Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental and CFD investigations of choked cavitation characteristics of the gap flow in the valve lintel of navigation locks

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Hydrodynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cavitation is ubiquitous in the water delivery system of high hydraulic head navigation locks. This paper studies the choked cavitation characteristics of the gap flows in the valve lintel of the navigation locks and analyzes the critical self-aeration conditions. The cavitation gap flow in the valve lintel is experimentally and numerically investigated. A visualized 1:1 full-scale slicing model is designed, with a high-speed camera, the details of the cavitation flow is captured without the reduced scale effect. Moreover, the numerical simulations are conducted to reveal the flow structures in the gap. The experimental results show that the flow pattern of the gap flow in the valve lintel could be separated into four models, namely, the incipient (1) the developing, (2), the intensive, (3), and the choked (4) cavitation models. The numerical simulation results are consistent with the experimental data. The choked cavitation conditions are crucial to the gap flow in the valve lintel. When the choked cavitation occurs, the gap is entirely occupied by two cavitation cloud sheets. The gap pressure then decreases sharply to the saturated water vapor pressure at the operating temperature. This water vapor pressure is the ultimate negative pressure in the gap that remains unchanged with the continuous decrease of the downstream pressure. The volumetric flow rate reaches a peak, then remains constant, with the further decrease of the pressure ratio or the cavitation number. At the choking point, the volumetric flow rate is proportional to the root mean square of the difference between the upstream pressure (absolute pressure) and the saturated pressure of the water. Moreover, the pressure ratio is linearly correlated with the downstream cavitation number with a slope of (1 + Ϛc).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Luo X. W., Ji B., Tsujimoto Y. A review of cavitation in hydraulic machinery [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2016, 28(3): 335–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghassemi H., Fasih H. F. Application of small size cavitating venturi as flow controller and flow meter [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2011, 22(5): 406–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gągol M., Przyjazny A., Boczkaj G. Wastewater treatment by means of advanced oxidation processes based on cavitation-A review [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 338: 599–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brinkhorst S., Lavante E. V., Wendt G. Experimental and numerical investigation of the cavitation-induced choked flow in a herschel venturi-tube [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2017, 54: 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yan Y., Thorpe R. B. Flow regime transitions due to cavitation in the flow through an orifice [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1990, 16(6): 1023–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Long X., Zhang J., Wang J. et al. Experimental investigation of the global cavitation dynamic behavior in a venturi tube with special emphasis on the cavity length variation [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2017, 89: 290–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cioncolini A., Scenini F., Duff J. et al. Choked cavitation in micro-orifices: An experimental study [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 74: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tomov P., Khelladi S., Ravelet F. et al. Experimental study of aerated cavitation in a horizontal venturi nozzle [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2016, 70: 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abdulaziz A. M. Performance and image analysis of a cavitating process in a small type venturi [J]. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science, 2014, 53: 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Harada K., Murakami M., Ishii T. PIV measurements for flow pattern and void fraction in cavitating flows of He II and He I [J]. Cryogenics, 2006, 46(9): 648–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Decaix J., Balarac G., Dreyer M. et al. RANS computations of tip vortex cavitation [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2015, 656: 12183.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Argyropoulos C. D., Markatos N. C. Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows [J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2015, 39(2): 693–732.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Shih T., Liou W. W., Shabbir A. et al. A new k-ε eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 1995, 24(3): 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashrafizadeh S. M., Ghassemi H. Experimental and numerical investigation on the performance of small-sized cavitating venturis [J]. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2015, 42: 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Charrière B., Goncalves E. Numerical investigation of periodic cavitation shedding in a Venturi [J]. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2017, 64: 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ji B., Luo X. W., Arndt R. E. A. et al. Large eddy simulation and theoretical investigations of the transient cavitating vortical flow structure around a NACA66 hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2015, 68: 121–134.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Long X., Cheng H., Ji B. et al. Large eddy simulation and Euler-Lagrangian coupling investigation of the transient cavitating turbulent flow around a twisted hydrofoil [J]. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 2018, 100: 41–56.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang C. C., Liu Y., Chen J. et al. Cavitation vortex dynamics of unsteady sheet/cloud cavitating flows with shock wave using different vortex identification methods [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2019, 31(3): 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang B., Zhao Y., Wang G. Large eddy simulation of turbulent vortex-cavitation interactions in transient sheet/cloud cavitating flows [J]. Computers and Fluids, 2014, 92: 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Long X., Long Y., Wang W. et al. Some notes on numerical simulation and error analyses of the attached turbulent cavitating flow by LES [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2018, 30(2): 369–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ji B., Long Y., Long X. et al. Large eddy simulation of turbulent attached cavitating flow with special emphasis on large scale structures of the hydrofoil wake and turbulence-cavitation interactions [J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2017, 29(1): 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nouri N. M., Mirsaeedi S. M. H., Moghimi M. Large eddy simulation of natural cavitating flows in Venturi-type sections [J]. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2011, 225(2): 369–381.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ANSYS FLUENT theory guide, release 14.0 [R]. ANSYS INC., 2014.

  24. Araoye A. A., Badr H. M., Ahmed W. H. Investigation of flow through multi-stage restricting orifices [J]. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2017, 104: 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kalitzin G., Medic G., Iaccarino G. et al. Near-wall behavior of RANS turbulence models and implications for wall functions [J]. Journal of Computational Physics, 2005, 204(1): 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iyer C. O., Ceccio S. L. The influence of developed cavitation on the flow of a turbulent shear layer [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14(10): 3414–3431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. šarc A., Stepišnik-Perdih T., Petkovšek M. et al. The issue of cavitation number value in studies of water treatment by hydrodynamic cavitation [J]. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2017, 34: 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y., Tian Y., Zhang Z. et al. Experimental and numerical study of cavitating flow with suction in a mixing reactor for water treatment [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2018, 353: 796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mishra C., Peles Y. Cavitation in flow through a microorifice inside a silicon microchannel [J]. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(1): 13601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Molina S., Salvador F. J., Carreres M. et al. A computational investigation on the influence of the use of elliptical orifices on the inner nozzle flow and cavitation development in diesel injector nozzles [J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2014, 79: 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ya-an Hu.

Additional information

Project supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0402007), the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51779151).

Biography

Bo Wu (1991-), Male, Ph. D. Candidate, E-mail: bowu1991@whu.edu.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, B., Hu, Ya., Wang, X. et al. Experimental and CFD investigations of choked cavitation characteristics of the gap flow in the valve lintel of navigation locks. J Hydrodyn 32, 997–1008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-020-0065-6

Key words

Navigation