Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T07:38:10.668Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FORMAL QUALITATIVE PROBABILITY

Part of: Foundations of probability theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2020

DANIEL KIAN Mc KIERNAN
DANIEL KIAN Mc KIERNAN*
Affiliation:
INDEPENDENT RESEARCHER E-mail:Mc_Kiernan@Oeconomist.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Choices rarely deal with certainties; and, where assertoric logic and modal logic are insufficient, those seeking to be reasonable turn to one or more things called “probability.” These things typically have a shared mathematical form, which is an arithmetic construct. The construct is often felt to be unsatisfactory for various reasons. A more general construct is that of a preordering, which may even be incomplete, allowing for cases in which there is no known probability relation between two propositions or between two events. Previous discussion of incomplete preorderings has been as if incidental, with researchers focusing upon preorderings for which quantifications are possible. This article presents formal axioms for the more general case. Challenges peculiar to some specific interpretations of the nature of probability are brought to light in the context of these propositions. A qualitative interpretation is offered for probability differences that are often taken to be quantified. A generalization of Bayesian updating is defended without dependence upon coherence. Qualitative hypothesis testing is offered as a possible alternative in cases for which quantitative hypothesis testing is shown to be unsuitable.

Keywords

axiomatic probabilityformal epistemologyhypothesis testingqualitative probabilityBayes’ TheoremBayesian updating

MSC classification

Primary: 60A05: Axioms; other general questions
Type
Research Article
Information
The Review of Symbolic Logic , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 2021 , pp. 882 - 909
Check for updates
Copyright
© Association for Symbolic Logic, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aristoteles. (1933). Metaphysics, Volume I: Books 1-9. Translated by Hugh Tredennick. Loeb Classical Library 271. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, S. N. (1917). Опыть аксiоматическаго обоснованiя теорiи вероятностей. Communications de la Société mathématique de Kharkow, 15(5–6), 209–274.Google Scholar
Boole, G. (1854). An Investigation of the Laws of Thought on Which Are Founded the Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Dublin: Walton and Maberly.Google Scholar
Cardano, G. (1663). Liber de ludo aleae. In Opera Omnia, Vol. 1. Lyons: Karl Spon.Google Scholar
Crosby, A. W. (1996). The Measure of Reality Quantification and Western Society, 1250–1600. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Finetti, B. (1931). Sul significato suggettivo della probabilità. Fundamenta Mathematicæ, XVII, 298–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. L. (1843). On the foundations of the theory of probability. Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, Vol. 8. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–6. Available from: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ia/transactionsofca08camb. Delivered before the Cambridge Philosophical Society on 1842-02-14.Google Scholar
Fine, T. L. (1971). Rational decision making with comparative probability. In IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, pp. 355–356.Google Scholar
Fine, T. L. (1931). Theories of Probability. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fioretti, G. (2001). Von Kries and the other 'German logicians'. Economics and Philosophy , 17(2), 245–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishburn, P. C. (1986). The axioms of subjective probability. Statistical Science, 1(3), 335–345.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2001). The Science of Conjecture. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2016). Pre-history of probability. In Hájek, A. & Hitchcock, C., editors. Oxford Handbook of Probability and Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–49.Google Scholar
Franklin, J. (2018). Quantifying and managing risks in commercial contracts and games of chance—Latin traditions. In Heiduk, M., editor. Prophecy and Prognostication in Medieval European and Mediterranean Societies. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.Google Scholar
Godambe, V. P. (1976). A historical perspective of the recent developments in the theory of sampling from actual populations. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 38(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1975). The Emergence of Probability (first edition). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan & Company.Google Scholar
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung (first edition). Berlin, Germany: Julius Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, B. O. (1940a). The axioms and algebra of intuitive probability. The Journal of Symbolic Logic , 41(2), 269–292.Google Scholar
Koopman, B. O. (1940b). The bases of probability. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 46(10), 763–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kries, J. A. V. (1886). Die Principien der Wahrscheinlichkeits-Rechnung, eine logische Untersuchung. Freiburg: Akademische Verlagsbuchhandlung von J.C.B. Mohr.Google Scholar
Kyburg, H. E. (1978). Subjective probability. Journal of Philosophical Logic , 7(1), 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mc Kiernan, D. K. (2012). Indifference, indecision, and coin-flipping. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 48(4), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(1), 103–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neyman, J. (1937). Outline of a theory of statistical estimation based on the classical theory of probability. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 236, 333–380.Google Scholar
Ramsey, F. P. (1931). Truth and probability. In Braithwaite, R. B., editor. The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd, pp. 156–198.Google Scholar
Shimony, A. E. (1955). Coherence and the axioms of confirmation. The Journal of Symbolic Logic , 20(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, W. (1891). Popular Lectures and Addresses. London: MacMillan and Company.Google Scholar
Toti Rigatelli, L. (1985). Il ‘problema delle parti’ in manoscritti del xiv e xv secolo. In Folkerts, M. & Lindgren, U., editors. Mathemata: Festschrift für Helmuth Gericke. Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, pp. 229–236.Google Scholar
Walley, P. (2000). Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 24(2–3), 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1901). On the theory of consistence of logical class-frequencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character , 197(287–299), 91–132.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1911). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics (first edition). London: Charles Griffin and Company, Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar