Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growing pains: Small-scale farmer responses to an urban rooftop farming and online marketplace enterprise in Montréal, Canada

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing interest in the role of new urban agriculture models to increase local food production capacity in cities of the Global North. Urban rooftop greenhouses and hydroponics are examples of such models receiving increasing attention as a technological approach to year-round local food production in cities. Yet, little research has addressed the unintended consequences of new modes of urban farming and food distribution, such as increased competition with existing peri-urban and rural farmers. We examine how small-scale farmers perceive and have responded to a recently established rooftop greenhouse and online marketplace enterprise in Montréal, Canada. Drawing on interviews with key informants and small-scale farmers, we find that peri-urban and rural producers have been affected in three key ways that represent tensions, adaptations, and synergies arising from this new urban agriculture and food distribution enterprise. First, many farmers are concerned about increased competition and value conflation with the ideals of community supported agriculture (CSA) and organic farming. Second, some farmers have adapted by developing novel marketing strategies and working with local bridge organizations to collectively market their produce to urban consumers. Third, a few farmers have decided to wholesale their produce to this new enterprise, allowing them to specialize production and avoid marketing their produce directly to urban consumers. Our study suggests that the emergence of a new form of alternative food network in Montréal has created both positive and negative disruptions for existing small-scale producers. Advocates for the expansion of new urban food production and distribution models should therefore give greater consideration to the effects on other actors in the local food system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Web links: Brooklyn Grange (https://www.brooklyngrangefarm.com) and Gotham Greens (https://www.gothamgreens.com/).

  2. We observed from Lufa Farms’ online marketplace (https://montreal.lufa.com/en/marketplace) that its partner network varies to some degree over time and by season. There were at least 39 participating farms providing fresh fruits and vegetables as of May 2019, mainly located in the province of Québec, but with several farms in Ontario, Canada, and Florida, U.S. Based on information provided about these suppliers, they included soil-based organic farms, as well as conventional greenhouse and hydroponic operations.

  3. Équiterre’s Fermier de Famille [Family Farmer Network] database varies in size over time; however, there were at least 113 participating farms in April 2019, almost exclusively in Québec Province. These farms are predominantly smaller in scale, soil-based, and often certified organic or practicing some tenets of organic management. Interactive map available at: https://www.fermierdefamille.com

  4. Archived copies of some webpage content from previous years can be found at: https://web.archive.org/.

  5. We use a fairly standard dictionary definition of ‘farm’ as a tract of land devoted to agricultural purposes, usually by a single owner or operator.

  6. While it can be argued that this is a relatively small interview sample size, qualitative semi-structured interviews are not intended to represent large populations; rather they describe the everyday lived experiences and concerns of individual participants (Valentine 2005). In this study, we did not interview consumers, as our aim was to direct attention to the impacts of commercial rooftop farming on nearby small-scale rural and peri-urban farms.

  7. For comparison, there were 31,050 male and 10,945 female farm operators province-wide in Québec in 2016 (Statistics Canada 2017). The greater proportion of women farmers in our study is perhaps due to the lead author being a young woman.

  8. Jean-Martin Fortier is a Québécois farmer specializing in organic and biologically intensive cropping practices. In 2014, Fortier released a popular book called “The Market Gardener,” which provides horticultural techniques and innovative growing methods. His book includes practical information on setting-up a small but profitable farm by designing intensive cropping system based on Fortier’s experiences at Les Jardins de la Grelinette, a farm in Saint-Armand, Quebec.

  9. Details on these individual farming operations can be found at: Serres Royales (https://www.lesserresroyales.com/en/); Serres Lefort (https://culturevog.com/en/serres-lefort/).

  10. Future research will be needed to address concerns identified by farmer interviewees regarding potential consumer confusion over rooftop hydroponics and organic production in the North American context. For example, Specht et al. (2016) surveyed consumers in Berlin about their preferences related to UA production and found that initiatives that fused social and ecological goals were more desirable than production-oriented initiatives that focused on technology.

