Stability criteria for roller-bent circular-hollow-section steel arches

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2020.106431Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Investigating the stability of roller-bent circular-hollow-section steel arches.

  • Nonlinear finite element modeling accounting for residual stresses & imperfections.

  • Development of design buckling curves for CHS arches.

  • Proposing stability criteria according to structural steel design standards.

Abstract

The structural stability of steel arches comprising Circular-Hollow-Sections (CHS) is examined in the present study. Appropriate finite element models are developed, accounting for geometry and material nonlinearities, as well as, incorporating residual stresses and geometric imperfections of roller-bent arches. A verification study is first performed to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed finite element modeling, followed by sensitivity analyses aiming at estimating the effects of residual stresses and geometric imperfections on the structural response. Findings reveal that the magnitude of geometric imperfections and the distribution of residual stresses significantly affect the arch's buckling resistance. An extensive parametric study is carried out to assess the spatial stability of arches comprising a wide range of non-dimensional slenderness, commonly encountered in the civil engineering practice. Based on the results of parametric analyses, suitable parameters are determined for the in-plane and out-of-plane buckling. Finally, stability criteria are proposed via regression analyses, which are used to define relevant buckling curves according to structural steel design standards.

Introduction

Steel arches are encountered in many structural and infrastructure engineering applications, such as atriums, bridges, buildings, etc. Apart from constituting an attractive solution due to their aesthetic appeal, arches can cover significant spans without intermediate supports, as loads are carried largely in compression rather than bending. The analysis and design of arches is widely associated with structural stability. The arch stability can be characterized by snap-through, in-plane, or out-of-plane buckling, as shown in Fig. 1. Snap-through buckling is usually the prevailing instability mechanism in cases of shallow arches, which are restrained against out-of-plane displacements. In this case, the arch stiffness gradually reduces due to the induced axial shortening, resulting in a limit point where transition from compressive to tensile action occurs suddenly. In-plane buckling is predominant in cases of non-shallow arches, which are adequately braced against out-of-plane displacements. In this context, either symmetric or antisymmetric mode shapes can be developed. Out-of-plane buckling occurs in cases of arches exhibiting significant free-standing portions. This type of instability comprises a combination of flexural and lateral-torsional buckling, and therefore is also denoted as flexural-torsional buckling.

The structural behavior of arches with emphasis on stability is presented in several literature sources. An overview of the research studies prior to 1970 is given in the “Handbook of Structural Stability” [1]. In the “Stability of Metal Structures, a World View” [2], a comparison is presented between standard provisions for the spatial stability of arches. The arch elastic and inelastic stability are discussed in a book chapter of the “Structural Stability Design, Steel and Composite Structures” [3]. A summation of experimental studies on arches is presented in the “Buckling Experiments” by Singer et al. [4]. In the “Design of curved steel” by King and Brown [5], a comprehensive methodology is proposed for the practical design of curved members including several worked examples. The spatial stability of arches, pertinent design criteria and several bracing recommendations, are thoroughly discussed in a book chapter of the “Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures” [6]. In the “Curved Member Design” by Dowswell [7], a contemporary guide is presented including practical information related to fabrication, detailing and design issues of curved steel members.

The roller-bending process is the most common method for producing circular arches in the steel constructional industry. It is a cold-forming process, where the workpiece is passed iteratively through three rollers. In each subsequent pass, the bending rolls are manipulated in an appropriate manner causing local plastification of steel, until the desired curvature is reached. Residual stresses are induced to steel profiles after roller-bending due to the plastic deformations caused by three-point bending. A theoretical distribution of the residual stresses emanating from the inelastic bending of beams is given by Timoshenko [8], as function of the steel's yield stress fy and the ratio α between the plastic and elastic section modulus. By aggregating the bending stresses due to inelastic Mpl and elastic ‘spring-back’ Msb moments, the self-equilibrated locked-in distribution is obtained, shown in Fig. 2. This theoretical distribution, exhibiting an anti-symmetrical layout about the neutral axis, makes no differentiation with regard to the cross-sectional shape. Based on the classical beam theory, the theoretical distribution is generally valid for the inelastic bending of beams incorporating small shear stresses relative to the bending stresses.

The residual stresses of roller-bent arches have been investigated by means of experimental and numerical methods [[9], [10], [11], [12], [13]]. Pertinent residual stress models for roller-bent arches of wide-flange-sections and rectangular-hollow-sections have been proposed by Spoorenberg et al. [11] and Chiew et al. [12], respectively. Following an extensive parametric study, a residual stress model for roller-bent arches of Circular-Hollow-Sections (CHS) has been proposed by Thanasoulas and Gantes [13]. The locked-in stress distributions in all cases (Fig. 3) are found to differ significantly from Timoshenko's theoretical distribution. Differences have been interpreted by considering that the classical beam theory is not appropriate for bending beams that are deep and short in length, like the beam segment within the three-point-bending length, where shear stresses become large relative to the bending stresses and thus cannot be neglected. The roller-bent flanged or hollow sections exhibit effects of plates or shells [14], such as stress concentrations at the web-to-flange junctions or transverse bending, which result in non-uniform bending stress distributions over the cross-sectional width. Therefore, the main assumptions of beam theory do not hold in the case of roller-bending, and thus the theoretical distribution cannot be accurately applied.

Residual stresses and geometric imperfections significantly affect the inelastic stability of steel members under axial compressive loads as in the case of arches. The effects of geometric imperfections and residual stresses on the stability of arches have been reported in early studies conducted by Komatsu and Sakimoto [15] and Sakimoto et al. [16]. In these studies, arches of welded wide-flange and box sections were examined, revealing that the presence of geometric imperfections and residual stresses can cause a significant reduction on buckling resistance. The in-plane stability of steel arches was studied by Pi and Trahair [17] and Pi and Bradford [18], while the out-of-plane stability was studied by Pi and Trahair [19] and Pi and Bradford [20]. In these studies, appropriate axial force - bending moment interaction design formulas were proposed for circular arches of I-sections. La Poutré et al. [21] carried out an experimental study on the out-of-plane stability of roller-bent arches comprising wide-flange-sections, while pertinent finite element simulations were carried out by Spoorenberg et al. [22]. Experimental tests and numerical analyses on roller-bent arches of rectangular-hollow-section were performed by Thanasoulas et al. [23], highlighting the presence of the Bauschinger effect on arches' inelastic response due to roller-bending.

Analysis and design methods of steel arches are based on the evaluation of their structural adequacy, considering the nonlinear effects due to material yielding and elastic/inelastic buckling. Several design methods for evaluating the structural adequacy of steel arches are based on normative provisions developed for straight members. Such methods are very popular in the structural steel design practice due to their simplicity, as second-order analyses are usually not required. A state-of-the-art design procedure is described in the “Curved Member Design” [7], in which design equations of the “Specification for Structural Steel Buildings” [24] are employed. A similar design methodology is proposed by King and Brown [5], based on the requirements of BS 5950–1 [25] with appropriate modifications to account for the effects of arcs curvature. Relevant design formulas are also given in the “Guide to Stability Design Criteria for Metal Structures” [6], which were originally developed by Pi and Trahair [17] and Pi and Bradford [18] for the in-plane strength, as well as, by Pi and Trahair [19] and Pi and Bradford [20] for the out-of-plane strength. The implementation of such design methods is mainly dependent on the existence of appropriate buckling curves accounting for reliable residual stress distributions and representative geometric imperfection magnitudes. Pertinent buckling curves have been proposed for the out-of-plane buckling of roller-bent arches comprising wide-flange-sections by Spoorenberg et al. [22].

In the present study, the in-plane and out-of-plane stability of roller-bent CHS arches is investigated by means of finite element analyses accounting for geometry and material nonlinearities. The effects of geometric imperfections and residual stresses are included in the developed numerical models, incorporating reliable residual distributions and geometric tolerances of roller-bent arches. A verification study is first performed to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed finite element modeling, followed by sensitivity analyses aiming at estimating the separate and combined effects of residual stresses and geometric imperfections on the arch structural response. An extensive parametric study is performed to assess the spatial stability of steel arches exhibiting various geometric dimensions. Several arches that are not prone to snap-through buckling are examined, comprising a wide range of arch non-dimensional slenderness, commonly encountered in the civil engineering practice. A systematic methodology is employed to determine buckling parameters for the spatial stability of steel arches using the column-curve formulation. Based on the results of parametric analyses, appropriate design formulas are proposed via regression equations which are used to define relevant buckling curves according to structural steel design standards.

Section snippets

Finite element simulation

In the present work, the Finite Element Method (FEM) is employed to simulate the structural behavior of steel arches. Circular arches are modeled using two-node beam elements of an adequate mesh size to sufficiently follow the arc curvature. The circular geometry of examined arches is characterized by the rise f, the span l, the radius of curvature R, and the semi-length S, as shown in Fig. 4. The local Cartesian system of beam elements is defined by x΄, y΄and z΄ axes referring to the

Numerical verification

In this section, a verification study is performed to evaluate the proposed finite element modeling; the numerical validation of relevant finite element models against experimental results has been performed in a previous study [23]. To that end, a benchmark case of a circular arch is examined, comprising rise f = 0.49 m, span l = 4.36 m, and radius of curvature R = 5.09 m. In the first case, the arch of CHS with diameter d = 100 mm and thickness t = 5 mm is modeled using two-node beam elements

Sensitivity analyses

In this section, sensitivity analyses are performed to investigate the effects of geometric imperfections and residual stresses on the inelastic stability of arches. Finite element analyses are carried out for the benchmark case of CHS arch comprising shell elements, as presented in Section 3. Numerical results are compared in terms of load-displacement equilibrium paths.

Parametric study

Parametric analyses are carried out to assess the inelastic stability of CHS steel arches. Several arches are examined, comprising a wide range of rise-to-span ratio f/l and bending ratio R/d that are commonly encountered in practice, namely 0.10 ≤ f/l ≤ 0.30 and 10.9 ≤ R/d ≤ 106.3, as shown in Table 1. In all cases, the cross-sectional diameter d = 100 mm and thickness t = 5 mm remain constant. The examined arches are not prone to snap-through buckling, according to the pertinent criteria of

Proposed design criteria

The development of column curves is based on extensive studies accounting for the effects of residual stresses and geometric imperfections [6]. Following this approach, pertinent buckling curves can be developed for the spatial stability of steel arches. Based on the results of parametric analyses, the generalized parameter n and the non-dimensional slenderness λ¯ are approximated via regression equations for the in-plane and out-of-plane buckling, as shown in Fig. 12. Linear regression is

Conclusions

The structural stability of CHS arches was assessed in the present study by means of finite element analyses accounting for geometry and material nonlinearities. The effects of geometric imperfections and residual stresses were also included in the developed numerical models, incorporating reliable residual stress distributions and geometric tolerances of roller-bent arches. A verification study was first performed to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed finite element modeling, followed by

Author CRediT roles

Ilias D. Thanasoulas Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Software; Data Curation; Writing - Original Draft

Charis J. Gantes Conceptualization; Investigation; Methodology; Supervision; Resources; Writing - Review & Editing

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Acknowledgements

This study is based on the Ph.D. dissertation [30] of the first author at the National Technical University of Athens. The valuable advice of Prof. Ioannis Vayas and Prof. Vlassis Koumousis, as members of the doctoral thesis committee, is gratefully acknowledged.

References (30)

  • Y. Fukumoto

    Structural Stability Design, Steel and Composite Structures

    (1996)
  • J. Singer et al.

    Buckling Experiments: Experimental Methods in Buckling of Thin-Walled Structures

    (1998)
  • C. King et al.

    Design of Curved Steel

    (2001)
  • Cited by (1)

    View full text