Elsevier

Annals of Physics

Volume 424, January 2021, 168346
Annals of Physics

Entanglement Enabled Intensity Interferometry of different wavelengths of light

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2020.168346Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We use quantum entanglement to erase the color of photons for a new imaging method.

  • Can achieve higher resolution imaging by accessing hidden phase information.

  • We detail practical experimental designs to implement our theoretical protocols.

Abstract

We propose methods to perform intensity interferometry of photons having two different wavelengths. Distinguishable particles typically cannot interfere with each other, but we overcome that obstacle by processing the particles via entanglement and projection so that they lead to the same final state at the detection apparatus. Specifically, we discuss how quasi-phase-matched nonlinear crystals can be used to convert a quantum superposition of light of different wavelengths onto a common wavelength, while preserving the phase information essential for their meaningful interference. We thereby gain access to a host of new observables, which can probe subtle frequency correlations and entanglement. Further, we generalize the van Cittert–Zernike formula for the intensity interferometry of extended sources, demonstrate how our proposal supports enhanced resolution of sources with different spectral character, and suggest potential applications.

Introduction

The Hanbury-Brown–Twiss (HBT) effect is a staple of multi-particle interferometry, with broad applications in experimental physics [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. It is generally considered that indistinguishability of particles is a central requirement for multi-particle interference, but in fact it is possible to generalize HBT to allow for the interference of distinguishable particles. Interference between potentially distinguishable particles can be observed by a using detection apparatus that does not, at a fundamental quantum mechanical level, distinguish the particles: a procedure we call “Entanglement Enabled Intensity Interferometry” (E2I2).

To enable interference between photons of different wavelength, it is not enough that the detector fail to read out the wavelength of an incoming photon. Rather, the detector must reach the same final quantum state in response to photons of either wavelength. To achieve that goal, one must exploit appropriate projections and/or entanglement between the incoming particles and the detector. In this paper, we explore several methods involving nonlinear crystals, coherent pumps, and filters to demonstrate intensity interferometry with photons of different wavelengths. Our methods potentially have applications in several fields, notably including astronomy and fluorescence microscopy, in which one might profit from improved resolution among sources with different spectral characteristics.

Nonlinear optical properties of crystals figure centrally in our practical proposals. Frequency upconversion and downconversion are forms of three-wave mixing in which the frequency of a photon is changed while its other quantum properties (including phase information) are preserved [7], [8], [9]. In these processes, an input photon as well as a coherent state (referred to as the pump) interacts in the nonlinear crystal in such a way that the frequency of the input photon is altered while a pump photon is created or annihilated, conserving energy. Quantum frequency upconversion has been used to bring the wavelength of a photon into a region where detectors are very efficient [10], [11], while quantum frequency downconversion may be used to convert photons from a wavelength convenient for information processing to a wavelength that is convenient for transmission [12], [13], [14], [15].

The possibility to perform frequency conversion on sources of different wavelength, thus producing indistinguishable photons which subsequently interfere, has been demonstrated experimentally. This was achieved in the context of the Hong–Ou–Mandel dip, where two photons of different wavelength were both upconverted before arriving simultaneously at a beamsplitter [16]. The quality of the resulting interference quantifies the success of the upconversion and its ability to preserve phase information. It is even possible to combine frequency conversion and beamsplitting into a single step [17].

In HBT, two detectors can receive photons from either of two distinct sources. The inability of the detectors to determine which photons come from which source is a necessary condition for two-photon interference. If the sources emit distinguishable photons, it becomes possible to determine which photons were emitted from which source. If our detectors are capable of making that determination, then interference becomes impossible. In many applications of interferometry, one only has access to light from a particular source after it has been spatially mixed with light from other sources. To address such applications we must modify the procedures of the previous paragraph. A major goal of this paper is to spell out how to do that.

In Section 2, we explain E2I2 in the context of HBT and describe the mechanism that allows one to perform intensity interferometry on sources of different wavelengths conceptually. Then in Section 3, we detail three different methods, of increasing complexity and generality, for implementing this mechanism for E2I2. Section 4 provides a detailed, concrete proposal for a proof-of-principle experiment demonstrating the first of the methods from Section 3. Applications are described mathematically in Section 5, where we generalize the classic van Cittert–Zernike formulae, and specific examples are given in Section 6. Additional protocols for E2I2 in more general settings are presented in theAppendix A Polarization, Appendix B Bosons and fermions, Appendix C General entanglement, Appendix D Single source of decaying particles.

Section snippets

E2I2 for HBT

In this section we explain E2I2 in the context of HBT, and establish our notation. Consider the setup displayed in Fig. 1.

We have two sources, labeled 1 and 2, which emit red and blue photons, respectively. At the other end of the setup, we have two detectors A and B. The propagator (i.e., transition amplitude) from 1 to A is denoted by D1A, and the other propagators for source–detector combinations are defined similarly. Temporarily neglecting the possible difference in arrival times for

Single crystal method

Consider photons of wavelength λ1 and λ2 with energies E1 and E2, respectively. Further, we suppose that E1<E2 and define ΔEE2E1. Photons with energy ΔE will be denoted by their wavelength λ.

Now consider the detector setup in Fig. 2. An incoming photon with wavelength λ1 or λ2 as well as a pump laser beam of wavelength λ is incident on a quasi-phase-matched nonlinear crystal.

An incoming photon of wavelength λ1 has some probability of upconverting to a wavelength λ2, and similarly an incoming

Proposal for implementation

In this section we design, in meaningful detail, a proof-of-principle experiment implementing the first of the three methodologies detailed above. We will first describe our detector, and then the entire experimental setup containing two such detectors. Correlations in the firing of the detectors will demonstrate intensity interferometry by photons of two different wavelengths.

Each detector contains a crystal designed such that both the up- and downconversion processes will occur with equal

Enhanced resolution via intensity correlations

The original HBT experiment entailed measuring two-particle intensity correlations of the star Sirius to determine its diameter [1]. More generally, people have used HBT to determine the shapes of thermal sources as well as to distinguish sources. HBT allows one to resolve the distance between two sources with similar peak emission frequencies, even if the distance between them is less than can be resolved by each detector individually. However, this technique fails to resolve sources with peak

Applications

Having seen how E2I2 can be used to resolve nearby sources of different spectral character, here we discuss several areas where this capability could be helpful. There are many possible applications of E2I2 for different wavelengths, involving a wide range of scales.

In general, prior to use of E2I2 one should first measure a standard 1-point intensity function to locate the sources of interest approximately (for instance, by imaging). If the 1-point function is insufficient to resolve the

Conclusion

We have presented a practical method to implement E2I2 with sources of different wavelengths of light, and showed how this can be used to better resolve sources of different spectral character. Since the HBT effect has proved fruitful in a wide variety of applications, we anticipate useful applications of our multiple-wavelength generalization.

These developments exemplify a broader strategy, whereby one sacrifices the ability to extract some information about a quantum system by projecting

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jordan Cotler: Developed the theoretical proposal, Writing - original draft. Frank Wilczek: Developed the theoretical proposal, Writing - original draft. Victoria Borish: Developed specific experimental designs, Writing - original draft.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Philip Bucksbaum, Savas Dimopolous, Martin Fejer, Aram Harrow, Yu-Ping Huang, Andreas Kaldun, Mark Kasevich, Tim Kovachy, Ken Van Tilburg and Vladan Vuletić for valuable conversations and feedback. JC is supported by the Fannie and John Hertz Foundation, USA and the Stanford Graduate Fellowship, USA program. FW is supported by the Swedish Research Council under Contract No. 335-2014-7424, the European Research Council under grant 742104, and the U.S. Department

References (30)

  • RaymerM.G. et al.

    Opt. Commun.

    (2010)
  • DravinsDainis

    Astropart. Phys.

    (2013)
  • ShiraiTomohiro et al.

    Opt. Commun.

    (2007)
  • BrownR. Hanbury et al.

    Nature

    (1956)
  • BrownR. Hanbury et al.

    Nature

    (1956)
  • BrownR. Hanbury et al.

    Proc. R. Soc. A

    (1957)
  • BrownR. Hanbury

    The Intensity Interferometer; its Application to Astronomy

    (1974)
  • BaymGordon

    The physics of Hanbury Brown–Twiss intensity interferometry: from stars to nuclear collisions

    (1998)
  • CsernaiLaszlo P. et al.

    Differential HBT method for binary stars

    (2015)
  • RaymerMichael G. et al.

    Phys. Today

    (2012)
  • KumarPrem

    Opt. Lett.

    (1990)
  • HuangJianming et al.

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (1992)
  • AlbotaM.A. et al.

    Opt. Lett.

    (2004)
  • LangrockC. et al.

    Opt. Lett.

    (2005)
  • OuZ.Y.

    Phys. Rev. A

    (2008)
  • Cited by (4)

    Note: This paper is a combination of:

    Cotler, Jordan, and Frank Wilczek. “Entanglement Enabled Intensity Interferometry.” arXiv:1502.02477v1 (2015).

    Cotler, Jordan, Frank Wilczek, and Victoria Borish. “Entanglement Enabled Intensity Interferometry of Different Wavelengths of Light.” arXiv:1607.05719v1 (2016).

    View full text