Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An accuracy-based proficiency testing programme with metrological reference values for the mass fraction of acesulfame potassium and sucralose in cake mix flour

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes a metrological approach to evaluate the measurement capability of laboratories participating in a then Asia Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation [APLAC, now Asia Pacific Accreditation Cooperation] proficiency testing (PT) programme on mass fraction of acesulfame potassium and sucralose in cake mix flour. The programme was jointly organised by the Chemical Metrology Laboratory of the Health Sciences Authority, Singapore, and the Singapore Accreditation Council. Through the extensive APLAC network of accreditation bodies, 41 nominated laboratories from 32 economies registered, of which 40 laboratories submitted their results. Reference values of artificial sweeteners in the programme for performance evaluation were obtained from a high-accuracy liquid chromatography isotope dilution mass spectrometry (LC-IDMS) method. One of the unique features of this PT programme was the provision of pure substance certified reference materials (CRMs) of acesulfame potassium and sucralose to the participating laboratories as calibration standards to ensure comparability and metrological traceability of results. The participating laboratories’ performance, based on z-scores, were evaluated using the assigned reference value determined from IDMS. Five and one of the laboratories’ results would be incorrectly evaluated using consensus value calculated from the laboratories’ results for performance evaluation and using commercial standard as calibrant, respectively. This PT programme demonstrates the importance of the use of metrologically traceable reference values as the assigned values for appropriate evaluation of accuracy and reliable assessment. The provision of CRMs also heightened the testing laboratories’ awareness on the importance of using CRMs as calibrants for accurate measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zimmet PZ, Magliano DJ, Herman WH, Shaw JE (2014) Diabetes: a 21st century challenge. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruyere O, Ahmed SH, Altan C, Belegaud J, Bortolotti M, Canivenc-Lavier MC, Charriere S, Girardet JP, Houdart S, Kalonki E, Nadaud P, Rajas F, Slama G, Margaritis I (2015) Review of the nutritional benefits and risks related to intense sweeteners. Arch Public Health 73:41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zygler A, Wasik A, Namiesnik J (2009) Analytical methodologies for determination of artificial sweeteners in foodstuffs. Trends Anal Chem 28:1082–1102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroger M, Meister K, Kava R (2006) Low calorie sweeteners and other sugar substitutes: a review of the safety issues. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 5:35–47

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Garcia-Almeida JM, Casado Fdez GM, Garcia Aleman J (2013) A current and global review of sweeteners. Regulatory aspects. Nutr Hosp 28:17–31

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wasik A, McCourt J, Buchgraber M (2007) Simultaneous determination of nine intense sweeteners in foodstuffs by high performance liquid chromatography and evaporative light scattering detection—development and single-laboratory validation. J Chromatogr A 1157:187–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC 17025 (2017) General requirements for the competency of testing and calibration laboratories, International Standards Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

  8. Thompson M, Ellison S, Wood R (2006) The international harmonised protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. ISO 13528 (2015) Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons, International Standards Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland

  10. Taverniers I, Loose MD, Bockstaele EV (2004) Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 23:535–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Website of the Asia Pacific Accreditation Cooperation (APAC). apac-accrediation.org. Accessed 2 Mar 2020

  12. List of APAC PT Programmes. APAC PT Masterlist-20180919. apac-accreditation.org/publications/tec2-series/apac-pt-masterlist-20180919/. Accessed 2 Mar 2020

  13. Kaarls R, Mackay L, Samuel A, Sin DW, Mok CS, Wong YL, Yip YC (2017) Laboratory capacity building through the use of metrologically traceable reference values in proficiency testing programmes. Accred Qual Assur 22:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarita T, Otake T, Aoyagi Y, Kuroiwa T, Numata M, Takatsu A (2015) Proficiency testing for determination of pesticide residues in soybean: comparison of assigned values from participants’ results and isotope-dilution mass spectrometric determination. Talanta 132:269–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dayarathna D, Thirimanna C, Mubarak A, Mackay L, Rogerson J, Tang H, Feng J, Sin DW, Wong YC (2013) A multinational joint project on the evaluation of residual pesticide analysis in tea in the Asia Pacific region. Food Res Int 53:931–937

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heuillet M, Lalere B, Peignaux M, Graeve JD, Vaslin-Reimann S, Barros JP, Gambert P, Duvillard L, Delatour V (2013) Validation of a reference method for total cholesterol measurement in human serum and assignation of reference values to proficiency testing samples. Clin Biochem 46:359–364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bievre P (2012) A reference value in a proficiency testing scheme should be as metrologically credible as possible. Accred Qual Assur 17:561–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Narukawa T, Inagaki K, Naito S, Zhu Y, Miyashita S, Kuroiwa T, Hioki A, Fujimoto T, Chiba K (2016) Assessment of technical problems in the analysis of inorganic elements in squid through proficiency testing. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 76:216–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sin DW, Wong YC (2015) Use of assigned reference values: revisiting a small-scale inter-laboratory comparison for residual pesticides in tea. Accred Qual Assur 20:495–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng S, Mesquida C, Gui EM, Cheow PS, Lee TK, Teo TL (2014) Providing a traceable assigned value in a proficiency testing programme on the determination of benzoic acid in orange juice. Accred Qual Assur 19:439–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Otake T, Yarita T, Aoyagi Y, Numata M, Takatsu A (2014) Evaluation of the performance of 57 Japanese participating laboratories by two types of z-scores in proficiency test for the quantification of pesticide residues in brown rice. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:7337–7344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kardash E, Kuselman I, Pankratov I, Elhanan S (2013) Proficiency testing of pH and electrolytic conductivity measurements of groundwater: a case study of the difference between consensus and metrologically traceable values. Accred Qual Assur 18:373–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hon PYT, Wan MY, Sin DW, Wong YC (2013) Performance evaluation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons analysis in sediment from proficiency testing with metrological reference values. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:7241–7250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yarita T, Otake T, Aoyagi Y, Numata M, Takatsu A (2016) Difference between consensus value of participants’ results and isotope-dilution mass spectrometric results in proficiency testing for pesticide residues in husked wheat. Anal Sci 32:557–580

