Elsevier

Acta Biomaterialia

Volume 119, 1 January 2021, Pages 419-431
Acta Biomaterialia

Co-inspired hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds for vascularized bone regeneration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Hydroxyapatite (HA) is the main inorganic component of human bone. Inspired by nacre and cortical bone, hydroxyapatite-based coil scaffolds were successfully prepared. The scaffolds presented “brick and mortar” multi-layered structure of nacre and multi-layered concentric circular structure of cortical bone. Because of bioactive components and hierarchical structure, the scaffolds possessed good compressive strength (≈95 MPa), flexural strength (≈161 MPa) and toughness (≈1.1 MJ/m3). In addition, they showed improved angiogenesis and osteogenesis in rat and rabbit critical sized bone defect models. By mimicking co-biological systems, this work provided a feasible strategy to optimize the properties of traditional tissue engineering biological materials for vascularized bone regeneration.

Introduction

After millions of years of natural evolution, nature organisms have obtained a combination of sophisticated structure and multi-functionality. Learning from the hierarchical structures of nature materials, researchers have produced high-performance materials ranging from nanometers to micrometers [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. For instance, the 3D printed scaffolds with high porosity and good bioactivity inspired by lotus root [6,7], high-adhesion materials inspired by gecko and frog [8,9], bio-inspired superwettable surfaces or interface materials [10], [11], [12], [13] and other prominent biomimetic materials [14], [15], [16].

A classic problem of biological material design is that strength and toughness, the two key structural properties, tend to be exclusively reciprocal. Generally, materials with high toughness are invariably weak, whereas high-strength materials are frequently brittle [17]. Inspired by natural organisms, such as nacre, fish scales, teeth, and bone, structural materials with both good strength and toughness have been developed [18], [19], [20], [21]. Amongst a variety of animal taxa, eight structural features in biological materials have been identified as the most common: layered, fibrous, helical, gradient, tubular, sutural, cellular, and overlapping [2]. These structural elements can serve as a new paradigm and toolbox to rationalize the complicated mechanical behaviour of biological structures and systematize the biomimetic designs of structural biological materials. Layered structures are often employed to improve the strength and toughness of brittle materials [18]. For instance, cortical bone, a natural material with light weight and high strength, has a lamellar structure [3]. The osteons in cortical bone possess a multi-layered concentric circular structure assembled by collagen fibrils and hydroxyapatite (HA, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2) nanocrystals [22,23], which contribute enormously to the high mechanical properties and nutrition delivery (Fig. 1a) [24,25]. Similarly, nacre, consisting of 95 vol% brittle aragonite tablets and 5 vol% chitin fibrils and proteins, is the “gold standard” for biomimetic materials. Nacre exhibits high strength (70-100 MPa) and toughness (4-10 MPa∙m1/2) three orders of magnitude greater (in energy terms) than that of either biopolymers or minerals [18,26]. The mechanical properties of nacre result from its typical hierarchical micro/nanoscale architecture, including the classic “brick and mortar” multi-layered structure and the interfacial interactions between the organic layers and aragonite tablets (Fig. 1b) [27,28]. Such a strategy has been used to develop various synthetic nacre-mimetic materials with improved mechanical properties [16,[29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]]. Thus, constructing hierarchically layered architectures in biological materials is a promising strategy to achieve optimal mechanical properties.

Large bone regeneration remains a challenge in clinical applications, especially for load-bearing bones. The most common method to repair bone defects is to implant bone substitutes [35], [36], [37]. For the regeneration of large bone defects, especially for load-bearing bone regeneration, an ideal bone substitute must have good biological properties (biocompatibility, osteogenesis, osteoconduction, and osteoinduction), porous structure, and good strength and toughness. However, most bone substitutes cannot satisfy these requirements, which limits their application for bone regeneration. Although metallic biological materials have enough mechanical strength, their insufficient bioactivity remains a major problem in clinical applications [38]. In terms of non-metallic biological materials, bioceramics have low toughness, and hydrogels have low strength [39,40]. These materials generally have high bioactivity but insufficient mechanical strength. The compressive strength of most conventional bioceramic scaffolds for bone regeneration is lower than 50 MPa [41,42]. Furthermore, bone substitutes need good toughness to prevent fatigue fractures for medical device applications. However, ceramic scaffolds are generally prone to brittle fractures (as they have a fracture toughness typically less than 1 MPa∙m1/2) [43]. The compressive strength and toughness of cortical bone can reach 100 MPa and 1.2 MJ/m3 [44,45]. In our previous study, we prepared a CaSiO3–based composite with hierarchical layers inspired by nacre. This biomimetic composite has high mechanical strength, but its osteogenic and angiogenic capabilities are not optimal for bone regeneration [46]. An ideal biological material with outstanding mechanical strength and good osteogenic and angiogenic bioactivities still needs to be systematically explored.

In this study, we considered two factors when designing new materials: chemical composition and nano/microstructure. Graphene oxide (GO) and chitosan (CTS) were used as ideal candidates for the “brick” and adhesive “mortar” in the prepared materials system, respectively. Additionally, HA was introduced to improve the bioactivity of the material. Inspired by the micro/nanoscale structures of nacre and cortical bone, HA/GO/CTS scaffolds with a “brick-and-mortar” layered structure and a multi-layered concentric circular macrostructure were successfully prepared (Fig. 1c, d). Because these scaffolds were synthesized by mimicking co-biological systems (nacre and cortical bone), we termed these scaffolds co-inspired scaffolds (CIS). These CISs present good mechanical properties and bioactivity that may meet the requirements of load-bearing bone substitutes (Fig. 1e).

Section snippets

Fabrication of the nacre-inspired hydroxyapatite-based preliminary films

To prepare the hydroxyapatite-based co-inspired films and scaffolds as shown in Fig. 1, a vacuum filtration self-assembly technology was employed to construct the “brick” and “mortar” hierarchical micro/nanostructure of nacre. Additionally, bioactive HA particles were introduced into this system with two approaches, namely, in situ synthesis and ex situ synthesis. The nacre-inspired HA/GO/CTS film was prepared by in situ synthesis of HA [47,48] and self-assembly with vacuum filtration (referred

Preparation and characterization of the hydroxyapatite-based co-inspired films and scaffolds

The three HA/GO/CTS films are referred to as “in situ and filter,” “ex situ and filter” and “ex situ and dry” preliminary films (Fig. 1d). “CTS” and “0% HA, GO/CTS=2:1” films were prepared though vacuum filtration to investigate the impact of chemical composition on this co-inspired material. As shown in Fig. 2, the “CTS” film was semi-transparent and white, while the “0% HA, GO/CTS=2:1” and “20% HA, in situ and filter” films were black with a metallic lustre. The “20% HA, ex situ and filter”

Conclusions

In this study, HA composite 3D materials with good mechanical and biological properties were prepared by mimicking co-biological systems. By mimicking the multilayer morphology of nacre and cortical bone, a “brick and mortar” layered microstructure and concentric circular structure were successfully prepared in this biomimetic system. The co-inspired coil scaffolds were prepared with vacuum filtration self-assembly, which is more cost effective and easier to operate than other methods such as

Authors' contribution

C. Feng designed and performed the experiments, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript. J. Xue, M. Zhang, R. Lin and L. Xia performed animal experiments. X. Yu and Q. Yao contributed to the data analysis. D. Zhai and X. Wang performed In vitro bioactivity experiments. J. Chang and J. Xue revised the manuscript. C. Wu initiated, designed and supervised the study, and revised the final manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1105201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51761135103, 81771989), Innovation Cross Team of Chinese Academy Sciences (JCTD-2018-13), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (QYZDB-SSW-SYS027), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20442420300) and Innovative Research Team of High-level Local Universities in Shanghai.

References (78)

  • X. Cai et al.

    Preparation and characterization of homogeneous chitosan–polylactic acid/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering and evaluation of its mechanical properties

    Acta Biomater

    (2009)
  • Y.Z. Zhang et al.

    Electrospun biomimetic nanocomposite nanofibers of hydroxyapatite/chitosan for bone tissue engineering

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • M. Farokhi et al.

    Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering

    Biotechnol. Adv.

    (2018)
  • B. Mondal et al.

    Fish scale derived hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone tissue engineering

    Mater. Charact.

    (2016)
  • C.H. Turner et al.

    Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: a tutorial

    Bone

    (1993)
  • H.N. Wang et al.

    Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • S.L. Aktug et al.

    Bioactivity and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite-based bioceramic coatings on zirconium by plasma electrolytic oxidation

    Mat. Sci. Eng. C-Mater.

    (2017)
  • J.S. Lee et al.

    In vivo study of chitosan-natural nano hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue regeneration

    Int. J. Biol Macromol.

    (2014)
  • H. Li et al.

    An osteogenesis/angiogenesis-stimulation artificial ligament for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

    Acta Biomater

    (2017)
  • W. Fan et al.

    Enhancing in vivo vascularized bone formation by cobalt chloride-treated bone marrow stromal cells in a tissue engineered periosteum model

    Biomaterials

    (2010)
  • J. Aizenberg et al.

    Biological and biomimetic materials

    Adv. Mater.

    (2009)
  • S.E. Naleway et al.

    Structural design elements in biological materials: application to bioinspiration

    Adv. Mater.

    (2015)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Hierarchical structures of bone and bioinspired bone tissue engineering

    Small

    (2016)
  • G.T. Zan et al.

    Biomimetic and bioinspired synthesis of nanomaterials/ nanostructures

    Adv. Mater.

    (2016)
  • B. Bhushan

    Biomimetics: lessons from nature-an overview

    Philos. T. R. Soc. A

    (2009)
  • C. Feng et al.

    3D printing of lotus root-like biomimetic materials for cell delivery and tissue regeneration

    Adv. Sci.

    (2017)
  • W. Federle et al.

    Wet but not slippery: boundary friction in tree frog adhesive toe pads

    J. R. Soc. Interface

    (2006)
  • L.F. Boesel et al.

    Gecko-inspired surfaces: a path to strong and reversible dry adhesives

    Adv. Mater.

    (2010)
  • S.T. Wang et al.

    Bioinspired surfaces with superwettability: new insight on theory, design, and applications

    Chem. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Q. Xu et al.

    Biomimetic self-cleaning surfaces: synthesis, mechanism and applications

    J. R. Soc. Interface

    (2016)
  • G. Ciasca et al.

    Recent advances in superhydrophobic surfaces and their relevance to biology and medicine

    Bioinspir. Biomim.

    (2016)
  • F. Xia et al.

    Bio-inspired, smart, multiscale interfacial materials

    Adv. Mater.

    (2008)
  • L.H. Ferrand et al.

    Magnetically assisted slip casting of bioinspired heterogeneous composites

    Nat. Mater.

    (2015)
  • J.W.C. Dunlop et al.

    Bioinspired composites: Making a tooth mimic

    Nat. Mater.

    (2015)
  • L.J. Bonderer et al.

    Bioinspired design and assembly of platelet reinforced polymer films

    Science

    (2008)
  • R.O. Ritchie

    The conflicts between strength and toughness

    Nat. Mater.

    (2011)
  • X. Li et al.

    The lamellar structure and biomimetic properties of a fish scale matrix

    Rsc Adv.

    (2020)
  • A. Lubke et al.

    Composites of fluoroapatite and methylmethacrylate-based polymers (PMMA) for biomimetic tooth replacement

    Bioinspir. Biomim.

    (2016)
  • R. Hao et al.

    A new structure model of biomimetic composites considering the sub-microscale porosity of bone

    Adv. Eng. Mater.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (50)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text