Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Nest substrate, more than ant activity, drives fungal pathogen community dissimilarity in seed-dispersing ant nests

  • Plant-microbe-animal interactions – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Myrmecochory is a widespread mutualism in which plants benefit from seed dispersal services by ants. Ants might also be providing seeds with an additional byproduct benefit via reduced plant pathogen loads in the ant nest environment through their antimicrobial glandular secretions. We investigate this byproduct benefit by identifying fungal communities in ant nests and surrounding environments and quantifying fungal community change (1) through time, (2) between different nest substrates, and (3) as a function of average ant activity levels within nests (based on observed ant activity at nest entrances throughout the summer). We split fungal communities by functional guild to determine seed-dispersing ant-induced changes in the overall fungal community, the animal pathogen fungal community, the plant pathogen fungal community, and the myrmecochore pathogen fungal community. Nest substrate (soil or log) explained much of the variation in fungal community dissimilarity, while substrate occupation (ant nest or control sample) and time had no influence on fungal community composition. Average ant activity had no effect on the community turnover in fungal communities except for the myrmecochore pathogenic fungal community. In this community, higher ant activity throughout the summer resulted in more fluctuation in the pathogenic community in the ant nest. Our results are not consistent with a byproduct benefit framework in myrmecochory, but suggest that nest substrate drives dissimilarity in fungal communities. The influence of nest substrate on fungal communities has important implications for seeds taken into ant nests, as well as ant nest location choice by queens and during nest relocation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

CLL was funded by the Margaret Walton Scholarship from Mountain Lake Biological Station. Field work was funded by the Breedlove, Dennis Fund for Student Botanical Field Experiences from the TENN Herbarium and lab work was funded by a Student Faculty Research Award to CLL and CK from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. JAF was supported by National Science Foundation grant DEB-1638922. Collections were done through permitting from The Nature Conservancy and the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation’s Natural Heritage Program. Thanks to Sam Truslow and Ryan Klopf for assistance with field site access. Austin Davis, Henry Davie, and Jamie Albert assisted with field collections. Thanks to Kimberly Gwinn, Kimberly Sheldon, Sam Borstein, Veronica Brown and two anonymous reviewers for suggestions on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CLL and CK originally formulated the idea and developed methodology. CLL conducted all field and lab work. JAF generated the statistical framework and JAF and CLL conducted all statistical analyses. CLL wrote the first draft of the manuscript and CK and JAF commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chloe L. Lash.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by Caroline Müller.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 17 KB)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 314 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lash, C.L., Fordyce, J.A. & Kwit, C. Nest substrate, more than ant activity, drives fungal pathogen community dissimilarity in seed-dispersing ant nests. Oecologia 194, 649–657 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04796-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04796-5

Keywords

Navigation