Skip to main content
Log in

Using some traditional and nanomaterials in the cleaning of ancient Egyptian pottery artifacts (jar and shallow plate) from Athribis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study applies mechanical, wet, and chemical cleaning to remove any undesired materials from artistic/historical pottery surfaces. It aims to evaluate the effects and efficiency of three types of cleansers: One in the nano form and two in the traditional form. These three cleansers are Triton-based microemulsion, Na2EDTA, and EDTA. They were applied as poultices to clean some ancient Egyptian pottery shreds. Euromex Netherland stereo microscope (SM), ESEM Quanta 250 FEG (SEM), and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) were adopted for investigating and analyzing the cleaned pottery sherds and the cleaning of extracted water to evaluate the efficiency of the aforementioned three poultices. The results showed that the Triton-based microemulsion poultice was ranked first, followed by Na2EDTA and finally EDTA with respect to the time of application and the target achievement. Thus, Triton-based microemulsion poultice was employed in the cleaning of two case studies excavated from Athribis (jar and plate). In conclusion, this poultice managed to remove all the accumulated deposits from the surfaces of the two pottery objects after 2 h, in addition to preventing the composition of light surface encrustations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study may be made available from the authors on reasonable request.

References

  • Abd-Allah R (2007) Stabilization and treatment of corroded glass objects displayed in the museum of Jordanian heritage. Mediter Archaeol Archaeom 7:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-Allah R, Al-Muheisen Z, Al-Howadi S (2010) Cleaning strategies of pottery objects excavated from Khirbet Edh-Dharih and Hayyan Al-Mushref, Jordan: four case studies. Mediter Archaeol Archaeom 10:97–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel Rahim N (2016) Restoration of an archaeological ceramic jar from Mamluk period (1250–1517a.c.), al-fustat, Egypt: an analytical study. Egypt J Archaeol Restor Stud 6:1–11. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejars.2016.6842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ágnes B, Bajnóczi B, Tóth M, Szabo C (2012) Deterioration of building ceramics by environmental factors - a case study on Zsolnay ceramics from the museum of applied arts (Budapest). Geosci Eng 1(2):7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Emam E, Motawea AG, Janssens K, Caen J (2019) Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohol–borax/agarose (PVA–B/AG) blend hydrogels for removal of deteriorated consolidants from ancient Egyptian wall paintings. Herit Sci 7:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-019-0264-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arriba-Rodriguez L, Villanueva-Balsera J, Ortega-Fernandez F, Rodriguez-Perez F (2018) Methods to evaluate corrosion in buried steel structures: a review. Metals 8:334. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8050334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer NS (1978) Chemical aspects of the conservation of archaeological materials. In: archaeological chemistry—II, vol 171. Advances in Chemistry, vol 171. AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, pp 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1021/ba-1978-0171.ch002

  • Baglioni M, Giorgi R, Berti D, Baglioni P (2012a) Smart cleaning of cultural heritage: a new challenge for soft nanoscience. Nanoscale 4:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR10911A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni M, Raudino M, Berti D, Keiderling U, Bordes R, Holmberg K, Baglioni P (2014a) Nanostructured fluids from degradable nonionic surfactants for the cleaning of works of art from polymer contaminants. Soft Matter 10:6798–6809. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SM01084A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni M, Jáidar Benavides Y, Desprat-Drapela A, Giorgi R (2015a) Amphiphile-based nanofluids for the removal of styrene/acrylate coatings: cleaning of stucco decoration in the Uaxactun archeological site (Guatemala). J Cult Herit 16:862–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2015.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni M, Poggi G, Ciolli G, Fratini E, Giorgi R, Baglioni P (2018) A Triton X-100-based microemulsion for the removal of hydrophobic materials from works of art: SAXS. Charact Appl Mater 11:1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni P, Giorgi R (2011) Inorganic nanoparticles for the conservation of works of art. In: Altavilla C, Ciliberto E (eds) Inorganic nanoparticles, synthesis, Application and Perspectives. CRC press, Taylor & Francis Group, US, pp. 17–29

  • Baglioni P, Giorgi R, Chelazzi D (2012b) Nano-materials for the conservation and preservation of movable and immovable artworks. Int J Herit Dig Era 1:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1260/2047-4970.1.0.313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni P, Berti D, Bonini M, Carretti E, Dei L, Fratini E, Giorgi R (2014b) Micelle, microemulsions, and gels for the conservation of cultural heritage. Adv Colloid Interf Sci 205:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2013.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baglioni P, Chelazzi D, Giorgi R (2015b) Nanotechnologies in the conservation of cultural heritage: a compendium of materials and techniques. Springer Netherlands,

  • Bartram J, Pedley S (1996) Microbiological analysis. In: Bartram J, Balance R (eds) Water quality monitoring: a practical guide to the design and implementation of freshwater quality studies and monitoring programmes. CRC Press, UK, pp 229–255

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Berti D (2013) Cleaning III: emulsions and microemulsions. In: Chelazzi D (ed) Baglioni P. The Royal Society of Chemistry, Nanoscience for the conservation of works of art, pp 200–224. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849737630-00200

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bingöl D, Canbazoğlu M, Aydoğan S (2005) Dissolution kinetics of malachite in ammonia/ammonium carbonate leaching. Hydrometallurgy 76:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.09.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgioli L, Caminati G, Gabrielli G, Ferroni E (1995) Removal of hydrophobic impurities from pictorial surfaces by means of heterogeneous systems. Sci Technol Cult Herit 4:67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys S, Oakley V (2014) Conservation and restoration of ceramics. Taylor & Francis

  • Caple C (2012) Conservation skills: judgement, method and decision making. Taylor & Francis,

  • Carretti E, Bonini M, Dei L, Berrie BH, Angelova LV, Baglioni P, Weiss RG (2010) New fontiers in materials science for art conservation: responsive gels and beyond. Acc Chem Res 43:751–760. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900282h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter S, Fisher AS, Hinds MW, Lancaster S, Marshall J (2013) Atomic spectrometry update. Review of advances in the analysis of metals, chemicals and materials. J Anal At Spectrom 28:1814–1869. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3JA90051G

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casaletto MP, Ingo GM, Riccucci C, de Caro T, Bultrini G, Fragalà I, Leoni M (2008) Chemical cleaning of encrustations on archaeological ceramic artefacts found in different Italian sites. Appl Phys A Mater Sci Process 92:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4519-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission CUMG (1992) The science for conservators series: volume 2: cleaning. Taylor & Francis,

  • Cooper A (1970) The use of phase diagrams in dissolution studies. In: Alper A (ed) Refractory materials. Academic Press, New York, pp 237–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremonesi P (2013) Rigid gels and enzyme cleaning. In: Mecklenburg MF, Charola AE, Koestler RJ (eds) New insights into the cleaning of paintings: proceedings from the Cleaning 2010 International Conference. Universidad Politecnica de Valencia and Museum Conservation Institute. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, pp 179–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronyn JM (2003) The elements of archaeological conservation. Taylor & Francis,

  • Das KP, Ceglie A, Lindman B (1987) Microstructure of formamide microemulsions from NMR self-diffusion measurements. J Phys Chem 91:2938–2946. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100295a058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Posada E, Moreira Osorio L, Arronte García M, Ponce L (2014) On the use of laser ablation for cleaning high voltage ceramic insulators. Surf Eng Mater Adv Technol 4:257–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei L (2013) Conservation treatments: cleaning, consolidation and protection. In: Baglioni P, Chelazzi D (eds) Nanoscience for the conservation of works of art. The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849737630-00077

  • Dei L, Giorgi R (2013) The degradation of works of art materials. In: Baglioni P, Chelazzi D (eds) Nanoscience for the conservation of works of art. The Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 49–76. https://doi.org/10.1039/9781849737630-00049

  • El-Ghareb W (2007) Scientific assessment of the impact of technology industry pottery relics on damage rates in some of the various archaeological sites. Cairo Univ, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary M (2009) Experimental tests used for treatment of red weathering crusts in disintegrated granite – Egypt. J Cult Herit 10:471–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2009.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary M (2015) Effective roles of some deterioration agents affecting Edfu royal Birth House “Mammisi”. Int J Conserv Sci 6:349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary M, Al-Naddaf M (2009) Characterization of brick used in the external casing of Roman bath walls “Gedara-Jordan”. Mediter Archaeol Archaeom 9:29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary M, Metawa A (2016) Cleaning of architectural bricks using RF plasma “Metallic Stains”. Int J Conserv Sci 7:669–682

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary MA (2016) A holistic approach to the assessment of the groundwater destructive effects on stone decay in Edfu temple using AAS, SEM-EDX and XRD. Environ Earth Sci 75:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4849-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary MA (2017) Environmental impacts: weathering factors, mechanism and forms affected the stone decaying in Petra. J Afr Earth Sci 135:204–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2017.08.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Gohary M, El-Ghareb W, Saad M (2019) Damage quantification of archaeological pottery in Sheikh Hamad “Athribis”. Sohag-Egypt Ceram Int 45:17611–17619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.05.326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner HE, Hougardy HP (1988) Quantitative image analysis of microstructures: a practical guide to techniques, instrumentation and assessment of materials. DGM Informationsgesellschaft,

  • Feilden BM (2003) Conservation of historic buildings. Architectural Press

  • Ferroni E (1991) Environmental and conservation of cultural heritage. In: Rossi C, Tiezzi E (eds) Ecological physical chemistry. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 345–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Froh J (2004) Archaeological ceramics studied by scanning electron microscopy. Hyperfine Interact 154:159–176. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:HYPE.0000032074.98045.cc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglestad B, Gupta K, Wand AJ, Sharp KA (2019) Water loading driven size, shape, and composition of cetyltrimethylammonium/hexanol/pentane reverse micelles. J Colloid Interface Sci 540:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gänsicke S, Hatchfield P, Hykin A, Svoboda M, Tsu CM-A (2003) The ancient Egyptian collection at the museum of fine arts, Boston. Part 2, a review of former treatments at the MFA and their consequences. J Am Inst Conserv 42:193–236. https://doi.org/10.1179/019713603806112804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y et al (2007) The effect of water on the microstructure of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate/TX-100/benzene ionic liquid microemulsions. Chem Eur J 13:2661–2670. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200600939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y, Zhang J, Xu H, Zhao X, Zheng L, Li X, Yu L (2006) Structural studies of 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate/TX-100/ p-xylene ionic liquid microemulsions. ChemPhysChem 7:1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200600120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaspar P, Hubbard C, McPhail D, Cummings A (2003) A topographical assessment and comparison of conservation cleaning treatments. J Cult Herit 4:294–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(02)01211-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi R, Baglioni M, Berti D, Baglioni P (2010) New methodologies for the conservation of cultural heritage: micellar solutions, microemulsions, and hydroxide nanoparticles. Acc Chem Res 43:695–704. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900193h

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi R, Carretti E (2013) Cleaning III: applications and case studies. In: Baglioni P, Chelazzi D (eds) Nanoscience for the conservation of works of art. The Royal Society of Chemistry, UK, pp 225–251

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goren Y, Gurwin S, Arie E (2014) Messages impressed in clay: scientific study of Iron Age Judahite bullae from Jerusalem. In: Martinón-Torres M (ed) Craft and science: international perspectives on archaeological ceramics, vol 1. vol UCL Qatar series in archaeology and cultural heritage. UCL Qatar, Qatar, pp. 143–149

  • Hofenk-De Graaff JH (1968) The constitution of detergents in connection with the cleaning of ancient textiles. Stud Conserv 13:122–141. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1968.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg K, Jönsson B, Kronberg B, Lindman B (2002) Surfactants and polymers in aqueous solution. Wiley

