Abstract
Utilizing three different sets of reanalysis data, this study examines the long- and short-lived observed positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) events (referred to as NAO+_LE and NAO+_SE) and long- and short-lived observed negative NAO events (referred to as NAO−_LE and NAO−_SE). Composite results indicate that the NAO-like circulation anomalies associated with the long-lived NAO events can reach the stratosphere, while they are primarily confined to the troposphere in the short-lived NAO events. Thus, the coupling/connection of stratospheric and tropospheric circulation anomalies is much better (worse) in the long-lived (short-lived) NAO events. A series of modified stratospheric initial-value experiments conducted with a simplified model indicate that a better (worse) connection between stratospheric and tropospheric circulation anomalies in the initial-value fields tend to gradually induce the NAO-like tropospheric circulation anomalies in the troposphere on the subsequent days, and thus naturally elongate (reduce) the lifetimes of the original NAO events by altering the tropospheric synoptic eddy vorticity flux over the North Atlantic region.
摘要
利用三套不同的再分析资料, 本文研究了观测的北大西洋涛动(NAO)的长生命和短生命事件。合成的结果表明, 长生命NAO事件的环流异常可以上探到平流层, 而短生命NAO事件的环流异常则主要局限于对流层。因此, 平流层和对流层的联系/耦合在长(短)生命的NAO事件中更为紧密(疏远)。利用一个简单大气模式运行的一组改变NAO事件的平流层初值场的实验表明, 在初值场中, 联系更为紧密(疏远)的平流层和对流层, 通过影响对流层天气涡旋强迫, 能够逐渐导致在随后的对流层中出现和原先NAO事件符号相同(相反)且空间结构类似的环流异常。这将自然地延长(缩短)原先NAO事件的生命期。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ambaum, M. H. P., and B. J. Hoskins, 2002: The NAO troposphere-stratosphere connection. J. Climate, 15, 1969–1978, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<1969:TNTSC>2.0.CO;2.
Baldwin, M. P., and T. J. Dunkerton, 1999: Propagation of the Arctic Oscillation from the stratosphere to the troposphere. J. Geophys. Res., 104, 30 937–30 946, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900445.
Benedict, J. J., S. Lee, and S. B. Feldstein, 2004: Synoptic view of the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 121–144, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0462(2000)061<0121:SVOTNA>2.0.CO;2.
Black, R. X., 2002: Stratospheric forcing of surface climate in the Arctic Oscillation. J. Climate, 15, 268–277, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0268:SFOSCI>2.0.CO;2.
Cassou, C., 2008: Intraseasonal interaction between the Madden-Julian Oscillation and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Nature, 455, 523–527, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07286.
Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S), 2017: ERA5: Fifth generation of ECMWF atmospheric reanalyses of the global climate. Copernicus Climate Change Service Climate Data Store (CDS).
Czaja, A., and C. Frankignoul, 2002: Observed impact of Atlantic SST anomalies on the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Climate, 15, 606–623, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0422(2022)015<0606:OIOASA>2.0.CO;2.
Drouard, M., G. Rivière, and P. Arbogast, 2013: The North Atlantic Oscillation response to large-scale atmospheric anomalies in the Northeastern Pacific. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2854–2874, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0351.1.
Feldstein, S. B., 2000: The timescale, power spectra, and climate noise properties of teleconnection patterns. J. Climate, 13, 4430–4440, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0420(2000)013<4430:TTPSAC>2.0.CO;2.
Feldstein, S. B., 2003: The dynamics of NAO teleconnection pattern growth and decay. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 129, 901–924, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.76.
Franzke, C., S. Lee, and S. B. Feldstein, 2004: Is the North Atlantic Oscillation a breaking wave? J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 145–160, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2004)061<0145:ITNAOA>2.0.CO;2.
Gerber, E. P., and L. M. Polvani, 2009: Stratosphere-troposphere coupling in a relatively simple AGCM: The importance of stratospheric variability. J. Climate, 22, 1920–1933, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2548.1.
