Rational orbits around 4 Einstein–Lovelock black holes
Introduction
Black holes are perfect laboratories in the strong gravitational field of the Universe, allowing one to probe the nature of gravitation deeply, as well as to get an insight into an unified theory beyond the Einstein’s theory of general relativity (GR). During the last five years, the great leap made in astronomy for the first time is to detect gravitational waves from black hole binaries [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and to image the supermassive black hole shadow in the center of galaxy M87 [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. Meanwhile, these direct observations of black holes also leave the window for testing alternative theories in the extreme environments open [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21]. It is interesting to note that some influences of alternative theories on the strong gravitational field can present unique features and be well studied by using the orbital dynamical approach for a test particle’s motion around a black hole.
It is well-known that an extreme mass ratio inspiral is formed from a stellar-mass black hole closely whirling around one supermassive black hole, which can be approximatively regarded as a timelike particle orbiting around the supermassive black hole. During the inspiral stage for detecting the gravitational wave, the timelike particle’s path should be located in bound orbits around the black hole. For the timelike particle, these bound orbits mainly depend on two crucial regions: one is the marginally bound orbits (MBO); the other is the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCO). Bound orbits for test particles’ motions around black holes have been extensively studied in their geodesic motions [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], long-term effects on the radial velocities [29], [30], dynamical effects [31], their energy level diagrams [32], gravitational redshifts [33], “no-hair” theorems [34] and these black holes’ evolutions [35], [36], [37].
As one kind of bound orbits, periodic orbits play an important role in our understandings of celestial bodies’ motions in the Solar System, their long-term stabilities and dynamical evolutions, and even the adiabatic inspiral stage for detecting the gravitational wave. At the inspiral regime, for example, a series of periodic orbits consist of one continuing transitional orbit and play an important part in the detection of the gravitational wave [36]. In view of the fact, a classification of the zoom–whirl structure has been proposed in Ref. [38] with a rational number , which is described by three integers . and respectively count the numbers of zooms and whirls for a timelike particle’s orbits around black holes. denotes the vertex number, which indicates geometrically a different structure of periodic orbits with the same whirl and zoom numbers. Given one angular momentum and energy of the particle’s motion in bound orbits, a rational number corresponds to a closed periodic orbit. The classification of the zoom–whirl structure with for representing periodic orbits has been widely investigated in Kerr black holes [38], Reissner–Nordström black holes [39] and others black holes [40], [41], [42], [43], [44].
Although GR has been tested and proved to be quite effective to describe some observations in the Solar System and beyond with unprecedented accuracy (see Refs. [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], for reviews), it ineffectively describes others phenomena such as cosmic inflation, the problems of spacetime singularities, unification theories, etc. As one competitive candidate of unification theories, string theory are proposed with spacetime more than four dimensions. Especially, in the low-energy limit of string theory, higher curvature corrections induced considerable interest to Einstein–Lovelock theories and Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet. Based on dimensional regularization procedure [51], a modified theory that caught a lot of attention recently is the so-called the 4-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity, which could be treated as a reduced 4-dimensional theory of high-dimensional string theory and satisfies Lovelock’s theorem [52]. Although the authors claim that this gravity bypasses the Lovelock’s theorem and avoids Ostrogradsky instability, limit of higher-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity is currently under the debate [51] and whether the theory is well defined is constantly attracting criticism [51], [53], [54], [55], [56], [57]. In Ref. [52], it is argued that a physical observer could never reach this curvature singularity given the repulsive effect of gravity at short distances. However, considering the geodesic equations, this claim has been refuted by Ref. [58]. The authors in Ref. [58] explicitly showed that the infalling particle starts at rest will reach the singularity with zero velocity as attractive and repulsive effects compensate each other along the trajectory of the particle.
Since Einstein–Lovelock theories include an infinite series of corrections to the corresponding Einstein term with an increasing power of the curvature, a general covariant modified theory called the 4-dimensional Einstein–Lovelock (4EL) gravity has been recently developed [51], [53]. By performing the dimensional regularization of the Einstein–Lovelock equations, the authors in Ref. [51], [53] formulate and propose the most general static four-dimensional metric in this theory with diffeomorphism invariance. The 4EL gravity not only covers the solution of 4-dimensional Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity with the quadratic in curvature (e.g., ) by the covariance and general method, but also contains the most general static 4 black-hole solution allowing for a -term (either positive or negative) and the electric charge . In addition, it is shown that if one is limited by positive values of coupling constants in front of Lovelock terms, the eikonal instability works as an effective cut-off for higher order terms in the 4EL gravity [51], [53]. And basic observable quantities such as quasinormal modes, frequencies at the innermost stable circular orbit and radius of the black-hole shadow change almost indistinguishably when the Lovelock corrections of higher than the fourth order in curvature are included (see Ref. [51], [53] for details). Some fascinating properties in 4EL black holes have been attentively studied in thermodynamics [54], [59], [60], the gravitational collapse [56], [57], geodesic and orbital dynamics [61], [62], gravitational lensing [63], [64], (in)stability [55], [65], whereas the classification of the zoom–whirl structure and rational orbits in 4EL black holes is still missing in the literature.
In the light of some unique features of the classification, in the present work, we primarily concentrate on investigating periodic orbits of a timelike particle around 4EL black holes. In what follows, and the metric signature is . The paper is organized in the following way. In Section 2, we study the effective potential and bound orbits for the timelike particle around 4EL black holes. By considering the classification of the zoom–whirl structure [38] and bound orbits, Section 3 will be devoted to investigate periodic orbits and rational numbers in 4EL black holes. In Section 4, conclusions and discussion will be represented.
Section snippets
Effective potential and bound orbits
The static and spherically symmetric solution in the 4-dimensional Einstein–Lovelock black holes (4EL) gravity [51], [53] with is where the metric has the relationship with a new variable as follows and satisfies [66], [67] In the above equation, denotes the power of curvature of the Lovelock term and denotes the asymptotic mass [51], [53].
From Eq. (3), the Lovelock corrections lead to
Periodic orbits and classifications
During the inspiral stage for detecting the gravitational wave, a series of periodic orbits plays an important role and forms a successive transitional orbit [36]. In view of the fact, a classification of the zoom–whirl structure has been proposed in Ref. [38] when the particle located in bound orbits around black holes. The classification of the zoom–whirl structure for periodic orbits could be described by a rational number , which has relationship with three integers as follows
Conclusions and discussion
In the paper, as the first step, we primarily concentrate on investigating periodic orbits of a timelike particle around the 4-dimensional Einstein–Lovelock (4EL) black holes with the quadratic in curvature (). By considering the timelike particle’s motion between the marginally bound orbits (MBO) and the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCO) around 4EL black holes, it is found that the particle’s energy and its angular momentum at the ISCO decrease with , where denotes
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11773080, 11473072 and 11533004.) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA15016700).
References (72)
- et al.
Probing a regular non-minimal Einstein–Yang–Mills black hole with gravitational lensings
Phys. Lett. B
(2019) - et al.
Strong deflection lensing by a Lee–Wick black hole
Phys. Lett. B
(2017) - et al.
On the Newtonian and spin-induced perturbations felt by the stars orbiting around the massive black hole in the Galactic center
Astrophys. J.
(2017) Geodesics and periodic orbits around quantum-corrected black holes
Phys. Dark Univ.
(2020)- et al.
Bound orbits around Bardeen black holes
Ann. Phys.
(2020) - et al.
4D Einstein-Lovelock black holes: Hierarchy of orders in curvature
Phys. Lett. B
(2020) Charged black holes in AdS spaces in 4D Einstein Gauss–Bonnet gravity
Phys. Lett. B
(2020)- et al.
(In)stability of black holes in the 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet and Einstein-Lovelock gravities
Phys. Dark Univ.
(2020) - et al.
Dust collapse in 4D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet gravity
Phys. Dark Univ.
(2020) - et al.
Limits on stellar structures in Lovelock theories of gravity
Phys. Dark Univ.
(2020)
Charged particle and epicyclic motions around 4 D Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet black hole immersed in an external magnetic field
Phys. Dark Univ.
Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger
Phys. Rev. Lett.
Binary black hole mergers in the first advanced LIGO observing run
Phys. Rev. X
GW151226: Observation of gravitational waves from a 22-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence
Phys. Rev. Lett.
GW170104: Observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence at redshift 0.2
Phys. Rev. Lett.
GW170608: Observation of a 19 solar-mass binary black hole coalescence
Astrophys. J. Lett.
GW170814: A three-detector observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole coalescence
Phys. Rev. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole
Astrophys. J. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. II. Array and instrumentation
Astrophys. J. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. III. Data processing and calibration
Astrophys. J. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. IV. Imaging the central supermassive black hole
Astrophys. J. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. V. Physical origin of the asymmetric ring
Astrophys. J. Lett.
First M87 event horizon telescope results. VI. The shadow and mass of the central black hole
Astrophys. J. Lett.
Probing compactified extra dimensions with gravitational waves
New observational constraints on f (T) gravity through gravitational-wave astronomy
Phys. Rev. D
Probing noncommutative gravity with gravitational wave and binary pulsar observations
Phys. Rev. D
Cosmological bouncing solutions in f(T, B) gravity
Eur. Phys. J. C
Strong deflection gravitational lensing by a Lee–Wick ultracompact object
Eur. Phys. J. C
Stability analysis for cosmological models in gravity
Eur. Phys. J. C
Weak and strong deflection gravitational lensing by a renormalization group improved Schwarzschild black hole
Eur. Phys. J. C
Precession of timelike bound orbits in Kerr spacetime
Geodesic congruences and a collapsing stellar distribution in f (T) theories
Phys. Rev. D
Periastron shifts of stellar orbits near the Galactic center
Astron. Astrophys.
Post-Keplerian effects on radial velocity in binary systems and the possibility of measuring general relativity with the star S2 in 2018
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.
Geodesic study of regular Hayward black hole
Astrophys. Space Sci.
Dynamics of particles near brane-world black hole
Internat. J. Modern Phys. A
Cited by (43)
Lense–Thirring effect and precession of timelike geodesics in slowly rotating black hole and naked singularity spacetimes
2023, Physics of the Dark UniversePeriodic orbits around a static spherically symmetric black hole surrounded by quintessence
2022, Annals of PhysicsOn charged black holes in 4D Lovelock theory coupled to ModMax nonlinear electrodynamics
2022, Annals of PhysicsParticle dynamics around the Einstein-Maxwell-Yang-Mills black hole
2024, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsObservational aspects of a class of dark matter spacetimes
2023, Physical Review D