Skip to main content
Log in

Control Homotopy of Trajectories

  • Published:
Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to establish the machinery for doing homotopy of (regular) trajectories of control systems. In a mildly different setting than our earlier work in Colonius et al. (J Differ Equ. 2005; 216:324–53), we require this time two trajectories of a (conic) control system to be homotopic by means of their control parameters and simply call them control homotopic. More precisely, let p be a fixed inial point of the state space manifold and let ep denote the end-point mapping that associates to a given control the terminal point of the corresponding trajectory. Then, we say two trajectories α and β are control homotopic if their corresponding controls u and v belong to the same path component of the fiber (ep)− 1(m) for m = ep(u) = ep(v). Due to this point of view, we constrain in the present work our attention to the study of the set \(\mathcal {U}\) of addmissible control as an open subset of a certain Banach space. Control homotopy may hence be viewed as an equivalence relation on \(\mathcal {U}\) for which the equivalence classes are the path components of the sets (ep)− 1(m), where m belongs to the (regular) accessible set from p. This interpretation also motivates to deal with notions such as control homotopically trivial andcontrol homotopy chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. An open cone is a convex open subset that is closed under multiplication by positive scalars.

References

  1. Agrachev A, Sachkov Y. Control theory from the geometric viewpoint. Berlin: Springer; 2004.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Colonius F, Kizil E, San Martin L. Covering space for monotonic homotopy of trajectories of control systems. J Differ Equ 2005;216:324–53.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dominiy J, Rabitz H. Dynamic homotopy and landscape dynamical set topology in quantum control. J Math Phys 2012;53:1–17.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Jurdjevic V. Geometric control theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Krener A. A generalization of Chow’s theorem and the bang-bang theorem to non-linear control problems. SIAM J Control Optim 1974;12:43–52.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lang S. Fundamentals of differential geometry. Graduate texts in mathematics. Berlin: Springer; 1999.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Montgomery R. 2002. A Tour of subriemannian geometries, their geodesics and applications. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 91 Amer. Math. Soc.

  8. Sarychev A. On homotopy properties of the space of trajectories of a completely nonholonomic differential system. Soviet Math Dokl 1991;4:674–8.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyüp Kizil.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kizil, E. Control Homotopy of Trajectories. J Dyn Control Syst 27, 683–692 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-020-09523-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10883-020-09523-0

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

Navigation