Biocontrol efficiency of Meyerozyma guilliermondii Y-1 against apple postharvest decay caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea and the possible mechanisms of action

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108957Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Meyerozyma guilliermondii Y-1 effectively controls apple ring rot caused by B. dothidea;

  • M. guilliermondii Y-1 inhibits mycelial growth and spore generation of B. dothidea;

  • M. guilliermondii Y-1 competes for space and nutrient with pathogen;

  • M. guilliermondii Y-1 promotes the activities of defensive enzymes and up-regulates pathogenesis-related genes expression.

Abstract

Apple ring rot, caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea, is one of the important diseases in China. This pathogen infects branches and fruit and also results in fruit decay during storage. Biocontrol agents have been proposed to reduce apple decays during storage and are considered as a promising alternative strategy to traditional chemical treatment. In this study, Meyerozyma guilliermondii Y-1, isolated from healthy grape fruit, was firstly evaluated for its biocontrol efficiency against B. dothidea in postharvest apple fruit, and the possible mechanisms were investigated. The results revealed that M. guilliermondii Y-1 treatment effectively reduced apple ring rot caused by B. dothidea in vivo. The disease incidence and lesion diameter were reduced by 32.22% and 57.51% compared with those of control fruit. Furthermore, the use of filtrate and autoclaved culture of M. guilliermondii Y-1 also showed a certain degree of control efficiency against fruit ring rot. M. guilliermondii Y-1 significantly inhibited the mycelial growth and spore generation of B. dothidea in vitro and exhibited an obvious ability to colonize in apple fruit wounds and surface at 25 °C or 4 °C. In addition, M. guilliermondii Y-1 treatment significantly enhanced the activities of catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL), and polyphenoloxidase (PPO), promoted the total phenolics content, and alleviated lipid peroxidation in apple fruit. As expected, we found that the expression of four pathogenesis-related proteins genes (MdPR1, MdPR5, MdGLU, and MdCHI) was remarkably increased by M. guilliermondii Y-1 treatment. Our data together suggest that M. guilliermondii Y-1 is a potential biocontrol agent against B. dothidea postharvest infection in apple fruit, partially through inhibiting mycelial growth and spore germination of B. dothidea, competing for space and nutrient with pathogen, and inducing resistance in apple fruit by stimulating a series of defense responses.

Introduction

Ring rot caused by Botryosphaeria dothidea is a common postharvest disease that significantly affects apple production (Tang et al., 2012; Q. Zhang et al., 2016). Differently from other postharvest diseases, B. dothidea also infects branches of apple trees, resulting in warts and cankers. The pathogen could overwinter and survive several years on diseased or dead branches (Tang et al., 2012; Zhao et al., 2016). Due to the large amount of B. dothidea in the orchards and the pathogen could infect apple latently at the growth stage, it is difficult to control apple ring rot (Liu et al., 2011; Q. Zhang et al., 2016).

There has been an increase in the use of biological control agents as an alternative to the synthetic fungicides to contain fruit postharvest decay over the past decade (Droby et al., 2016). In the case of apple fruit, biocontrol agents have also been proposed to reduce apple decays during storage (He et al., 2020; Ippolito et al., 2000; Li et al., 2011; Q. Zhang et al., 2016). Especially, yeasts have attracted considerable interest as postharvest biocontrol agents because of their ability to colonize and grow rapidly in the wounded tissues and survive on fruit surfaces for a long period, even at low temperature (Perez et al., 2019; Rodriguez Assaf et al., 2020; Shen et al., 2019). Yeasts also inhibit spore germination and mycelia growth of pathogens, produce volatile compounds, and induce fruit resistance during postharvest (da Cunha et al., 2018; Fiori et al., 2014; He et al., 2020; Lu et al., 2013). Additionally, biocontrol yeasts are perceived as environmentally safer and more acceptable to the general public (Droby et al., 2009).

In the postharvest fruit-yeast biocontrol system, induced disease resistance can be triggered by Yarrowia lipolytica in table grapes against Penicillium rubens infection (Wang et al., 2019), by Pichia membranefaciens in peaches to control Rhizopus rot (Zhang et al., 2020), and by Rhodosporidium paludigenum in citrus and pear against P. digitatum and P. expansum, respectively (Lu et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2018). Due to the complex interactions among pathogen, host and yeast, the mechanisms of action by which biocontrol yeasts induce resistance remain largely unknown (Droby et al., 2009). Previous studies have demonstrated that Meyerozyma guilliermondii could control postharvest blue mold decay of pear and apple. However, whether M. guilliermondii is effective against B. dothidea in apple fruit and the possible mechanisms have yet to be investigated.

This study presented a biocontrol yeast M. guilliermondii Y-1, which was isolated in our laboratory from the surfaces of grape picked in a commercial orchard. The objective of current research was to determine its effects on mycelial growth and spore germination of B. dothidea and evaluate its efficiency in controlling apple ring rot. Moreover, the ability of M. guilliermondii Y-1 to colonize wounds and the surface of apple fruit was determined, and other possible mechanisms of action underlying its high efficiency against B. dothidea were explored.

Section snippets

Fruit, yeast and pathogen

Apple (cv. ‘Fuji’) fruit were harvested at a commercial mature stage from an orchard in Qingdao, China. Fruit with uniform shape, size and free of any physical injuries were selected, surface disinfected with 2% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite for 2 min, washed with tap water, and then air-dried for use in the following experiments.

M. guilliermondii Y-1 was isolated from the surface of healthy grapes and preserved in China Center for Culture Collection (CCTCC, No. M2015814) (Prendes et al., 2018).

Efficiency of M. guilliermondii Y-1 in controlling ring rot in apple fruit

In the control fruit treated with sterile distilled water, brown lesion with large zone appeared around the inoculation site and developed rapidly (Fig. 1A). In contrast, while M. guilliermondii Y-1 at 1 × 105 or 1 × 106 cells/mL did not effectively control ring rot in apple fruit (Fig. 1B and C), the treatment with 1 × 107 cells/mL to 1 × 109 cells/mL M. guilliermondii Y-1 caused a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in lesion diameter (Fig. 1B) and disease incidence (Fig. 1C). Higher

Discussion

In recent years, biocontrol yeasts have been explored for their abilities to protect fruit against postharvest infection, and to meet the needs of people in pursuit of health (Zhang et al., 2019). Further identification of new biocontrol yeasts is desirable because antagonists identified in specific geographic areas may be more effective against the pathogen strains present in that production area (Vero et al., 2002). In our laboratory, we previously identified a yeast strain, M. guilliermondii

Conclusions

M. guilliermondii Y-1, isolated from healthy grape fruit, can effectively reduce apple ring rot caused by B. dothidea during storage. The possible mechanisms of action include: (1) Inhibition of B. dothidea mycelial growth and spore germination; (2) Competition with pathogen for space and nutrition; (3) Induction of disease resistance in apple fruit by stimulating the activities of defense-related enzymes, increasing the total phenolics content, and triggering PR genes expression. Hence, our

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank to the financial support from projects of Shandong Provincial Primary Research and Development Plan (No. 2019GSF109061), Qingdao Science and Technology Demonstration and Guidance Project (No. 20-3-4-23-nsh), National Key Research and Development Program (No. 2016YFD0201122) and Chinese Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System (No. CARS-27).

References (41)

  • Y. Liu et al.

    Enhancing bioefficacy of Bacillus subtilis with sodium bicarbonate for the control of ring rot in pear during storage

    Biol. Control

    (2011)
  • L. Lu et al.

    Rhodosporidium paludigenum induces resistance and defense-related responses against Penicillium digitatum in citrus fruit

    Postharvest Biol. Technol.

    (2013)
  • G.K. Mahunu et al.

    Improving the biocontrol efficacy of Pichia caribbica with phytic acid against postharvest blue mold and natural decay in apples

    Biol. Control

    (2016)
  • R. Mittler

    Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2002)
  • F. Passardi et al.

    Performing the paradoxical: how plant peroxidases modify the cell wall

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2004)
  • M.F. Perez et al.

    Biocontrol features of Clavispora lusitaniae against Penicillium digitatum on lemons

    Postharvest Biol. Technol.

    (2019)
  • L.P. Prendes et al.

    Isolation, identification and selection of antagonistic yeast against Alternaria alternata infection and tenuazonic acid production in wine grapes from Argentina

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2018)
  • L.A. Rodriguez Assaf et al.

    Use of yeasts from different environments for the control of Penicillium expansum on table grapes at storage temperature

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2020)
  • R.R. Sharma et al.

    Biological control of postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables by microbial antagonists: a review

    Biol. Control

    (2009)
  • H. Shen et al.

    The marine yeast Sporidiobolus pararoseus ZMY-1 has antagonistic properties against Botrytis cinerea in vitro and in strawberry fruit

    Postharvest Biol. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text