Elsevier

Precision Engineering

Volume 67, January 2021, Pages 393-418
Precision Engineering

New insights into the methods for predicting ground surface roughness in the age of digitalisation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2020.11.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The classification of ground surface roughness prediction methods are discussed.

  • Numerous methods for the predicition of the ground surface roughness with their principles and limitations are presented.

  • The development trend of the ground surface roughness prediction models are analyzed.

  • A futuristic multi-information fusion system for surface roughness prediction in the age of digitalisation is proposed.

Abstract

Grinding is a multi-length scale material removal process that is widely employed to machine a wide variety of materials in almost every industrial sector. Surface roughness induced by a grinding operation can affect corrosion resistance, wear resistance, and contact stiffness of the ground components. Prediction of surface roughness is useful for describing the quality of ground surfaces, evaluate the efficiency of the grinding process and guide the feedback control of the grinding parameters in real-time to help reduce the cost of production. This paper reviews extant research and discusses advances in the realm of machining theory, experimental design and Artificial Intelligence related to ground surface roughness prediction. The advantages and disadvantages of various grinding methods, current challenges and evolving future trends considering Industry-4.0 ready new generation machine tools are also discussed.

Introduction

Grinding is a displacement or position-controlled processing method where the excess material from the workpiece surface is removed by using an abrasive tool. The advantages of this important precision machining technology over other processing methods such as turning and milling include high material removal rate, better surface finishes and longer production runs. With the incorporation of electrolytic in-process dressing (ELID), self-dressing of the wheel is possible to achieve a longer tool life. Grinding is now being increasingly used in the processing of high precision parts [1,2] and to machine ‘difficult to cut’ glass ceramics [3,4], particularly for the large science programs requiring Precision-at-scale fabrication of telescope mirrors. Ground surface quality is governed by many factors e.g. process variables, loop stiffness, environment, stochastic distribution of the abrasive grits on the grinding wheel). Researchers have therefore long been working to develop predictive models to analyze the effect of grinding parameters on the surface topography [5] as well as the grinding wheel and workpiece properties [6].

Surface roughness has a significant impact on the service life and reliability of mechanical products as it can directly affect the tribological conditions and thus the corrosion, wear, fatigue and similar other attributes of the workpiece [7]. Ground surface roughness depends on interactions of a multitude of factors [8,9] and these interactions depend on the process parameters of grinding, properties of the processed material and the grinding wheel. Predictive values of the ground surface roughness can guide the design of machine tools to make them Industry 4.0 compliant which will eliminate the downstream material wastage and excessive generation of grinding sludge [10].

This review article aims to provide new insights into the methods and strategies for predicting the roughness of ground surfaces. We review, analyze, and categorize extant research to provide detailed insights into the state-of-the-art and identify future research directions, thus providing a comprehensive reference for ground surface roughness prediction, especially considering the digitalisation tools currently available. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the classification of ground surface roughness prediction models. We review methods based on the machining theory in Section 3. We present a review of prediction models based on the experimental design and analysis in Section 4. In Section 5, we discuss artificial intelligence (AI) methods that can be used to make the grinding process more robust and resilient. We discuss current challenges and future trends for predicting the ground surface roughness in Section 6 and conclude by offering remarks on the latest developments in Section 7.

Section snippets

Classification of ground surface roughness prediction models

In recent years, many surface roughness prediction models have been developed and these have largely remained focused on grinding parameters [11]. Tönshoff [12] subdivided the models describing the grinding process into physical and empirical models and compare the principles and applications of the two approaches shown in Fig. 1.

More than a decade ago, Brinksmeier et al. [13] reviewed the advances in modelling and simulation of grinding processes by focusing on ground surface topography,

Methods based on machining theory

Material removal and chip formation during the grinding process involve interaction between the abrasive grits and the workpiece. The stochastic distribution of the abrasive grits leads to multiple levels of engagement between the workpiece and grinding and this poses challenges in the accurate prediction of ground roughness. Research into the prediction of ground roughness has been based on:

  • (i)

    Numerical simulations to describe the changes in grinding wheel geometry

  • (ii)

    The theory of machining such as

Methods based on experimental design and analysis

The experimental design and analysis methods base their predictions on the design of experiments, data processing and analysis. Regression analysis, Quantile Regressions, Response Surface methodology and Taguchi methods for the design of experiments (DoE) are the most wide-spread methodologies for predicting surface roughness.

Artificial intelligence methods

Artificial intelligence (AI) methods attempt to solve the prediction problem of ground surface roughness by several tools - Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Fuzzy Expert Systems (FES) and Genetic Algorithm (GA). The application of AI in the grinding process is conducive to solving the problem of prediction bias caused by the simplification of traditional methods. The most common type of AI methods that have been used in the published papers is the ANN models, improved Neural Networks, and GA [

Open research questions

Existing research methods applied in grinding technology are yet to mature to fully meet the needs of future development (as outlined in various remarks in each of the previous three sections), and it is therefore imperative to propose and develop new methods or strategies that can predict ground surface roughness more accurately and in real time. This is going to be a consistent requirement of digitalized and smart manufacturing in the future. Fig. 29 shows the trend of development in the

Concluding remarks

Grinding is one of the most widely used precision machining operations. Measurement of ground surface roughness relies on carrying out a large number of heuristic experimental trials depending on the skill of the operator and this results in wastage of time, energy and materials. In the age of digitalisation (with new sensor developments) and the machines becoming smarter with the induction of Industry 4.0, it is now high time to revisit the extant grinding models to assess the possibility of

Research data statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

All authors appreciate the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51875078, 51991372), and the Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of NSFC of China (51621064). SG acknowledges the financial support provided by the UKRI via Grants No.: (EP/L016567/1, EP/S013652/1, EP/S036180/1, EP/T001100/1 and EP/T024607/1″, Royal Academy of Engineering via Grants No. (IAPP18-19\295, TSP1332 and EXPP2021\1\277), EU Cost Actions (CA15102, CA18125, CA18224 and CA16235) and

References (155)

  • J.C. Aurich et al.

    Kinematic simulation of high-performance grinding for analysis of chip parameters of single grains

    CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol

    (2012)
  • P. Koshy et al.

    Simulation of diamond-ground surfaces

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (1999)
  • Y.D. Gong et al.

    The simulation of grinding wheels and ground surface roughness based on virtual reality technology

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2002)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Investigation of different grain shapes and dressing to predict surface roughness in grinding using kinematic simulations

    Precis Eng

    (2013)
  • J.L. Jiang et al.

    2D/3D ground surface topography modeling considering dressing and wear effects in grinding process

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2013)
  • J.L. Osa et al.

    Discrete-element modelling of the grinding contact length combining the wheel-body structure and the surface-topography models

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2016)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Analysis and simulation of the grinding process, part 2: mechanics of grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (1996)
  • T.A. Nguyen et al.

    Simulation of surface grinding process, part 2: interaction of the abrasive grain with the workpiece

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2005)
  • W.H. Zhou et al.

    A comprehensive investigation of surface generation and material removal characteristics in ultrasonic vibration assisted grinding

    Int J Mech Sci

    (2019)
  • W.H. Zhou et al.

    A comprehensive investigation of plowing and grain-workpiece micro interactions on 3D ground surface topography

    Int J Mech Sci

    (2018)
  • J. Wu et al.

    Research on predicting model of surface roughness in small-scale grinding of brittle materials considering grinding tool topography

    Int J Mech Sci

    (2020)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Study on key factors influencing the surface generation in rotary ultrasonic grinding for hard and brittle materials

    J Manuf Process

    (2019)
  • M. Arif et al.

    A predictive model of the critical undeformed chip thickness for ductile–brittle transition in nano-machining of brittle materials

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2013)
  • C. Jiang et al.

    Theoretical model of brittle material removal fraction related to surface roughness and subsurface damage depth of optical glass during precision grinding

    Precis Eng

    (2017)
  • H.N. Li et al.

    Analytical modeling of ground surface topography in monocrystalline silicon grinding considering the ductile-regime effect

    Arch Civ Mech Eng

    (2017)
  • N. Huang et al.

    Elastic recovery of monocrystalline silicon during ultra-fine rotational grinding

    Precis Eng

    (2020)
  • H. Huang et al.

    High speed grinding of silicon nitride with resin bond diamond wheels

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2003)
  • P.K.S.B. Basuray

    A simple model for evaluating surface roughness in fine grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (1980)
  • X. Zhou et al.

    Modeling and predicting surface roughness of the grinding process

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2002)
  • Z.B. Hou et al.

    On the mechanics of the grinding process-Part I. Stochastic nature of the grinding process

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2003)
  • R.L. Hecker et al.

    Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2003)
  • S. Agarwal et al.

    A probabilistic approach to predict surface roughness in ceramic grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2005)
  • S. Agarwal et al.

    Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in ceramic grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2010)
  • S. Agarwal et al.

    Predictive modeling of undeformed chip thickness in ceramic grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2012)
  • S.K. Khare et al.

    Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding

    Procedia CIRP

    (2015)
  • W. Ding et al.

    Grinding performance of textured monolayer CBN wheels: undeformed chip thickness nonuniformity modeling and ground surface topography prediction

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2017)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Modeling and simulation of the distribution of undeformed chip thicknesses in surface grinding

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2018)
  • A. Agrawal et al.

    Prediction of surface roughness during hard turning of AISI 4340 steel (69 HRC)

    Appl Soft Comput

    (2015)
  • F. Pashmforoush et al.

    Influence of water-based copper nanofluid on wheel loading and surface roughness during grinding of Inconel 738 superalloy

    J Clean Prod

    (2018)
  • L. Wang et al.

    Process modeling of controlled forming with time variant blank holder force using RSM method

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2007)
  • J. Kwak et al.

    An analysis of grinding power and surface roughness in external cylindrical grinding of hardened SCM440 steel using the response surface method

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2006)
  • J. Kwak

    Application of Taguchi and response surface methodologies for geometric error in surface grinding process

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2005)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Material removal mechanism of laser-assisted grinding of RB-SiC ceramics and process optimization

    J Eur Ceram Soc

    (2019)
  • M.F. Kahraman et al.

    Experimental study of newly structural design grinding wheel considering response surface optimization and Monte Carlo simulation

    Measurement

    (2019)
  • F.C. Tsai et al.

    A Taguchi and experimental investigation into the optimal processing conditions for the abrasive jet polishing of SKD61 mold steel

    Int J Mach Tool Manufact

    (2008)
  • C.H. Liu et al.

    Grinding force control in an automatic surface finishing system

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2005)
  • S. Shaji et al.

    Analysis of process parameters in surface grinding with graphite as lubricant based on the Taguchi method

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2003)
  • P.J. Patil et al.

    Analysis of process parameters in surface grinding using single objective Taguchi and multi-objective grey relational grade

    Perspectives in Science

    (2016)
  • U. Çaydaş et al.

    A study on surface roughness in abrasive waterjet machining process using artificial neural networks and regression analysis method

    J Mater Process Technol

    (2008)
  • A.W. Labib et al.

    Towards next generation electrochemical machining controllers: a fuzzy logic control approach to ECM

    Expert Syst Appl

    (2011)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Position-dependent rough surface formation in face gear worm grinding

      2024, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
    • A review of surface quality control technology for robotic abrasive belt grinding of aero-engine blades

      2023, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    • Modelling and prediction of surface textures after abrasive machining processes: A review

      2023, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text