Elsevier

Journal of Energy Chemistry

Volume 59, August 2021, Pages 160-190
Journal of Energy Chemistry

Review
An account of the strategies to enhance the water splitting efficiency of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.10.022Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Strategies to enhance the activity of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts are summarized.

  • Reasons behind activity increment owing to these modifications are discussed thoroughly.

  • Morphology modulation as an activity enhancement strategy is summerized for the first time.

  • Remaining research gaps and future prospects in this field are discussed in detail.

Abstract

The electrolysis of water for hydrogen generation has shown immense promise as an energy conversion technology for the green energy economy. Two concurrently occurring electrochemical reactions in water electrolysis (hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions) are sluggish in nature and therefore the employment of electrocatalysts is highly essential. Noble-metal-based electrocatalysts (Pt, RuO2, IrO2, etc.) have shown superior activity towards these reactions. However, their lower natural abundance and inferior stability make the cost to performance ratio of water electrolysis too high. Thus, huge amount of research efforts are being carried out to develop electrocatalysts consisting of earth abundant elements (transition metals, carbon etc.) as the replacement of these noble-metal-based materials. Transition metal compounds, carbonaceous and hybrid materials have shown promise as efficient electrocatalysts but there is still huge gap between the activities of these materials and the noble-metal-based electrocatalysts. Several strategies like morphology modulation, elemental doping, defect engineering etc. are being deployed to enhance the activity of these noble-metal-free electrocatalysts. This review summarizes these strategies and thoroughly discusses the reason behind the changes in activity of the electrocatalysts owing to these modifications. Finally, the remaining research gaps and future prospects in this field are also discussed in detail.

Graphical abstract

This review summarizes the strategies which are being adopted to enhance the performance of the noble-metal-free electrocatalysts, discusses the reasons behind activity enhancement owing to these modifications and proposes future scopes in this research field.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (203KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

Ever-growing energy demand and environmental pollution motivated the researchers to develop a carbon–neutral energy economy [1]. Generation of hydrogen by water electrolysis has been proven to be a promising energy conversion technology to achieve that goal [1], [2]. The electrolysis of water involves two half-cell reactions: (1) hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at cathode and (2) oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at anode [1], [3]. These two reactions involve several charge and proton transfer steps causing the whole water electrolysis process to be sluggish [4], [5]. Electrocatalysts are utilized to enhance the rate of these half-cell reactions and facilitate the water electrolysis process. Previous research efforts established the superior electrocatalytic water splitting activity of noble-metal-based materials [6]. The platinum (Pt) has been found to be the most efficient electrocatalyst for HER whereas the oxides of ruthenium and iridium (RuO2 and IrO2) show efficiency towards OER [6], [7]. Commercial-scale applicability of these noble-metal-based electrocatalysts is hindered by their low natural abundance and cost-effectiveness [7]. Over the past few decades, researchers are trying to reduce the price to performance ratio of the electrocatalysts in two ways: (1) by minimizing the noble-metal-loading in the electrocatalysts and (2) by developing noble-metal-free electrocatalysts [8]. The amount of noble metal in an electrocatalyst is being minimized by engineering various structural features [9], [10], [11]. In recent times, the most fascinating area of research is related to the development of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts [12], [13], [14]. The natural abundance of transition metals (specially the first row) and carbon is high as compared to the other elements in the periodic table. Therefore, most of the focuses are being deployed on the development of transition-metal-based and carbonaceous material-based electrocatalysts [15]. The transition-metal-based electrocatalysts are showing significant promise as the viable replacement of the noble-metal-based electrocatalysts [16], [17], [18]. Recently, the electrocatalytic water splitting activity of a series of materials is being investigated which can be categorized in the following way: (1) transition metal chalcogenides, pnictides, carbides and borides; (2) chemically modified carbonaceous materials like graphene, graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) and carbon nanotubes (CNT); and (3) various heterostructures [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27]. Selection of suitable noble-metal-free electrocatalyst is a crucial factor for further advancement in this field. A recently published review article has provided a systematic idea about the development of pentlandites, a new type of noble-metal-free electrocatalyst [28]. Although these noble-metal-free electrocatalysts showed promising electrocatalytic activity, there is still significant gap between the efficiency of these materials and the noble-metal-based electrocatalysts.

Three basic physicochemical steps occur during the electrocatalytic HER and OER: (1) adsorption of the active species on the catalytically active site, (2) transfer of charges from the electrocatalyst which causes some chemical changes in the active species and (3) desorption of the produced gas [5], [29], [30]. Therefore, the efficiency of an electrocatalyst depends on some of its intrinsic features like electrical conductivity, substrate adsorption efficiency, amount of accessible catalytically active sites, operational stability etc. The electrical conductivity and substrate adsorption efficiency of an electrocatalyst are directly related to its electronic structure [8], [31]. The catalytically active site accessibility of an electrocatalyst depends on its morphology [32], [33]. The operation stability of an electrocatalyst depends on various physicochemical aspects like chemical bonding, structural robustness etc. [34], [35]. Recently, the researchers are trying to enhance the activity of the noble-metal-free electrocatalysts following some innovative strategies like, morphology modulation, doping, defect engineering etc. [32], [33], [36], [37], [38], [39]. The elemental doping, strain, phase and defect engineering affect the electronic structure of a material and also increase the amount of catalytically active site in it [40], [41], [42], [43]. Development of an electrocatalyst with varied morphology alters the amount of accessible catalytically active sites [32], [33]. Formation of heterostructure between multiple transition metal compounds shows synergistic increment in electrocatalytic activity and the operational stability also increases [44], [45]. The amount of accessible catalytically active sites, charge transfer efficiency and stability of the transition metal-based materials increase when it forms heterostructure with carbonaceous materials [46], [47]. Several researchers have attempted to find out the relations between physicochemical modification of electrocatalysts and its catalytic activities with the help of in operand techniques and theoretical calculations [40], [48], [49], [50]. A comprehensive idea about these relations will help the researchers to make significant progress in the development of cheap electrocatalysts with efficiency comparable or superior to the noble-metal-based electrocatalysts.

This review summarizes the strategies to enhance the efficiency of the noble-metal-free materials towards water splitting. The implemented strategies are classified as: (1) morphology modulation, (2) doping, (3) defect engineering, (4) strain engineering, (5) phase engineering, and (6) heterostructure formation. In addition to these major strategies, some newly developed techniques are also discussed briefly in this review. It is noteworthy that, the morphology modulation is not systematically reviewed as an electrocatalytic activity enhancement strategy, till date. A few authors have tried to discuss the effectiveness of morphology modulation as catalytic activity enhancement strategy in their review articles [51], [52], [53]. However, either they have tried to focus this strategy from the point-of-view of different electrochemical reactions or have not established it to be a self-sufficient strategy for activity enhancement. They have considered the morphology modulation as an additional strategy which plays synergistically with other techniques like electronic modulation [53]. The relation between the above mentioned strategies and the corresponding change in catalytic activity has been discussed in detail. Finally, some challenges and future prospect in this research area has been discussed.

Section snippets

Electrochemical water splitting and electrocatalyst

Decomposition of water into hydrogen and oxygen due to the passage of electricity is termed as electrochemical water splitting or electrolysis of water [54], [55]. Like other electrochemical reactions, water splitting process can also be subdivided into two half-cell reactions. The reduction reaction i.e. the HER occurs at the cathode whereas the OER, the oxidation reaction, occurs at the anode [54], [55]. The generalized reactions can be represented as follows:HER: 4H2O + 4e → 2H2 + 4OHOER:

Morphology modulation

Morphology modulation is an effective strategy to enhance the efficiency of an electrocatalyst in various aspects. The morphology modulation of the electrocatalyst has been started to overcome the potential drop due to the gas bubble formation on the electrode. This issue minimizes as the surface roughness and hydrophilicity of the electrocatalyst increase [71]. Modulating the morphology of an electrocatalyst can tune the amount of electrocatalytically active sites and charge transfer

Doping

Doping can effectively tune the intrinsic electronic structure of a material which affects its substrate adsorption capability and electrocatalytic activity [92]. Doping of foreign elements in a material creates lattice defects which can also significantly tune its electrocatalytic activity. In addition to that, introduction of defect enhances the amount of available electrocatalytically active centers in an electrocatalyst [93]. The following section discusses about the correlation between the

Defect engineering

Discussion from the previous section demonstrates that doping of any material with heterogeneous element might induce defects in it. These defect sites enhance the amount of catalytically active sites and facilitate the mass transfer process [43], [93], [97]. Defects can also be created in the lattice of a material without doping it with heteroatom. Few physicochemical processes like, ion irradiation, UV-ozone treatment, alkali etching etc. are utilized to introduce and engineer defects in

Strain engineering

Theoretical and experimental investigations show that the generation of strain in a material can effectively alter its electronic structure [69], [138]. As the electrocatalytic activity of a material is directly correlated with its electronic structure, it can be successfully tuned by strain engineering. Lattice strain in an electrocatalyst can be generated in several ways and the mechanical processes show higher potentiality. A lattice strain in an electrocatalyst is generated if mechanical

Phase engineering

The phase engineering has shown potentiality as electrocatalytic activity modulation technique for the transition-metal-based materials especially for the TMDs (such as CoSe2, NiSe2, MoS2, MoSe2 etc.) [149], [150], [151], [152], [153], [154], [155], [156], [157], [158], [159]. The electrical conductivity and substrate adsorption–desorption efficiency of an electrocatalyst is highest in its metallic phase as compared to the semi-metallic or semiconducting phase [149], [154], [159]. The phase

Heterostructure formation

Heterostructure formation is another widely adopted strategy to enhance the efficiency and stability of an electrocatalyst. Hybridization between two or more transition metal-based materials synergistically enhances their individual catalytic activity [164], [165], [166], [167], [168]. Bifunctional activity towards overall water splitting is achieved by combining one material active towards HER and other towards OER [167], [168]. The amount of active site and operational stability of a material

Other strategies

In addition to the previously discussed major strategies, some new techniques are also being adopted in recent times to enhance the activity of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts. Some worthy to mention strategies are: (1) electrochemical activation, (2) surface functionalization and (3) single atom anchoring [193], [194], [195], [196], [197].

WSe2 obtained from colloidal synthesis process is electrochemically activated using H+ and alkali ions like Li+, Na+ and K+ [193]. This type of activation

Conclusions and outlook

The review discussed about the strategies being extensively utilized to enhance electrocatalytic activity of the noble-metal-free electrocatalysts. Tremendous research efforts of the past few years resulted in development of some cheap but efficient electrocatalysts consisting of earth-abundant elements. Table 1 summarizes the procedure or techniques researchers have undertaken to enhance the performance of the noble-metal-free-electrocatalysts. Table 2 demonstrates the change in

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Director of CSIR-CMERI, Durgapur.

Subhasis Shit is currently pursuing PhD in Chemical Sciences under the supervision of Dr. Tapas Kuila and Dr. Naresh Chandra Murmu at the Surface Engineering & Tribology Division, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, India. He completed his B.Sc in Chemistry from The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India in 2014. He received his M.Sc in Chemistry from University of North Bengal, West Bengal, India in 2016. His research interest includes development of transition

References (201)

  • X. Zhong et al.

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2018)
  • J. Wang et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2020)
  • N. Yuan et al.

    Arabian J. Chem.

    (2020)
  • C. Zhang et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2020)
  • C. Xie et al.

    Mater. Today

    (2019)
  • Y. Zhou et al.

    Appl. Catal., B

    (2020)
  • S. Wang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2018)
  • K. Zeng et al.

    Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.

    (2010)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Nano Today

    (2017)
  • Y. Cheng et al.

    Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int.

    (2015)
  • J. Hwang et al.

    Mater. Today

    (2019)
  • B. Long et al.

    Appl. Catal., B

    (2019)
  • L. Fang et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2018)
  • M.M. Mohamed et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2019)
  • M. Zhu et al.

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2018)
  • K. Kordek-Khalil et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2020)
  • S.J. Marje et al.