Jiang, Z. N., M. Mu, and D. H. Luo, 2013: A study of the North Atlantic oscillation using conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation. J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 855–875, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-12-0148.1.
Kalnay, E., and Coauthors, 1996: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–472, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077<0437:TNYRP>2.0.CO;2.
Kidston, J., A. A. Scaife, S. C. Hardiman, D. M. Mitchell, N. Butchart, M. P. Baldwin, and L. J. Gray, 2015: Stratospheric influence on tropospheric jet streams, storm tracks and surface weather. Nature Geoscience, 8, 433–440, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2424.
Kim, J., and T. Reichler, 2016: Quantifying the uncertainty of the annular mode time scale and the role of the stratosphere. Climate Dyn., 47, 637–649, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2860-2.
Li, Y., and N.-C. Lau, 2012: Impact of ENSO on the atmospheric variability over the North Atlantic in late winter-Role of transient eddies. J. Climate, 25, 320–342, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00037.1.
Luo, D. H., A. R. Lupo, and H. Wan, 2007: Dynamics of eddy-driven low-frequency dipole modes. Part I: A simple model of North Atlantic oscillations. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 3–28, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3818.1.
Rivière, G., and I. Orlanski, 2007: Characteristics of the Atlantic storm-track eddy activity and its relation with the North Atlantic Oscillation. J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 241–266, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3850.1.
Shindell, D. T., G. A. Schmidt, M. E. Mann, D. Rind, and A. Waple, 2001: Solar forcing of regional climate change during the Maunder Minimum. Science, 294, 2149–2152, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064363.
Simpson, I. R., P. Hitchcock, T. G. Shepherd, and J. F. Scinocca, 2011: Stratospheric variability and tropospheric annular-mode timescales. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L20806, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049304.
Song, J., 2016: Understanding anomalous eddy Vorticity forcing in North Atlantic Oscillation Events. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 2985–3007, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0253.1.
Song, J., 2019: The long- and short-lived North Atlantic Oscillation events in a simplified atmospheric model. J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 2673–2700, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0288.1.
Stenchikov, G., A. Robock, V. Ramaswamy, M. D. Schwarzkopf, K. Hamilton, and S. Ramachandran, 2002: Arctic Oscillation response to the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption: Effects of volcanic aerosols and ozone depletion. J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACL 28-1–ACL 28-16, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002090.
Stephenson, D. B., V. Pavan, and R. Bojariu, 2000: Is the North Atlantic Oscillation a Random Walk? International Journal of Climatology, 20, 1–18, https://doi.org/10.1022/(SICI)1097-0088(200001)20:1<1::AID-JOC456>3.3.CO;2-G.
Ulbrich, U., and M. Christoph, 1999: A shift of the NAO and increasing storm track activity over Europe due to anthropogenic greenhouse gas forcing. Climate Dyn., 15, 551–559, https://doi.org/10.1007/s003820050299.
Uppala, S. M., and Coauthors, 2005: The ERA-40 re-analysis. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.04.176.
Walker, G. T., 1924: Correlations in seasonal variations of weather IX. Mem. Indian Meteorol. Dep., 24, 275–332.
Wallace, J. M., and D. S. Gutzler, 1981: Teleconnections in the Geopotential height field during the Northern Hemisphere Winter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 109, 784–812, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1981)109<0784:TITGHF>2.0.CO;2.
Wallace, J. M., 2000: North Atlantic oscillatiodannular mode: Two paradigms-one phenomenon. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 791–805, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712656402.
Waugh, D. W., A. H. Sobel, and L. M. Polvani, 2017: What is the polar vortex and how does it influence weather? Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 98, 37–44, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00212.1.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41790473).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The lifetimes of observed NAO events are related to the connection between stratospheric and tropospheric circulation anomalies in the initial-value fields.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, J., Zhao, J. Observed Long- and Short-lived North Atlantic Oscillation Events: Role of the Stratosphere. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 37, 1338–1358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0021-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-020-0021-y