Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Condition of Occurrence of Large Man-Made Earthquakes in the Zone of Oil Production, Oklahoma

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Man-made seismicity is a response of the brittle crust to fluid injection at depth and to the subsequent increase in pore-pressure and stress field perturbations. In Oklahoma, where the sharp increase in earthquake rate correlates with injection operations, we show that the earthquake-size distribution can differ significantly on the volume of injected fluid. The size distribution of M < 3.5 earthquakes exhibits a near-constant slope b, while significant variation of b-values (from b ≈ 1 to b > 2) may be documented for larger magnitude ranges. This change shows statistically significant positive dependence on injection activity. In addition, largest events occur at the border of the injection area at some distance from massive injection, and in the periods of steady injection rate. These observations suggest that a deficit of large induced earthquakes under conditions of high injection rate can be accompanied by an overall increase of natural seismicity along pre-existing faults in the surrounding volume, where large events are more likely to be triggered over longer space-time scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Adushkin, V.V. and Turuntaev, S.B., Tekhnogennaya seismichnost’–indutsirovannaya i triggernaya (Man-Made Seismicity: Induced and Triggered), Moscow: IDG RAN, 2015.

  2. Barbour, A., Norbeck, J.H., and Rubinstein, J.L., The effects of varying injection rates in Osage county, Oklahoma, on the 2016 Mw 5.8 Pawnee earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2017, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1040–1053. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bender, B., Maximum likelihood estimation of b-values for magnitude grouped data, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1983, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 831–851.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, X., Nakata, N., Pennington, C., Haffener, J., Chang, J.C., He, X., Zhan, Z., Ni, S. and Walter, J.I., The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks, Sci. Rep., 2017, vol. 7, paper ID 4945. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04992-z

  5. Cornet, F., Seismic and aseismic motions generated by large scale fluid injections in a deep granite massif, Proc. 47th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, San Francisco, 2013, New York: Curran Associates, 2013, vol. 2, pp. 987–994.

  6. Davis, S.D. and Frohlich, C., Did (or will) fluid injection cause earthquakes?-criteria for a rational assessment, Seismol. Res. Lett., 1993, vol. 64, nos. 3–4, pp. 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dinske, C. and Shapiro, S.A., Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity, J. Seismol., 2013, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-012-9292-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellsworth, L.E., Injection-induced earthquakes, Science, 2013, vol. 341, no. 6142, pp. 1225,942-1–1225,942-7. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225942

  9. Ellsworth, W.L., Llenos, A.L., McGarr, A.F., Michael, A.J., Rubinstein, J.L., Mueller, C.S., Petersen, M.D., and Ca-lais, E., Increasing seismicity in the U.S. midcontinent: Implications for earthquake hazard, Leading Edge, 2015, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Grandin, R., Vallée, M., and Lacassin, R., Rupture process of the Mw 5.7 Pawnee, Oklahoma, earthquake from Sentinel-1 InSAR and seismological data, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2017, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Heimpel, M. and Malin, P., Aseismic slip in earthquake nucleation and self-similarity: evidence from Parkfield, California, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 1998, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hincks, T., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R., and Gernon, T., Oklahoma’s induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth, Science, 2018, vol. 359, no. 6381, pp. 1251–1255. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap7911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hong, Z., Moreno, H.A., and Hong, Y., Spatiotemporal assessment of induced seismicity in Oklahoma: Foreseeable fewer earthquakes for sustainable oil and gas extraction?, Geosciences, 2018, vol. 8, no. 436, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johann, L., Shapiro, S.A., and Dinske, C., The surge of earthquakes in Central Oklahoma has features of reservoir-induced seismicity, Sci. Rep., 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, paper ID 11505. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29883-9

  15. Langenbruch, C., Weingarten, M., and Zoback, M.D., Physics-based forecasting of man-made earthquake hazards in Oklahoma and Kansas, Nat. Commun., 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, Paper ID 3946. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06167-4