  • Hughes MJ, Cowell MR, Craddock PT (1976) Atomic absorption techniques in archaeology. Archaeometry 18:19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4754.1976.tb00141.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanterna G, Matteini M (2000) Laser cleaning of stone artefacts: a substitute or alternative method? J Cult Herit 1:S29–S35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(00)00136-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macchia A, Sammartino MP, Tabasso ML (2011) A new method to remove copper corrosion stains from stone surfaces. JAS 38:1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulik S, Rakshit AK (2006) Physicochemisty and applications of microemulsions. J Surf Sci Technol 22:159–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormsby B, Keefe M, Phenix A, von Aderkas E, Learner T, Tucker C, Kozak C (2016) Mineral spirits-based microemulsions: a novel cleaning system for painted surfaces. J Am Inst Conserv 55:12–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2015.1120406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradies H (1980) Shape and size of a nonionic surfactant micelle. Triton X-100 in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem 84:599–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul BK, Moulik SP (2001) Uses and applications of microemulsions. Curr Sci 80:990–1001

    Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa JC, Antunes JLF, Figueiredo MO, Fortes MA (1996) Removal and analysis of soluble salts from ancient tiles. Stud Conserv 41:153–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/1506530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall MG, Trivedi DP, Graham J, Small JS, Hughes C (2003) Mineralogical characterisation of sediments at the drigg low level radioactive waste disposal site and the influence on groundwater chemistry. MRS Proc 807:557. https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-807-557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy AGS, Kumar KN (2010) Identification of the hydrogeochemical processes in groundwater using major ion chemistry: a case study of Penna–Chitravathi river basins in Southern India. Environ Monit Assess 170:365–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1239-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi-Manaresi R (1982) Scientific investigation in relation to the conservation of stone. Stud Conserv 27:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1982.27.Supplement-1.39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell D (1994) Soil science methods & applications. Routledge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad M (2018) Usage of nano materials in the conservation of archaeological pottery: an experimental applied study on some excavated objects from El-Sheikh Hamd-Sohag. Sohag Univ, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert KV, Lusvardi KM, Kaler EW (1996) Polymerization in nonaqueous microemulsions. Colloid Polym Sci 274:875–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00654746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sease C (1994) A conservation manual for the field archaeologist. Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press

  • Selwyn LS, Argyropoulos V (2005) Removal of chloride and iron ions from archaeological wrought iron with sodium hydroxide and ethylenediamine solutions. Stud Conserv 50:81–100. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2005.50.2.81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shewmon P (1994) Diffusion in solids. Wiley, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel T, Koob S (1997) Conservation and restoration under field conditions: ceramics treatment at Sardis. Turkey Objects Special Group Post prints 5:98–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M, Munns D (1999) Soils: an introduction. Prentice Hall, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Singley KR (1981) Caring for artifacts after excavation—some advice for archaeologists. Hist Archaeol 15:36–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stober I, Teiber H, Li X, Jendryszczyk N, Bucher K (2017) Chemical composition of surface- and groundwater in fast-weathering silicate rocks in the Seiland Igneous Province, North Norway Norsk. Geologisk Tidsskrift 97:63–94. https://doi.org/10.17850/njg97-1-04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1981) Aquatic chemistry: an introduction emphasizing chemical equilibria in natural waters. Wiley,

  • Turner-Walker G (2008) A practical guide to the care and conservation of metals

  • Williams N (1983) Porcelain: repair and restoration. British Museum Publications,

  • Wolbers R (2000) Cleaning painted surfaces: aqueous methods. Archetype Publications,

  • Zaki S (1998) The objects excavated in the temple of Ptolemy “Aulletes” in El-Sheich-Hamad: archaeological and philological study. Sohag Univ, Egypt

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Zhen B, Al-Shuja’a SAS, Zhou G, Li X, Feng Y (2018) Fast-response and monodisperse silica nanoparticles modified with ionic liquid towards electrophoretic displays. Dyes Pigments 148:270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.09.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Ehab Al-Emam (Conservation dept., Faculty of Archaeology, Sohag Univ., Egypt - AXES research group, Faculty of Science, Antwerp Univ., Belgium) for his helpful collaboration and proof reading of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

El-Gohary designed, directed, and carried out this study, in addition to the analyzing of the results and wrote the paper. Saad prepared the samples and helped the 1st author during defining their characteristics.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed El-Gohary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Gohary, M., Saad, M. Using some traditional and nanomaterials in the cleaning of ancient Egyptian pottery artifacts (jar and shallow plate) from Athribis. Archaeol Anthropol Sci 12, 277 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01235-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-020-01235-7

Keywords

Navigation