Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Scientific divagations: from signaling and transcription to chromatin changes in T cells

Anjana Rao describes the team effort to define the changes in chromatin accessibility in naive T cells during TH1 and TH2 cell differentiation after stimulation with TCR ligands and the appropriate cytokines. Her lab showed that differentiated TH1 and TH2 cells, which produce the cytokines IFN-γ and IL-4, respectively, displayed distinct patterns of DNase I hypersensitivity, histone acetylation and NFAT1 transcription factor binding around the Ifng and Il4 genes. This project turned them into a ‘real’ immunology lab!

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Rao, A. Nat. Immunol. 10, 3–5 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain, J. et al. Nature 365, 352–355 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCaffrey, P. G. et al. Science 262, 750–754 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flanagan, W. M., Corthésy, B., Bram, R. J. & Crabtree, G. R. Nature 352, 803–807 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogan, P. G., Chen, L., Nardone, J. & Rao, A. Genes Dev. 17, 2205–2232 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gwack, Y. et al. Nature 441, 646–650 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Feske, S. et al. Nature 441, 179–185 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prakriya, M. et al. Nature 443, 230–233 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hogan, P. G., Lewis, R. L. & Rao, A. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 28, 491–533 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, L., Glover, J. N. M., Hogan, P. G., Rao, A. & Harrison, S. C. Nature 392, 42–48 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, H., Rao, A. & Hogan, P. G. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 91–103 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Macián, F. et al. Cell 109, 719–731 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez, G. J. et al. Immunity 42, 265–278 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen, J. et al. Nature 567, 530–534 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Seo, H. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12410–12415 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, A., Luo, C. & Hogan, P. G. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15, 707–747 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, C. L. & Hager, G. L. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 27493–27496 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kadonaga, J. T. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 766–770 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, Q., Peterson, K. R., Fang, X. & Stamatoyannopoulos, G. Blood 100, 3077–3086 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cockerill, P. N., Shannon, M. F., Bert, A. G., Ryan, G. R. & Vadas, M. A. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2466–2470 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Iwafuchi-Doi, M. & Zaret, K. S. Development 143, 1833–1837 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Carey, M. Cell 92, 5–8 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Seder, R. A. & Paul, W. E. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 635–673 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal, S. & Rao, A. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10, 345–352 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal, S. & Rao, A. Immunity 9, 765–775 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leonard, W. J., Lin, J.-X. & O’Shea, J. J. Immunity 50, 832–850 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Murphy, K. M. et al. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18, 451–494 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bird, J. J. et al. Immunity 9, 229–237 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Agarwal, S., Avni, O. & Rao, A. Immunity 12, 643–652 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Loots, G. G. et al. Science 288, 136–140 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ansel, K. M. et al. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1251–1259 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Solymar, D. C., Agarwal, S., Bassing, C. H., Alt, F. W. & Rao, A. Immunity 17, 41–50 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vijayanand, P. et al. Immunity 36, 175–187 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Ansel, K. M., Djuretic, I., Tanasa, B. & Rao, A. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 607–656 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grogan, J. L. et al. Immunity 14, 205–215 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Strahl, B. D. & Allis, C. D. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Avni, O. et al. Nat. Immunol. 3, 643–651 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee, D. U., Agarwal, S. & Rao, A. Immunity 16, 649–660 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tahiliani, M. et al. Science 324, 930–935 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Lio, C.-W. J. J. Biosci. 45, 21 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Janssen, A., Colmenares, S. U. & Karpen, G. H. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 34, 265–288 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank all the members of our labs — students, postdocs, technicians and administrative folks — who have contributed to these various projects over the years. Special thanks to Suneet Agarwal, who delved fearlessly into unfamiliar fields to initiate what was at the time a rather high risk project; provided help and advice to two new graduate students, Debbie Solymar and Dong Lee; and bequeathed us some interesting gene-disrupted mice for Mark Ansel and Debbie Solymar to investigate in later years. Special thanks also to Orly Avni, who gamely (and successfully) struggled with chromatin immunoprecipitation at a time when very few people had mastered this still difficult technique. Thanks to Mark Ansel, who took the gene-disrupted mice off my hands and continued to analyze them when he set up his own lab at UCSF (we were both a little tired of the project by that time). Finally, we are grateful to the US National Institutes of Health for funding the research; typically, however, the applications were funded after the discoveries had all been made, and the study sections took pains to ensure that any post-discovery funding was strictly for pedestrian extensions of the original research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjana Rao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, A. Scientific divagations: from signaling and transcription to chromatin changes in T cells. Nat Immunol 21, 1473–1476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00823-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-020-00823-y

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing