An integrated computational materials engineering framework to analyze the failure behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites for lightweight vehicle applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108560Get rights and content

Abstract

A bottom-up multi-scale modeling approach is used to develop an Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) framework for carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites, which has the potential to reduce development to deployment lead time for structural applications in lightweight vehicles. In this work, we develop and integrate computational models comprising of four size scales to fully describe and characterize three types of CFRP composites. In detail, the properties of the interphase region are determined by an analytical gradient model and molecular dynamics analysis at the nano-scale, which is then incorporated into micro-scale unidirectional (UD) representative volume element (RVE) models to characterize the failure strengths and envelopes of UD CFRP composites. Then, the results are leveraged to propose an elasto-plastic-damage constitutive law for UD composites to study the fiber tows of woven composites as well as the chips of sheet molding compound (SMC) composites. Subsequently, the failure mechanisms and failure strengths of woven and SMC composites are predicted by the meso-scale RVE models. Finally, building upon the models and results from lower scales, we show that a homogenized macro-scale model can capture the mechanical performance of a hat-section-shaped part under four-point bending. Along with the model integration, we will also demonstrate that the computational results are in good agreement with experiments conducted at different scales. The present study illustrates the potential and significance of integrated multi-scale computational modeling tools that can virtually evaluate the performance of CFRP composites and provide design guidance for CFRP composites used in structural applications.

Introduction

With the growing attention on energy conservation and environmental protection, lightweight design for automobiles is becoming increasingly attractive in the automotive industry. Generally speaking, material replacement, structural optimization, and application of new manufacturing technology can be adopted in the lightweight design process, among which material replacement is arguably the most effective approach [1]. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites, with a density of 1.55 g/cm3 and a tensile strength of up to 2000 MPa along the fiber direction, stand as one of the most promising classes of materials to replace the engineered metals for automotive structural components. In particular, chopped carbon fiber sheet molding compound (SMC) and woven composites have great potential in automotive manufacturing due to their excellent mechanical performance, moderate cost, and easier fabrication compared to unidirectional (UD) CFRP composites [[2], [3], [4]]. In order to fully exploit the potential of these CFRP composites, we need to target increasing the accessibility of CFRP component designs, improving the robustness of initial designs, and most importantly, reducing the development to deployment lead time of CFRP components. These targets will eventually help mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from passenger vehicles and improve national energy independence [5].

The typical material design (or replacement) cycle consists of appropriate material selection followed by component size, shape design, and optimization [6]. In woven and chopped SMC CFRP composites, material selection also involves the size of representative element selection at the microstructure level. For instance, changing the size and/or angle of fiber tows for woven composites or changing the chip orientation for SMC composites significantly alter the anisotropic behavior of the material as well as its failure mechanisms, which in turn influence failure strength and fracture toughness of the material [3]. Thus, material design is not only limited to the size and geometry of constituents but also closely connected to the microstructural design. Traditionally, characterization of materials is done by carrying out expensive and time-consuming material tests to establish stiffness (elastic modulus) as well as strength properties in all material coordinates. With the advancements in computational materials science and engineering as well as multi-scale modeling, the “validation through simulation” approach has been increasingly adopted to decrease the time and cost of applying new materials to automotive components. Integrated Computational Materials Engineering (ICME) is the integration of materials information captured through computational tools with engineering product performance analysis and manufacturing process simulation [7]. This concept was first described by the U. S. National Materials Advisory Board Committee in 2008. Since then, ICME has become a fast-growing discipline within materials science and engineering and has been successfully employed in the design of metallic metals [[8], [9], [10]]. Compared to advanced metallic systems, the CFRP composites have the unique features of anisotropic and heterogeneous multi-scale microstructures and even larger variations in the material properties induced by the unique injecting/compression molding processes. Currently, there still exist two major challenges in developing ICME tool for CFRP composites: (1) development of high fidelity computational models; and (2) integration of the validated models and computational tools into one automated workflow so that the material processing, microstructure, and component structure can be optimized simultaneously [11].

In line with the overarching goal of ICME to reduce the time and the cost in the discovery and development of novel CFRP composites structures, multi-scale computational models have been established and embraced in our previous work and those of other researchers [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24]]. A majority of those models deliver the concerned information embedded in equations and parameters from lower-scale simulations to higher-scale, which is termed as the bottom-up hierarchical approach [17]. These previous studies on multi-scale model development have addressed the first challenge to a large extent. The primary objective of the present work is to address the second challenge, i.e., to integrate the multi-scale computational models and demonstrate an ICME framework of CFRP composites for lightweight vehicles, with a particular focus on three types of widely-used thermoset epoxy based CFRP composites in structural parts: long fiber UD composites, chopped short fiber SMC composites, and woven composites.

Section snippets

Synopsis of ICME framework

In the ICME framework considered in the present work, the intrinsic relationship between material microstructure (i.e., the fiber volume fraction of UD CFRP composites, woven yarn angle, SMC chip orientation, and size, etc.) and the mechanical performance of CFRP composites will be systematically developed by a bottom-up multi-scale modeling approach with the aim of structural design and failure analysis. As shown in Fig. 1, we use a four-scale model to describe the cured CFRP composites:

Nano-scale model of the interphase region based on MDA

Down to the nano-scale level, the carbon fiber surface is quite rough, partially due to the treatments applied to the carbon fibers during the fiber manufacturing process [27]. In addition, there is a significant nano-confinement effect from the carbon fibers on matrix resins [[28], [29], [30]]. As a result, a submicron-thick interphase region exists between carbon fibers and the matrix, as shown schematically in Fig. 2(a). It has been demonstrated that the interphase property has a significant

UD RVE model and constitutive laws for constituents

For model development, a cross-section of the microstructure of the UD RVE model with cylindrical fibers randomly distributed in the matrix is obtained using an algorithm proposed by Melro et al. [34]. The average fiber diameter of 7 μm and fiber volume fraction (Vf) of 51.4% are utilized based on experimental material characterization. In addition to the fiber and matrix phase, the UD RVE model includes a finite thickness (~200 nm) interphase region adjacent to fibers, consistent with the

Chopped SMC and woven composites description

Chopped SMC and woven fabric composites are produced using the same DowAksa A42 carbon fiber and Dow thermoset epoxy as the UD CFRP composites. The fiber diameter and fiber volume fraction of chips for SMC as well as fiber tows (yarns) for woven are 7 μm and 51.4% respectively, which are the same as for UD CFRP composites.

For chopped SMC composites, long continuous UD prepregs are chopped into sections approximately 25 mm in length, which are then distributed onto a resin film to create an SMC

Macro-scale bending model of hat-section-shaped parts made of UD and woven CFRP composites

In this section, we use a hat-section-shaped part subjected to four-point bending load to demonstrate the final stage of the proposed bottom-up multi-scale ICME framework. The detailed geometry of the hat-section-shaped part is shown in Fig. 9(a). The UD CFRP hat-section-shaped part is made up of [0/90/90/0/0/0]s and [0/60/-60/0/60/-60]s layup with 12 layers (noted as UD 0–90 and UD 0–60, respectively), and the layups of woven CFRP hat-section-shaped part are [90/0/90/0]s and [45/-45/45/-45]s

Conclusions

This study presents a systematic investigation into the failure behaviors of UD, woven, and chopped SMC CFRP composites at different scales by developing an ICME framework with a bottom-up multi-scale modeling approach. The multi-scale models combine MDA at the nano-scale, UD RVE model at the micro-scale, chopped SMC, and woven RVE models at the meso-scale, and hat-section-shaped parts at the macro-scale. The major insights/conclusions are summarized below.

  • (1)

    At the nano-scale, the average

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qingping Sun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Guowei Zhou: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Zhaoxu Meng: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Mukesh Jain: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Xuming Su: Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge support from the Ford Motor Company with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), under Award Number DE-EE0006867. Q. Sun acknowledges support from the China Scholarship Council (CSC). Z. Meng would like to acknowledge startup funds from Clemson University and SC TRIMH support (P20 GM121342).

References (59)

  • W. Tao et al.

    Uncertainty quantification of mechanical properties for three-dimensional orthogonal woven composites. Part II: multiscale simulation

    Compos. Struct.

    (2020)
  • Z. Ullah et al.

    A unified framework for the multi-scale computational homogenisation of 3D-textile composites

    Compos. B Eng.

    (2019)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Notch insensitivity in fatigue failure of chopped carbon fiber chip-reinforced composites using experimental and computational analysis

    Compos. Struct.

    (2020)
  • H. Tang et al.

    Fatigue behavior analysis and multi-scale modelling of chopped carbon fiber chip-reinforced composites under tension-tension loading condition

    Compos. Struct.

    (2019)
  • T. Zheng et al.

    A novel mesoscopic progressive damage model for 3D angle-interlock woven composites

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (2020)
  • S.L. Omairey et al.

    Multiscale surrogate-based framework for reliability analysis of unidirectional FRP composites

    Compos. B Eng.

    (2019)
  • Q. Wu et al.

    Nano-analysis on the structure and chemical composition of the interphase region in carbon fiber composite

    Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf.

    (2014)
  • T. Li et al.

    Interfacial mechanics and viscoelastic properties of patchy graphene oxide reinforced nanocomposites

    Carbon

    (2020)
  • W. Zhao et al.

    Effects of environmental degradation on near-fiber nanomechanical properties of carbon fiber epoxy composites

    Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf.

    (2009)
  • C. Kiritsi et al.

    Load carrying characteristics of short fiber composites containing a heterogeneous interphase region

    Comput. Mater. Sci.

    (2001)
  • B. Wang et al.

    Effect of heterogeneous interphase on the mechanical properties of unidirectional fiber composites studied by FFT-based method

    Compos. Struct.

    (2019)
  • A. Melro et al.

    Generation of random distribution of fibres in long-fibre reinforced composites

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (2008)
  • A. Melro et al.

    Micromechanical analysis of polymer composites reinforced by unidirectional fibres: Part I–Constitutive modelling

    Int. J. Solid Struct.

    (2013)
  • M. Heidari-Rarani et al.

    Finite element modeling of mode I delamination growth in laminated DCB specimens with R-curve effects

    Compos. B Eng.

    (2013)
  • X. Bai et al.

    High-fidelity micro-scale modeling of the thermo-visco-plastic behavior of carbon fiber polymer matrix composites

    Compos. Struct.

    (2015)
  • S. Yurgartis

    Measurement of small angle fiber misalignments in continuous fiber composites

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (1987)
  • I.M. Daniel et al.

    A new yield and failure theory for composite materials under static and dynamic loading

    Int. J. Solid Struct.

    (2018)
  • I.M. Daniel

    Yield and failure criteria for composite materials under static and dynamic loading

    Prog. Aero. Sci.

    (2016)
  • K.-S. Liu et al.

    A progressive quadratic failure criterion for a laminate

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text