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhu Y, Kuroiwa T, Narukawa T, Inagaki K, Chiba K (2012) Proficiency test in Japan for the elements in tea-leaf powder. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 34:152–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan KM, Cheung STC, Wong YL, Cheng ALS, Mok CS, Wong YC, Wong WW, Tholen DW (2010) Proficiency tests for contaminants in food and herbal medicine in the Asia Pacific region. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29:562–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim SH, Heo SW, Cho H, Yim YH, Lim Y, Lee K, Hwang E (2016) Asia-Pacific Metrology Program (APMP) and Asia-Pacific Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC) joint proficiency testing with metrological reference values for hazardous elements in cabbage. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 85:98–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim B, Ahn S, Mitani Y (2011) Interlaboratory comparison for the determination of pesticide residues in Chinese cabbage. Accred Qual Assur 16:499–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kong MF, Chan S, Wong YC, Wong SK, Sin DW (2007) Interlaboratory comparison for the determination of five residual organochlorine pesticides in ginseng root samples by gas chromatography. J AOAC Int 90:1133–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Beltrami MC, Doring T, Lindner JD (2018) Sweeteners and sweet taste enhancers in the food industry. Food Sci Technol 38:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. ISO/IEC 17043 (2010) Conformity assessment—general requirements for proficiency testing. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland

  32. Mackay LG, Taylor CP, Myors RB, Hearn R, King B (2003) High accuracy analysis by isotope dilution mass spectrometry using an iterative exact matching technique. Accred Qual Assur 8:191–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. De Bievre P, Peiser HS (1997) Basic equations and uncertainties in isotope-dilution mass spectrometry for traceability to SI of values obtained by this primary method. Fresenius J Anal Chem 359:523–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sargent M, Harte R, Harrington C (2002) Guidelines for achieving high accuracy in isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gui EM, Lu T, Teo TL, Cheow PS, Lee TK (2017) Optimisation of extraction methods and quantification of benzo[a]pyrene and benz[a]anthracene in yerba mate tea by isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 26:6069–6080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Teo TL, Quan C, Cheow PS, Huang T, Lee TK, Li H, Zhang W (2012) A bilateral study for the establishment of comparability in the measurement of ethanol in bioethanol fuel using isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Accred Qual Assur 17:315–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Milton MJT, Quinn TJ (2001) Primary methods for the measurement of amount of substance. Metrologia 38:289–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. ISO Guide 35 (2017) Reference materials—guidance for characterisation and assessment of homogeneity and stability. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva, Switzerland

  39. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008 Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995)

  40. Mann I, Brookman B (2011) Eurachem/CITAC guide: selection, use and interpretation of proficiency testing (PT) schemes, 2nd edn. www.eurachem.org

  41. Ellison SLR, William A (eds) (2019) Eurachem/CITAC guide: metrological traceability in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. ISBN: 978-0-948926-34-1. www.eurachem.org

  42. Linsinger TPJ (2008) Use of recovery and bias information in analytical chemistry and estimation of its uncertainty contribution. Trends Anal Chem 27:916–923

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Thompson M, Wood R (1995) Harmonised guidelines for internal quality control in analytical chemistry laboratories. Pure Appl Chem 67:649–666

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Da Silva R, Camões M (2010) Comparability of measurement results for pesticide residues in foodstuffs: an open issue. Accred Qual Assur 15:691–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our sincere thanks to colleagues (past and present) in HSA and SAC, all the participating accreditation bodies and laboratories for their contributions to the APLAC PT programme, as well as APLAC for the partial financial support to this PT programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chemical Metrology Laboratory, Chemical Metrology Division, Applied Sciences Group, Health Sciences Authority, 1 Science Park Road, #01-05/06, The Capricorn, Singapore Science Park II, Singapore, 117528, Singapore

    Pui Sze Cheow, Tang Lin Teo, Ting Lu, Ee Mei Gui & Tong Kooi Lee

Authors
  1. Pui Sze Cheow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tang Lin Teo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ting Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ee Mei Gui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tong Kooi Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pui Sze Cheow.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheow, P.S., Teo, T.L., Lu, T. et al. An accuracy-based proficiency testing programme with metrological reference values for the mass fraction of acesulfame potassium and sucralose in cake mix flour. Accred Qual Assur 25, 355–366 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01449-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01449-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation