Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research

  • Published:
Geotectonics Aims and scope

Abstract—

A comprehensive analysis of instrumental data was carried out to establish indicators of the geodynamic conditions of interaction between the Scythian Plate and the collage of southern plates; and to determine the type and kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and the nature of volcanoes in the North Caucasus. In terms of structure and tectonics, the studies were conducted within the alpine structure of the Greater Caucasus, and they equally characterize both of its first-order structures: the folded-block uplift of the Main Range and the North Caucasian regional massif. In the kinematics of the Main Caucasian Thrust and volcanoes of the North Caucasus, there are no subduction elements. The absence of correspondence of the Main Thrust to the Benioff zone, and, conversely, its similarity to listric faults and shallow-focus volcanic centers are more consistent with a collisional geodynamic situation. Geological and geophysical sections along the network of regional profiles of deep geophysical studies in Ciscaucasia and the central part of the Greater Caucasus are characterized by similarity in the elements of the deep structure and semithrust kinematics of interaction with the consolidated crust of the southern microplates–terranes framing the Arabian Plate from the north. The volcanoes of the Central Caucasus arose in a collisional setting and a relationship between Elbrus volcano and the Main Caucasian Thrust as a collision compression structure is assumed. Data were obtained on the results of geophysical studies using the earthquake converted-wave method (ECWM), microseismic sounding method (MSM), magnetotelluric sounding (MTS), and gravimagnetic measurements in combination with data obtained from processing of satellite images of the specific length of lineaments of tectonic fragmentation for different depths of lithospheric sections. Laboratory determination of radiocarbon dating of volcanic complexes, distribution of the thermal field in surface and deep thermal springs, as well as isotopic assessment of the ratios of indicator elements of Elbrus volcano, which make it possible to confidently identify a magma chamber at depth of ~5 km and a magma chamber at depth of ~30–40 km. Our studies allow us to consider the main characteristics as an increased thermal field, variations in the helium isotope ratios, a seismic gap under the volcanic structure, and insignificant energy unloadings occurring on gentle low-power tectonic zones on the northeastern and eastern slopes, where periodic fumarole gas emissions are inherent to the active volcano.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. O. A. Bogatikov, I. V. Melekestsev, A. G. Gurbanov, D. M. Katov, and A. I. Puriga, “The Elbrus caldera in Northern Caucasus,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 363, 1202‒1204 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. V. Giorgobiani, “The Alpine fold system of Greater Caucasus: Formation settings and characteristic features of the structure,” Geol. Geofiz. Yuga Ross., No. 1, 43‒57 (2019).

  3. A. V. Gorbatikov, E. A. Rogoghin, M. Yu. Stepanova, Yu. V. Kharazova, A. I. Sysolin, A. A. Rybin, and N. V. Andreeva, “Model of the deep structure of the Elbrus volcano in the light of new geophysical data,” Dokl. Earth Sci. 480, 642–645 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. N. V. Koronovskii and L. I. Demina, “Collisional Late Cenozoic volcanism of Greater Caucasus,” in Volcanism and Geodynamics: Proceedings of the III All-Russia Symposium on Volcanology and Paleovolcanology, Ulan-Ude, Russia,2006 (Buryat. Nauchn. Tsentr Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ulan-Ude, 2006), Vol. 1, pp. 219‒223.

  5. G. V. Krasnopevtseva and A. M. Kuzin, “Integrated seismic interpretation of the P-wave deep seismic sounding data: Case study of the Volgograd–Nakhichevan profile,” in Proceedings of the All-Russia Meeting, Irkutsk, Russia,2009 (Inst. Zemnoi Kory Sib. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Irkutsk, 2009), Vol. 1, pp. 61‒63.

  6. G. V. Krasnopevtseva, B. A. Matushkin, and V. I. Shevchenko, “A new interpretation of the deep seismic sounding data along the Stepnoe–Bakuriani profile, Caucasus region,” Sov. Geol., No. 8, 113–120 (1970).

  7. Yu. V. Nechaev and A. L. Sobisevich, “New technologies for monitoring the inner structure of volcanoes (magmatic source and magmatic chambers),” Vestn. Vladikavkaz. Nauchn. Tsentra. 7 (4), 29‒35 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu. I. Nikol’skii, T. A. Milai, and L. Z. Kogan, Geological-Geophysical Investigations of Tectonics, Magmatism, and Metallogeny of Caucasus (Nedra, Leningrad, 1975), pp. 58‒62.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. Pavlenkova, “Crustal structure of the Caucasus from the Stepnoe-Bakuriani and Volgograd-Nakhichevan DSS profiles (reinterpretation of the primary data),” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 48, 375–384 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. A. Rogozhin, M. Yu. Stepanova, Yu. V. Kharazova, and A. V. Gorbatikov, “Deep structure, volcanic and seismic activity regime in Elbrus region,” Geotectonics 52, 647‒657 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Simonov, Candidate’s Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Moscow, 1998), pp. 96‒114.

