Anti-tumor effects and cell motility inhibition of the DN604-gemcitabine combined treatment in human bladder cancer models

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115858Get rights and content

Abstract

Bladder cancer is one of the major tumors for men in the world, in which therapy the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine is still fist-line applied to treat with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer. In our early study, we developed a potential Pt(II) agent, DN604, which has anti-tumor effect as potent as cisplatin toward bladder cancers. Herein, we aim at investigating the combinatory application of DN604 with gemcitabine for bladder cancer treatment. In vitro studies proved that the combined treatment of DN604 and gemcitabine could limit cell proliferation by elevating the incidence of DNA damage induced apoptosis. Notably, further researches showed that the DN604-gemcitabine treatment suppressed cell autophagy to inhibit cell motility upon the ROS dependent p38 MAPK signaling pathway, explicating its better anti-tumor activity than single drug treatment or the cisplatin-gemcitabine treatment. In vivo tests confirmed that the DN604-gemcitabine treatment has superior anti-tumor activity with low toxicity to cisplatin or its combination with gemcitabine treatments. DN604 plus gemcitabine, is of great significance for the treatment with human bladder cancer. Our study has provided a potential combination treatment option.

Introduction

Each year over 500,000 new cases are diagnosed and 200,000 patients die of bladder cancer worldwide, making it the fourth most common cancer in men.1 At present, urothelial carcinomas remains one of the most common types in bladder cancer, while about 75% of patients have non-muscle invasive bladder cancer and 25% have muscle-invasive or metastatic disease.2

Although traditional Pt(II) agent, cisplatin, plus gemcitabine treatment has achieved good cure effect for bladder cancer, the invasive growing bladder tumors generally have poor prognosis. In spite of improved diagnostic and treatment strategies, the risk of recurrence after 5 years ranges over 50%.3, 4 Since cancer metastasis and failures to clinically treat metastases are responsible for the majority of patient deaths from solid tumors,5, 6 it is still necessary to find an efficient therapeutic method to inhibit tumor metastasis of bladder cancer. Cancer invasion, a complex process driven by cells and tissues, is triggered and maintained by the signaling pathways that control cytoskeletal dynamics, the transformation of cell-matrix and cell–cell connections, subsequent cell migration to adjacent tissue.7, 8 During the progression of the disease, physical, cellular and molecular determinants will adapt and react.9

It is well known that platinum-based compounds including cisplatin and carboplatin can target DNA and induce DNA damage.10, 11 As far as we know, reactive oxygen species (ROS), constantly produced and eliminated in biological systems, play important roles in a variety of normal biochemical functions and abnormal pathological processes. Evidences from extensive studies suggested that ROS can affect DNA damage response (DDR) and induce cell apoptosis.12, 13 More importantly, the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) signaling pathway is a general stress-activated kinase pathway, which relates to various intracellular stimulations including ROS. It has been reported that the activated-p38 MAPK signaling pathway has a close relationship to tumor invasion, which can induce cell apoptosis and suppress cell motility by inhibiting cell autophagy to solve the inevitable problem of tumor metastasis in bladder cancer treatments.14, 15, 16, 17

In previous studies, we designed a novel Pt(II)-based agent named DN604, which have been introduced a carbonyl group to the skeleton of 1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylate based on the structure of carboplatin, exhibiting much stronger anti-tumor activity than carboplatin.18 On account of the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine used to treat with advanced or metastatic bladder cancer, we herein report a new treatment by using DN604 to combine with gemcitabine to suppress cell motility and induce cell apoptosis. The in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor activity and the mechanism of such a combined therapy in human bladder cancer cells T24 were investigated.

Section snippets

Cytotoxicity

The cytotoxicity of DN604 and cisplatin as well as their mixture with gemcitabine (molar ratio = 1:1) was measured by the MTT assay together with carboplatin and gemcitabine as the references. The IC50 values of the tested groups toward several cell lines are presented in Table 1. The results showed that both DN604 alone and combined treatment could achieve the best anti-tumor effects in T24 cells. Thus, we selected T24 cells to conduct the following experiments. After treatment for 72 h, the

Conclusion

As a common cancer occurs in the world, bladder cancer generally results from three aspects, namely, genetic and molecular abnormalities, chemical or environmental exposures, and chronic irritation.1, 37 Multiple treatments for bladder cancer have been merged with the development of research, such as traditional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy including the bacillus of Calmette and Guerin (BCG) therapy and anti PD-1/PD-L1 therapy.38 At present, cisplatin plus

Materials and antibodies

DN604 was prepared and characterized according to our former method.18 Gemcitabine was commercially purchased and structurally characterized via using 1H- and 13C NMR spectroscopy.

Antibodies used in this study were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). All detection kits were obtained from Jiangsu KeyGEN BioTECH company (Nanjing, JS, China).

Cell culture

T24 (human bladder cancer cell), NCI-H460 cells, MCF-7 cells and HUVEC (human umbilical vein endothelial cell) were purchased from the Cell Bank of

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Project 2242019K30028) and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Project 1107047002) for supplying basic facilities to our key laboratory. Jiangsu Keygen Biotech Co., Ltd is appreciated for the in vivo tests.

References (46)

  • P.D. Jiang et al.

    LC3-and p62-based biochemical methods for the analysis of autophagy progression in mammalian cells

    Methods

    (2015)
  • C.H. Wang et al.

    Targeted p53 activation by saRNA suppresses human bladder cancer cells growth and metastasis

    J Exp Clin Canc Res

    (2016)
  • H.W. Kava et al.

    CpG methylation increases the DNA binding of 9-aminoacridine carboxamide Pt analogues

    Bioorgan Med Chem

    (2016)
  • A.L. Edinger et al.

    Death by design: apoptosis, necrosis and autophagy

    Curr Opin Cell Biol

    (2004)
  • F. Bray et al.

    Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2018)
  • S. Ahmad et al.

    Structural and mechanistic aspects of platinum anticancer agents

    Transit Metal Chem

    (2006)
  • G. Sonpavde et al.

    Preoperative chemotherapy for bladder cancer

    Cancer

    (2011)
  • S. Terrisse et al.

    Which is the best perioperative chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer?

    Oncologie

    (2015)
  • C.D. Paul et al.

    Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces

    Nat Rev

    (2017)
  • A.F. Chambers et al.

    Dissemination and growth of cancer cells in metastatic sites

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2002)
  • E. Sahai

    Illuminating the metastatic process

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2007)
  • S. Ahmad et al.

    Ali S Structural and mechanistic aspects of platinum anticancer agents

    Transit Metal Chem

    (2006)
  • M.M. Retz et al.

    CXCR4 expression reflects tumor progression and regulates motility of bladder cancer cells

    Int J Cancer

    (2004)
  • Cited by (3)

    View full text