Selective recovery and separation of rare earth elements by organophosphorus modified MIL-101(Cr)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110747Get rights and content

Highlights

  • MIL-101(Cr) was successfully functionalized with three organophosphorus compounds.

  • pH effect, adsorption isotherms, kinetics, selectivity and reusability were studied.

  • All modified adsorbents have high affinity towards heavier REEs.

  • The functionalized MOFs demonstrated over 90% selectivity towards Er3+.

Abstract

Development of state-of-the-art selective adsorbent materials for recovery of rare earth elements (REEs) is essential for their sustainable usage. In this study, a metal-organic framework (MOF), MIL-101(Cr), was synthesized and post-synthetically modified with optimised loading of the organophosphorus compounds tributyl phosphate (TBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) hydrogen phosphate (D2EHPA, HDEHP) and bis(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl) phosphinic acid (Cyanex®-272). The materials were characterized and their adsorption efficiency towards Nd3+, Gd3+ and Er3+ from aqueous solutions was investigated. The MOF derivatives demonstrated an increase in adsorption capacity for Er3+ at optimal pH 5.5 in the order of MIL-101-T50 (37.2 mg g−1) < MIL-101-C50 (48.9 mg g−1) < MIL-101-H50 (57.5 mg g−1). The exceptional selectivity of the materials for Er3+ against transition metal ions was over 90%, and up to 95% in the mixtures with rare earth ions. MIL-101-C50 and MIL-101-H50 demonstrated better chemical stability than MIL-101-T50 over 3 adsorption−desorption cycles. The adsorption mechanism was described by the formation of coordinative complexes between the functional groups of modifiers and Er3+ ions.

Introduction

Rare earth elements (REEs), as critical materials [1], are essential in fields such as the production of high-tech electronic devices and the development of green technologies. To enable a move away from high-grade ores processing with its high energy costs, projected supply shortages and access issues, it is necessary to develop more sustainable methods for recovery and concentration of REEs. Recycling of secondary resources, such as electronic waste, has been attracting considerable interest [2,3] as many of these resources contain valuable elements, for instance, light (La, Nd and Gd) and heavy (Dy, Ho and Er) REEs [4,5]. Moreover, such recycling contributes towards circular economy.

Electronic waste usually contains a small amount (ppm level) of REEs [6] available for further extraction and concentration. The applied hydrometallurgy techniques [2,7], chemical precipitation [8], extraction processes [9,10] and ion exchange [11] possess drawbacks, such as high operating costs, hazardous acidic environments, non-selectivity, and high losses of REEs, especially at low initial concentrations. Clearly, there is a lack of green and cost-efficient methods for effective REE recovery [12].

Adsorption is a feasible alternative for the recovery and separation of rare earth metals due to its environmentally-friendly characteristics, low cost, tuneable selectivity towards REEs, and applicability at low initial concentrations [13]. In recent years, porous adsorbent materials, such as zeolites, silica gel, activated carbon, ion-exchange resins, have been extensively studied and widely applied in a commercial use for broad-ranging wastewater treatments, including recovery of rare earth metals. However, the efficiency of a porous material is highly dependent on its and the adsorbate's nature as well as the aqueous media conditions. For example, the final uptake of Nd3+ varies from 7.3 to 232 mg of Nd3+ per gram of a material [14]. Although adsorption has many advantages, the reusability of the adsorbents and their selectivity towards REEs in the presence of other metals may be uncertain and differ depending on process conditions.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), a relatively new class of porous adsorbent materials, are constructed from an inorganic part of metal clusters interconnected by an organic part of rigid linkers, resulting in a highly crystalline structure with a large specific surface area, and adjustable volume and porosity [15,16]. These compounds have been successfully used in such applications as heterogeneous catalysis, storage and separation of gases [17], electrochemistry [18] and photocatalysis [19,20]. Their application as adsorbent materials for various compounds, including heavy metal ions, has been studied to some extent [21,22], but only a limited number of publications have investigated adsorption of REEs. Thus, the full potential of this type of porous materials for recovery of REEs is not fully known.

Although MOFs have favourable characteristics, their structural stability in aqueous solutions remains a challenge. MIL-101(Cr) has been found to have remarkable stability during long-term exposure to acidic and alkaline solutions, H2O2 and air [23], and it could thus be considered an appropriate candidate for REE recovery. However, the pristine MIL-101(Cr) showed a weak affinity towards REEs, while a post-synthetic modification by various functional groups enhanced the adsorption capacity and selectivity, making it a promising material compared to traditional adsorbents [24].

As typical Lewis acids, REEs have strong affinity to Lewis bases, for instance, phosphorous or various oxygen-based functional groups [25]. Organophosphorus compounds such as TBP, HDEHP and Cyanex-272 (Table S1) are well-known selective acid extractants (Lewis bases) for REEs [[26], [27], [28]]. Several studies have reported the possible functionalization of different substrates [[29], [30], [31], [32]] by organophosphorus extractants. In the study by Shu et al. [32], a HDEHP modified silica-based adsorbent demonstrated relatively high adsorption capacities of 39.6 and 51.4 mg g−1 for Ce3+ and Gd3+, respectively. In other work, synthesized zirconium organophosphates and phosphorous acid-modified mesoporous SBA-15 showed high uptake of Eu+3 (60 mg g−1) [33] and Gd3+ (200 mg g−1) [34], respectively. Moreover, it has also been demonstrated that a combination of –POH and –COOH groups on the surface of zirconium-based coordination polymers [35] and MIL-101(Cr)-PMIDA [24] can result in an adsorption capacity for Gd3+ of higher than 90 mg g−1.

While some studies were carried out on efficient recovery of REEs using MOFs, the challenge experienced by separation between light and heavy REEs over the past decades remains unresolved [36]. Moreover, there is no studies in which a high separation efficiency between HREEs and LREEs has been achieved. Therefore, in this work, the possibility to develop a stable and selective adsorbent by combining attractive characteristics of MIL-101 and extraction ability of the modifiers was considered.

Furthermore, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, the functionalization of MOFs, specifically MIL-101(Cr), by organophosphorus extractants for recovery of REEs has hitherto not been investigated. In this study, a post-synthetic modification of MIL-101(Cr) was carried out using Cyanex-272, HDEHP and TBP. The synthesized materials were characterized and subsequently tested in aqueous solutions of REEs (Nd3+, Gd3+ and Er3+) to investigate adsorption behaviour, reusability and separation performance for transition metal ions and REEs.

Section snippets

Materials and material characterization methods

A list of materials and material characterization methods used in the experimental studies is given in Sections S1 and S2, respectively.

Synthesis of MIL-101

Hydrothermal synthesis was carried out in accordance with the reported procedure [37] with slight modification: nitric acid was utilized as a mineralizing agent instead of hydrofluoric acid. The synthesis details are provided in Section S3.

Preparation of mixtures of Cyanex-272, HDEHP and TBP

For each modifier, Cyanex-272, HDEHP and TBP, a specified amount of mmol (3.5, 7, 15, 35 and 70) was weighed and added to

Results and discussions

For MOFs, such as MIL-100(Fe), MIL-101(Cr) and HKUST-1, where the structure allows coordinatively unsaturated sites (CUS), removal of solvent molecules is essential to obtain CUS suitable for post-synthetic modification [15]. Therefore, an extensive washing procedure followed by vacuum heating of the prepared MIL-101(Cr) was performed to generate open metal sites for coordinative interaction with modifier agents [[38], [39], [40], [41]]. Then, the activated green powder was functionalized with

Conclusions

The aim of the current study was to determine the applicability and efficiency of MIL-101(Cr) post-synthetically modified with organophosphorus compounds for the selective recovery of REEs and potential separation of HREEs from LREEs in aqueous solutions.

MIL-101(Cr) was synthesized by the stoichiometric addition of 1:1 nitric acid:chromium nitrate and further functionalized with Cyanex-272, HDEHP and TBP. The presence of functional groups of modifiers and their successful grafting on the

Author contribution

Vitalii Kavun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - Original Draft, Visualization. Monique A. van der Veen: Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision. Eveliina Repo: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the valuable assistance of Dr. Liisa Puro, Toni Väkiparta and Esmaeili Mohammadamin. This work was supported by the Emil Aaltonen Foundation (Tampere, Finland).

References (83)

  • S. Wu et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • F. Xie et al.

    Miner. Eng.

    (2014)
  • M.J. Page et al.

    Hydrometallurgy

    (2017)
  • I. Anastopoulos et al.

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2016)
  • B.N. Bhadra et al.

    Mater. Today

    (2019)
  • M. Zhang et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2020)
  • K. Leus et al.

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2016)
  • S.A. Wood

    Chem. Geol.

    (1990)
  • J.E. Quinn et al.

    Hydrometallurgy

    (2015)
  • M.S. Gasser et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • H. Zhou et al.

    Rare Met.

    (2008)
  • J. Veliscek-Carolan et al.

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2014)
  • Q. Gao et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • M. Shafiei et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • M. Sheikh Alivand et al.

    J. Environ. Chem. Eng.

    (2019)
  • Z. Niu et al.

    Inside Chem.

    (2018)
  • A. Buragohain et al.

    J. Solid State Chem.

    (2016)
  • K. Omelchuk et al.

    J. Mol. Liq.

    (2018)
  • J. De Decker et al.

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2017)
  • S.K. Papageorgiou et al.

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2009)
  • S. Sen Gupta et al.

    Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2011)
  • I. Ahmed et al.

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2019)
  • A.F. Abdel-Magied et al.

    Microporous Mesoporous Mater.

    (2019)
  • V.S. Sastri et al.

    Kinetics and Mechanisms of Rare Earth Complexation

    (2003)
  • M. Sethurajan et al.

    Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2019)
  • Think Tank Recovery of Rare Earths from Electronic Wastes: an Opportunity for High-Tech SMEs

    (2015)
  • Y. Yang et al.

    J. Sustain. Metall.

    (2017)
  • C.E.D. Cardoso et al.

    Nanomaterials

    (2019)
  • M. Gergoric et al.

    Metals

    (2018)
  • S.M. Abdelbasir et al.

    J. Sustain. Metall.

    (2018)
  • T. Barcelos da Costa et al.

    J. Rare Earths

    (2019)
  • A.J. Howarth et al.

    Chem. Mater.

    (2017)
  • S. Yuan et al.
  • R. Abazari et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2020)
  • P. Li et al.

    Nat. Commun.

    (2019)
  • R. Abazari et al.

    Inorg. Chem. Front.

    (2020)
  • D. Chen et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2016)
  • Y.-R. Lee et al.

    ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces

    (2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text