Abbreviations

UA:

Urban agriculture

CSA:

Community supported agriculture

AFN:

Alternative food network

References

  • Alkon, A.H., and J. Agyeman. 2011. The food movement as polyculture. In Cultivating Food Justice: Race, Class, and Sustainability, ed. A.H. Akon and J. Agyeman, 1–20. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alkon, A., and T. Mares. 2012. Food sovereignty in US food movements: Radical visions and neoliberal constraints. Agriculture and Human Values 29: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, B. 2017. Taking greenhouses to new heights. Produce Grower. http://magazine.producegrower.com/article/june-2017/taking-greenhouses-to-new-heights.aspx. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Bhatt, V., and L. M. Farah. 2016. Cultivating Montréal: A Brief History of Citizens and Institutions Integrating Urban Agriculture in the City. Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems 1.

  • Blumberg, R. 2014. The Spatial Politics and Political Economy of Alternative Food Networks in Post-Soviet Latvia and Lithuania. Dissertation completed at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

  • Born, B., and M. Purcell. 2006. Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research. Journal of Planning Education and Research 26: 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, L.K. 2016. Getting farming on the agenda: Planning, policymaking, and governance practices of urban agriculture in New York City. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 19: 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian General Standards Board. 2015. Organic production systems: general principles and management standards. CAN/CGSB-32.310-2015 (Amended March 2018). Gatineau QC [Online] Available at: https://publications.gc.ca/pub?id=9.854643&sl=0. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • City of Montréal / Ville de Montréal. 2012. État de l’Agriculture Urbaine à Montréal—Rapport de consultation publique, 157. Montréal, QC: Office de consultation publique de Montréal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N., P. Cloke, C. Barnett, and A. Malpass. 2008. The spaces and ethics of organic food. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 219–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope, M. 2010. Coding qualitative data. In Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography, ed. I. Hay, 281–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darly, S., and N. McClintock. 2017. Introduction to urban agriculture in the Neoliberal city: Critical European perspectives. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies 16: 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deelstra, T., and H. Girardet. 2000. Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. In Growing Cities, Growing Food: Urban Agriculture on the Policy Agenda, ed. N. Bakker, M. Dubbeling, S. Gundel, U. Sabel-Koschella, and H. de Zeeuw, 43–65. Feldafing: Deutsche Stiftung fur Internationale Entwicklung (DSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchemin, E., F. Wegmuller, and A.M. Legault. 2008. Urban agriculture: Multi-dimensional tools for social development in poor neighborhoods. Field Actions Science Reports 1: 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • EcoCert Canada. 2018. Steps to Certification. https://ecocertcanada.com/content/steps-certification. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Elton, S. 2012. The farm on top of the city. https://www.macleans.ca/society/technology/the-farm-on-top-of-the-city/. Accessed 1 January 2018.

  • Ferris, J., C. Norman, and J. Sempik. 2001. People, land and sustainability: Community gardens and the social dimension of sustainable development. Social Policy & Administration 35: 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R.E. 2013. The moral economy is a double-edged sword: Explaining farmers’ earnings and self-exploitation in community-supported agriculture. Economic Geography 89: 341–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecge.12015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galt, R.E., K. Bradley, L. Christensen, J. Van Soelen Kim, and R. Lobo. 2016. Eroding the Community in Community Supported Agriculture (CSA): Competition’s Effects in Alternative Food Networks in California. Sociologia Ruralis 56: 491–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, D.N., C. Bazzani, R.M. Nayga Jr., and H.A. Snell. 2019. Do consumers value hydroponics? Implications for organic certification. Agricultural Economics 50: 707–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, B., M. Hauschild, J. Fernández, and M. Birkved. 2016. Urban versus conventional agriculture, taxonomy of resource profiles: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., and M.K. Goodman. 2009. Alternative food networks. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, ed. R. Kitchin and N. Thrift, 208–220. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Guthman, J. 2008. Neoliberalism and the making of food politics in California. Geoforum 38: 1171–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, D., L. Gillies, A. Canter, V. Rinner, L. Pancrazi, and F. Martellozzo. 2014. The potential of urban agriculture in Montréal: A quantitative assessment. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 3: 1101–1117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1999. Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N.C. 2003. The scalar production of injustice within the urban forest. Antipode 35: 980–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C.C. 2000. Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies 16: 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israelson, D. 2020. Four storeys up, a commercial vegetable garden thrives in a converted Sears warehouse. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/industry-news/property-report/article-four-storeys-up-a-commercial-vegetable-garden-thrives-in-a-converted/. Accessed 20 September 2020.

  • Jarosz, L. 2008. The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, B.L., P. Hamel, T. McPhearson, M.H. Hamann, M.L. Donahue, K.A.M. Prado, K.K. Arkema, G.N. Bratman, K.A. Brauman, J.C. Finlay, A.D. Guerry, et al. 2019. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nature Sustainability 2: 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Les Bio Locaux. 2020. À propos. https://www.biolocaux.coop/a-propos/. Accessed 18 June 2020.

  • Lockeretz, W. 1986. Trends in farming near cities. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 41: 256–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, S.T. 2010. Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustainability 2: 2499–2522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, N., and B. Gleeson. 1998. Justice, Society, and Nature: An Exploration of Political Ecology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lufa Farms. 2017a. Our Story. https://corpo.lufa.com/en/our-story.html. Accessed 4 November 2017.

  • Lufa Farms. 2017b. Our Farms. https://corpo.lufa.com/en/our-farms.html. Accessed 1 September 2017.

  • Lufa Farms. 2019. Marketplace. https://montreal.lufa.com/en/marketplace. Accessed 18 June 2019.

  • Lufa Farms. 2020. Our Partners. https://montreal.lufa.com/en/partners. Accessed 27 June 2020.

  • MAPAQ (Ministère de l'Agriculture des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation du Québec). 2014. Portrait agroalimentaire de la Montérégie. Directions régionales de la Montérégie, secteurs est et oust. Dossiers régionaux. https://www.mapaq.gouv.qc.ca/fr/Publications/Portrait_agroalimentaire_monteregie.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Marsden, T., J. Banks, and G. Bristow. 2000. Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 4: 424–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D. 2011. Moving alternative food networks beyond the niche. International Journal of Agriculture & Food 20: 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maye, D., and J. Kirwan. 2010. Alternative food networks. Sociology of Agriculture and Food 20: 383–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, N. 2010. Why farm the city? Theorizing urban agriculture through a lens of metabolic rift. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 3: 191–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, N. 2014. Radical, reformist, and garden-variety neoliberal: Coming to terms with urban agriculture’s contradictions. Local Environment 19: 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, J.K., and S.A. Low. 2020. Online sales: A direct marketing opportunity for rural farms? Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 52: 222–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, F., D. Gasperi, L. Marchetti, C. Piovene, S. Draghetti, S. Ramazzotti, G. Bazzocchi, and G. Gianquinto. 2014. Exploring the production capacity of rooftop gardens (RTGs) in urban agriculture: The potential impact on food and nutrition security, biodiversity and other ecosystem services in the city of Bologna. Food Security 6: 781–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, T., and R. Hopkins. 2009. Local Food: How to Make it Happen in Your Community. Totnes: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Population Reference Bureau. 2017. Degree of urbanization (percentage of urban population in total population) by continent in 2017. In Statista - The Statistics Portal. https://www.statista.com/statistics/270860/urbanization-by-continent/. Accessed 19 March 2018.

