Skip to main content
Log in

The role of circulating tumor cells and K-ras mutations in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Molecular Biology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rectal cancer is a common malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. We assessed the possible prognostic and predictive role(s) of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and K-ras mutations in locally advanced rectal carcinoma (LARC) patients. CTCs number and K-ras mutation status were assessed in the Peripheral blood and tumor tissue samples of 60 patients with LARC compared to control group (normal rectal mucosa). Data were correlated to relevant clinico-pathological features, response to treatment, disease free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates. K-ras mutations were present in 24/60 (40%) patients. Baseline CTCs (< 5 cells/7 ml blood) were detected in 23/60 (38.3%) patients, and 37 (61.7%) had baseline CTCs (≥ 5 cells/7 ml) blood (P = 0.071). Serial sampling showed a decrease in CTCs levels in 40 (66.7%) patients and increase in 20 (33.3%) patients (P = 0.01). Patients with K-ras mutations had a significantly poor response to treatment, with reduced DFS and OS rates (P = 0.001, 0.004, and 0.001; respectively). Similarly, decreased CTCs levels during treatment associated significantly with better pathological responses (P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that K-ras mutation and baseline CTCs are independent prognostic factors for DFS (P = 0.014 and 0.045; respectively) and OS (P = 0.002 and 0.045; respectively). The presence of mutant K-ras and baseline CTCs ≥ 5 cells associated significantly with poor pathological response, shorter DFS and OS rates compared to those with either K-ras mutation or CTCs ≥ 5 cells only (P = 0.014, 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). K-ras mutations, baseline and serial CTCs changes represent good prognostic and predictive factors for LARC patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68(6):394–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bailey CE, Hu CY, You YN et al (2015) Increasing disparities in the age-related incidences of colon and rectal cancers in the United States, 1975–2010. JAMA Surg 150(1):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gaertner WB, Kwaan MR, Mado RD, Melton GB (2015) Rectal cancer: an evidence-based update for primary care providers. World J Gastroenterol 21:7659–7671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ryan JE, Warrier SK, Lynch AC, Ramsay RG, Phillips WA, Heriot AG (2016) Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 18:234–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Deschoolmeester V, Baay M, Specenier P, Lardon F, Vermorken JB (2010) A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy. Oncologist 15(7):699–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhunussova G, Djansugurova L, Khussainova E, Zhunusbekova B, Afonin G, Khaidarova D, Matejcic M, Parker MI (2015) Analysis of K-ras codon 12 and TP53 mutations in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. S Afr Med J 105(8):670–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li Z, Chen Y, Wang D, Wang G, He L, Suo J (2012) Detection of KRAS mutations and their associations with clinicopathological features and survival in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. J Int Med Res 40(4):1589–1598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rasmy A, Fayed A, Omar A, Fahmy N (2019) Effect of KRAS mutational status on disease behavior and treatment outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: intratumor heterogeneity and mutational status. J Gastrointest Oncol 10(5):886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bahnassy AA, Saber MM, Mahmoud MG, Abdellateif MS, Samra MA, El-Fatah RM, Zekri AR, Salem SE (2018) The role of circulating tumor cells in metastatic breast cancer: prognostic and predictive value. Mol Biol Rep 45(6):2025–2035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, Parker C, Miller MC, Tissing H, Doyle GV, Terstappen LW, Pienta KJ, Raghavan D (2008) Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14(19):6302–6309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thorsteinsson M, Söletormos G, Jess P (2011) Low number of detectable circulating tumor cells in non-metastatic colon cancer. Anticancer Res 31(2):613–617

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen SJ, Punt CJ, Iannotti N, Saidman BH, Sabbath KD, Gabrail NY, Picus J, Morse M, Mitchell E, Miller MC, Doyle GV (2008) Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Oncol 26:3213–3221

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vafaei S, Fattahi F, Ebrahimi M, Janani L, Shariftabrizi A, Madjd Z (2019) Common molecular markers between circulating tumor cells and blood exosomes in colorectal cancer: a systematic and analytical review. Cancer Manag Res 11:8669

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F (2016) AJCC cancer staging system: update. AJCC, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bahnassy AA, Zekri AR, El-Bastawisy A, Fawzy A, Shetta M, Hussein N, Omran D, Ahmed AA, El-Labbody SS (2014) Circulating tumor and cancer stem cells in hepatitis C virus-associated liver disease. World J Gastroenterol WJG 20(48):18240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bahnassy AA, Salem SE, Mohanad M, Abulezz NZ, Abdellateif MS, Hussein M, Zekri CA, Zekri AR, Allahloubi NM (2019) Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in Egyptian non-metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a comparative study for four different techniques of detection (Flowcytometry, Cell Search, quantitative real-time pcr and cytomorphology). Exp Mol Pathol 106:90–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Popović Hadžija M, Korolija M, Jakić Razumović J, Pavković P, Hadžija M, Kapitanović S (2007) K-ras and Dpc4 mutations in chronic pancreatitis: case series. Croat Med J 48(2):218–224

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimminger PP, Danenberg P, Dellas K, Arnold D, Rödel C, Machiels JP, Haustermans K, Debucquoy A, Velenik V, Sempoux C, Bracko M (2011) Biomarkers for cetuximab-based neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17(10):3469–3477

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, Juan T et al (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(10):1626–1634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Tu D, Tebbutt NC, Simes RJ, Chalchal H, Shapiro JD, Robitaille S, Price TJ (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359(17):1757–1765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang J, Lin Y, Huang Y, Jin J, Zou S, Zhang X, Li H, Feng T, Chen J, Zuo Z, Zheng J (2019) Genome landscapes of rectal cancer before and after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Theranostics 9(23):6856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Duldulao MP, Lee W, Nelson RA et al (2013) Mutations in specific codons of the KRAS oncogene are associated with variable resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 20:2166–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaedcke J, Grade M, Jung K, Schirmer M, Jo P, Obermeyer C, Wolff HA, Herrmann MK, Beissbarth T, Becker H, Ried T (2010) KRAS and BRAF mutations in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 94(1):76–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Bengala C, Bettelli S, Bertolini F, Sartori G, Fontana A, Malavasi N, Depenni R, Zironi S, Del Giovane C, Luppi G, Conte PF (2010) Prognostic role of EGFR gene copy number and KRAS mutation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Br J Cancer 103(7):1019

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai WS, Chen JS, Shao HJ, Wu JC, Lai JM, Lu SH, Hung TF, Chiu YC, You JF, Hsieh PS, Yeh CY (2016) Circulating tumor cell count correlates with colorectal neoplasm progression and is a prognostic marker for distant metastasis in non-metastatic patients. Sci Rep 6:24517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun W, Zhang Z (2016) Circulating tumor cells: a promising marker in predicting tumor response after preoperative chemo-radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 27(suppl_6):69507

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen SJ, Punt CJ, Iannotti N et al (2008) Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(19):3213–3221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vacante M, Ciuni R, Basile F, Biondi A (2020) The liquid biopsy in the management of colorectal cancer: an overview. Biomedicines 8(9):308

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is supported by National Cancer Institute, Cairo University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abeer A. Bahnassy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors approve the submission and declare no competence of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the ethical committee of the institutional review board of the NCI, Cairo University, which is in accordance to the 2017 declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

A signed informed consent was obtained from all participating patients and control subjects prior to enrollment in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Electronic supplementary material 1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bahnassy, A.A., Abdel-Azim, Y.A., Ezzat, S. et al. The role of circulating tumor cells and K-ras mutations in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a prospective study. Mol Biol Rep 47, 9645–9657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05973-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-020-05973-8

Keywords

Navigation