Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic characterization of Ti-4Al-1.5Mn titanium alloy and a simplified approach for shot peening simulation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To predict the residual stress distribution of the Ti-4Al-1.5Mn (TC2) alloy in the manufacturing process, quickly and accurately, a precise dynamic constitutive model for rheological behavior and a new simplified approach for numerical simulation were proposed. The dynamic stress-strain curves indicate that the enhancement effect and plasticizing of the TC2 alloy are sensitive to high strain rates. The dispersed β particles play an important role in the formation of the adiabatic shear band and not widened significantly. The average relative error of 1.04% and the correlation coefficient of 0.9949 indicate that the modified Johnson-Cook constitutive model well describes the rheological behavior. Then, with the help of the Almen test, an efficient but simplified approach was proposed to achieving coverage and uniform loading in simulation. At last, the residual stress contribution of the TC2 alloy in the shot peening test is in a good agreement with the simulation results by random multipellet model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang ZD (2013) Study on microstructure and properties of CO2 laser welding butt weld joints of TC2 titanium alloy sheets. Electric Welding Machine 43:80–82. https://doi.org/10.7512/j.issn.1001-2303.2013.08.19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zong YY, Shao B, Wang XG, Guo B, Shan DB. (2018) Effect of hydrogen on phase transformation, thermal deformation behavior, and forming limit of TC2 alloy. Adv Eng Mater, 20. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201800690

  3. Li Y, Pei Z, Zaman B, Zhang Y, Yuan H, Cao B. (2018) Effects of plastic deformations on the electrochemical and stress corrosion cracking behaviors of TC2 titanium alloy in simulated seawater. Materials Research Express, 5. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aadc44

  4. Harrison J (1987) Controlled shot peening: cold working to improve fatigue strength. Heat Treat 19:16–18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ghorashi MS, Farrahi GH, Movahhedy MR (2019) Effect of severe shot peening on the fatigue life of the laser-cladded Inconel 718 specimens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104(5–8):2619–2631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-04082-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Torres M, Voorwald H (2002) An evaluation of shot peening, residual stress and stress relaxation on the fatigue life of AISI 4340 steel. Int J Fatigue 24:877–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00205-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meguid SA (1991) Effect of partial-coverage upon the fatigue fracture behaviour of peened components. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 14:515–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1991.tb00680.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zimmermann M, Klemenz M, Schulze V (2010) Literature review on shot peening simulation. Int J Comput Mater Sci Surf Eng 3:289. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCMSSE.2010.036218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva DP, Bastos IN, Fonseca MC (2020) Influence of surface quality on residual stress of API 5L X80 steel submitted to static load and its prediction by artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(11–12):3753–3764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05621-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang C, Wang C, Wang L, Lai Y, Li K, Zhou Y (2020) A dislocation density-based comparative study of grain refinement, residual stresses, and surface roughness induced by shot peening and surface mechanical attrition treatment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 108(1–2):505–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05413-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Elmagd E, Abouridouane M (2006) Characterization, modelling and simulation of deformation and fracture behaviour of the light-weight wrought alloys under high strain rate loading. Int J Impact Eng 32:741–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali T, Wang L, Cheng X, Liu A, Xu X (2019) Omega phase formation and deformation mechanism in heat treated Ti-5553 alloy under high strain rate compression. Mater Lett 236:163–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.10.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yi XB, Zhang JX, Li BD, Guo XR, Li XF, Chang WC. (2019) Dynamic compressive mechanical properties of TB6 titanium alloy under high temperature and high strain rate. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, 48:1220–1224. WOS: 000467321400030

  14. Skubisz P, Lisiecki L, Packo M, Skowronek T, Micek P, Tokarski T. (2018) Effect of high strain rate beta processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of near- titanium alloy Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part L—Journal of Materials-Design and Applications, 232:181–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420715619447

  15. Brozek C, Sun F, Vermaut P, Millet Y, Lenain A, Embury D, Jacques PJ, Prima F (2016) A beta-titanium alloy with extra high strain-hardening rate: design and mechanical properties. Scr Mater 114:60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang GQ, Xie LS, Chen MH, Si SS, Wu RH (2019) Flow stress characteristics and constitutive relation of Ti2AlNb alloy under high strain rate. Rare Metal Mater Eng 48:847–852 WOS: 000463845300023

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zheng Y, Zeng W, Wang Y, Zhou D, Gao X (2017) High strain rate compression behavior of a heavily stabilized beta titanium alloy: kink deformation and adiabatic shearing. J Alloys Compd 708:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinberg DJ, Cochran SG, Guinan MW (1980) A constitutive model for metals applicable at high-strain rate. J Appl Phys 51:1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.327799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zerilli FJ, Armstrong RW (1987) Dislocation-mechanics-based constitutive relations for material dynamics calculations. J Appl Phys 61:1816–1825. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook GRJA (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7944(85)90052-9

  21. Bhalerao, Nitin B, Joshi, Suhas S, Naik et al (2018) High strain rate and high temperature behavior of Ti-6Al-4V alloy under compressive loading. J Eng Mater Technol 140. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038671

  22. Che JT, Zhou TF, Liang ZQ, Wu JJ, Wang XB (2018) An integrated Johnson-Cook and Zerilli-Armstrong model for material flow behavior of Ti-6Al-4V at high strain rate and elevated temperature. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1168-7

  23. Ara B, Ramin G, Mario G (2012) On the shot peening surface coverage and its assessment by means of finite element simulation: a critical review and some original development. Appl Surf Sci 259:186–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mohamed J, Augustin G, Julie L, Oussama et al (2016) Robust methodology to simulate real shot peening process using discrete-continuum coupling method. Int J Mech Sci 107:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim T, Lee H, Kim M, Jung S (2012) A 3D FE model for evaluation of peening residual stress under angled multi-shot impacts. Surf Coat Technol 206:3981–3988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dassault Systèmes. Abaqus 6.12 online documentation. Providence, RI: Dassault Systèmes, 2012

  27. Chen JS, Desai DA, Heyns SP, Pietra F (2019) Literature review of numerical simulation and optimisation of the shot peening process. Advances in. Mech Eng 11(3):168781401881827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018818277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elbella A, Rami V, Hogirala J. A sensitivity analysis of shot peening parameters. In: ASME 2006 International design engineering technical conferences & computers and information in engineering conference (IDETC/CIE), Philadelphia, PA, 10–13 September 2006. New York: ASME

  29. Kim T, Jin HL, Lee H, Cheong SK (2010) An area-average approach to peening residual stress under multi-impacts using a three-dimensional symmetry-cell finite element model with plastic shots. Mater Des 31:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Farrahi GH, Lebrijn JL, Couratin D (2007) Effect of shot peening on residual stress and fatigue life of a spring steel. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 18:211–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00156.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Curtis S, Rios ERDL, Rodopoulos CA, Levers A (2003) Analysis of the effects of controlled shot peening on fatigue damage of high strength aluminium alloys. Int J Fatigue 25:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00049-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tekeli S (2002) Enhancement of fatigue strength of SAE 9245 steel by shot peening. Mater Lett 57:604–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00838-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao X, Sun Y, Zhao R, Yang M, Gao G, Li Y (2019) A design for lumped mass of a shot model in random peening simulation and prediction of dimple size evolution. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 103(9–12):4597–4608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03581-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiang J, Pang S, Xie L, Cheng G, Liang R, Gao F, Bai L (2018) A numerically low-cost and high-accuracy periodic FE modeling of shot-peened 34CrNiMo6 and experimental validation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 97(5–8):1673–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2029-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gangaraj SMH, Guagliano M, Farrahi GH (2014) An approach to relate shot peening finite element simulation to the actual coverage. Surf Coat Technol 243:39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.03.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miao HY, Larose S, Perron C, Levesque M (2009) On the potential applications of a 3D random finite element model for the simulation of shot peening. Adv Eng Softw 40:1023–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2009.03.013

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Majzoobi GH, Azizi R, Nia AA. (2005) A three-dimensional simulation of shot peening process using multiple shot impacts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 164–165:1226–1234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.139

  38. Stranart SAMA (2002) 3D FE analysis of peening of strain-rate sensitive materials using multiple impingement model. Int J Impact Eng 27:119–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0734-743x(01)00043-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhuo C, Fan Y, Meguid SA (2014) Realistic finite element simulations of arc-height development in shot-peened Almen strips. J Eng Mater Technol 136:41001–41002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang XF, Liu ZW, Xie HM (2013) Recent progress in residual stress measurement techniques. Acta Mechanica Solida Sinica 26:570–583 CNKI:SUN:GTLB.0.2013-06-002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim T, Lee H, Jung S, Jin HL (2012) A 3D FE model with plastic shot for evaluation of equi-biaxial peening residual stress due to multi-impacts. Surf Coat Technol 206:3125–3136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.12.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Teo A, Ahluwalia K, Aramcharoen A (2020) Experimental investigation of shot peening: correlation of pressure and shot velocity to Almen intensity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106(11):4859–4868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04982-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Y (2011) Shot stream finite element model for shot peening numerical simulation and its experiment study. J Mech Eng 47:43. https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2011.22.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu DY, Gao Y, Meng FC, Song J, Wang YF, Ren MX, Wang RQ (2017) A unifying approach in simulating the shot peening process using a 3D random representative volume finite element model. Chin J Aeronaut 030:1592–1602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2016.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (20153021001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Helicopter Transmission, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 210016, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China

    Nan Su, Minghe Chen, Lansheng Xie, Wenxiang Shi & Feng Luo

Authors
  1. Nan Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Minghe Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lansheng Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenxiang Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Feng Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minghe Chen.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, N., Chen, M., Xie, L. et al. Dynamic characterization of Ti-4Al-1.5Mn titanium alloy and a simplified approach for shot peening simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111, 2733–2747 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06299-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06299-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation