Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of the UV Chemometrics, Ratio Spectra Derivative and HPLC-QbD Methods for the Estimation of Their Simultaneous Estimation in Combined Marketed Formulation

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 February 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

The CARISOMA™ consists of carisoprodol (CAR), paracetamol (PCM) and caffeine (CAF) used for fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis. The study discussed the comparative study of UV chemometrics (method A), ratio spectra derivative (method B) and HPLC-QbD (method C) for simultaneous estimation of the aforementioned drugs in API and marketed tablet formulation. From the listed methods, method A can estimate CAR without derivatization. Analytical figures of merit (FOM) were determined for method A. The CAR has a weak chromophoric group so diazotization was carried out and the derivatized-CAR (D-CAR) was evaluated by IR, mass and NMR; further estimated by method B simultaneously with PCM and CAF. Method C involved the application of quality by design approach for the estimation of aforesaid drugs. The calibration curves of CAR, PCM and CAF found linear in the range of 1–5 µg mL−1, 2–10 µg mL−1 and 0.2–1 µg mL−1 for method A; 1–5 µg mL−1, 2–10 µg mL−1, 0.2–1 µg mL−1 for method B and 10–50 µg mL−1, 20–100 µg mL−1 and 1.85–9.25 µg mL­−1 for method C. Method C involved the use of C18 column and ACN: potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer (90:10 v/v) as the mobile phase at pH 3. For resolution of drugs, the described methods were successfully applied, validated and compared statistically. Method A was found to be more acceptable due to its accuracy and simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Change history

Abbreviations

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

CAR:

Carisoprodol

CAF:

Caffeine

D-CAR:

Derivatized carisoprodol

FFD:

Full factorial design

FOM:

Figure of merit

NPLS:

N-Way partial least square

PCM:

Paracetamol

PCR:

Principal component regression

PLS:

Partial least square

QbD:

Quality by design

RMSEC:

Root mean square error of calibration

RMSECV:

Root means square error of cross-validation

RMSEP:

Root mean square error of prediction

References

  1. American Pharmaceutical Association (2012) U.S Pharmacopoeia. American Pharmaceutical Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of health and family welfare (2010) Indian Pharmacopoeia commision. Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sweetman S, Martindale W (2007) Martindale: the complete drug reference, 36th edn. Pharmaceutical Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sreenivasulu V, Ramesh M, Kumar IJ et al (2013) Simultaneous determination of carisoprodol and aspirin in human plasma using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry in polarity switch mode: application to a human pharmacokinetic study. Biomed Chromatogr 27:179–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.2766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Skinner W, McKemie D, Stanley S (2004) Quantitative determination of carisoprodol and its metabolites in equine urine and serum by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Chromatographia 59:S61–S67. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0244-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Delavenne X, Gay-Montchamp JP, Basset T (2011) HPLC MS/MS method for quantification of meprobamate in human plasma: application to 24/7 clinical toxicology. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 879:215–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.11.034

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miksa IR, Poppenga RH Direct and rapid determination of baclofen (Lioresal) and carisoprodol (Soma) in bovine serum by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Anal Toxicol 27:275–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/27.5.275

  8. Rohith T, Ananda S, Gowda N (2013) Method development and validation of carisoprodol and its impurities by ultra violet-high performance liquid chromatography. Adv Anal Chem 3:15–19. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.aac.20130302.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher J, Sherma J (2001) Analysis of carisoprodol tablets by HPTLC with visible absorbance densitometry. Acta Chromatogr 11:96–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadad GM, Abdel-Salam RA, Emara S (2012) Determination of glucosamine and carisoprodol in pharmaceutical formulations by LC with pre-column derivatization and UV detection. J Chromatogr Sci 50:307–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bms008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shihana F, Dissanayake D, Dargan P, Dawson A (2010) A modified low-cost colorimetric method for paracetamol (acetaminophen) measurement in plasma. Clin Toxicol 48:42–46. https://doi.org/10.3109/15563650903443137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsumoto T, Sano T, Matsuoka T et al (2003) Simultaneous determination of carisoprodol and acetaminophen in an attempted suicide by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with positive electrospray ionization. J Anal Toxicol 27:118–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/27.2.118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawar VT, Pishawikar SA, More HN (2011) Spectrophotometric estimation of aceclofenac and paracetamol from tablet dosage form. Int Res J Pharm 2:93–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murtaza G, Khan A, Shabbir A et al (2011) Development of a UV-spectrophotometric method for the simultaneous determination of aspirin and paracetamol in tablets. Sci Res Essays 6:417–421. https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE10.925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Islam SMA, Shultana S, Bin SMS, Dewan I (2012) UV-Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC methods for the simultaneous estimation of acetaminophen and caffeine: validation, comparison and application for marketed tablet analysis. Int J Pharm 2:39–45

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. An DTT, Hoang VD (2009) Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and codeine phosphate in combined tablets by first-order derivative and ratio spectra first-order derivative UV spectrophotometry. Asian J reserch Chem 2:143–147

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sawant R, Bhangale L, Joshi R, Lanke P (2010) Validated spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of paracetamol, domperidone and tramadol HCl in pure and tablet dosage form. J Chem Metrol 4:21–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang A, Sun J, Feng H et al (2008) Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and caffeine in human plasma by LC-ESI-MS. Chromatographia 67:281–285. https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0493-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khanage SG, Mohite PB, Dharam PG, Deshmukh VK (2015) Development and validation of reversed phase high performance liquid chromatographic method for simultaneous estimation of paracetamol, caffeine and carisoprodol in tablet formulation. Eurasian J Anal Chem 10:163–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel M, Shah C (2018) Multivariate UV-chemometric and HPLC-QbD method for simultaneous estimation of vardenafil and dapoxetine in active pharmaceutical ingredients and its marketed formulation. Curr Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573411014666180501122512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel MN, Kothari CS (2016) Multivariate approaches for simultaneous determination of avanafil and dapoxetine by UV chemometrics and HPLC-QbD in binary mixtures and pharmaceutical product. J AOAC Int. https://doi.org/10.5740/jaoacint.15-0259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Patel MN, Kothari CS (2018) Review on implementation of multivariate approach for forced degradation study and impurity profiling with regulatory considerations. Chromatographia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-017-3393-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Olivieri AC, Faber NM, Ferré J et al (2006) Uncertainty estimation and figures of merit for multivariate calibration (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 78:633–661. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200678030633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Biancolillo A, Marini F (2018) Chemometric methods for spectroscopy-based pharmaceutical analysis. Front Chem 6:576. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00576

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gummadi S, Chandaka PK (2019a) Chemometrics approach to drug analysis. An overview. Am J PharmTech Res 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.46624/ajptr.2019.v9.i1.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gummadi S, Chandaka P (2019b) Chemometrics approach to drug analysis—an overview. Am J PharmTech Res 9:1–13. https://doi.org/10.4624/ajptr.2019.v9.i1.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Patel NS, Nandurbarkar VP, Patel AJ, Patel SG (2014) Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of celecoxib and Diacerein in bulk and capsule by absorption correction method and chemometric methods. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 125:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.01.036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tena RC, Delgado MA, Sanchez M, Montelongo FG (1997) Comparative study of the zero-crossing, ratio spectra derivative and partial least-squares methods applied to the simultaneous determination of atrazine and its degradation product desethylatrazin-2-hydroxy in ground waters. Talanta 44:673–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-9140(96)02104-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Yazbi FA, Hammud HH, Assi SA (2007) Derivative-ratio spectrophotometric method for the determination of ternary mixture of aspirin, paracetamol and salicylic acid. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 68:275–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2006.11.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Khamanga SM, Walker RB (2011) The use of experimental design in the development of an HPLC-ECD method for the analysis of captopril. Talanta 83:1037–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2010.11.025

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rote AR, Bari PD (2009) Ratio spectra derivative and zero-crossing difference spectrophotometric determination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide in combined pharmaceutical dosage form. AAPS PharmSciTech 10:1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-009-9318-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Krishna MV, Dash RN, Jalachandra Reddy B et al (2016) Quality by Design (QbD) approach to develop HPLC method for eberconazole nitrate: application oxidative and photolytic degradation kinetics. J Saudi Chem Soc 20:S313–S322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2012.12.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luo YR, Han J, Yun C, Lynch KL (2019) Azo coupling-based derivatization method for high-sensitivity liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry analysis of tetrahydrocannabinol and other aromatic compounds. J Chromatogr A 1597:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. ICH tripartite guideline (2005) Validation of analytical methods: definitions and terminology Q2(R1). https://www.ich.org/page/quality-guidelines. Accessed 20 Sep 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to Centurion Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd., India and Cadila Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., India for supplying gift samples of pure Carisoprodol (CAR), Paracetamol (PCM) and Caffeine (CAF).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. G. Patel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors report no conflict of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1717 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patel, M.N., Patel, A.J., Shah, U.H. et al. Comparative Study of the UV Chemometrics, Ratio Spectra Derivative and HPLC-QbD Methods for the Estimation of Their Simultaneous Estimation in Combined Marketed Formulation. Chromatographia 84, 75–86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-020-03979-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-020-03979-9

Keywords

Navigation