    J. Alloys Compd.

    (2019)
  • Z. Yang et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2020)
  • H. Chu et al.

    Appl. Catal., B

    (2019)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Catal. Commun.

    (2015)
  • W. Yang et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2019)
  • J.F. Qin et al.

    J. Energy Chem.

    (2019)
  • L. Yan et al.

    Appl. Catal., B

    (2020)
  • Z. Qiu et al.

    Nano Energy

    (2019)
  • B. You et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2018)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2016)
  • S. Jayabal et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2017)
  • N.T. Suen et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2017)
  • H. Sun et al.

    Adv. Mater.

    (2020)
  • J. Zhang et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2016)
  • X. Du et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2019)
  • C. Zhu et al.

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.

    (2017)
  • H.N. Nong et al.

    Chem. Sci.

    (2014)
  • J.X. Wang et al.

    Sci. Rep.

    (2015)
  • Y. Jiao et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Y. Yan et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2016)
  • M.A. Younis et al.

    BMC Mat.

    (2019)
  • X. Zou et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Z. Chen et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2019)
  • D. Siegmund et al.

    ChemElectroChem

    (2020)
  • S. Anantharaj et al.

    J. Mater. Chem. A

    (2020)
  • X. Peng et al.

    Sustainable Energy Fuels

    (2019)
  • H. Du et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2018)
  • W.F. Chen et al.

    Chem. Commun.

    (2013)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Nanoscale

    (2020)
  • J. Li et al.

    ChemCatChem

    (2017)
  • Y. Xu et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2016)
  • G. Zhao et al.

    Adv. Funct. Mater.

    (2018)
  • V.I. Korobov et al.
  • C. Hu et al.

    Energy Environ. Sci.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (46)

    • Recent progress in hydrogen: From solar to solar cell

      2024, Journal of Materials Science and Technology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Subhasis Shit is currently pursuing PhD in Chemical Sciences under the supervision of Dr. Tapas Kuila and Dr. Naresh Chandra Murmu at the Surface Engineering & Tribology Division, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, India. He completed his B.Sc in Chemistry from The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India in 2014. He received his M.Sc in Chemistry from University of North Bengal, West Bengal, India in 2016. His research interest includes development of transition metal-based and carbon-based materials with potential target application in electrochemical water splitting.

    Saikat Bolar completed his B.Sc in Chemistry from The University of Burdwan, West Bengal, India in 2013. He received his M.Sc in Chemistry from Sidho-Kanho-Birsha University, Purulia, India, 2015. He qualified the NET (National Level Eligibility Test) conducted by CSIR, New Delhi. He is currently pursuing his PhD from Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR) in Chemical Sciences under the supervision of Dr. Tapas Kuila and Dr. Pranab Samanta at the Surface Engineering & Tribology Division, CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur, India. Currently he is working on transition metal dichalcogenide - MoS2 based Electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction in different pH medium.

    Dr Naresh Chandra Murmu is working as a Senior Principal Scientist in CSIR – Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute, Durgapur since 2003. Previously he was a Scientist in the National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore for 9 years. He received his B.E. from Calcutta University in 1992, M.E. from IISc Bangalore in 1994 and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from IIT (BHU), Varanasi in 2010. He has published over 87 research/review articles in peer reviewed journals and 4 book chapters. Dr Murmu is the recipient of the prestigious National Design Award (2012), CSIR-Raman Research Fellowship (2012) and DAAD Fellowship (2001) among many awards and honors.

    Dr. Tapas Kuila is working as Senior Scientist at CSIR-Central Mechanical Engineering Research Institute,​Durgapur, India. Dr. Kuila completed PhD in Chemistry from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 2009. Then, he moved to Chonbuk National University, South Korea for postdoctoral study. Dr. Kuila is working in the areas of graphene supercapacitor, graphene/epoxy composite, graphene lubricant, electrocatalytic water splitting, and graphene enhanced phase change materials. He has published ~133 research/review articles in different international peer-reviewed journals. Dr. Kuila also authored 17 book chapters 3 Indian patents.

    View full text