  • Pourias, J., C. Aubry, and E. Duchemin. 2016. Is food a motivation for urban gardeners? Multifunctionality and the relative importance of the food function in urban collective gardens of Paris and Montréal. Agriculture and Human Values 33: 257–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pro-Cert Organic Systems Ltd. 2018. What is Organic? https://www.pro-cert.org/en/component/k2/item/20-what-is-organic. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Reid, D. 2009. Community gardens and food security. Open House International 34: 91–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, D., E.M. Bennett, and J.M. Rhemtulla. 2016. Agro-biodiversity has increased over a 95 year period at sub-regional and regional scales in southern Québec, Canada. Environmental Research Letters 11: 124024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. 2015. Disparity despite diversity: Social injustice in New York City’s Urban Agriculture System. Antipode 47: 240–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saed. 2012. Urban farming: The right to what sort of city? Capitalism Nature Socialism 23: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldivar-Tanaka, L., and M.A. Krasny. 2004. Culturing community development, neighborhood open space, and civic agriculture: The case of Latino community gardens in New York City. Agriculture and Human Values 21: 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyé-Mengual, E., I. Anguelovski, J. Oliver-Solà, J.I. Montero, and J. Rieradevall. 2016. Resolving differing stakeholder perceptions of urban rooftop farming in Mediterranean cities: promoting food production as a driver for innovative forms of urban agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 33: 101–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shinew, K.J., T.D. Glover, and D.C. Parry. 2004. Leisure spaces as potential sites for interracial interaction: Community gardens in urban areas. Journal of Leisure Research 36: 336–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, K., R. Siebert, I. Hartmann, U.B. Freisinger, M. Sawicka, A. Werner, S. Thomaier, D. Henckel, H. Walk, and A. Dierich. 2014. Urban agriculture of the future: An overview of sustainability aspects of food production in and on buildings. Agriculture and Human Values 31: 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, K., and E. Sanyé-Mengual. 2017. Risks in urban rooftop agriculture: Assessing stakeholders’ perceptions to ensure efficient policymaking. Environmental Science & Policy 69: 13–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Specht, K., T. Weith, K. Swoboda, and R. Siebert. 2016. Socially acceptable urban agriculture businesses. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 36: 17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. 2017. Census of Agriculture 2016: “Direct Marketing in Canada”. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/11-627-m/11-627-m2017015-eng.htm. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Swynedouw, E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89: 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E., and N.C. Heynen. 2003. Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode 35: 898–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tornaghi, C. 2014. Critical geography of urban agriculture. Progress in Human Geography 38: 551–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treleaven, S. 2018. An Urban Farm in Montréal Works a Lot Like Amazon Prime. https://www.citylab.com/environment/2018/02/is-personalized-next-day-delivery-the-future-of-urban-farming/551981. Accessed 1 March 2018.

  • Valentine, G. 2005. Tell me about...: Using interviews as research methodology. In Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project, ed. R. Flowerdew and D. Martin, 110–127. Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venn, L., M. Kneafsey, L. Holloway, R. Cox, E. Dowler, and H. Tuomainen. 2006. Researching European “alternative” food networks: some methodological considerations. Area 38: 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L'Union des producteurs agricoles. 2015. Fiche technique : L’agriculture biologique au Québec. https://www.upa.qc.ca/content/uploads/2015/03/Agriculture-biologique-Fiche-internet.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2020.

  • L'Union des producteurs agricoles. 2020. Agriculture biologique : tant de chemin parcouru!. https://www.upa.qc.ca/fr/textes-dopinion/2020/02/agriculture-biologique-tant-de-chemin-parcouru/. Accessed 27 June 2020.

  • Vitiello, D., and L. Wolf-Powers. 2014. Growing food to grow cities? The potential of agriculture for economic and community development in the urban United States. Community Development Journal 49 (1): 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. 2016. Urban agriculture and the sustainability fix in Vancouver and Detroit. Urban Geography 37: 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, R. 1997. Reorganizing U.S. agriculture: The rise of industrial agriculture and direct marketing. Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative Agriculture, Policy Studies 7. Greenbelt, Maryland.

  • Whatmore, S., P. Stassart, and H. Renting. 2003. What’s alternative about alternative food networks? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 35: 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, T., M. Ernst, and D. Tropp. 2017. Community Supported Agriculture—New Models for Changing Markets. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service. https://www.ams.usda.gov/sites/default/files/media/CSANewModelsforChangingMarketsb.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the farmers and key informants who contributed their time to participate in this research and shared their knowledge with us. Graham MacDonald acknowledges the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grants program for supporting his research program. Fieldwork conducted as part of this study was approved by McGill University’s Research Ethics Board (REB File #: 19-0617). Feedback from four anonymous referees improved the manuscript and we extend to them our thanks.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Graham K. MacDonald.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allaby, M., MacDonald, G.K. & Turner, S. Growing pains: Small-scale farmer responses to an urban rooftop farming and online marketplace enterprise in Montréal, Canada. Agric Hum Values 38, 677–692 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10173-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-020-10173-y

Keywords

Navigation