Family’s health: Opportunities for non-collocated intergenerational families collaboration on healthy living

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102559Get rights and content

Highlights

  • There is a need to further understand non-collocated family members’ current practices, needs, and challenges to collaborate on healthy living activities.

  • We conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with non-collocated family members’ – specifically elderly parents and adult children – to gain insights into existing obstacles that prevents family members to collaborate on healthy lifestyles within their family.

  • We discuss how to strengthen family members’ engagement on healthy living practices and suggest design implications to support family members living apart on their efforts to cultivate health within their families.

Abstract

When a family is engaged in healthy living practices together, it enhances the quality of life for all individuals. However, when members in families are separated over distance, the everyday encouragement and support may shift and obstacles arise within the family. In this study, we investigate non-collocated family members’ practices of healthy living, their perspectives on their family’s healthy living activities, and what obstacles exist regarding collaboration on their family health. We conducted an interview study with 26 independently living participants representing “elderly parents” and “adult children” in a family dynamic. We present members’ practices and strategies for sustainable healthy living activities. We also explore members’ creative use of technology for health promotion and describe existing obstacles that prevent families to effectively collaborate in healthy living. Based on our findings, we suggest design implications to support family members living apart on their efforts to cultivate health within their families.

Introduction

Promotion of family health is an important process that goes beyond care provision. It empowers individuals to increase control over, and to improve their health (Hubley and Copeman, 2018). This process involves a combination of components, including: health education, the environment in which people live, and health policies (Fertman, Allensworth, 2016, Hubley, Copeman, 2018). To help individuals make better use of these components and make informed decisions about their health, many health promotion programs have been developed, including ones that promote collaboration among all individuals involved in care provision (Patient and Care, 2019) and others that engage families in building a familial culture of health and well-being (Johnson, 2019).

Supporting family health initiatives has garnered attention in the HCI research community (Colineau, Paris, 2012, Lukoff, Li, Zhuang, Lim, 2018, Schaefbauer, Khan, Le, Sczechowski, Siek, 2015). Although some researchers have linked family influence with individuals’ dissatisfaction with their bodies (Kluck, 2010) and family problematic communication styles with eating disorders (Steinberg and Phares, 2001), still other researchers have examined the importance of involving families – especially ones that live together in the same home – in the promotion of a healthy lifestyle, particularly when trying to help individuals adopt positive health behaviors (Edelman, Mandle, Kudzma, 2017, Fertman, Allensworth, 2016, Gillman, Rifas-Shiman, Frazier, Rockett, Camargo, Field, Berkey, Colditz, 2000). For example, Lukoff et al. (2018)’s study showed that collocated family members value both tangible and informational support on health promotion where members take action to help others such as by cooking healthy meals and giving advice. However, these kinds of support can be affected by different factors, including geographical distance. It is common to see the health care supporters living apart, e.g., the young adults who leave their parents’ house or the siblings who have their own family. The “leaving home” family members may provide or receive health support remotely (Seiffe-Krenke, 2006), which may cause the everyday encouragement and support to change compared to when members lived together. Moreover, obstacles may arise within the family, for example, with an aging parent health decline. Given that, some researchers have turned their focus from examining collocated to non-collocated family members and the unique obstacles they face when it comes to collaborating on health promotion, i.e., challenges on staying up-to-date on each other’s activities and health status when living apart (Binda, Yuan, Cope, Park, Choe, Carroll, 2018, Nurgalieva, Frik, Ceschel, Egelman, Marchese, 2019).

In this paper, we were interested in the implications of aging for families and health collaboration-related issues that may arise. We frame family health as each family member is supporting, improving, and maintaining health both personally and for the whole family (Fertman, Allensworth, 2016, Hubley, Copeman, 2018). Based on the literature, we consider health practices as a form of collective practices composed by healthy eating, physical activities/exercises, and mental care as a way to maintain a healthy lifestyle (Hubley and Copeman, 2018). In our study, we focus on non-collocated family members – specifically individuals filling the roles of “elderly parents” and “adult children” in their respective families – to identify opportunities that can be used to promote health collaboration within families even when the family members are living apart. To be more specific, we sought to answer the following research questions: (RQ1a) What factors have motivated non-collocated family members to engage in healthy behaviors? (RQ1b) How do non-collocated family members maintain their personal healthy behaviors and cultivate their family’s healthy living practices? (RQ2a) What are common obstacles that non-collocated family members encounter in cultivating their family healthy practices together? (RQ2b) How might technology design help non-collocated family members deal with those obstacles?

To answer these questions, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 26 participants filling the roles of “elderly parents” and “adult children” in a family dynamic. We contribute to research on family health informatics (Pina et al., 2017) by expanding the understanding of non-collocated family members’ current practices, needs, and challenges to collaborate on healthy living activities. We discuss how to strengthen family members’ engagement on healthy living practices, and leverage some existing strategies that influence their behaviors. In addition, we present factors related to lack of interest, consistency, and understanding as obstacles that affect family collaboration on healthy living. Thus, we recommend design directions for family-centered health technologies to help non-collocated families overcome and thrive in their efforts to cultivate healthy living within their families.

In summary, our work intends to investigate non-collocated family members’ – specifically elderly parents and adult children – current practices of healthy living, to gain insights into existing obstacles that prevents family members to collaborate on healthy lifestyles within their family, and to identify design opportunities for family-centered health technologies.

Section snippets

Related work

We first focus on literature related to family health and situate our research relative to prior work. Then, we highlight previous work in technologies for supporting family healthy living as well as technologies for supporting non-collocated families.

Methods

To unpack the practices and challenges of non-collocated family members to collaborate on healthy living, we sought the perspectives of people filling the roles of “elderly parents” and “adult children” in a family dynamic. For the purposes of this work, we consider “elderly parents” as family members in an older generation who shared about their own and their family’s practices on healthy living from their perspective. And we consider “adult children” as the younger generation representing the

Results

In this section, we describe the major themes and factors under the themes derived from our qualitative analysis. Our analysis shows non-collocated family members’ motivation to pursue healthy living practices, which include: family’s model of healthy living, social reflection, and health concerns. Then, we present individuals’ strategies to sustain good health, including: combining different healthy activities and family support. We also present examples of technology use to support healthy

Discussion

This study investigated non-collocated families, specifically elderly parents and adult children, to identify opportunities to develop collective health practices, and address and minimize obstacles through technological design. We build on previous work by expanding the view of family health informatics (Pina et al., 2017) to include non-collocated families’ view on health promotion. As follows, we reflect explicitly on how our results address the proposed research questions. Then, we discuss

Limitations

In this study, we tried our best to recruit participants from different families to understand the reasons and meanings behind some family experiences. However, our sample size (n=26) and a group of participants might not be representative of the general population of non-collocated families, as the majority of them were female, white, self-reported as being relatively healthy, highly educated, and experienced in using technologies. Our sample complies with the nature of this research and its

Conclusion

Even though families are considered a source of encouragement and support in one’s different life events, many factors can come across the family’s provision of support and prevent members from fully experiencing the benefits of family endorsement such as geographical distance. In this study, we proposed a research investigation focusing on non-collocated family members, specifically independently living participants representing the “elderly parents” and “adult children” in their respective

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jomara Sandbulte: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Chun-Hua Tsai: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - review & editing. John M. Carroll: Resources, Writing - review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank the anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful feedback on earlier versions of the paper. We also would like to thank the family participants for making this study possible. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Smart and Connected Health Award No. 1502176. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.

References (100)

  • J. Binda et al.

    Supporting effective sharing of health information among intergenerational family members

    Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

    (2018)
  • J. Birnholtz et al.

    Independence and interaction: understanding seniors’ privacy and awareness needs for aging in place

    Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2010)
  • A. Blandford

    HCI for health and wellbeing: challenges and opportunities

    Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud.

    (2019)
  • G. Bouchard

    How do parents react when their children leave home? An integrative review

    J. Adult Dev.

    (2014)
  • V. Braun et al.

    Successful Qualitative Research: A Practical Guide for Beginners

    (2013)
  • A. Bussone et al.

    It feels like i’m managing myself: Hiv+ people tracking their personal health information

    Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

    (2016)
  • Center, P. R., 2015. Pew research center - 5 facts about family caregivers....
  • Center, P. R., 2018. Pew research center - adult caregiving often seen as very meaningful by those who do it....
  • K.L. Cheung et al.

    How recommender systems could support and enhance computer-tailored digital health programs: a scoping review

    Digit. Health

    (2019)
  • E.K. Choe et al.

    Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration

    Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

    (2017)
  • E.K. Choe et al.

    Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data

    Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2014)
  • P.K. Christensen et al.

    Together together: combining shared and separate activities in designing technology for family life

    Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children

    (2019)
  • C.-F. Chung et al.

    Identifying and planning for individualized change: patient-provider collaboration using lightweight food diaries in healthy eating and irritable bowel syndrome

    Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol.

    (2019)
  • H. Chung et al.

    Lover’s cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels

    CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2006)
  • L. Claassen et al.

    Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence

    BMC Public Health

    (2010)
  • W. Cohn et al.

    Health heritage©, a web-based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: initial user experience and analytic validity

    Public Health Genomics

    (2010)
  • N. Colineau et al.

    Family vs. individual profiles in a health portal: strengths and weaknesses

    Proceedings of the 25th BCS Conference on Human-Computer Interaction

    (2011)
  • N. Colineau et al.

    Motivating reflection about health within the family: the use of goal setting and tailored feedback

    User Model. User-Adapted Interact.

    (2011)
  • N. Colineau et al.

    A portal to promote healthy living within families

  • N. Colineau et al.

    Supporting family engagement in weight management

    CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2009)
  • R. Cornejo et al.

    Promoting active aging with a paper-based SNS application

    Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare

    (2015)
  • P. Cremonesi et al.

    Investigating the persuasion potential of recommender systems from a quality perspective: an empirical study

    ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.(TiiS)

    (2012)
  • J.W. Creswell et al.

    Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches

    (2007)
  • E.C. Derix et al.

    Days of our lives: family experiences of digital technology use

    Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

    (2018)
  • C.L. Edelman et al.

    Health Promotion Throughout the Life Span-e-book

    (2017)
  • D. Elsweiler et al.

    Towards automatic meal plan recommendations for balanced nutrition

    Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    (2015)
  • D.A. Epstein et al.

    Beyond abandonment to next steps: understanding and designing for life after personal informatics tool use

    Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2016)
  • D.A. Epstein et al.

    A lived informatics model of personal informatics

    Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

    (2015)
  • J. Eschler et al.

    Shared calendars for home health management

    Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing

    (2015)
  • C.I. Fertman et al.

    Health Promotion Programs: From Theory to Practice

    (2016)
  • A. Forghani et al.

    The routines and needs of grandparents and parents for grandparent-grandchild conversations over distance

    Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2014)
  • M.W. Gillman et al.

    Family dinner and diet quality among older children and adolescents

    Arch. Fam. Med.

    (2000)
  • A. Grimes et al.

    Toward technologies that support family reflections on health

    Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work

    (2009)
  • F.J. Gutierrez et al.

    It takes at least two to tango: understanding the cooperative nature of elderly caregiving in Latin America

    Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing

    (2017)
  • F.J. Gutierrez et al.

    Identifying opportunities to support family caregiving in chile

    Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2016)
  • J. Hubley et al.

    Practical Health Promotion

    (2018)
  • K. Inkpen et al.

    Experiences2Go: sharing kids’ activities outside the home with remote family members

    Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work

    (2013)
  • B. Johnson et al.

    Partnering with Patients and Families to Design a Patient-and Family-Centered Health Care System

    Institute for Patient-and Family-Centered Care and Institute for Healthcare Improvement

    (2008)
  • Johnson, R. W., 2019. Building a culture of health....
  • J. Jones et al.

    Co-constructing family memory: understanding the intergenerational practices of passing on family stories

    Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    (2018)
  • View full text