Skip to main content
Log in

Paleomagnetism and Age Correlation of the Mesoproterozoic Rocks of the Udzha and Olenek Uplifts, Northeastern Siberian Platform

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—This paper presents the results of paleomagnetic studies of the Proterozoic sedimentary and igneous rocks composing the structure of sections of the Olenek and Udzha uplifts. Carbonate rocks of the upper unit of Khaipakh formation have been studied within the Olenek uplift, and terrigenous and volcanic-sedimentary rocks of the Udzha and Unguokhtakh formations and the Early Mesoproterozoic igneous complex have been investigated within the Udzha uplift. Within the Olenek uplift, the carbonate rocks of the upper unit of the Khaipakh formation have been studied; within the Udzha uplift–terrigenous and volcanogenic-sedimentary rocks of the Udzha and Unguokhtakh formations, and the Early Mesoproterozoic magmatic complex. The results of the paleomagnetic study (1) indicate that the upper unit of Khaipakh formation of the Olenek uplift and the Udzha formation of the Udzha uplift have different sedimentation age, which contradicts the currently accepted correlation scheme of the Proterozoic sections in the northern Siberian platform; (2) support the existence of two stages of the Proterozoic magmatism in the territory of the Udzha uplift, with a more ancient stage having an age of ~1500 Ma according to the paleomagnetic data; (3) show that from ~1500 to 1110 Ma ago, the Siberian platform was located in the equatorial and subequatorial latitudes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bowring, S., Grotzinger, J., Isachsen, C., Knoll, A., Pelechaty, S., and Kolosov, P., Calibrating rates of early Cambrian evolution, Science, 1993, vol. 261, pp. 1293–1298. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.11539488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler, R.F., Paleomagnetism: Magnetic Domains to Geologic Terranes, Boston: Blackwell Sci. Publ., 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, K.M., Finney, S.C., Gibbard, P.L., and Fan, J.-X., The ICS international chronostratigraphic chart, Episodes, 2013, vol. 36, pp. 199–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Day, R., Fuller, M., and Schmidt, V.A., Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: grain-size and compositional dependence, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1977, vol. 13, pp. 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(77)90108-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Debiche, M.G. and Watson, G.S., Confidence limits and bias correction for estimating angles between directions with applications to paleomagnetism, J. Geophys. Res., 1995, vol. 100, no. B12, pp. 24405-24430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dunlop, D.J., Theory and application of the Day plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc). 1. Theoretical curves and tests using titanomagnetite data, J. Geophys. Res., 2002a, vol. 107, p. 2056. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunlop, D.J., Theory and application of the Day plot (Mrs/Ms versus Hcr/Hc). 2. Application to data for rocks, sediments, and soils, J. Geophys. Res., 2002b, vol. 107, p. 2057. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunlop, D.J. and Özdemir, Ö., Rock Magnetism. Fundamentals and Frontiers, Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Enkin, R.J., A Computer Program Package for Analysis and Presentation of Paleomagnetic Data, Sidney, British Columbia:_Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geological Survey of Canada, 1994.

  10. Ernst, R.E., Buchan, K.L., Hamilton, M.A., Okrugin, A.V., and Tomshin, M.D., Integrated paleomagnetism and U–Pb geochronology of mafic dikes of the eastern Anabar Shield region, Siberia: implications for Mesoproterozoic paleolatitude of Siberia and comparison with Laurentia, J. Geol., 2000, vol. 108, pp. 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1086/314413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst, R.E., Hamilton, M.A., Söderlund, U., Hanes, J.A., Gladkochub, D.P., Okrugin, A. V., Kolotilina, T., Mekhonoshin, A.S., Bleeker, W., LeCheminant, A.N., Buchan, K.L., Chamberlain, K.R., and Didenko, A.N., Long-lived connection between southern Siberia and northern Laurentia in the Proterozoic, Nat. Geosci., 2016a, vol. 9, pp. 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ernst, R.E., Okrugin, A.V., Veselovskiy, R.V., Kamo, S.L., Hamilton, M.A., Pavlov, V., Soderlund, U., Chamberlain, K.R., and Rogers, C., The 1501 Ma Kuonamka Large Igneous Province of northern Siberia: U–Pb geochronology, geochemistry, and links with coeval magmatism on other crustal blocks, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2016b, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 653–671. https://doi.org/10.15372/GiG20160502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Evans, D.A., Veselovsky, R.V., Petrov, P.Y., Shatsillo, A.V., and Pavlov, V.E., Paleomagnetism of Mesoproterozoic margins of the Anabar Shield: A hypothesized billion-year partnership of Siberia and northern Laurentia, Precambrian Res., 2016, vol. 281, pp. 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2016.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gladkochub, D.P., Stanevich, A.M., Travin, A.V., Mazukabzov, A.M., Konstantinov, K.M., Yudin, D.S., and Kornilova, T.A., The Udzha Mesoproterozoic paleorift (northern Siberian craton): new data on the age of basites, stratigraphy and microphytology, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2009, vol. 425, no. 5, pp. 642–648.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grant, N.K., Laskowski, T.E., and Foland, K.A., Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages of Paleozoic glauconites from Ohio—Indiana and Missouri, U.S.A, Chem. Geol., 1984, vol. 46, pp. 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(84)90191-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurevich, E.L., Paleomagnetic studies of the Precambrian deposits of the northern Siberian platform, in Sb. nauchn. tr. VNIGRI: Paleomagnetizm verkhnego dokembriya SSSR (Collect. Pap. VNIGRI: Paleomagnetism of the Upper Precambrian of the USSR), Leningrad: VNIGRI, 1983, pp. 39–51.

  17. Jiang, Z., Liu, Q., Dekkers, M.J., Tauxe, L., Qin, H., Barrón, V., and Torrent, J., Acquisition of chemical remanent magnetization during experimental ferrihydrite–hematite conversion in Earth-like magnetic field—implications for paleomagnetic studies of red beds, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2015,vol. 428, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2015.07.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Khramov, A.N., Goncharov, G.I., Komissarova, R.A., et al., Paleomagnitologiya (Paleomagnetology), Khramov, A.N., Ed., Leningrad: Nedra, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kirschvink, J.L., The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of palaeomagnetic data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 1980, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kodama, K.P., Paleomagnetism of Sedimentary Rocks: Process and Interpretation, Chechester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118384138

  21. Konstantinov, K.M., Pavlov, V.E., Petukhova, E.P., and Gladkochub, D.P., Results of reconnaissance paleomagnetic studies of rocks of the Udzha uplift (northern Siberian platform), in Mater. semin.: Paleomagnetizm i magnetizm gornykh porod: teoriya, praktika, eksperiment (Proc. of Workshop “Paleomagnetism and Magnetism of Rocks: Theory, Practice, Experiment”), Gapeev, A.K., Ed., Borok, 2007, Moscow: GEOS, 2007. pp. 68–72.

  22. Kruiver, P.P., Dekkers, M.J., and Heslop, D., Quantification of magnetic coercivity components by the analysis of acquisition curves of isothermal remanent magnetisation, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2001, vol. 189, pp. 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00367-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Malyshev, S.V., Pasenko, A.M., Ivanov, A.V., Gladkochub, D.P., Savatenkov, V.M., Meffre, S., Abersteiner, A., Kamenetsky, V.S., and Shcherbakov, V.D., Geodynamic significance of the Mesoproterozoic magmatism of the Udzha Paleo-Rift (Northern Siberian Craton) based on U–Pb geochronology and paleomagnetic data, Minerals, 2018, vol. 8, p. 555. https://doi.org/10.3390/min8120555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Markov, F.G., Lopatin, B.G., Vishnevskii, A.N., Kulikov, Yu.P., Grozdilov, A.L., Trukhalev, A.I., Borshcheva, N.A., Bardaeva, M.A., Staritsyna, G.N., and Yegorov, L.S., Geologicheskaya karta SSSR. Masshtab 1 : 1 000 000 (novaya seriya). Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska. List R-48-(50)-Olenek (Scale 1 : 1 000 000 Geological Map of the USSR (New Series). Explanatory Note. Sheet R-48-(50) – Olenek), Leningrad: VSEGEI, 1983.

  25. Maxbauer, D.P., Feinberg, J.M., and Fox, D.L., MAX UnMix: A web application for unmixing magnetic coercivity distributions, Comput. Geosci., 2016, vol. 95, pp. 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McDougall, I., Potassium-argon dating of glauconite from a greensand drilled at Site 270 in the Ross Sea, DSDP Leg 28, in Initial Rep. Deep Sea Drill. Proj., vol. 36, Barker, P.F., Dalziel, I.W.D., Eds., Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1977, pp. 1071–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  27. McFadden, P.L. and McElhinny, M.W., Classification of the reversal test in palaeomagnetism, Geophys. J. Int., 1990, vol. 103, pp. 725–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1990.tb05683.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mezhvilk, A.A. and Markov, F.G., Geologicheskaya karta SSSR masshtaba 1  : 1 000 000 (novaya seriya). Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska. List R-(50)-52 –Tiksi (Scale 1 : 1 000 000 Geological Map of the USSR (New Series). Explanatory Note. Sheet R-(50)-52 – Tixie), Leningrad: VSEGEI, 1983.

