and storage from a bioethanol plant: Carbon and energy footprint and economic assessment
Int J Greenhouse Gas Control
CO2 utilization: Turning greenhouse gas into fuels and valuable products
J Environ Manage
Exergy analysis of thermochemical ethanol production via biomass gasification and catalytic synthesis
Energy
Cited by (83)
Tri-generation design and analysis of methanol-reforming high-temperature fuel cell based on double-effect absorption cooling power cycle
2024, Energy Conversion and ManagementLife cycle assessment of apricot puree concentrate production
2024, Journal of Food EngineeringBiorefinery-based sustainability assessment of macroalgae waste valorization to polylactic acid: Exergy and exergoeconomic perspectives
2024, Biochemical Engineering JournalA critical review of the advances in valorizing agro-industrial wastes through mixed culture fermentation
2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering