Abstract
The very low-degree Earth’s gravity coefficients, associated with the largest-scale mass redistribution in the Earth’s fluid envelope (atmosphere, oceans and continental hydrology), are the most poorly known. In particular, the first three degree geopotential terms are important, as they relate to intrinsic Earth’s mass references: gravitational coefficient (GM) of the Earth (degree 0), geocenter motion (degree 1), Earth’s figure axis orientation (degree 2). This paper presents a self-consistent determination of these three properties of the Earth. The main objective is to deal with the remaining sources of altimetry satellite orbit uncertainties affecting the fundamental record of sea surface height measurements. The analysis identifies the modeling errors, which should be mitigated when estimating the geocenter coordinates from Satellite Laser Ranging (SLR) observations. The long-term behavior of the degree-0 and -2 spherical harmonics is also observed over the 34-year period 1984–2017 from the long-time history of satellite laser tracking to geodetic spherical satellites. From the analysis of the evolution of these two coefficients, constraints regarding the Earth’s rheology and uncertainties in the value of GM could be inferred. Overall, the influence of the orbit characteristics, SLR station ranging/position biases and satellite signature effects, measurement modeling errors (tropospheric corrections, non-tidal deformations) are also discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This work takes advantage of the ILRS data (Pearlman et al. 2002). The SLR tracking data over the low Earth Starlette/Stella, Ajisai, LARES, Jason-2/OSTM and medium Earth LAGEOS-1/2 satellites are available from ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/slr/data/npt*. The combined LAGEOS-1–LAGEOS-2–Starlette–Stella–Ajisai–LARES estimations of the figure axis components (\(\overline{C}_{2,1}\), \(\overline{S}_{2,1}\)) obtained in this work are available to download from the website https://syrte.obspm.fr/~bizouard/ipercc.
References
Altamimi Z, Rebischung P, Métivier L, Collilieux X (2016) ITRF2014: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame modeling nonlinear station motions. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 121(8):6109–6131. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013098
Appleby G, Rodríguez J, Altamimi Z (2016) Assessment of the accuracy of global geodetic satellite laser ranging observations and estimated impact on ITRF scale: estimation of systematic errors in LAGEOS observations 1993–2014. J Geodesy 90(12):1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0929-2
Arnold D, Montenbruck O, Hackel S, Sonica K (2018) Satellite laser ranging to low earth orbiters: orbit and network validation. J Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1140-4
Benjamin D, Wahr J, Ray RD, Egbert GD, Desai SD (2006) Constraints on mantle anelasticity from geodetic observations, and implications for the J2 anomaly. Geophys J Int 165(1):3–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02915.x
Bizouard C, Lambert S, Gattano C, Becker O, Richard JY (2019) The IERS EOP 14C04 solution for Earth orientation parameters consistent with ITRF 2014. J Geodesy 93(5):621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1186-3
Boschi E, Sabadini R, Yuen DA (1985) Transient polar motions and the nature of the asthenosphere for short time scales. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 90(B5):3559–3568. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB05p03559
Carrou JP (1986) Zoom software: error analysis and accurate orbit restitution at CNES. In: Bhatnagar KB (ed) Space dynamics and celestial mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 381–398
Chen W, Ray J, Li J, Huang C, Shen W (2013) Polar motion excitations for an Earth model with frequency-dependent responses: 1. A refined theory with insight into the Earth’s rheology and core-mantle coupling. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 118(9):4975–4994. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrb.50314
Chen JL, Wilson CR, Ries JC (2016) Broadband assessment of degree-2 gravitational changes from GRACE and other estimates, 2002–2015. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 121(3):2112–2128. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012708
Cheng M, Ries JC, Tapley BD (2011) Variations of the Earth’s figure axis from satellite laser ranging and GRACE. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JB000850
Collilieux X, Altamimi Z, Ray J, van Dam T, Wu X (2009) Effect of the satellite laser ranging network distribution on geocenter motion estimation. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JB005727
Couhert A, Mercier F, Moyard J, Biancale R (2018) Systematic error mitigation in DORIS-derived geocenter motion. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 123(11):10,142–10,161. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015453
Dahle C, Murböck M, Flechtner F, Dobslaw H, Michalak G, Neumayer K, Abrykosov O, Reinhold A, König R, Sulzbach R, Förste C (2019) The GFZ GRACE RL06 monthly gravity field time series: processing details and quality assessment. Remote Sens 11(18):2116
Degnan JJ (1993) Millimeter accuracy satellite laser ranging: a review. American Geophysical Union (AGU), pp 133–162. https://doi.org/10.1029/GD025p0133
Dobslaw H, Dill R (2018) Predicting Earth orientation changes from global forecasts of atmosphere–hydrosphere dynamics. Adv Sp Res 61(4):1047–1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.11.044
Dunn P, Torrence M, Kolenkiewicz R, Smith D (1999) Earth scale defined by modern satellite ranging observations. Geophys Res Lett 26(10):1489–1492. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900260
Exertier P, Bonnefond P, Nicolas J, Barlier F (2001) Contributions of satellite laser ranging to past and future radar altimetry missions. Surv Geophys 22(5):491–507. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015624418639
Farrell WE (1972) Deformation of the Earth by surface loads. Rev Geophys 10(3):761–797. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG010i003p00761
Hackel S, Gisinger C, Balss U, Wermuth M, Montenbruck O (2018) Long-term validation of TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X orbit solutions with laser and radar measurements. Remote Sens 10:762. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050762
Jinyun G, Wang Y, Shen Y, Liu X, Sun Y, Kong Q (2018) Estimation of SLR station coordinates by means of SLR measurements to kinematic orbit of LEO satellites. Earth Planets Sp. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0973-7
Lejba P, Schillak S (2011) Determination of station positions and velocities from laser ranging observations to Ajisai, Starlette and Stella satellites. Adv Sp Res 47(4):654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.013
Loomis BD, Rachlin KE, Luthcke SB (2019) Improved Earth oblateness rate reveals increased ice sheet losses and mass-driven sea level rise. Geophys Res Lett 46(12):6910–6917. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082929
Luceri V, Pavlis EC, Pace B, König D, Kuzmicz-Cieslak M, Bianco G (2017) Overview of the ILRS contribution to the development of ITRF2013. In: van Dam T (ed) REFAG 2014. Springer, Cham, pp 101–108
Marini JW, Murray CW (1973) Correction of laser range tracking data for atmospheric refraction at elevations above 10 degrees. NASA technical memorandum NASA-TM-X-70555
McGarry JF, Hoffman ED, Degnan JJ, Cheek JW, Clarke CB, Diegel IF, Donovan HL, Horvath JE, Marzouk M, Nelson AR, Patterson DS, Ricklefs RL, Shappirio MD, Wetzel SL, Zagwodzki TW (2018) NASA’s satellite laser ranging systems for the twenty-first century. J Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1191-6
Mendes VB, Pavlis EC (2004) High-accuracy zenith delay prediction at optical wavelengths. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020308
Mendes VB, Prates G, Pavlis EC, Pavlis DE, Langley RB (2002) Improved mapping functions for atmospheric refraction correction in SLR. Geophys Res Lett 29(10):53–1–53–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014394
Meyrath T, van Dam T, Weigelt M, Cheng M (2013) An assessment of degree-2 Stokes coefficients from Earth rotation data. Geophys J Int 195(1):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt263
Minster J, Altamimi Z, Blewitt G (2010) Precise geodetic infrastructure: national requirements for a shared resource. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.17226/12954
Nakada M, Karato SI (2012) Low viscosity of the bottom of the Earth’s mantle inferred from the analysis of Chandler wobble and tidal deformation. Phys Earth Planet Inter 192–193:68–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2011.10.001
Nakada M, Okuno J (2013) GIA-related rotational variations for the Earth with low-viscosity \(D^{\prime \prime }\) layer. Geophys J Int 195(2):725–739. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt290
Otsubo T, Appleby GM (2003) System-dependent center-of-mass correction for spherical geodetic satellites. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JB002209
Otsubo T, Sherwood RA, Appleby GM, Neubert R (2015) Center-of-mass corrections for sub-cm-precision laser-ranging targets: Starlette, Stella and LARES. J Geodesy 89(4):303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0776-y
Otsubo T, Müller H, Pavlis EC, Torrence MH, Thaller D, Glotov VD, Wang X, Sośnica K, Meyer U, Wilkinson MJ (2018) Rapid response quality control service for the laser ranging tracking network. J Geodesy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-018-1197-0
Pearlman MR, Degnan JJ, Bosworth JM (2002) The international laser ranging service. Adv Space Res 30(2):135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00277-6
Peltier WR, Luthcke SB (2009) On the origins of Earth rotation anomalies: new insights on the basis of both “paleogeodetic” data and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (grace) data. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JB006352
Peltier WR, Wu P, Yuen DA (1981) The viscosities of the Earth’s mantle. American Geophysical Union (AGU), pp 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1029/GD004p0059
Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions (2010), IERS Technical Note 36. Verlag des Bundesamts für Kartographie und Geodäsie, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, p 179
Picot N, Marechal C, Couhert A, Desai S, Scharroo R, Egido A (2018) Jason-3 products handbook. SALP-MU-M-OP-16118-CN 1(5):28–31
Ries JC, Eanes RJ, Huang C, Schutz BE, Shum CK, Tapley BD, Watkins MM, Yuan DN (1989) Determination of the gravitational coefficient of the Earth from near-Earth satellites. Geophys Res Lett 16(4):271–274. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i004p00271
Ries JC, Eanes RJ, Shum CK, Watkins MM (1992) Progress in the determination of the gravitational coefficient of the Earth. Geophys Res Lett 19(6):529–531. https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00259
Rodríguez J, Appleby G, Otsubo T (2019) Upgraded modelling for the determination of centre of mass corrections of geodetic SLR satellites: impact on key parameters of the terrestrial reference frame. J Geodesy 93(12):2553–2568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01315-0
Roy K, Peltier WR (2011) GRACE era secular trends in Earth rotation parameters: a global scale impact of the global warming process? Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047282
Sabadini R, Yuen DA, Gasperini P (1985) The effects of transient rheology on the interpretation of lower mantle viscosity. Geophys Res Lett 12(6):361–364. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL012i006p00361
Saito M (1978) Relationship between tidal and load Love numbers. J Phys Earth 26(1):13–16. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.26.13
Sasao T, Wahr JM (1981) An excitation mechanism for the free ‘core nutation’. Geophys J Int 64(3):729–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1981.tb02692.x
Schreiber KU, Kodet J (2017) The application of coherent local time for optical time transfer and the quantification of systematic errors in satellite laser ranging. Space Sci Rev 214(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-017-0457-2
Seitz F, Kirschner S, Neubersch D (2012) Determination of the Earth’s pole tide Love number k2 from observations of polar motion using an adaptive Kalman filter approach. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JB009296
Smith DE, Kolenkiewicz R, Dunn PJ, Torrence MH (2000) Earth scale below a part per billion from Satellite Laser Ranging. In: Schwarz KP (ed) Geodesy Beyond 2000. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–12
Sośnica K, Jäggi A, Meyer U, Thaller D, Beutler G, Arnold D, Dach R (2015) Time variable Earth’s gravity field from SLR satellites. J Geodesy 89(10):945–960. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-015-0825-1
Tamisiea ME, Mitrovica JX, Tromp J, Milne GA (2002) Present-day secular variations in the low-degree harmonics of the geopotential: sensitivity analysis on spherically symmetric Earth models. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 107(B12):ETG 18-1–ETG 18-10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000696
Wahr J, Nerem RS, Bettadpur SV (2015) The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time-variable gravity measurements: implications for estimates of surface mass variations. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 120(6):4597–4615. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB011986
Wu X, Ray J, van Dam T (2012) Geocenter motion and its geodetic and geophysical implications. J Geodyn 58:44–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2012.01.007
Wu X, Kusche J, Landerer FW (2017) A new unified approach to determine geocentre motion using space geodetic and GRACE gravity data. Geophys J Int 209(3):1398–1402. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggx086
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AC, CB, FM, KC, MG and PE designed the research; AC, CB, FM, KC and MG performed the research; AC, FM, KC and MG analyzed the data; and AC wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors wish to acknowledge Dr. Richard Biancale for his longstanding commitment to embrace the work presented in the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Couhert, A., Bizouard, C., Mercier, F. et al. Self-consistent determination of the Earth’s GM, geocenter motion and figure axis orientation. J Geod 94, 113 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01450-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-020-01450-z