Abstract
The LATIN-PGD method is a powerful alternative to the Newton–Raphson scheme for solving non-linear time-dependent problems in combination with reduced-order modeling methods. Many developments have been carried out over the last few decades and have led to some variants of the LATIN-PGD method. However, only few comparisons have been made between these variants and none using the digital resources now available. In this article, a comparison between the two major variants of the LATIN-PGD method, as well as with the Newton–Raphson one, is performed using a unified software which highlights the assets of the LATIN-PGD. Various test cases dealing with elasto-visco-plastic problems are undertaken, including comparison with commercial solvers, which reveals the interesting time saving in favor of the LATIN-PGD method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdali A, Benkrid K, Bussy P (1996) Simulation of sheet cutting by the large time increment method. J Mater Process Technol 60(1):255–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-0136(96)02339-4
Alameddin S, Bhattacharyya M, Fau A, Nackenhorst U, Néron D, Ladevèze P (2017) Large time increment approach for fatigue damage computations. PAMM 17(1):231–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201710085
Alart P, Dureisseix D (2008) A scalable multiscale LATIN method adapted to nonsmooth discrete media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(5):319–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.05.002
Allix O, Ladevèze P (1992) Interlaminar interface modelling for the prediction of delamination. Compos Struct 22(4):235–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8223(92)90060-P
Allix O, Ladevèze P, Gilletta D, Ohayon R (1989) A damage prediction method for composite structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 27(2):271–283. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620270205
Allix O, Vidal P (2002) A new multi-solution approach suitable for structural identification problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(25):2727–2758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00211-6
Arzt M, Cognard JY, Ladevèze P (1992) An efficient computational method for complex loading histories. In: Owen D, Onãte E, Hinton E (eds) Proceedings of 3rd international conference on computational plasticity. Pineridge Press, Swansea, pp 225–236
Aubard X, Boucard PA, Ladevèze P, Michel S (2002) Modeling and simulation of damage in elastomer structures at high strains. Comput Struct 80(27):2289–2298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(02)00241-9
Bellenger E, Bussy P (1998) Plastic and viscoplastic damage models with numerical treatment for metal forming processes. J Mater Process Technol 80–81:591–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00166-6
Bellenger E, Bussy P (2001) Phenomenological modeling and numerical simulation of different modes of creep damage evolution. Int J Solids Struct 38(4):577–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7683(00)00042-1
Bhattacharyya M, Fau A, Nackenhorst U, Néron D, Ladevèze P (2018) A LATIN-based model reduction approach for the simulation of cycling damage. Comput Mech 62(4):725–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1523-z
Bhattacharyya M, Fau A, Nackenhorst U, Néron D, Ladevèze P (2018) A multi-temporal scale model reduction approach for the computation of fatigue damage. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 340:630–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.06.004
Blanchard M, Allix O, Gosselet P, Desmeure G (2019) Space/time global/local noninvasive coupling strategy: application to viscoplastic structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 156:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2019.01.003
Blanzé C, Champaney L, Cognard JY, Ladevèze P (1996) A modular approach to structure assembly computations: application to contact problems. Eng Comput 13(1):15–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644409610110976
Blanzé C, Champaney L, Vedrine P (2000) Contact problems in the design of a superconducting quadrupole prototype. Eng Comput 17(2):136–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644400010313093
Blanzé C, Danwé R, Ladevèze P, Maurel P (1992) A new simplified method for the analysis of 2D structures. In: XXVIIIth international congress of theorical and applied mechanics
Boisse P, Bussy P, Ladevèze P (1990) A new approach in non-linear mechanics: the large time increment method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 29(3):647–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620290312
Boisse P, Ladevèze P, Poss M, Rougee P (1991) A new large time increment algorithm for anisotropic plasticity. Int J Plast 7(1):65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(91)90005-J
Bonnet M, Frangi A (2006) Analyse Des Solides Déformables Par La Méthode Des Éléments Finis. Editions de l’Ecole Polytechnique
Boucard PA, Buytet S, Guidault PA (2007) Une stratégie multi-échelle pour l’étude paramétrique de détails géométriques au sein de structures en contacts multiples. Eur J Comput Mech 16(8):1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.3166/remn.16.1011-1036
