Fire resistance of axially restrained Q690 H-shaped welded steel columns: Test, simulation and design
Graphical abstract
Introduction
High strength steel (HSS) usually refers to the steel with yield strength higher than 460 MPa, thus realizing high strength by adopting special manufacturing technology and adding alloy elements. The application of HSS can reduce the structural weight and improve the structural seismic performance due to the nature of high yield strength. Fire resistance research is essential for the steel structure because steel was demonstrated to have sharp reductions in strength and stiffness with increasing temperatures. Concerning a local fire condition, columns in a frame are typically axially restrained by adjacent members that impose a thermal restraint on the columns and introduce additional force. Thus, the fire behavior (structural performance under fire condition) of the restrained column is entirely different from that of the unrestrained column.
Numerous investigations have been conducted to study the fire performance of axially restrained steel columns. Li et al. [[1], [2], [3]] employed experimental and numerical analyses to investigate the fire behavior of restrained mild steel columns and revealed the significant influence of the axial restraining stiffness and load ratio on its fire performance. Moreover, Li et al. [[1], [2], [3]] identified the presence of the post-buckling behavior in the restrained column, which should be considered in the fire-safety design. Correia and Rodrigues [4] indicated that increasing the axial restraining stiffness might not reduce the critical temperature of the column. Afterward, Correia and Rodrigues [5] conducted a series of parametric analyses and proposed a simplified design approach for the fire safety of restrained columns. Moreover, Ali et al. [6] and Neves et al. [7] also developed simplified methods to evaluate the critical temperature of the axially restrained column.
However, the aforementioned works mainly focused on mild steel columns, whereas research on the HSS columns was limited. The mechanical properties of HSS at elevated temperatures are generally quite different from mild steel due to the manufacturing and alloy composition. Thus, the current design standards and research, which adopted the mechanical properties of mild steel for the fire safety design, cannot be directly used for HSS members [8]. The lack of usable design information, which allows designers to harness the advantages of HSS, introduced barriers to the widespread use of HSS in construction. Wang et al. [9] conducted experimental research on the fire behavior of restrained Q460 HSS columns and indicated that it had better fire resistance than mild steel columns. Winful et al. [10] used numerical simulation to investigate the fire behavior of S690QL and S700MC HSS columns and found that the EN 1993-1-2 [11] approach can be unconservative (i.e., unsafe) and conservative (i.e., safe), respectively. Chen and Young [12] developed the numerical models to investigate the structural behavior and design of HSS columns with increasing temperatures. They found that the EN 1993-1-2 [11] and the direct strength method [13] conservatively predicted the HSS column strengths at elevated temperatures.
Q690 HSS, which has a nominal yield strength of 690 MPa, is one of the widely used HSS in China. Thus, numerous studies were conducted to investigate the mechanical behavior of Q690 HSS members at ambient temperature to promote its application. In recent years, researchers began to provide additional attention to the fire behavior of Q690 HSS but mainly focused on its material properties, including mechanical properties at elevated temperatures [14,15], post-fire mechanical properties [[16], [17], [18], [19], [20]], and high-temperature creep [14,21]. Research conducted for the fire behavior of Q690 HSS members remained limited. J. H. Luo et al. [22] investigated the mechanical behavior of Q690 HSS beams at room and high temperatures using experimental and numerical analyses. Their results indicated a sharp reduction in the load-bearing capacity of the beams in a fire with an increase in temperature. Moreover, elevated temperatures could influence the failure mode of Q690 HSS beams. Wang et al. [23] conducted fire resistance tests and numerical analyses on Q690 HSS unrestrained columns and revealed that the critical temperature of these columns as predicted by Chinese specification GB 51249–2017 [24] and EN 1993-1-2 [11] was unconservative. Wang et al. [23] also proposed a simplified design method to evaluate the critical temperature of unrestrained Q690 HSS columns. Therefore, additional research was required on the fire behavior of the restrained Q690 HSS columns.
The fire behavior of axially restrained Q690 HSS columns was experimentally studied in this paper. An elaborate numerical model was developed to reproduce the tests. Finally, a simplified design method was proposed based on parametric analyses to evaluate the critical temperature of the axially restrained Q690 HSS columns.