  16. Marzocchi, W. and Sandri, L., A review and new insights on the estimation of the b-value and its uncertainty, Ann. Geophys., 2003, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Narteau, C., Byrdina, S., Shebalin, P., and Schorlemmer, D., Common dependence on stress for the two fundamental laws of statitical seismology, Nature, 2009, vol. 462, no. 3, pp. 642–645. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivière, J., Lv, Z., Johnson, P., and Marone, C., Evolution of b-value during the seismic cycle: Insights from laboratory experiments on simulated faults, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2018, vol. 482, no. 7, pp. 407–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Romanowicz, B., Strike-slip earthquakes on quasi-vertical transcurrent faults: Inferences for general scaling relations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1992, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 481–484. https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rubinstein, J.L., and Mahani, A.B., Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2015, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 1060–1067. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoenball, M., and Ellsworth, W.L., A systematic assessment of the spatiotemporal evolution of fault activation through induced seismicity in Oklahoma and southern Kansas, J. Geophys. Res., 2017a, vol. 122, no. 12, pp. 10189–10206. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Schoenball, M. and Ellsworth, W.L., Waveform-relocated earthquake catalog for Oklahoma and southern Kansas illuminates the regional fault network, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2017b, vol. 88, no. 5, pp. 1252–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scholz, C., Aviles, C., and Wesnousky, S., Scaling differences between large intraplate and interplate earthquakes, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1986, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schorlemmer, D., Wiemer, S., and Wyss, M., Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimes, Nature, 2005, vol. 437, no. 7058, pp. 539–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro, S.A., Krüeger, O.S., Dinske, C., and Langenbruch, C., Magnitudes of induced earthquakes and geometric scales of fluid-stimulated rock volumes, Geophysics, 2011, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. WC55–WC63. https://doi.org/10.1190/GEO2010-0349.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro, S.A., Krueger, O.S., and Dinske, C., Probability of inducing given-magnitude earthquakes by perturbing finite volumes of rocks, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth., 2013, vol. 118, no. 7, pp. 3557–3575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tormann, T., Wiemer, S., and Mignan, A., Systematic survey of high-resolution b-value imaging along Californian faults: inference on asperities, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 2014, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 2029–2054. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JB010867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vorobieva, I., Narteau, C., Shebalin, P., Beauducel, F., Nercessian, A., Clourad, V., and Bouin, M.-P., Multiscale mapping of completeness magnitude of earthquake catalogs, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2013, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 2188–2202. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vorobieva, I., Shebalin, P., and Narteau, C., Break of slope in earthquake size distribution and creep rate along the San Andreas Fault system, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2016, vol. 43, no. 13, pp. 6869–6875. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vorobieva I.A., Soloviev, A.A., and Shebalin, P.N., Mapping of interplate coupling in the Kamchatka subduction zone from variations in the earthquake size distribution, Dokl. Earth Sci., 2019, vol. 484, no. 4, pp. 478–481. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869-56524844478-481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Walsh, F.R. III and Zoback, M., Oklahoma’s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal, Sci. Adv., 2015, vol. 1, no. 5, Paper ID e1500195. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500195

  32. Wyss, M., Sammis, C., Nadeau, R., and Wiemer, S., Fractal dimension and b-value on creeping and locked patches of the San-Andreas fault near Parkfield, California, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2004, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Earthquake Prediction Theory and Mathematical Geophysics, 117997, Moscow, Russia

    Inessa Vorobieva & Peter Shebalin

  2. Université de Paris, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris, CNRS, F-75005, Paris, France

    Clément Narteau

  3. Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123242, Moscow, Russia

    Peter Shebalin

Authors
  1. Inessa Vorobieva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peter Shebalin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Clément Narteau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Inessa Vorobieva, Peter Shebalin or Clément Narteau.

Ethics declarations

The method of the study was developed with support of the Russian Federation Ministry of Science and Education (project no. 14.W03.31.0033) and the data analysis under state contract within the research project no. AAAA-A19-119011490127-6.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vorobieva, I., Shebalin, P. & Narteau, C. Condition of Occurrence of Large Man-Made Earthquakes in the Zone of Oil Production, Oklahoma. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 56, 911–919 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320060130

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351320060130

Keywords:

Search

Navigation