Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Analysis on the Wear Performance of New and Reconditioned Ceramic Cutting Tools When Machining Nodular Cast Iron GGG-60, with Lubrication of Two Types of Fluids

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The advantages and disadvantages of reusing machining tools were evaluated in this research, because through the monitoring of insert wear it was possible to compare the performance between the new and reconditioned tools when machining nodular cast iron GGG-60. In this way, the material was milled with a new tool, reconditioned tool with SiAlON, silicon nitride based ceramic insert. In the study, two cutting parameters were considered, one recommended by the tool manufacturer and the other optimized during pretests. Aiming at a sustainable process, a semi-synthetic soluble mineral oil and a vegetable oil were used as the cutting fluid for the study. Thus, through the Action 6.0 software, a complete factorial experimental design was carried out, in three independent variables and two levels, observing the tool life and the wear mechanisms in the response. Therefore, it was observed that the main mechanism of abrasion and adhesion wear, both for the new tool and the reconditioned one, generated a noticeable flank wear. However, the best statistically obtained interaction for the process variables was found for new tools in cutting parameter P1 and semi-synthetic Rocol Ultracut cutting fluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Products—Kennametal Master Cutting Tools; Inc. 525 William Penn Place Suite 330, Pittsburgh. https://www.kennametal.com/pt/pt/products.html, 2020

  2. A. Siddhpura and R. Paurobally, A Review of Flank Wear Prediction Methods for Tool Condition Monitoring in a Turning Process, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2012, 65, p 371–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4177-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Niu, C. Huang, R. Su, B. Zou, J. Wang, Z. Liu, and C. Li, Study on Surface Integrity of Compacted Graphite Iron Milled by Cemented Carbide Tools and Ceramic Tools, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 103, p 4123–4134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03592-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Su, C. Huang, L. Xu, B. Zou, H. Liu, Y. Liu, and C. Li, Changes of Cutting Performance under Different Workpiece Removal Volume during Normal Speed and High Speed Milling of Compacted Graphite Iron, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2019, 100(9–12), p 2785–2794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2848-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Guo, T. Stalbaum, J. Mann, H. Yeung, and S. Chandrasekar, Modulation-Assisted High Speed Machining of Compacted Graphite Iron (CGI), J. Manuf. Process, 2013, 15(4), p 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2013.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Chen, L. Jiang, G. Guo, and Q. An, Experimental and FEM Study of Coated and Uncoated Tools Used for Dry Milling of Compacted Graphite Cast Iron, Trans. Tianjin Univ., 2011, 17(4), p 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12209-011-1609-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. M.P. Kumar, N. Ramakrishna, K. Amarnath, and S.M. Kumar, Study on Tool Life and Its Failure Mechanisms, Int. J. Innov. Res. Sci. Technol., 2015, 2(4), p 126–131

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.C. Perju, D.G. Galuşcă, C. Nejneru, and A.E. Lărgeanu, Ferrite-Pearlite Cast Iron Parts Restoring Using The Impulse Discharge Method, Petrol. Gas Univ. Ploiesti Bull. Tech. Ser., 2010, 62(2), p 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Yigit, E. Celik, F. Findik, and S. Koksal, Effect of Cutting Speed on the Performance of Coated and Uncoated Cutting Tools in Turning Nodular Cast Iron, J. Mater. Process Technol., 2008, 204(1), p 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.Jmatprotec.2007.10.082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandivik, https://www.sandvik.coromant.com/en-us/services/pages/recycling.aspx, 2015

  11. W. Grzesik, Advanced Machining Processes of Metallic Materials: Theory, Modelling, and Applications, 2nd ed., 2017

  12. V.V. Oliveira, P.A.C. Beltrão, and G. Pintaude, Effect of Tool Geometry on the Wear of Cemented Carbide Coated with TiAlN during Drilling of Compacted Graphite Iron, Wear, 2010, 271, p 2561–2569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2010.12.075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Richetti, A.R. Machado, M.B. Silva, E.O. Ezugwu, and J. Bonney, Influence of the Number of Inserts for Tool Life Evaluation in Face Milling of Steels, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2004, 44, p 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J.R.S. Moreno, G.L. Silva, C.E. Silva Junior, and J.F.S. Gonçalves, Comparative Performance Analysis of Tung and Jatropha Emulsions for Development as Cutting Fluids, Mater. Res. Express, 2020, 7, p 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab5f7e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.M. Belentani, H. Funes Júnior, F.C. Canarima, A.E. Dinizb, A. Hassuib, P.R. Aguiarc, and E.C. Bianchi, Utilization of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) with Water in CBN Grinding of Steel, Mater. Res., 2014, 17(1), p 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14392013005000165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. C.A.S. Bork, J.F.S. Gonçalves, J.O. Gomes, and J. Gheller, Performance of the Jatropha Vegetable-Base Soluble Cutting Oil as a Renewable Source in the Aluminum Alloy 7050-T7451 Milling, J. Manuf. Sci. Technol., 2014, 7, p 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2014.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kedare, D. Borse, and P. Shahane, Effect of Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) on Surface Roughness of Mild Steel of 15 HRC on Universal Milling Machine, Procedia Mater. Sci., 2015, 6, p 150–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. B.L. Tai, D.A. Stephenson, R.J. Furness, and A.J. Shih, Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) in Automotive Powertrain Machining, Procedia CIRP, 2014, 14, p 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. X. Youqiang, D. Jianxin, Z. Kedong, W. Xingsheng, L. Yunsong, and Z. Yonghui, Fabrication and Dry Cutting Performance of Si3N4/TiC Ceramic Tools Reinforced with the PVD WS2/Zr Soft-Coatings, Ceram. Int., 2015, 41, p 10261–11027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.04.153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A.M. Souza, W.F. Sales, S.C. Santos, and A.R. Machado, Performance of Single Si3N4 and Mixed Si3N4/CPCBN Wiper Cutting Tools Applied to High Speed Face Milling of Cast Iron, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 2005, 45, p 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. W. Grzesik, J. Rech, and Z. Żak, Determination of Friction in Metal Cutting with Tool Wear and Flank Face Effects, Wear, 2014, 317, p 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2014.05.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Siddhpura and R. Pauro, A Study of the Effects of Friction on Flank Wear and the Role of Friction in Tool Wear Monitoring, Aust. J. Mech. Eng., 2011, 10(2), p 141–156. https://doi.org/10.7158/M12-027.2012.10.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. F. Zemzemi, J. Rech, W. Ben Salem, A. Dogui, and P. Kapsa, Identification of a Friction Model at Tool/Chip/Workpiece Interfaces in Dry Machining of AISI4142 Treated Steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209(8), p 3978–3990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.09.019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. R. Suresh and S. Basavarajappa, Effect of Process Parameters on Tool Wear and Surface Roughness during Turning of Hardened Steel with Coated Ceramic Tool, Procedia Mater. Sci., 2014, 5, p 1450–1459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Y.C. Yen, A. Jain, and T. Altan, A Finite Element Analysis of Orthogonal Machining Using Different Tool Edge Geometries, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2004, 146(1), p 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00846-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Nayyar, J. Kaminski, A. Kinnander, and L. Nyborg, An Experimental Investigation of Machinability of Graphitic Cast Iron Grades; Flake, Compacted and Spheroidal Graphite Iron in Continuous Machining Operations, Procedia CIRP, 2012, 1, p 488–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal Technological University of Paraná (UTFPR), Cornélio Procópio Campus, Alberto Carazzai Av., 1640, Cornélio Procópio, PR, CEP 86300-000, Brazil

    João Roberto Sartori Moreno, André Alonso Ribeiro & Janaina Fracaro de Souza Gonçalves

Authors
  1. João Roberto Sartori Moreno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. André Alonso Ribeiro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Janaina Fracaro de Souza Gonçalves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Roberto Sartori Moreno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moreno, J.R.S., Ribeiro, A.A. & de Souza Gonçalves, J.F. Comparative Analysis on the Wear Performance of New and Reconditioned Ceramic Cutting Tools When Machining Nodular Cast Iron GGG-60, with Lubrication of Two Types of Fluids. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 248–257 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05319-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05319-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation