Abstract
Diverse studies were developed in last years about the precision of coordinate measuring machines (CMMs) in order to enhance the calibration method for these testing devices or their application for dimensional verification of manufactured parts, but new research works are needed to identify the effect of the different types of geometric errors that exists in CMMs and deduce the measuring conditions that allow the optimization of CMM performance. The aim of this work consist of analyzing the influence of some of these machine errors such as the straightness errors and position errors associated to the CMM axis displacement, with the purpose of deducing the specific contribution of these errors inside the global uncertainty of these testing devices. This study was focused on coordinate measuring machines with a configuration type FXYZ, and it was carried out using a simplified model that is restricted to the effect of the straightness errors and position errors, without considering the contribution of the rest of CMM geometric errors. The unexpected variations that can be originated in the machine errors between the successive calibration points were described by the numerical model, and their influence on the CMM measuring accuracy were also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zhang, G. (2012). Error compensation of coordinate measuring machines. In R. J. Hocken & P. H. Pereira (Eds.), Coordinate measuring machines and systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press. (Chapter).
Huang, P. S., & Ni, J. (1995). On-line error compensation of coordinate measuring machines. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 35(5), 725–738.
Wei, J., & Chen, Y. (2011). The geometric dynamic errors of CMMs in fast scanning-probing. Measurement, 44, 511–517.
Meng, Z., Che, R. S., Huang, Q. C., & Yu, Z. J. (2002). The direct-error-compensation method of measuring the error of a six-freedom-degree parallel mechanism CMM. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 129, 574–578.
Thompson, M. N., & Cogdell, J. D. (2007). Measuring probe alignment errors on cylindrical coordinate measuring machines. Precision Engineering, 31, 376–379.
Ahn, H. K., Kang, H., Ghim, Y.-S., & Yang, H.-S. (2019). Touch probe tip compensation using a novel transformation algorithm for coordinate measurements of curved surfaces. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 20, 193–199.
Sładek, J., Ostrowska, K., & Gąska, A. (2013). Modeling and identification of errors of coordinate measuring arms with the use of a metrological model. Measurement, 46, 667–679.
González-Madruga, D., Barreiro, J., Cuesta, E., & Martínez-Pellitero, S. (2014). Influence of human factor in the AACMM performance: A new evaluation methodology. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15, 1283–1291.
Swornowski, P. J. (2014). A new concept of continuous measurement and error correction in coordinate measuring technique using a PC. Measurement, 50, 99–105.
Echerfaoui, Y., El Ouafi, A., & Chebak, A. (2018). Experimental investigation of dynamic errors in coordinate measuring machines for high speed measurement. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19, 1115–1124.
Chanthawong, N., Takahashi, S., Takamasu, K., & Matsumoto, H. (2014). Performance evaluation of a coordinate measuring machine’s axis using a high-frequency repetition mode of a mode-locked fiber laser. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 15(8), 1507–1512.
Krajewski, G., & Wozniak, A. (2014). Simple master artefact for CMM dynamic error identification. Precision Engineering, 38, 64–70.
Curran, E., & Phelan, P. (2004). Quick check error verification of coordinate measuring machines. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155–156, 1207–1213.
Yang, P., Takamura, T., Takahashi, S., Takamasu, K., Sato, O., Osawa, S., et al. (2011). Development of high-precision micro-coordinate measuring machine: Multi-probe measurement system for measuring yaw and straightness motion error of XY linear stage. Precision Engineering, 35, 424–430.
Savio, E., & De Chiffre, L. (2002). An artefact for traceable freeform measurements on coordinate measuring machines. Precision Engineering, 26, 58–68.
Raghunandan, R., & Venkateswara Rao, P. (2008). Selection of sampling points for accurate evaluation of flatness error using coordinate measuring machine. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 202, 240–245.
Ramu, P., Yagüe, J. A., Hocken, R. J., & Miller, J. (2011). Development of a parametric model and virtual machine to estimate task specific measurement uncertainty for a five-axis multi-sensor coordinate measuring machine. Precision Engineering, 35, 431–439.
Sładek, J., & Gąska, A. (2012). Evaluation of coordinate measurement uncertainty with use of virtual machine model based on Monte Carlo method. Measurement, 45, 1564–1575.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Franco, P., Jodar, J. Theoretical Analysis of Straightness Errors in Coordinate Measuring Machines (CMM) with Three Linear Axes. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 22, 63–72 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00264-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00264-0