Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of Net Carbon Consumption in Aluminum Electrolysis Using Multivariate Analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the aluminum electrolysis, the amount of carbon consumed per unit of metal produced is always higher than the theoretical one. Raw material variability, anode properties, and reduction cell operation and performance can influence this discrepancy. Linking these factors to each individual anode could help close this gap thus improving the environmental footprint and reducing production cost. In today’s industrial environment, large volume of data, both structured and unstructured, are collected, otherwise known as big data. These capabilities could enable predicting the consumption for each anode as opposed to estimating it at the plant level as performed so far. This can be achieved using a tracking system to link the pot operation to individual baked and green anode properties. The performance of R&D Carbon Net Carbon Consumption formula was compared to a multivariate statistical approach that considers process data variables gathered from the aforementioned, linked, databases. Given the process data at hand, the prediction power of the net carbon consumption for individual anodes is significantly improved as opposed to using the existing model.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://aluminium.ca/en/planet-aluminium/canada. Accessed 30 April, 2020

  2. Grjotheim K, Kvande H (1993) Introduction to aluminum electrolysis, 2nd edn. Aluminium, Dusseldorf, p 120

    Google Scholar 

  3. Khaji K, AlQassemi M (2016) The role of anode manufacturing processes in net carbon consumption. Metals 6:128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jassim A, Mofor E, Eddin JW, Polle S, Whitfield D (2018) Effect of changes in anode top cover composition on anode butt quality. Light Met. 1243 (2018)

  5. Fischer W, Keller F, Perruchoud R (1991) Interdependence between anode net consumption and pot design, pot operating parameters and anode properties. Light Met. 681

  6. McClung M, Ross JA, Chovanec G (2000) A method to determine. The optimal baking level Of carbon anodes. Light Met. 473

  7. Piffer V, Miotto P, Kato C, Meier M, Perruchoud R, Sulger P (2007) Process optimization in bake furnace. Light Met. Appendix C

  8. Outotec ARTS(TM) Anode and Rod Tracking System For Primary Aluminum Smelters, https://www.outotec.com/company/media/news/2013/outotec-artstm-anode-and-rod-tracking-system-for-primary-aluminum-smelters/. Accessed April 30 2020

  9. Musallam Al-Marzooqi M, Riasat T (2016) Anode Rod Tracking System for Electrolysis Plant, International patent application. Publication Number: WO/2016/097968

  10. Sahu TK, Al Jabri N, Rabba SA, Banjab AJ, Al Marzouqi A, Al Marzouqi A, Almarzooqi M, Ndjom B, Palavar P, Kaur R, Mofor E (2017) Improving net carbon consumption at EGA with the support of anode tracking and butt analyser, travaux 46. Proc. Int. Symp. ICSOBA, 35th. Hamburg, Germany

  11. Edwards L (2015) The history and future challenges of calcined petroleum coke production and use in aluminum smelting. JOM 67:308

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tessier J, Duchesne C, Tarcy GP, Gauthier C, Dufour G (2011) Multivariate analysis and monitoring of the performance of aluminum reduction cells. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 15:1311

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geladi P, Kowalski BR (1986) Partial least squares regression: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta 186:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kevin Dunn (2020) Process Improvement Using Data, 2016, 6.7. https://learnche.org/pid/ - Accessed 10 March, 2020

  15. Chong IG, Jun CH (2005) Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom Intell Lab Sys 78:103–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tabereaux AT (1996) The role of sodium in aluminum electrolysis: a possible indicator of cell performance. Light Met. 319

  17. Wijayaratne H, Hyland M, Taylor M, Grama A, Groutso T (2011) Effects of composition and granulometry on thermal conductivity of anode cover materials. Light Met. 399

  18. Zhang Q, Taylor M, Chen J, Cotton D, Groutzo T, Yang X (2013) Composition and thermal analysis of crust formed from industrial anode cover. Light Met. 675

  19. Feng-qin L, Ye-xiang L, Mannweiler U, Perruchoud R (2006) Effect of coke properties and its blending recipe on performances of carbon anode for aluminium electrolysis. J Cent South Univ Technol 13(6):647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fellner P, Ambrová M, Híves J, J, Korenko M, Thonstad J (2005) Chemical and electrochemical reaction of sulphur species in cryolite melts. Light Met. 577

  21. Batista JS, Silveira BI (2008) Influence of the sodium content on the reactivity of carbon anodes. Mater Res Mater Res 11(3):387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fischer W, Perruchoud R (2016) Interdependence between properties of anode butts and quality of prebaked anodes. Essent Read Light Met 4:267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rhedey P (2016) A review of factors affecting carbon anode consumption in the electrolytic production of aluminum. Essent Read Light Met 4:611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Paris A, Duchesne C, Poulin E, Lauzon-Gauthier J (2020) Development of a soft sensor for detecting overpitched green anodes. Light Met 1176

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [Grant Number RDCPJ 509004-17], Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies (FRQNT) through the Aluminum Research Centre - REGAL, and Alcoa Corporation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Duchesne.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Hojong Kim.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1(PDF 81 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manolescu, P., Duchesne, C., Tessier, J. et al. Estimation of Net Carbon Consumption in Aluminum Electrolysis Using Multivariate Analysis. J. Sustain. Metall. 6, 739–750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-020-00310-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-020-00310-6

Keywords

Navigation