Abstract
Reconciling livelihoods and conservation aspects in rattan utilization is an intricate problem. To shed light on possible solutions, this study analyzed multiple scenarios using system dynamics models for balancing the ecological and economic sustainability of rattan harvesting in the Lore Lindu National Park. The system dynamics models were developed from the rattan inventory and collected socio-economic data. The analysis was performed using three scenarios: the current harvesting practice; sustainable harvesting without restocking; and sustainable harvesting with restocking. It was found that reconciling livelihoods with conservation could be best achieved under the third scenario. Further, the reconciliation will be best achieved through allocating a specific rattan utilization area, deciding the harvesting quota, determining the number of harvesters, proposing a reasonable price, and restocking rattan for optimizing income and a sustainable rattan population. To realize this condition, it will be necessary to develop a local institution to manage rattan in Lore Lindu National Park. These results also support a policy to give access of forest-dependent communities for utilizing rattan in protected areas as long as this is aligned with conservation strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adhikari RK, Kindu M, Pokharel R, Castro LM (2017) Financial compensation for biodiversity conservation in Ba Be National Park of Northern Vietnam. J Nat Conserv 35:91–100
Arnold JEM, Pérez MR (1998) Incomes from the forest: methods for the development and conservation of forest products for local communities. The role of non-timber forest products in conservation and development (pp. 17–41). Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research.
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik], (2017) Sulawesi Tengah Province in figures 2017. BPS of Central Sulawesi Province, Palu
Brites AD, Morsello C (2012) The ecological effects of harvesting non-timber forest products from natural forests: a review of the evidence. VI Encontro Nacional da Anppas 18 a 21 de setembro de 2012.
Brown K (2000) Innovations for conservation and development. Geogra J 168(1):6–17
Campbell MJ, Edwards W, Magrach A, Laurance SG, Alamgir M, Porolak G, Laurance WF (2017) Forest edge disturbance increases rattan abundance in tropical rain forest fragments. Sci Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06590-5
Chechina M, Neveux Y, Parkins JR (2018) Hamann A (2018) Balancing conservation and livelihoods: a study of forest-dependent communities in the Philippines. Conserv Soc 16(4):420–430
Dohrenbusch A (2006) Forest management systems and diversified production-principles of sustainable management of renewable resources. In sino-german symposium 2006: the sustainable harvest of non-timber forest products in china. Strategies to balance economic benefits and biodiversity conservation. Beijing: the Sino-German Center for Research Promotion.
Dransfield J (1979) A Manual of the Rattans of the Malay Peninsula. Malayan Forest Records No. 29. Forestry Department. Malaysia.
Forrester JW (1972) Industrial dynamics. The M.I.T. Press, Massachuse’s Insitute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusets (US)
Forrester, JW (1999) System dynamics: the foundation under systems thinking. Sloan School of Management Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA 02139. https://sysdyn.mit.edu/ftp/sdep/papers/D-4828.html.
Gaoue OG, Horvitz CC (2011) Ticktin T (2011) Non-timber forest product harvest in variable environments: modeling the effect of harvesting as a stochastic sequence. Ecol Appl 21(5):1604–2161
Godoy R (1990) The economics of traditional rattan cultivation. Agrofor Syst 12(163–172):1990
Hamzari H (2011) Community-based sustainable rattan conservation: a case study in Lore Lindu National Park Central Sulawesi. Biodiversitas 12(4):241–245. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d120410
Harbi J, Erbaugh JT, Sidiq M, Haasler B, Nurrochmat DR (2018) Making a bridge between livelihoods and forest conservation: Lessons from non-timber forest products’ utilization in South Sumatera. Indones For Policy Econ 94(2018):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.011
Hardjoprajitno S (2000) Role of forest survey and mapping in maintaining forest sustainability as an input to regional autonomy. Globe 2(1):6–13
Hess B (2013) Simulation of rattan harvests in Indonesia: different harvesting pressures and the resulting patterns. Swed Univ Agricul Sci.
ITTO [International Tropical Timber Organization], MoF [Ministry of Forestry] (2008) Technical report: inventory of rattan sanding stock in natural forest and plantation. ITTO and MoF of Indonesia, Jakarta
ITTO [International Tropical Timber Organization], NPWPCD [National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department] (2013) The inventory and monitoring of tree resources outside forest in Thailand. National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department, Bangkok
Kalima T (1996) Study of rattan potency in Gunung Halimun National Park, West Jawa Bul Pen Hutan (For Res Bull) 602: 9–16.
Kusters K, Achdiawan RB, Belcher PMR (2006) Balancing development and conservation? an assessment of livelihood and environmental outcomes of non-timber forest product trade in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Ecol Soc 11(2):20
Lane DC (2000) Diagramming conventions in system dynamics. J Oper Res Soc 51:241–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600864
Lore Lindu National Park (2018) Shapefile of Lore Lindu National Park zonation map. Balai Besar Taman Nasional Lore Lindu, Palu
Meijaard E, Achdiawan R, Wan M, Tabe A (2014) Rattan. the decline of a once-important non-timber forest product in Indonesia. Occasional Paper 101. Bogor: Indonesia.
MoEF [Ministry of Environment and Forestry] (2018) The state of indonesia’s forests 2018. Jakarta: Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Republic of Indonesia. ISBN: 978-602-8358-82-8.
Nepal S (2011) Spiteri A (2011) Linking livelihoods and conservation: an examination of local residents’ perceived linkages between conservation and livelihood benefits around nepal’s chitwan national park. Environ Manage 47:727–738
Pandey AK, Tripathi YC, Kumar (2016) Review article non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for sustained livelihood: challenges and strategies. Research Journal of Forestry. ISSN 1819–3439. Page 1–7. DOI https://doi.org/10.3923/rjf.2016.
Powling A (2004) Rattans: taxonomy and ecology. Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI).
Prosea (1993) Plant Resources of South-East Asia 6: Rattans. Dransfield J, Manokaran N, editor. Pudoc, Wageningen (NL): Prosea.Rachman O, Jasni. 2008. Rattan, Resources, Nature and Processing. Jakarta: Forestry Research and Development Agency.
Rachman O, Jasni. (2008) Rattan, resources, nature and processing. Forestry Research and Development Agency, Jakarta
Rustiami H (2011) Revision of Calamus and Daemonorops (Arecaceae) in Sulawesi Disertation. Bogor, IPB University.
Senaras AE (2017) Structure and behavior in system dynamics: a case study in logistic. J BusRes Turk 4(9):321–340. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2017.334
Shackleton C, Shackleton S (2004) The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa. S Afr J Sci 100:658–664
Siebert SF (2004) Demographic effects of collecting rattan cane and their implications for sustainable harvesting. Conserv Biol 18:424–430
Soea KT, Yeo-Chang Y (2019) Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: a case study in Bago Yoma, South-Central Myanmar. For Policy Econ 100:129–141
Stiegel S, Kessler M, Getto D, Thonhofer J, Siebert SF (2011) Elevational patterns of species richness and density of rattan palms (Arecaceae: Calamoideae) in Central Sulawesi Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 20(9):1987–2005
Sunderland TCH, Baling MPB, Asaha S, Malleson R (2008) The utilization and management of African rattans: constraints to sustainable supply through cultivation. For Trees Livelihoods 18:337–353
Twery MJ (2004) Environmental modelling: finding simplicity in complexity. Edited by J. Wainwright and M. Mulligan @2004 Wiley, Ltd. ISBNs: 0–471–49617–0 (HB); 0–471–49618–9 (PB).
Weinstock JA (1983) Rattan: ecological balance in Borneo rainforest Swidden. Econ Bot 37(1):55–68
Widayati A, Jones S, Carlisle B (2010) Accessibility factors and conservation forest designation affecting Rattan Cane harvesting in Lambusango forest, Buton, Indonesia. Hum Ecol 38(6):731–746
Wolstenholme EF (1982) System dynamics in perspective. J Oper Res Soc 33(6):547–556
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to express their gratitude to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia for providing research funding and SISF Japan for facilitating the exchange research student program at University of Tsukuba; to the head office and staff of Lore Lindu National Park for permission, assistance, and facilities during the research activities performed in the field; to officers of provincial forestry office, field assistant of cane group, trade and industry office, customary councils, village governmental offices and rattan sellers who participated in discussions; and to the local communities in Toro, Tomado, Kamarora, Sedoa, and Tuva who contributed on social economics interviews.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yulianto, Noguchi, R., Soekmadi, R. et al. Reconciling Livelihoods and Conservation for Rattan Sustainable Harvesting in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia. Small-scale Forestry 20, 175–197 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09463-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09463-4