  12. V. I. Shevchenko, “The Kazbek intercept of Central Caucasus: New data and their possible interpretation,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 99–111 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. G. Shempelev, S. U. Kukhmazov, Kh. O. Chotchaev, and L. N. Nevskii, “The structure of Greater Caucasus as a result of gentle thrusting of the Scythian Plate crust upon the consolidated crust of microplates in the southern Caucasus,” Geol. Geofiz. Yuga Ross., No. 4, 129–145 (2015).

  14. A. G. Shempelev, V. Ya. P’yankov, V. A. Lygin, S. U. Kukhmazov, and A. G. Morozova, “Results of geophysical studies along the Elbrus area profile (Elbrus volcano–Caucasian Mineral Waters),” Reg. Geol. Metallog., No. 25, 178‒185 (2005).

  15. Yu. G. Yurov, “Crustal structure in the Caucasus region with respect to isostasy,” Sov. Geol., No. 9, 42–47 (1963).

  16. R. Cioni, R. Santacroce, and A. Sbrana, “Pyroclastic deposits as a guide for reconstructing the multi-stage evolution of the Somma-Vesuvius Caldera,” Bull. Volcanol. 61, 207‒222 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. B. G. Polyak, “Helium isotopes, tectonics and heat flow in the Northern Caucasus,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 1925‒1944 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. T. Price, “Theory of the magnetotelluric field when considering the source field,” J. Geophys. Resolut. 67, 1907‒1918 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. I. Prutsky, A. G. Shempelev, S. U. Kuhmazov, A. G. Morozova, V. A. Lygin, and V. Ya. Pyankov, “Results of abyssal researches along Pre-Elbrus profile (Volkano Elbrus–The Caucasian Mineral Waters),” in Abstracts of 32nd International Geophysical Congress, Florence, Italy, 2004 (2004), Abstr. No. 168-23.

  20. T. I. Shankland and H. S. Waff, “Partial melting and electrical conductivity anomalies in the upper mantle,” J. Geophys. Res. 82, 5409–5417 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. A. G. Shempelev, V. B. Zaalishvili, and S. U. Kukhmazov, “Deep structure of the western part of the Central Caucasus from geophysical data,” Geotectonics 51, 479‒488 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Simkin and L. Siebert, Volcanoes of the World: A Regional Directory, Gazetteer, and Chronology of Volcanism in the Last 10,000 Years, 2nd ed. (Earth Sci. Press, Tucson, Ariz., 1994), pp. 146‒158.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. R. Wait, “On the relation between telluric currents and the Earth’s magnetic field,” Geophysics 19, 281–289 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Watanabe, “Effects of water and melt on seismic velocities and their application to characterization of seismic reflectors,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 20–24, 2933‒2936 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. D. L. Wells and K. J. Coppersmith, “New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length rupture width, rupture area and surface displacement,” Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 84, 974‒1002 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. V. B. Zaalishvili, N. I. Nevskaya, and D. A. Mel’kov, “Instrumental geophysical monitoring in the territory of the Northern Caucasus,” Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 50, 263‒272 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. V. B. Zaalishvili, N. I. Nevskaya, L. N. Nevskii, and A. G. Shempelev, “Geophysical fields above volcanic edifices in the Northern Caucasus,” J. Volcanol. Seismol. 9, 333‒338 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the anonymous reviewers for useful comments.

Funding

The study was carried out as part of the state task of the GPI FSC RAS, state. registration no. of project no. AAAA-A19-119022190018-6; part of the field works were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant no 19-47-92 190) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project nos. 18-05-00641_a, 19-55-53017 GFEN_a, 19-35-90 127).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geophysical Institute—Branch of Federal Scientific Center Vladikavkaz Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 362002, Vladikavkaz, Russia

    A. G. Shempelev, V. B. Zaalishvili, Kh. O. Chotchaev & E. A. Rogozhin

  2. North Caucasian Production Geological Association, 357600, Essentuki, Russia

    S. P. Shamanovskaya

  3. Schmidt Institute of Physics of the Earth, Russian Academy of Sciences, 123995, Moscow, Russia

    E. A. Rogozhin

  4. North Ossetian State University, 362025, Vladikavkaz, Russia

    V. B. Zaalishvili

Authors
  1. A. G. Shempelev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. B. Zaalishvili
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kh. O. Chotchaev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. P. Shamanovskaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. A. Rogozhin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. B. Zaalishvili.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shempelev, A.G., Zaalishvili, V.B., Chotchaev, K.O. et al. Tectonic Fragmentation and Geodynamic Regime of Elbrus and Kazbek Volcanoes (Central Caucasus, Russia): Results of the Deep Geophysical Research. Geotecton. 54, 652–664 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120050088

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016852120050088

Keywords:

Search

Navigation