Skip to main content
Log in

Social and cultural bonds left to “the mercy of the winds:” an agricultural transition

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 2004, the agricultural economies of many rural communities in the United States were impacted by the cessation of a price-support and supply-control program for tobacco production. Tobacco was not only an important livelihood, but also was central to social and cultural life. Using a social–ecological systems lens and the adaptive cycle metaphor, we examine the reorganization of agriculture in communities that previously produced tobacco under the program. Specifically, we seek to understand how transitional policy that provided financial support to tobacco farmers interacted with other social, cultural, physical and human capitals to condition system reorganization. We conducted semi-structured interviews with farmers, extension agents, and policy makers in Kentucky as well as examined trends in income and number of farmers before and after the transition as indicators of reorganization. We determined that the financial support was perceived as helpful in supporting the transition and that tobacco farmers reorganized their livelihoods primarily around existing, remnant assets and endogenous capacities. In addition, we determined that though the agricultural system may be reorganizing economically, it is not necessarily supportive of the same social bonds and values that co-existed with tobacco economy. Understanding agricultural economies as part of complex social–ecological systems that consist of interconnected values, identities, ecology and social ties is important for developing policies to support systems and communities through economic transitions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. USDA NASS. 2002. 2002 Census of Agriculture State Profile, Kentucky. Available at: https://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/AgCensusImages/2002/01/17/counties/StateData.pdf; USDA NASS. 2007. 2007 Census of Agriculture State Profile, Kentucky. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2007/Online_Highlights/County_Profiles/Kentucky/cp99021.pdf; USDA NASS. 2012. 2012 Census of Agriculture State Profile, Kentucky. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2012/Online_Resources/County_Profiles/Kentucky/cp99021.pdf.

  2. USDA NASS. 2014. Kentucky Equine Report. Available at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Kentucky/Publications/Kentucky_Equine_Report/Equine_Release_Final.pdf.

  3. Farmer refers to principal operator or primary producer as defined by the census. If there is more than one operator reported on a farm, the principal operator/primary producer is the person that makes the most decisions for the farm. If decision-making is split equally between operators, then the person who works off farm the least is the principal.

  4. A stripping room is a designated room in the tobacco barn that is used to strip the tobacco leaves off of the stalk once the crop has been hung and cured.

  5. According to the U.S. Agricultural Census, beginning farmers are those that have ten or fewer years of experience.

Abbreviations

SES:

Social–ecological systems

NGO:

Non-governmental organization

References

  • Abel, N., D.H.M. Cumming, and J.M. Anderies. 2006. Collapse and reorganization in social–ecological systems: Question, some ideas, and policy implications. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, H.E., and R.J. Hobbs. 2004. Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecology and Society 9 (1): 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoni, C., E. Huber-Sannwald, H.R. Hernández, A. van’t Hooft, and M. Schoon. 2019. Socio-ecological dynamics of a tropical agricultural region: Historical analysis of system change and opportunities. Land Use Policy 81: 346–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argent, N., and T. Measham. 2014. New rural economies: Introduction to the special themed issue. Journal of Rural Studies 36: 328–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beach, R.H., A.S. Jones, and J.A. Tooze. 2008. Tobacco farmer interest and success in income diversification. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics 40 (1): 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development 27 (12): 2021–2044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, P. 2011. Tobacco capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berardi, G., R. Green, and B. Hammond. 2011. Stability, sustainability, and catastrophe: Applying resilience thinking to U S. agriculture. Human Ecology Review 18 (2): 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H.R. 2006. Research methods in anthropology qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Altamira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, M.R., M.D. Partridge, M. Farren, and L. Lobao. 2015. Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics 50: 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, D.E., W.D. Rasmussen, and G.L. Baker. 1984. History of Agricultural Price-Support and Adjustment Programs, 1933–84. Agriculture Information Bulletin Number 485. USDA ERS archive. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=41994. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Capehart, T. 1991. Situation and outlook report: Tobacco. Characteristics of flue-cured and Burley farms compared. USDA, Economic Research Service.

