Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The t-latency bounded strong target set selection problem in some kinds of special family of graphs

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For a given simple graph \(G=(V,E)\), a latency bound t and a threshold function \(\theta (v)=\lceil \rho d(v)\rceil \), where \(\rho \in (0,1)\) and d(v) denotes the degree of the vertex \(v(\in V)\), a subset \(S\subseteq V\) is called a strong target set if for each vertex \(v\in S\), the number of its neighborhood in S not including itself is at least \(\theta (v)\), and all vertices in V can be activated by S through a process with t rounds. Initially, all vertices in S become activated. At the ith round of the process, each vertex is activated if the number of active vertices in its neighbor after \(i-1\) rounds exceeds its threshold. The \(t\)-Latency Bounded Strong Target Set Selection (t-LBSTSS) problem is to find such a strong target set S with the minimum cardinality in G. In general graphs, the t-LBSTSS problem is not only NP-hard, but also hard to be approximated. The aim of this paper is to find an optimal t-latency bounded strong target set for some special family of graphs. For a given simple graph G, a simple, tight but nontrivial inequality in terms of the number of edges in G is proposed to obtain the lower bound of the sum of degrees in a strong target set S to the t-LBSTSS problem. Moreover, a necessary and sufficient condition is presented for equality to hold. Finally, we give the exact formulas for the optimal solutions to the t-LBSTSS problem in two kinds of natural family of graphs, while it seems difficult to tell without the inequality given in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman E, Ben-Zwi O, Wolfovitz G (2010) Combinatorial model and bounds for target set selection. Theor Comp Sci 411:4017–4022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Zwi O, Hermelin D, Lokshtanov D, Newman I (2011) Treewidth governs the complexity of target set selection. Discret Optim 8:87–96

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Lyuu Y (2010) Bounding the number of tolerable faults in majority-based systems. In: International Conference on Algorithms and Complexity. pp 109–119

  • Chen N (2009) On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 23:1400–1415

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang CY, Huang LH, Huang WT, Yeh HG (2011) The Target Set Selection Problem on Cycle Permutation Graphs, Generalized Petersen Graphs and Torus Cordalis, arXiv: 1112.1313

  • Chiang CY, Huang LH, Li BJ, Wu JJ, Yeh HG (2013) Some Results on the Target Set Selection Problem. J Comb Optim 25:702–715

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang CY, Huang LH, Yeh HG (2013) Target set selection problem for honeycomb networks. SIAM J Discrete Math 27(1):310–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chopin M, Nichterlein A, Niedermeier R, Weller M (2014) Constant thresholds can make target set selection tractable. Theory Comput Syst 55(1):61–83

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cicalese F, Cordasco G, Gargano L, Milanič M, Vaccaro U (2014) Latency–Bounded target set election in social networks. Theor Comp Sci 535:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diestel R (2005) Graph theory. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dinh TN, Dung T, Nguyen DT, Thai MT (2012) Cheap, Easy, and Massively Effective Viral Markeing in Social Networks: Truth or Fiction? In: ACM conference on Hypertext and social media, pp 65-174

  • Domingos P, Richardson M (2001) Mining the network value of customers, In: Proceeding of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pp 57-66

  • Flocchini P, Kralovic R, Ruzicka P, Roncato A, Santoro N (2003) On time versus size for monotone dynamic monopolies in regular topologies. J Discrete Algo 1:129–150

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminski M, Lozin VV, Milanic M (2009) Recent developments on graphs of bounded Clique-width. Discrete Appl Math 157(12):2747–2761

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi F, Holme P (2013) Threshold model of cascades in temporal networks. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 392(16):3476–3483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe D, Kleinberg JM, Tardos E (2015) Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. Theory Comput 11(4):105–147

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kempe D, Kleinberg JM, Tardos E (2005) Influential nodes in a diffusion model for social networks. Languages and Programming, Automata, pp 1127–1138

  • Khoshkhah K, Soltani H, Zaker M (2012) On dynamic monopolies of graphs: the average and strict majority thresholds. Discrete Optim 9:77–83

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu XL, Yang ZS, Wang W (2013) Exact solutions for Latency–Bounded target set selection problem on some special families of graphs. Discrete Appl Math 2016:111–116

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nichterlein A, Niedermeier R, Uhlmann J, Weller M (2013) On tractable cases of target set selection. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(2):233–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg D (2002) Local majorities, coalitions and monopolies in graphs: a review. Theor Comp Sci 282:231–257

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zaker M (2012) On dynamic monopolies of graphs with general thresholds. Discrete Math 312:1136–1143

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wu W, Wang F, Xu K (2012) Positive influence dominating sets in power-law graphs. Soc Netw Anal Min 2:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou F, Zhang Z, Wu WL (2009) Latency–Bounded minimum influential node selection in social networks. Lect Notes Comp Sci 5682:519–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11701236, 11471005 and 11971376).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Yang, Z. & Wang, W. The t-latency bounded strong target set selection problem in some kinds of special family of graphs. J Comb Optim 41, 105–117 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00671-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-020-00671-4

Keywords

Navigation