Boucard PA, Champaney L (2003) A suitable computational strategy for the parametric analysis of problems with multiple contact. Int J Numer Methods Eng 57(9):1259–1281. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.724
Boucard PA, Dérumaux M, Ladevèze P, Roux P (2003) Macro-meso models for joint submitted to pyrotechnic shock. In: Bathe KJ (ed) Computational fluid and solid mechanics 2003. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044046-0.50036-1
Boucard PA, Ladevèze P (1999) Une application de la méthode LATIN au calcul multirésolution de structures non linéaires. Revue Européenne des Éléments Finis 8(8):903–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/12506559.1999.10511417
Boucard PA, Ladevèze P, Poss M, Rougée P (1997) A nonincremental approach for large displacement problems. Comput Struct 64(1):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(96)00165-4
Boucard PA, Odièvre D, Gatuingt F (2011) A parallel and multiscale strategy for the parametric study of transient dynamic problems with friction. Int J Numer Methods Eng 88(7):657–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3194
Bouclier R, Louf F, Chamoin L (2013) Real-time validation of mechanical models coupling PGD and constitutive relation error. Comput Mech 52(4):861–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-013-0850-y
Bussy P, Rougée P, Vauchez P (1990) The large time increment method for numerical simulation of metal forming processes. In: NUMETA. Elsevier, pp 102–109
Caignot A, Ladevèze P, Néron D, Durand JF (2010) Virtual testing for the prediction of damping in joints. Eng Comput 27(5):621–644. https://doi.org/10.1108/02644401011050912
Capaldo M, Guidault PA, Néron D, Ladevèze P (2017) The Reference Point Method, a “hyperreduction” technique: application to PGD-based nonlinear model reduction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 322:483–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.04.033
Chaboche JL (1986) Time-independent constitutive theories for cyclic plasticity. Int J Plast 2(2):149–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(86)90010-0
Chaboche JL (1989) Constitutive equations for cyclic plasticity and cyclic viscoplasticity. Int J Plast 5(3):247–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(89)90015-6
Champaney L, Cognard JY, Dureisseix D, Ladevèze P (1997) Large scale applications on parallel computers of a mixed domain decomposition method. Comput Mech 19(4):253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004660050174
Champaney L, Cognard JY, Ladevèze P (1999) Modular analysis of assemblages of three-dimensional structures with unilateral contact conditions. Comput Struct 73(1):249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00285-5
Chinesta F, Ladevèze P, Cueto E (2011) A short review on model order reduction based on proper generalized decomposition. Arch Comput Methods Eng 18(4):395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-011-9064-7
Chinesta F (ed) (2014) Separated representations and PGD-based model reduction: fundamentals and applications. No. 554 in courses and lectures/international centre for mechanical sciences. Springer, Wien
Cognard JY, Dureisseix D, Ladevèze P, Lorong P (1996) Expérimentation d’une approche parallèle en calcul des structures. Revue Européenne des Éléments Finis 5(2):197–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/12506559.1996.10511217
Cognard JY, Ladevèze P (1993) A large time increment approach for cyclic viscoplasticity. Int J Plast 9(2):141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-6419(93)90026-M
Cognard J, Ladevèze P, Talbot P (1999) A large time increment approach for thermo-mechanical problems. Adv Eng Softw 30(9–11):583–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00120-3
Cognard JY, Ladevèze P (1991) The large time increment method applied to cyclic loadings. In: Życzkowski M (ed) Creep in structures. Springer, Berlin, pp 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84455-362
de Borst R, Crisfield MA, Remmers JJC, Verhoosel CV (2012) Nonlinear finite element analysis of solids and structures. Wiley, New York
Douchin B, Ladevèze P (2001) Mise en œuvre numérique d’un mésomodèle d’endommagement des stratifiés. Revue Européenne des Éléments Finis 10(2–4):473–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/12506559.2001.11869263
Dureisseix D, Ladevèze P, Néron D, Schrefler B (2003) A multi-time-scale strategy for multiphysics problems: application to poroelasticity. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v1.i4.50
Gaignebet Y (1996) Approche non incrémentale des calculs de chocs pour des structures viscoplastiques. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan
Germain P, Suquet P, Nguyen QS (1983) Continuum thermodynamics. ASME Trans Ser E J Appl Mech 50:1010
Giacoma A, Dureisseix D, Gravouil A, Rochette M (2014) A multiscale large time increment/FAS algorithm with time-space model reduction for frictional contact problems. Int J Numer Methods Eng 97(3):207–230. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4590
Giacoma A, Dureisseix D, Gravouil A, Rochette M (2015) Toward an optimal a priori reduced basis strategy for frictional contact problems with LATIN solver. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 283:1357–1381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2014.09.005
Givoli D, Bharali R, Sluys LJ (2017) LATIN: a new view and an extension to wave propagation in nonlinear media. Int J Numer Methods Eng 112(2):125–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.5513
Guidault PA, Allix O, Champaney L, Cornuault C (2008) A multiscale extended finite element method for crack propagation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(5):381–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.07.023
Guinard S, Allix O, Guédra-Degeorges D, Vinet A (2002) A 3D damage analysis of low-velocity impacts on laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 62(4):585–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00153-1
Heyberger C, Boucard PA, Néron D (2013) A rational strategy for the resolution of parametrized problems in the PGD framework. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 259:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.03.002
Hu W, Thomson PF (1996) An evaluation of a large time increment method. Comput Struct 58(3):633–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00149-B
Jourdan F, Bussy P (2000) Large time increment method in dynamic regularization: sheet cutting simulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190(8):1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00161-4
Kerfriden P, Allix O, Gosselet P (2009) A three-scale domain decomposition method for the 3D analysis of debonding in laminates. Comput Mech 44(3):343–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-009-0378-3
Krempl E (1975) On the interaction of rate and history dependence in structural metals. Acta Mech 22(1):53–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01170619
Ladevèze P (1989) La méthode à grand incrément de temps pour l’analyse de structures à comportement non linéaire décrit par variables internes. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences 309(2):1095–1999
Ladevèze P (1999) Nonlinear computational structural mechanics: new approaches and non-incremental methods of calculation. Springer, New York
Ladevèze P, Dureisseix D (1999) Une nouvelle stratégie de calcul micro/macro en mécanique des structures. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences Ser IIB Mech Phys Astron 327(12):1237–1244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1287-4620(00)88647-0
Ladevèze P, Loiseau O, Dureisseix D (2001) A micro–macro and parallel computational strategy for highly heterogeneous structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(1–2):121–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.274
Ladevèze P, Nouy A, Loiseau O (2002) A multiscale computational approach for contact problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 191(43):4869–4891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(02)00406-1
Ladevèze P, Néron D, Gerbaud PW (2019) Data-driven computation for history-dependent materials. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 347(11):831–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2019.11.008
Ladevèze P, Perego U (2000) Duality preserving discretization of the large time increment methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 189(1):205–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00310-2
Ladevèze P (1985) Sur une famille d’algorithmes en mécanique des structures. Comptes-rendus des séances de l’Académie des sciences. Série 2, Mécanique-physique, chimie, sciences de l’univers, sciences de la terre 300(2):41–44
Ladevèze P, Lorong P (1991) A large time increment approach with domain decomposition for mechanical non linear problem. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on computing methods in applied sciences and engineering on computing methods in applied sciences and engineering. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., Paris, France, pp 569–578
Laurent L, Boucard PA, Soulier B (2013) A dedicated multiparametric strategy for the fast construction of a cokriging metamodel. Comput Struct 124:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.03.012
Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1990) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167970
Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL, Benallal A, Desmorat R (2009) Mécanique des matériaux solides, 3e édition edn. Dunod, Paris
Lemoussu H, Boucard PA, Ladevèze P (2002) A 3D shock computational strategy for real assembly and shock attenuator. Adv Eng Softw 33(7):517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(02)00074-1
Liu B, Dapeng C, Yu L (1996) A non-incremental time-space algorithm for numerical simulation of forming process. Appl Math Mech 17(11):1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119949
Loiseau O, Ladevèze P, Dureisseix D (2002) Sur une stratégie de calcul multiéchelle pour l’analyse des structures composites. Revue Européenne des Éléments Finis 11(2–4):349–362. https://doi.org/10.3166/reef.11.349-362
Nachar S, Boucard PA, Néron D, Bordeu F (2019) Coupling multi-fidelity kriging and model-order reduction for the construction of virtual charts. Comput Mech 10:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01745-9
Nachar S (2019) Optimisation de structures viscoplastiques par couplage entre métamodèle multi-fidélité et modèles réduits. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole Normale Supérieure Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Saclay
Nasri MA, Robert C, Ammar A, El Arem S, Morel F (2018) Proper Generalized Decomposition (PGD) for the numerical simulation of polycrystalline aggregates under cyclic loading. Comptes Rendus Mécanique 346(2):132–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2017.11.009
Nguyen HM, Allix O, Feissel P (2008) A robust identification strategy for rate-dependent models in dynamics. Inverse Prob 24(6):065006. https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/24/6/065006
Nouy A, Ladevèze P (2004) Multiscale computational strategy with time and space homogenization: a radial-type approximation technique for solving microproblems. Int J Multiscale Comput Eng 2(4):10. https://doi.org/10.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v2.i4.40
Néron D, Boucard PA, Relun N (2015) Time-space PGD for the rapid solution of 3D nonlinear parametrized problems in the many-query context. Int J Numer Methods Eng 103(4):275–292. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4893
Néron D, Dureisseix D (2008) A computational strategy for thermo-poroelastic structures with a time–space interface coupling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 75(9):1053–1084. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2283
Odièvre D, Boucard PA, Gatuingt F (2010) A parallel, multiscale domain decomposition method for the transient dynamic analysis of assemblies with friction. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(21):1297–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2009.07.014
Oumaziz P, Gosselet P, Boucard PA, Guinard S (2017) A non-invasive implementation of a mixed domain decomposition method for frictional contact problems. Comput Mech 60(5):797–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1444-x
Passieux JC, Ladevèze P, Néron D (2010) A scalable time–space multiscale domain decomposition method: Adaptive time scale separation. Comput Mech 46(4):621–633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-010-0504-2
Pelle JP, Ryckelynck D (2000) An efficient adaptive strategy to master the global quality of viscoplastic analysis. Comput Struct 78(1):169–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00107-3
Relun N, Néron D, Boucard PA (2011) Multiscale elastic-viscoplastic computational analysis. Eur J Comput Mech 20(7–8):379–409. https://doi.org/10.3166/ejcm.20.379-409
Relun N, Néron D, Boucard PA (2013) A model reduction technique based on the PGD for elastic-viscoplastic computational analysis. Comput Mech 51(1):83–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-012-0706-x
Ribeaucourt R, Baietto-Dubourg MC, Gravouil A (2007) A new fatigue frictional contact crack propagation model with the coupled X-FEM/LATIN method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(33):3230–3247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2007.03.004
Roulet V, Boucard PA, Champaney L (2013) An efficient computational strategy for composite laminates assemblies including variability. Int J Solids Struct 50(18):2749–2757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.04.028
Royer C (1990) Une Approche des problèmes de dynamique non-lineaires par la méthode à grand incrément de temps. Ph.D. thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6
Saavedra K, Allix O, Gosselet P, Hinojosa J, Viard A (2017) An enhanced nonlinear multi-scale strategy for the simulation of buckling and delamination on 3D composite plates. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 317:952–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2017.01.015
Sen Gupta J, Allix O, Boucard PA, Fanget A (2006) Mesodynamics of a 3D C/C: a dedicated numerical strategy. Comput Struct 84(19):1177–1189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.01.018
Stehly M, Remond Y (2002) On numerical simulation of cyclic viscoplastic and viscoelastic constitutive laws with the large time increment method. Mech Time-Depend Mater 6(2):147–170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015048101798
Trovalet M, Ladevèze P, Lubineau G (2009) A micro model for analysis of laminated composites, improvement and illustrations. In: Lamon POEJ (ed) JNC 16. AMAC, France, pp 1–9 (in French)
Vandoren B, De Proft K, Simone A, Sluys L (2013) A novel constrained LArge Time INcrement method for modelling quasi-brittle failure. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 265:148–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2013.06.005
Violeau D, Ladevèze P, Lubineau G (2009) Micromodel-based simulations for laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 69(9):1364–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.041
Vitse M, Néron D, Boucard PA (2019) Dealing with a nonlinear material behavior and its variability through PGD models: application to reinforced concrete structures. Finite Elem Anal Des 153:22–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2018.05.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Major Contributors to the Developments of the LATIN Method
Appendix: Major Contributors to the Developments of the LATIN Method
Scope | LATIN version | Search directions | References | Features | MS | MP | PGD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
\({\varvec{\Theta }}^{+}\) | \({\varvec{\Theta }}^{-}\) | |||||||
Large deformation | \({\mathcal {F}}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [27] | Plasticity | \(\checkmark\) | ||
\(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | \(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [68] | Forming process | \(\checkmark\) | ||||
\(\infty\) | \(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [1] | Contact friction, sheet cutting | \(\checkmark\) | ||||
[9] | Visco-plasticity, damage | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[10] | Creep damage | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
\(\mathcal {IV}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [24] | Beam buckling | \(\checkmark\) | |||
[8] | Elastomers damage | |||||||
Elasto-visco-plasticity, large number of cycles, fatigue, damage, quasi-brittle materials | \({\mathcal {F}}\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [62] | Reference work | \(\checkmark\) | ||
\(\checkmark\) | ||||||||
[39] | \(\mathcal {VI}\) premises | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[51] | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
\(\infty\) | \(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [90] | Snap-backs | |||||
\(\mathcal {IV}\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||||
[56] | Reference work | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[61] | Generalized variables | |||||||
\(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [23] | Buckling | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||
[38] | Thermo-mechanical | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[80] | Verification | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[82] | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
[75] | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[11] | Cyclic damage | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
\(\varvec{{\widehat{{\varvec{\varepsilon }}}}} = \varvec{{\varvec{\varepsilon }}}_{n_{\ell }}\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [71] | Multi-fidelity kriging | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||
\(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | \(\alpha \varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [92] | Concrete damage | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||
\(\mathcal {DDM}\) | [56] | |||||||
[79] | MS in space & time | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||||
Thermal | \({\mathcal {F}}\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [50] | Optimal MP | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |
Non-linear dynamics, fast dynamics, shocks, wave propagation | \({\mathcal {F}}\) | \(\varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | \(\varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [85] | \(\checkmark\) | |||
\(\infty\) | \(\varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [52] | Sheet cutting | \(\checkmark\) | ||||
\(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [47] | Causality principle | |||||
\(\mathcal {IV}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [43] | Visco-plasticity | \(\checkmark\) | |||
\(\mathcal {DDM}\) | [67] | Assembly | ||||||
[22] | ||||||||
[87] | Composite damage | |||||||
[77] | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[25] | Frictional contact | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) |
Composite damage | \({\mathcal {F}}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\varvec{{\mathcal {K}}}\) | [5] | \(\checkmark\) | |||
[4] | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
[49] | ||||||||
\(\mathcal {IV}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [41] | |||||
\(\mathcal {DDM}\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
[84] | Assembly | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||||
[86] | Buckling | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
Inverse problems, identification | \(\mathcal {IV}\) | \(\infty\) | \(\mathrm {T}_{\widehat{\varvec{s}}}\,( {\Gamma })\) | [6] | \(\checkmark\) | |||
[73] | Visco-plasticity, damage | |||||||
Assembly, frictional contact, parallelism, cracking | \(\mathcal {DDM}\) | [63] | ||||||
[16] | 2D-axisymmetrical | |||||||
[36] | ||||||||
[33] | 3D | |||||||
[57] | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
[15] | ||||||||
[58] | ||||||||
[69] | Composite | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[21] | \(\checkmark\) | |||||||
[74] | Visco-plasticity, damage | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[20] | Optimization | |||||||
[48] | XFem | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[3] | Discrete systems | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[28] | Damping | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[45] | POD & MG-FAS | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
[29] | Hyper-reduction RPM | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | |||||
[78] | Non-intrusive | \(\checkmark\) | ||||||
Multi-physics | \(\mathcal {DDM}\) | Poro-elasticity | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scanff, R., Nachar, S., Boucard, P.A. et al. A Study on the LATIN-PGD Method: Analysis of Some Variants in the Light of the Latest Developments. Arch Computat Methods Eng 28, 3457–3473 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09514-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-020-09514-1