  • Chan, K.M.A., P. Balvanera, K. Benessaiah, M. Chapman, S. Díaz, E. Gómez-Baggethun, R. Gould, et al. 2016. Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113 (6): 1462–1465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T.D. 1977. Agrarian Kentucky. Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G.S., and J. Collier. 2005. Change and identity in complex systems. Ecology and Society 10 (1): 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G.S., and G.D. Peterson. 2017. Unifying research on social–ecological resilience and collapse. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 32 (9): 695–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, P. 1985. Breaking the land: The transformation of cotton, tobacco, and rice cultures since 1880. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedoose Version 8.3.17, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data. 2017. Los Angeles, CA: SocioCultural Research Consultants, LLC. www.dedoose.com.

  • Eakin, H., S. Sweeney, A.M. Lerner, K. Appendini, H. Perales, D.G. Steigerwald, C.F. Dewes, F. Davenport, and J.C. Bausch. 2018. Agricultural change and resilience: Agricultural policy, climate trends and market integration in the Mexican maize system. Anthropocene 23: 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin, H., R.E. Shelton, J.M. Siqueiros-Garcia, L. Charli-Joseph, and D. Manuel-Navarrete. 2019. Loss and social–ecological transformation: Pathways of change in Xochimilco, Mexico. Ecology and Society 24 (3): 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, S., P. Aldunce, C.S. Bahinipati, R.D. Almeida Martins, J.I. Molefe, C. Nhemachena, K. O’Brien, et al. 2011. When not every response to climate change is a good one: Identifying principles for sustainable adaptation. Climate and Development 3 (1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G., and L. Phelan. 2016. Transition to a post-carbon society: Linking environmental justice and just transition discourses. Energy Policy 99: 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, A.K. 2009. “Replacing” Tobacco on Kentucky farms: Discourses of tradition, heritage, and agricultural diversification. PhD Dissertation, Graduate Program in English. The Ohio State University in Columbus, OH.

  • Ferrell, A.K. 2012. Doing masculinity: Gendered challenges to replacing burley tobacco in central Kentucky. Agriculture and Human Values 29 (2): 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, A.K. 2013. Burley: Kentucky tobacco in a new century. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., S.R. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Chapin, and J. Rockström. 2010. Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society 15 (4): 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GOAP. 2020. KADF Program. https://agpolicy.ky.gov/funds/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 14 October 2020.

  • Grise, V.N. 1989. Tobacco: background for 1990 farm legislation. USDA ERS Archive. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=41799. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Guillaumont, P. 1994. Adjustment policy and agricultural development. Journal of International Development 6 (2): 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. 2002. Panarchy synopsis: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Washington D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S.M. 1991. Working the black patch: Tobacco farming traditions, 1890–1930. Kentucky Historical Society 89 (3): 266–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harner, J. 2001. Place identity and copper mining in Sonora, Mexico. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (4): 660–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, P., and S. Wood. 2008. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363 (1491): 495–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C.S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4 (5): 390–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, J.W. 2002. Tobacco in transition. Southern Legislative Conference. https://208.35.88.201/knowledgecenter/docs/slc-0202-TobaccoInTransition.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Jones, N.A., S. Shaw, H. Ross, K. Witt, and B. Pinner. 2016. The study of human values in understanding and managing social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 21 (1): 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, M.C., Y.J. Lo, D.R. Nelson, H. Eakin, and A.M. Bedran-Martins. 2016. Linking development to climate adaptation: Leveraging generic and specific capacities to reduce vulnerability to drought in NE Brazil. Global Environmental Change 39: 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, J.M., R.A. Hoppe, and D. Newton. 2018. Three decades of consolidation in U.S. agriculture. USDA ERS Archives. https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=88056. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Manuel-Navarrete, D. 2015. Double coupling: modeling subjectivity and asymmetric organization in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society 20 (3): 26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., D.M. Fenton, P.A. Marshall, and S.G. Sutton. 2007. How resource dependency can influence social resilience within a primary resource industry. Rural Sociology 72 (3): 359–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., S.E. Park, W.N. Adger, K. Brown, and S.M. Howden. 2012. Transformational capacity and the influence of place and identity. Environmental Research Letters 7 (3): 034022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., A.M. Dowd, A. Fleming, C. Gambley, M. Howden, E. Jakku, C. Larsen, et al. 2014. Transformational capacity in Australian peanut farmers for better climate adaptation. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34 (3): 583–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N.A., S. Crimp, M. Curnock, M. Greenhill, G. Kuehne, Z. Leviston, and J. Ouzman. 2016. Some primary producers are more likely to transform their agricultural practices in response to climate change than others. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 222: 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masterson, V.A., R.C. Stedman, J. Enqvist, M. Tengö, M. Giusti, D. Wahl, and U. Svedin. 2017. The contribution of sense of place to social–ecological systems research: A review and research agenda. Ecology and Society 22 (1): 49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, M.P.M., P.H. Feindt, A. Spiegel, C.J.A.M. Termeer, E. Mathijs, Y. de Mey, R. Finger, et al. 2019. A framework to assess the resilience of farming systems. Agricultural Systems 176: 102656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P.J. 2000. An economic analysis of the southern dairy compact: Implications for Kentucky. Kentucky e-archives. https://www.e-archives.ky.gov/Pubs/LRC/Rr294.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Orden, D., R. Paarlberg, and T. Roe. 1999. Policy reform in American agriculture: Analysis and prognosis. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325 (5939): 419–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poage, B.D. (ed.). 1995. The Tobacco Church II: A Manual for Congregational Leaders. Richmond: Kentucky Appalachian Ministry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pushkarskaya, H., and D. Vedenov. 2009. Farming exit decision by age group: Analysis of tobacco buyout impact in Kentucky. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 41 (3): 653–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York City, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, J.C. 1952. The story of tobacco in America. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, M.D., and P.S. Armstrong. 1989. The farm crisis: An analysis of social psychological distress among North Carolina farm operators. American Journal of Community Psychology 17 (44): 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. CAUTION! Transitions ahead: Politics, practice and sustainable transition management. Environment and Planning A 39: 763–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout. 2005. The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy 34 (10): 1491–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, W., and S. Goetz. 1997. Overview of Kentucky’s tobacco economy. University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service. https://www2.ca.uky.edu/agcomm/pubs/aec/aec83/aec83.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Stull, D.D. 2009. Tobacco is going, going … but where? Culture & Agriculture 31 (2): 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA NASS. 2019. 2017 Census of Agriculture: United States Summary and State Data. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/AgCensus/2017/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Walker, B., and D. Salt. 2006. Resilience thinking. London, U.K: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., L.H. Gunderson, A. Kinzig, C. Folke, S. Carpenter, and L. Schultz. 2006. A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience. Ecology and Society 11 (1): 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B.H., S.R. Carpenter, J. Rockstrom, A.S. Crépin, and G.D. Peterson. 2012. Drivers, slow variables, fast variables, shocks, and resilience. Ecology and Society 17 (3): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellons, B. 2001. Tobacco contracting in Burley tobacco: The Kentucky tobacco task force study of tobacco contracting. Kentucky legislature archives. https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/lrc/publications/ResearchReports/RR301.pdf. Accessed 19 October 2020.

  • Wood, L.E. 1998. The economic impact of tobacco production in Appalachia. ARC archives. https://www.arc.gov/assets/research_reports/EconomicImpactof Tobacco ProductioninAppalachia.pdf. Accessed 15 July 2020.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful for the support of the Neely Foundation which funded the fieldwork for this project. We also want thank Dr. Sechindra Vallury for his support in the creation of figures for this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rebecca E. Shelton.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shelton, R.E., Eakin, H. Social and cultural bonds left to “the mercy of the winds:” an agricultural transition. Agric Hum Values 38, 693–708 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10178-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10178-7

Keywords

Navigation