  29. Okhlopkov, V.I., Koval’, S.G., Burtsev, I.N., et al., Otchet o GGS masshtaba 1 : 50 000 na territorii listov R-50-27-B; 28-A,B,G; 29; 30; 31; 40-V,G; 41-B,V,G; 42; 43 po rabotam Verkhne-Udzhinskogo ob”yekta Anabarskoi partii v 1980–1987 gg. pos. Nyurba (Report on 1 : 50 000 Group Geological Survey in the Territory of Sheets R-50-27-B; 28-A, B, D; 29; 30; 31; 40-B, G; 41-B, C, D; 42; 43 Based on Works on Verkhne-Udzhinskii Object of Anabar Field Party in 1980–1987. Nyurba Township), 1987.

  30. Osipova, Z.V. and Porshnev, G.I., About the age of the traps of the Udzha uplift, Uch. Zap. NIIGA, Ser. Reg. Geol., 1966, no. 8, pp. 207–209.

  31. Pavlov, V.E., Paleomagnetic poles of the Uchur-May Riphean hypostratotype and the drift of the Aldan block (of the Siberian craton) in the Riphean, Dokl. Earth Sci., 1994, no. 1, pp. 51–57.

  32. Pavlov, V.E., Shatsillo, A.V., and Petrov, P.Yu., Paleomagnetism of the upper Riphean deposits in the Turukhansk and Olenek uplifts and Uda Pre-Sayan region and the Neoproterozoic drift of the Siberian Platform, Izv.Phys. Solid Earth, 2015, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 716–747. https://doi.org/10.7868/s0002333715050099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pavlov, V.E., Pasenko, A.M., Shatsillo, A.V., Powerman, V.I., Shcherbakova, V.V., and Malyshev, S.V., Systematics of early cambrian paleomagnetic directions from the northern and eastern regions of the Siberian platform and the problem of an anomalous geomagnetic field in the time vicinity of the Proterozoic–Phanerozoic boundary, Izv. Phys. Solid Earth., 2018, vol. 54, pp. 782–805. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351318050117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pavlov, V.E., Gallet, Y., and Petrov, P.Yu., A new Siberian record of the ~1.0 Gyr-old Maya superchron, Precambrian Res., 2019, vol. 320, pp. 350—370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2018.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Prokopiev, A.V., Khudoley, A.K., Koroleva, O.V., Kazakova, G.G., Lokhov, D.K., Malyshev, S.V., Zaitsev, A.I., Roev, S.P., Sergeev, S.A., Berezhnaya, N.G., and Vasiliev, D.A., The Early Cambrian bimodal magmatism in the northeastern Siberian Craton, Russ. Geol. Geophys., 2016, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 155–175. https://doi.org/10.15372/GiG20160111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodionov, V.P., Paleomagnetism of the Upper Cambrian and Lower Paleozoic in the region of Udzha River, in Sb. nauchn. tr. VNIGRI: Paleomagnitnye metody v stratigrafii (Collect. Pap. VNIGRI: Paleomagnetic Methods in Stratigraphy), Khramov, A.N., Ed., Leningrad: VNIGRI, 1984, pp. 18–29.

  37. Semikhatov, M.A. and Serebryakov, S.N., Sibirskii gipostratotip rifeya (Siberian Hypostratotype of the Riphean), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

  38. Semikhatov, M.A., Ovchinnikova, G.V., Gorokhov, I.M., Vasil’eva, I.M., Gorokhovskii, B.M., Podkovyrov, V.N., and Kuznetsov, A.B., Isotope age of the Middle–Upper Riphean boundary: Pb–Pb geochronology of the Lakhanda group carbonates, eastern Siberia, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2000, vol. 372, no. 4, pp. 625–629.

  39. Shpunt, B.R., Shamshina, E.A., Shapovalova, I.G., Krylov, I.N., Davydov, Yu.V., Kelle E.Ya., Zabuga,B.R., and Lazebnik, K.A., Dokembrii Anabaro-Olenekskogo mezhdurech’ya (The Precambrian of the Anabar-Olenek Interfluve), Mokshantsev, K.B., Ed., Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sib. Otd., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shpunt, B.R., Shapovalova, I.G., Shamshina, E.A., et al., Proterozoi severo-vostochnoi okrainy Sibirskoi platformy (The Proterozoic of the Northeastern Margin of the Siberian Platform), Mokshantsev, K.B., Ed., Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sib. Otd., 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Shpunt, B.R., Shapovalova, I.G., and Shamshina, E.A., Pozdnii dokembrii severa Sibirskoi platformy (The Late Precambrian of the Northern Siberian Platform), Keller, B.M. and Kheraskova, T.N., Eds., Novosibirsk: Nauka, Sib. Otd., 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Smetannikova, L.I., Grinenko, V.S., Malanin, Yu.A., Prokop’ev, A.V., Knyazev, V.G., Trushchelev, A.M., Yuganova, L.A., Zharikova, L.P., Kazakova, G.G., Shepelev, N.G., and Yagnyshev, B.S., Gosudarstvennaya geologicheskaya karta Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Masshtab 1 : 1 000 000 (tret’e pokolenie). Seriya Anabaro-Vilyuiskaya. List R-51–Dzhardzhan. Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska (1 : 1 000 000 State Geological Map of the Russian Federation (Third Generation). Anabar-Vilyui Series: Sheet R-51–Dzhardzhan. Explanatory Note), St. Petersburg: VSEGEI Cartographic factory, 2013.

