Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Frozen Soil Under Passive Confined Pressure

  • Published:
Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Impact compression tests on frozen soil samples with different freezing temperatures and subjected to passive confined pressure were performed using a split Hopkinson pressure bar at different loading strain rates. The three-dimensional stress–strain curves of the frozen soil samples under the corresponding conditions were obtained. The experimental results showed that, when the frozen soil was loaded to its elastic limit, shear failure occurred, the bearing capacity of pore ice was lost, and the thawed soil functioned as the main stress-bearing body. Nevertheless, the capacity of frozen soil to withstand hydrostatic pressure continued to increase. The dynamic mechanical properties of the frozen soil under passive confined pressure were observed to be strongly related to the loading strain rate and freezing temperature. As the loading strain rate increased, the secant modulus, elastic modulus, and strength (including the shear strength) of the frozen soil increased, whereas its Poisson’s ratio and coefficient of lateral pressure decreased. As the freezing temperature decreased, the secant modulus, elastic modulus, and shear strength of the frozen soil increased; however, its Poisson’s ratio and coefficient of lateral pressure decreased. When the frozen soil was subjected to impact loading under passive confined pressure, energy dissipation occurred due to plastic deformation, mesoscopic damage evolution, and ice–water phase transition. When shear failure occurred, the absorption energy per unit volume of frozen soil increased as the freezing temperature decreased and the loading strain rate increased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsytovich NA. The mechanics of frozen ground. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tetsuya T, Ishikawa T. Measurement for permeability of frozen soil by transient pulse method. Transp Soil Eng Cold Reg. 2020;1:71–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ma W, Wu Z, Zhang L, Chang X. Analyses of process on the strength decrease in frozen soils under high confining pressures. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 1999;29(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kodama J, Goto T, Fujii Y, Hagan P. The effects of water content, temperature and loading rate on strength and failure process of frozen rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2013;62:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang H, Zhu Z, Song S, Kang G, Ning J. Dynamic behavior of frozen soil under uniaxial strain and stress conditions. Appl Math Mech. 2013;34(2):229–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhu Z, Kang G, Ma Y, Xie Q, Zhang D, Ning J. Temperature damage and constitutive model of frozen soil under dynamic loading. Mech Mater. 2016;102:108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma Q, Ma D, Yuan P, Yao Z. Energy absorption characteristics of frozen soil based on SHPB test. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2018;2018:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu Z, Liu Z, Xie Q, Lu Y, Li D. Dynamic mechanical experiments and microstructure constitutive model of frozen soil with different particle sizes. Int J Damage Mech. 2018;27(5):686–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. He Y, Luan G, Zhu Z. Dynamic constitutive modeling of partially saturated clay under impact loading. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2010;11(Supplement):195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fu T, Zhu Z, Cao C. Constitutive model of frozen soil dynamic characteristics under impact loading. Acta Mech. 2019;230(5):1869–89.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Xie Q, Zhu Z, Kang G. A dynamic micromechanical constitutive model for frozen soil under impact loading. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2016;29(1):13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cao C, Zhu Z, Fu T, Liu Z. A constitutive model for frozen soil based on rate-dependent damage evolution. Int J Damage Mech. 2018;27(10):1589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu Z, Cao C, Fu T. SHPB test analysis and a constitutive model for frozen soil under multiaxial loading. Int J Damage Mech. 2020;29(4):626–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma D, Ma Q, Yao Z, Huang K. Static-dynamic coupling mechanical properties and constitutive model of artificial frozen silty clay under triaxial compression. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2019;167:102858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Song B, Connelly K, Korellis J, Lu W, Antoun BR. Improved Kolsky-bar design for mechanical characterization of materials at high strain rates. Meas Sci Technol. 2009;20(11):115701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frew DJ, Forrestal MJ, Chen W. Pulse-shaping techniques for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure bar. Exp Mech. 2002;42(1):93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lifshitz JM, Leber H. Data processing in the split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Int J Impact Eng. 1994;15(6):723–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Villaggio P. Mathematical models for elastic structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shi S, Wang L. Passive confined pressure SHPB test method for materials under quasi-one-dimensional strain state. J Exp Mech. 2000;15(4):18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barr AD, Clarke SD, Tyas A, Warren JA. Effect of moisture content on high strain rate compressibility and particle breakage in loose sand. Exp Mech. 2018;58(8):1331–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Omidvar M, Iskander M, Bless S. Stress–strain behavior of sand at high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng. 2012;49:192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Luo H, Cooper WL, Lu H. Effects of particle size and moisture on the compressive behavior of dense Eglin sand under confinement at high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng. 2014;65:40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu X, Prakash V. Dynamic compressive behavior of ice at cryogenic temperatures. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 2015;118:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martin BE, Chen W, Song B, Akers SA. Moisture effects on the high strain rate behavior of sand. Mech Mater. 2009;41(6):786–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shazly M, Prakash V, Lerch BA. High strain rate behavior of ice under uniaxial compression. Int J Solids Struct. 2009;46(6):1499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koopmans RWR, Miller RD. Soil freezing and soil water characteristic curves. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1966;30(6):680–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song B, Chen W, Luk V. Impact compressive response of dry sand. Mech Mater. 2009;41(6):777–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ning J, Zhu Z. Constitutive model of frozen soil with damage and numerical simulation of the coupled problem. Chin J Theor Appl Mech. 2007;23(1):70–6.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim H, Keune JN. Compressive strength of ice at impact strain rates. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(8):2802–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Okochi Y, Tatsuoka F. Some factors affecting K0-values of sand measured in triaxial cell. Soils Found. 1984;24(3):52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaiping Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51778437).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, J., Tang, H. & Chen, H. Dynamic Mechanical Properties and Energy Dissipation Characteristics of Frozen Soil Under Passive Confined Pressure. Acta Mech. Solida Sin. 34, 184–203 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-020-00200-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-020-00200-0

Keywords

Navigation