Abstract
In the study, 2024 Al and 5083 Al bulk samples were heated using two different methods, induction and conventional heat treatment. Using these methods, the processing cost and time analysis for both materials were performed. 5083 Al material cannot be heat-treated. However, to evaluate differences in the production cost of induction by changing the components of aluminum, the same procedures were applied to 5083 Al material. In both aluminum series, square, cylindrical, and hexagonal shapes were processed, and the effect of sample shape variations on cost was evaluated. The heat treatment was performed in a conventional kiln of 2 kW. Al materials were heat-treated for 5 h at 540 °C, and water was suddenly supplied. Then they were left in the kiln at 190 °C for 10 h for artificial aging. Al samples were heat-treated in the same way at 590 °C for 1 minute in the 900 kHz ultra-high frequency induction heating system (UHFIHS), which was fed with instant water. The samples were then artificially aged at four different heating durations varying between 2 and 8 minutes using the induction system. As a result of examining the production time and cost of both methods, it was found that the heat treatment of 2024 Al samples by induction was much more advantageous. Furthermore, when Al samples were heated by induction, shape differences and main alloy elements significantly affected power consumption values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
H.K. Durmus, A. Okur, C. Meric, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 9(1), 9 (2003)
A.A.C. Silva, T. Gomes, B.D.P. Martins, R.B.R. Garcia,·, L.D.S. Cividanes,· E.Y. Kawachi, JIOP 30, 3105 (2020)
B. Javanpour,·M. M. Azadbeh, J.O.I.P. Mozammel (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01557-y
T. Şişmanoğlu, Diss. Institute of Science, (2009)
M. Gobara, S. Elbasuney, A. Baraka, H. Kamal, M. Elsayed, E.A. McNally, JOIP 28, 1598 (2018)
H. Kaçar, E. Atik, C. Meriç, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 142(3), 762 (2003)
Y.S. Hedberg, S. Pradhan, F. Cappellini, M.E. Karlsson, E. Blomberg, H.L. Karlsson, J.F.Hedberg,. Electrochimica Acta 212, 360 (2016)
O.B. Umaru, M. Abdulwahab, A. Tokan, A.M. Bello, H.A. Umar, Results in Physics 6, 342–345 (2016)
S.C. Vettivel, N. Selvakumar, P.V. Ponraj, Procedia Eng. 38, 2874 (2012)
B. Ahuja, M. Karg, K.Y. Nagulin, M. Schmidt, Physics Procedia 56, 135 (2014)
M. Sachs, O. Hentschel, J. Schmidt, M. Karg, M. Schmidt, K.E. Wirth, Physics Procedia 56, 125 (2014)
S.B. Hassan, V.S. Aigbodion, Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences 27(1), 49 (2015)
N. Ponweiser, C.L. Lengauer, K.W. Richter, Intermetallics 19(11), 1737 (2011)
M.H. Shaeri, M. Shaeri, M. Ebrahimi, M.T. Salehi, S.H. Seyyedein, S. H. (Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 26(2), 182 (2016)
M. Chemingui, G. Mesmacque, A.W. Kolsi, Physics Procedia 2(3), 1167 (2009)
C. Lei, H. Yang, H. Li, N. Shi, J. Fu, L. Zhan, L. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 29(5), 1445 (2016)
H. Mirzadeh, J. Magn. Alloys 2, 22 (2014)
Z. Wang, P. Chen, H. Li, B. Fang, R. Song, Z. Zheng, Corros. Sci. 114, 156 (2017)
N.E. Bekheet, R.M. Gadelrab, M.F. Salah, A.A. El-Azim, Materials & Design 23(2), 153 (2002)
M.H. Goodarzy, H. Arabi, H. Boutorabi, M.A. Seyedein, S. H., & S.H. Najafabadi, The effects of room temperature ECAP and subsequent aging on mechanical properties of 2024 Al alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 585, 753–759 (2014)
U. Cavdar, E. Atik, JOM, 66, I. 6, 1027, (2014)
M. Tastan, H. Gökozan, S. Taşkın, U. Cavdar, Revista de Metalurgia 51(3), e046 (2015)
H. Gokozan, M. Tastan, S. Taskin, P. Sarı, Cavdar, U. Cavdar Materials Testing. 58, 11–12 (2016) 1009
U. Cavdar, İ Gülşahin, Revista de Metalurgia 50(2), e016 (2014)
U. Cavdar, E. Yalamac, İ Gulsahin, Materials Testing 56(10), 852 (2014)
U. Cavdar, I.M. Kusoglu, Materials Testing 56, 11–12 (2014) 973
P. Sari Cavdar, U. Cavdar, Revista de Metalurgia 51(1), e036 (2015)
A. Altintas, U. Cavdar, I.M. Kusoglu, JOIP 29, 667 (2019)
M. Tastan, H. Gokozan, P. Sarı Cavdar, G. Soy, U. Cavdar, Revista de MEtalurgia 55, 1, e137 (2019)
U. Cavdar, L.U. Gezici, B. Gul, M. Ayvaz, Revista de Metalurgia 56, 1, e163 (2020)
U. Cavdar, I.M. Kusoglu, A. Altintas, Materials Testing 60, 7–8 (2018) 727
U. Cavdar, A. Altintas, B. Karaca, Kovove Materialy 56(3), 177 (2018)
S. Taskin, H. Gokozan, ElektronikaIr Elektrotechnika 108, 2, 75, (2011)
H. Gokozan, S. Taskin, S. Seker, H. Ekiz, Electr. Eng. 97(2), 111 (2014)
A. Özdemir, M. Taştan, Math. Probl. Eng. (ID 501781, 1 (2014)
M.H. Goodarzy, H. Arabi, M.A. Boutorabi, S.H. Seyedein, S.H. Hasani, Najafabadi, J. Alloy. Compd. 585, 753–759 (2014)
Z. Huda, N.I. Taib, T. Zaharinie, Mater. Chem. Phys. 113, 515–517 (2009)
Acknowledgements
The ultra-high frequency induction system used in this study was provided by FBE 2012-022 Celal Bayar University BAP Project and 214M414 TUBİTAK Project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çavdar, U., Taştan, M., Gökozan, H. et al. Heat Treatment of 2024 and 5083 Aluminum Materials by Induction, a Competitive Method, and Cost Analysis. J Inorg Organomet Polym 31, 1754–1763 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01813-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-020-01813-1