  43. Thébault, E., Finlay, C.C., Beggan, C.D., Alken, P., Aubert, J., et al., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the 12th generation, Earth, Planets Space., 2015, vol. 67, p. 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Torsvik, T.H. and Smethurst, M.A., Plate tectonic modeling: virtual reality with GMAP, Comput. Geosci., 1999, vol. 25, pp. 395–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Torsvik, T.H., Van der Voo, R., Preeden, U., Mac Niocaill, C., Steinberger, B., Doubrovine, P. V., Van Hinsbergen, D.J.J., Domeier, M., Gaina, C., Tohver, E., Meert, J.G., McCausland, J.A., and Cocks, L.R.M., Phanerozoic polar wander, palaeogeography and dynamics, Earth-Sci. Rev., 2012, vol. 114, nos. 3–4, pp. 325–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.06.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Veselovsky, R.V., Petrov, P. Yu., Karpenko, S.F., Kostitsyn, Yu.A., and Pavlov, V.E., New paleomagnetic and isotopic data on the Mesoproterozoic igneous complex of the northern slope of the Anabar Massif, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2006, vol. 411, no. 8, pp. 1190–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vishnevskaya, I.A., Letnikova, E.F., Vetrova, N.I., Kochnev, B.B., and Dril, S.I., Chemostratigraphy and detrital zircon geochronology of the Neoproterozoic Khorbusuonka Group, Olenek Uplift, Northeastern Siberian platform, Gondwana Res., 2017, vol. 51, pp. 255–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GR.2017.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Vladykin, N.V., Kotov, A.B., Borisenko, A.S., Yarmolyuk, V.V., Pokhilenko, N.P., Sal’nikova, E.B., Travin, A.V., and Yakovleva, S.Z., Age boundaries of formation of the Tomtor alkaline–ultramafic pluton: U–Pb and 40Ar/39Ar geochronological studies, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2014, vol. 454, no. 1, pp. 7–11. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869565214020224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wingate, M.T.D., Pisarevsky, S.A., Gladkochub, D.P., Donskaya, T.V., Konstantinov, K.M., Mazukabzov, A.M., and Stanevich, A.M., Geochronology and paleomagnetism of mafic igneous rocks in the Olenek Uplift, northern Siberia: Implications for Mesoproterozoic supercontinents and paleogeography, Precambrian Res., 2009, vol. 170, pp. 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precamres.2009.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zaitseva, T.S., Gorokhov, I.M., Kuznetsov, A.B., Semikhatov, M.A., Ivanovskaya, T.A., and Dorzhieva, O.V., Rb–Sr and K–Ar age of globular phyllosilicates and biostratigraphy of the Riphean deposits of the Olenek Uplift (North Siberia), Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2017, vol. 25, no. 6. pp. 581–606. https://doi.org/10.7868/s0869592x17060011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zaitseva, T.S., Gorokhov, I.M., Semikhatov, M.A., Kuznetsov, A.B., Ivanovskaya, T.A., Konstantinova, G.V., and Dorzhieva, O.V., “Rejuvenated” globular phyllosilicates in the Riphean deposits of the Olenek Uplift (north Siberia): structural ientification and geological significance of Rb–Sr and K–Ar age data, Stratigr. Geol. Correl., 2018, vol. 26, pp. 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0869593818060059

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Funding

The work was carried out under the State contract of IPE RAS with the support from the Government of the Russian Federation (project no. 14.Z50.31.0017). The interpretation of the paleomagnetic data was conducted under the project no. 19-77-10048 supported by the Russian Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. M. Pasenko.

Additional information

Translated by M. Nazarenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pasenko, A.M., Malyshev, S.V. Paleomagnetism and Age Correlation of the Mesoproterozoic Rocks of the Udzha and Olenek Uplifts, Northeastern Siberian Platform. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 56, 864–887 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320050067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320050067

Keywords:

Navigation