Section snippets
Experimental program
The tests were performed using an electric furnace. The parameters of non-dimensional slenderness (), axially restraining stiffness ratio (α), and load ratio (ρN) were considered in the tests. The furnace temperature (FT), specimen temperature (CT), specimen deformation, and internal force (P) were recorded during the tests. Moreover, the critical temperature (Tcr) and fire resistance (tcr) could be determined based on the test data.
Experimental results
Before analyzing the experimental results, it should be clarified that specimens S3-1.89-0.110-0.32 and S4-1.36-0.064-0.25 were not used to make a comparison with other specimens, because the longitudinal temperature distribution of S4-1.36-0.064-0.25 and the average restraining stiffness ratio for S3-1.89-0.110-0.32 were significantly different from other specimens. It would be explained in Section 3.1 and Section 3.3, respectively. Therefore, when studying the influence of slenderness,
Finite element simulation
The commercial software ABAQUS (version 6.14) [33] was used to reproduce fire behavior of restrained Q690 HSS columns. The longitudinally non-uniform temperature should be incorporated into the numerical model due to its significant influence on the fire behavior of the specimen. However, since the measured specimen temperatures only included three cross-sections (CAT1 to CAT3), it was difficult to develop a reliable temperature field for the model based on recorded specimen temperature.
A simplified design method
Parametric analyses were extensively conducted to investigate the influence of load, axial restraining stiffness, and non-dimensional slenderness. Furthermore, a simplified design method was proposed to evaluate the critical temperature of restrained Q690 HSS columns based on parametric analysis results. The numerical model in parametric analyses was developed based on the verified model with the cross-section of H200 × 200 × 14 × 14, assuming that the temperature field of the model was
Conclusions
Fire resistance research, including experimental and numerical analyses, were conducted in this paper to assess the fire response of axially restrained Q690 HSS columns. Non-dimensional slenderness, load, and axial restraining stiffness ratios were considered in the tests. All the specimens showed global buckling with increasing temperatures, and the longitudinally non-uniform temperature significantly altered the deflection point. Post-buckling behavior was not observed before the failure of
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Jingjie Yang: Data curation, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Weiyong Wang: Methodology, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Hisham Al-azzani: Writing - review & editing.
Declaration of Competing Interest
We declare that we do not have any commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the work submitted.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No.: 2019CDQYTM027), Natural Science Foundation of China (51678090). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.
References (35)
- et al.
Behavior and design of restrained steel column in fire, part 1: fire test
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2010) - et al.
Behavior and design of restrained steel column in fire, part 3: practical design method
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2010) - et al.
Behavior and design of restrained steel column in fire: part 2: parameter study
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2010) - et al.
Behavior of restrained high strength steel columns at elevated temperature
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2018) - et al.
Behavior of high strength steel columns under fire conditions
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2018) - et al.
Design of high strength steel columns at elevated temperatures
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2008) - et al.
Post-fire mechanical properties of high strength Q690 structural steel
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2017) - et al.
Experiment of ductile fracture performances of HSSS Q690 after a fire
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2018) - et al.
Hysteretic behavior of post fire structural steels under cyclic loading
J. Constr. Steel Res.
(2020) - et al.
Mechanical properties deterioration of high strength steels after high temperature exposure
Constr. Build. Mater.
(2019)
Experimental study of the post-fire mechanical properties of Q690 high strength steel
J. Constr. Steel Res.
Creep behavior and model of high-strength steels over 500 MPa at elevated temperatures
J. Constr. Steel Res.
Creep buckling of high strength Q460 steel columns at elevated temperatures
J. Constr. Steel Res.
Fire resistance of steel columns with restrained thermal elongation
Fire Saf. J.
A simplified calculation method for fire design of steel columns with restrained thermal elongation
Comput. Struct.
The effect of axial restraint on the fire resistance of steel columns
J. Constr. Steel Res.
Thermal restraint and fire resistance of columns
Fire Saf. J.
Cited by (10)
Experimental study on fire resistance of high strength Q960 steel columns under axial compression
2024, Journal of Constructional Steel ResearchBehaviour of axially-restrained slender steel tubes exposed to fire
2024, Journal of Constructional Steel Research